Ionic Liquids as Catalysts in Organic Synthesis: A Green and Tunable Platform for Pharmaceutical Innovation

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the application of ionic liquids (ILs) as catalysts and solvents in organic synthesis, with a specific focus on drug development. It explores the foundational principles of these 'designer solvents,' including their tunable physicochemical properties and role as green alternatives to volatile organic compounds. The review details methodological advances in using ILs for synthesizing key heterocycles, biofuels, and pharmaceutical intermediates, supported by case studies. It further addresses critical troubleshooting aspects, such as IL recovery, toxicity, and process optimization, and validates their efficacy through comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analyses against conventional methods. The article serves as a strategic guide for researchers and industrial scientists aiming to harness ILs for efficient and sustainable synthesis.

Ionic Liquids Unveiled: Principles, Properties, and the Path to Green Catalysis

Ionic liquids (ILs) have undergone a remarkable transformation from their origins as simple molten salts to their current status as versatile 'designer solvents'. This evolution is characterized by the deliberate tailoring of their physicochemical properties through a rational selection of cation-anion pairs. Initially defined as salts melting below 100 °C, their negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and intrinsic conductivity distinguished them from traditional molecular solvents [1] [2]. In the context of organic synthesis, particularly for drug development, this adaptability allows researchers to fine-tune reaction environments to enhance catalytic activity, improve reaction selectivity, and facilitate easier product separation [3] [4]. Their role has expanded beyond mere solvents to include functions as catalysts, promoters, and electrolytes, underpinning their growing importance in developing sustainable and efficient synthetic methodologies [5] [3].

Synthesis and Tailoring of Ionic Liquids

The synthesis of ionic liquids is a critical step in defining their properties and subsequent application potential. Modern synthetic approaches emphasize green chemistry principles and functionalization to create task-specific materials.

Advanced Synthesis Protocols

Recent protocols focus on sustainability and efficiency. The ion-driven phase separation method using aqueous isopropanol and NaCl represents a significant advancement. This approach eliminates the need for toxic organic solvents like dichloromethane, reduces energy consumption, and minimizes operator risk, resulting in an improved Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric [6]. It has been successfully used to synthesize high-purity ILs such as [TBP][DS] and [BMIm][OAc] with yields of 94.6% and 73.2%, respectively [6].

Table 1: Quantitative Data from Recent Ionic Liquid Syntheses

Ionic Liquid	Synthesis Method	Key Feature	Reported Yield	Application
[TBP][DS]	Ion-driven phase separation (Isopropanol/NaCl)	High greenness score (AGREE)	94.6%	Green synthesis paradigm [6]
[BMIm][OAc]	Ion-driven phase separation (Isopropanol/NaCl)	Reduced solvent toxicity & waste	73.2%	Green synthesis paradigm [6]
MI-EC (Imidazolium-based)	One-step activation with esters	Near-neutral, zwitterionic structure	Optimized at 85°C for 18 h	Transesterification catalyst [5]
AAIL [G0.5 C12][Pro]	Ion exchange & neutralization	Amino acid-based, eco-friendly	81%	Enhanced oil recovery [7]

For the synthesis of catalytic ILs like the zwitterionic MI-EC, a one-step method activated by carbonate esters has been developed. The optimal protocol involves a reaction at 85 °C for 18 hours, producing ILs with characteristics of near-neutrality, moderate nucleophilicity, and excellent catalytic activity for transesterification reactions [5].

A general protocol for amino acid-based ILs, such as AAIL [G0.5 C12][Pro], involves a two-step process of ion exchange and neutralization. The final product is obtained with a high yield after drying under vacuum, showcasing a pathway towards more environmentally benign ILs [7].

Ionic Liquids as Catalysts in Organic Synthesis

The application of ILs as catalysts in organic synthesis leverages their unique properties to drive transformations with enhanced efficiency and selectivity, offering significant advantages for pharmaceutical research and development.

Modes of Catalytic Action

Ionic liquids function in multiple catalytic roles:

• Solvent-Catalysts: Certain ILs, such as tetrachloroaluminate-based systems, can act as both solvent and catalyst in classical reactions like Friedel-Crafts alkylations, facilitating easy product separation and catalyst recycling [4] [8].
• Promoters and Additives: Functionalized ILs like [TMG][CF3COO] can promote challenging reactions, including the direct synthesis of amides, under milder conditions [3].
• Electrolytes for Electrochemical Synthesis: The intrinsic conductivity of ILs enables their use as electrolytes in electrochemical C-H activation reactions, providing alternative activation pathways [3].

Table 2: Catalytic Applications of Ionic Liquids in Organic Synthesis

Ionic Liquid	Reaction Type	Role of Ionic Liquid	Key Outcome/Advantage	Reference
Tetrachloroaluminate ILs	Friedel-Crafts alkylation, acylation	Lewis acid catalyst & solvent	Replaces hazardous HF or AlCl₃; easy separation	[4] [8]
[BMIM] BF₄	Quinazolinone synthesis	Recyclable solvent	Stabilizes catalyst; allows for recycling	[3]
MI-EC (Zwitterionic)	Transesterification	Homogeneous catalyst	High activity (TOF: 127.8 h⁻¹); wide substrate scope	[5]
Tetrabutylammonium Acetate (TBAA)	Cyclopropanation	Catalyst	Effective under mild conditions	[3]
Pyrrolidinium-based ILs	Asymmetric allylation of amines	Solvent	Enhances enantioselectivity and allows catalyst reuse	[4]

Experimental Protocol: C-H Activation in [EMIM]BF₄ for Heterocycle Synthesis

The following detailed protocol is adapted for the synthesis of quinazolinone derivatives, a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry, using a recyclable ionic liquid system [3].

Title: Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one in Recyclable [EMIM]BF₄

Objective: To execute a C-H activation/intramolecular cyclization in [EMIM]BF₄ serving as a green solvent and promoter.

Materials (The Scientist's Toolkit):

• Ionic Liquid: 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([EMIM]BF₄) - acts as the reaction medium and stabilizer.
• Substrate: 2-Aminobenzamide (1.0 equiv).
• Reactant: Aldehyde (1.2 equiv).
• Catalyst: Iodine (I₂, 10 mol%) - acts as a mild Lewis acid catalyst.
• Equipment: Round-bottom flask (25 mL), magnetic stirrer, heating mantle, thermometer, and equipment for Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC).

Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: In a 25 mL round-bottom flask, combine 2-aminobenzamide (2.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv), the aldehyde (2.4 mmol, 1.2 equiv), and iodine (0.2 mmol, 10 mol%).
• Solvent Addition: Add [EMIM]BF₄ (5 mL) to the reaction mixture.
• Heating and Stirring: Heat the reaction mixture at 80 °C with continuous magnetic stirring. Monitor the reaction progress by TLC.
• Reaction Completion: Typically, the reaction is complete within 2-4 hours.
• Work-up: After completion, cool the reaction mixture to room temperature. Add crushed ice and water (20 mL) to precipitate the product.
• Product Isolation: Filter the solid precipitate and wash thoroughly with cold water to remove any residual ionic liquid.
• Purification: Purify the crude product by recrystallization from ethanol to obtain the pure quinazolinone derivative.
• IL Recycling: The aqueous filtrate containing [EMIM]BF₄ can be evaporated under reduced pressure to recover the ionic liquid. The recovered IL can be dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 6 hours and reused in subsequent reactions.

Supported Ionic Liquid Phases (SILPs): A Hybrid Approach

To bridge the gap between homogeneous catalysis and heterogeneous processing, Supported Ionic Liquid Phases (SILPs) have been developed. This technology immobilizes a thin layer of catalytic IL onto a high-surface-area solid support [8].

Diagram 1: SILP Catalyst Function (76 chars)

Synthesis of a SILP Catalyst: A common method is the impregnation method, where the purified solid support (e.g., silica gel, mesoporous MCM-41) is added to a solution of the ionic liquid in a volatile organic solvent. The mixture is stirred vigorously for several hours to ensure uniform distribution. The solvent is then removed under reduced pressure, resulting in a dry, free-flowing solid catalyst where the IL is dispersed as a thin film on the support's surface [8].

Advantages for Industrial Application:

• Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces the amount of IL required and minimizes mass transfer limitations.
• Simplified Separation: The catalyst can be separated by simple filtration or used in a continuous fixed-bed reactor [8].
• Recyclability: SILP catalysts often demonstrate excellent stability and can be reused over multiple cycles without a significant loss of activity [5] [8].

Environmental and Safety Considerations

The "green" credentials of ILs, historically based on their non-volatility, are now balanced with a more nuanced understanding of their environmental impact and toxicity [1] [9] [2].

• Persistence and Ecotoxicity: Many first- and second-generation ILs show poor biodegradability and can be toxic to aquatic and terrestrial organisms. The toxicity is often correlated with the alkyl chain length in the cation and the nature of the anion [1] [9].
• Designing Safer ILs: Research is actively focused on developing a new generation of biodegradable ILs derived from renewable sources, such as amino acids, sugars, and choline [2]. The design of AAILs (Amino Acid Ionic Liquids) is a prime example of this effort to combine functionality with reduced environmental impact [7].
• Regulatory Outlook: As the application of ILs expands, a thorough risk assessment considering their entire life cycle is crucial for their sustainable adoption in industry, including pharmaceuticals [9].

Ionic liquids have firmly established themselves as a cornerstone of modern synthetic chemistry, successfully bridging the gap between simple molten salts and sophisticated 'designer solvents'. Their unparalleled flexibility in structure and function makes them indispensable for catalytic organic synthesis, particularly in the demanding field of drug development where selectivity and efficiency are paramount. The ongoing development of greener synthesis methods, biodegradable IL structures, and hybrid SILP systems points toward a future where their application will continue to expand in an environmentally responsible manner. As research progresses, the integration of computational design and artificial intelligence for predicting IL properties and toxicology will further solidify their role as enabling tools for sustainable science and technology.

Ionic liquids (ILs), a class of materials composed entirely of ions with melting points below 100 °C, have emerged as revolutionary solvents and catalysts in organic synthesis. [10] [11] Their unique physicochemical profile offers a sustainable alternative to conventional organic solvents, aligning with the principles of Green Chemistry. [11] For researchers and drug development professionals, the strategic application of ILs can enhance reaction efficiency, product purity, and catalytic performance while reducing environmental impact. [11] This application note details the core properties—low vapor pressure, exceptional thermal stability, and structural tunability—that make ILs indispensable in modern organic catalysis, providing quantitative data and detailed protocols for their evaluation.

Core Properties and Quantitative Analysis

Negligible Volatility and Vapor Pressure

The exceptionally low vapor pressure of ILs is a cornerstone of their green credential, drastically reducing solvent emissions and enabling safer high-temperature processes. [11]

Quantitative Vapor Pressure Data: The following table summarizes vapor pressure data for selected ionic liquids, demonstrating their low volatility.

Table 1: Vapor Pressure of Selected Tetrabutylammonium-Based Ionic Liquids [10]

Ionic Liquid	Chemical Formula / Abbreviation	Temperature (°C)	Vapor Pressure (Pa)
Tetrabutylammonium Bromide	TBA-Br	170	≈ 700
Tetrabutylammonium Trifluoromethanesulfonate	TBA-TFO	240	≈ 3
Tetrabutylammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide	TBA-NTF2	240	≈ 1

Thermal Stability

ILs exhibit high thermal stability, significantly surpassing many molecular solvents. This property expands the operable temperature window for catalytic reactions. [12] [11] However, stability can be influenced by the supporting material in heterogeneous systems. For instance, while pure [C₄C₁Im][BF₄] has a long-term thermal stability of ~400°C, it begins to react and decompose on a ZnO surface at temperatures as low as 80°C, indicating that the substrate can catalyze decomposition. [13]

Tunable Polarity and Solvation

The polarity of ILs can be finely adjusted by selecting different cation-anion combinations, allowing for the optimization of solute solubility and reaction kinetics. [11] This tunability is crucial for creating task-specific solvents for catalysis, such as in the activation of enzymes for immobilization. [14]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Determining Vapor Pressure via Isothermal Thermogravimetry

This protocol outlines the procedure for determining the vapor pressure of ionic liquids using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), based on established methods. [10]

I. Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Materials for Vapor Pressure Measurement

Item	Function
Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA)	Measures mass loss as a function of time at a constant temperature.
High-Purity Helium Gas	Provides an inert atmosphere to prevent sample oxidation.
Platinum Crucibles	Inert sample holders with high thermal stability.
Analytical Balance	Precisely measures initial sample mass.
Ionic Liquid Sample	High-purity (e.g., ≥ 99%) material for accurate measurement.

II. Methodology

• Sample Preparation: Tare a platinum crucible. Using an analytical balance, accurately weigh approximately 15 mg of the ionic liquid sample into the crucible. [10]
• Instrument Purge: Load the sample into the TGA and purge the system with a continuous flow of high-purity helium (e.g., 60 mL/min) for at least 30 minutes to ensure a complete inert atmosphere. [10]
• Temperature Equilibration: Program the TGA to rapidly heat to the desired isothermal temperature (e.g., 170°C for TBA-Br, 240°C for TBA-NTF2). [10]
• Isothermal Measurement: Once the target temperature is stable, hold the sample for a predetermined period while recording the mass loss over time.
• Data Analysis: The vapor pressure, ( p_v ), is derived from the rate of mass loss measured during the isothermal step. The specific calculation methodology can be referenced from prior literature. [10]
• Replication: Repeat the isothermal measurement at multiple temperatures to establish the temperature dependence of vapor pressure and calculate the mean enthalpy of vaporization, ( \Delta H_{vap} ). [10]

Protocol: Enhancing Lipase Catalysis using Amino Acid Ionic Liquids

This protocol describes the use of amino acid-based ILs to activate and stabilize lipase enzymes for improved catalytic performance, such as in the synthesis of phytosterol esters. [14]

I. Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents for Lipase Immobilization

Item	Function
Lipase (e.g., CRL)	The biocatalyst for esterification reactions.
Magnetic Graphene	Provides a high-surface-area, magnetically separable support.
Polyethyleneimine/Polydopamine (PEI/PDA)	Forms a flexible, bionic adhesive layer for enzyme attachment.
Amino Acid Ionic Liquid	Acts as an activator to enhance enzyme stability and performance.
Phytosterols & Fatty Acids	Substrates for the model esterification reaction.

II. Methodology

• Support Functionalization: Prepare the magnetic graphene support and coat it with a layer of PEI/PDA to create a "bionic adhesive" surface. [14]
• Enzyme Immobilization: Immobilize the lipase (CRL) onto the functionalized magnetic graphene surface.
• Ionic Liquid Activation: Treat the immobilized enzyme system with the amino acid ionic liquid to activate it. This step markedly enhances thermal stability and denaturant tolerance. [14]
• Performance Evaluation:
  • Thermal Stability: Incubate the free and immobilized enzymes at 60°C for 1 hour. The immobilized enzyme should retain >80% activity, approximately 1.8 times higher than the free enzyme. [14]
  • Reusability: Use the immobilized enzyme in a series of reaction cycles (e.g., 7 cycles). The catalyst should retain >70% of its initial catalytic activity. [14]
  • Synthesis Application: Apply the immobilized enzyme to synthesize phytosterol esters. A well-optimized system can achieve an esterification rate of 90.2%, maintaining a rate over 70% after five reuse cycles. [14]

Property Interplay in Catalysis

The synergistic relationship between the key properties of ILs is what makes them powerful in catalytic applications. The following diagram illustrates how these properties contribute to core catalytic functions.

Diagram: The synergistic relationship between the key properties of ionic liquids and their resulting catalytic functions and experimental outcomes. Low vapor pressure enables easy product separation and reduces solvent loss; high thermal stability allows for operation in expanded temperature and pressure windows; and tunable polarity facilitates optimized solute-solvent interactions for improved reaction kinetics.

The unique combination of low vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable polarity establishes ionic liquids as a versatile and powerful platform for catalysis in organic synthesis and pharmaceutical development. Their ability to enhance enzyme stability, enable high-temperature reactions, and simplify product separation directly addresses key challenges in research and industrial processes. By applying the detailed protocols and understanding the quantitative data presented herein, scientists can leverage these properties to design more efficient, sustainable, and high-performing catalytic systems.

Ionic liquids (ILs), a class of materials often defined as salts with melting points below 100°C, have undergone a significant evolution since their discovery. This evolution has been characterized by a strategic shift in design philosophy, moving from a primary focus on advantageous physical properties towards an emphasis on sustainability and biocompatibility. This transition is crucial for their application in sensitive fields, including organic synthesis and pharmaceutical development, where toxicity and environmental impact are paramount concerns. The journey of ILs can be systematically categorized into four distinct generations, each reflecting the changing priorities and expanding knowledge of chemists and engineers [15] [16] [17].

The following timeline illustrates this generational evolution, highlighting the key focus and examples of each stage:

This article details the characteristics of each generation, provides protocols for working with modern, biocompatible ILs, and outlines the essential toolkit for researchers employing ILs in synthetic chemistry.

The Four Generations of Ionic Liquids

The properties and environmental impact of an IL are fundamentally determined by the choice of its cationic and anionic components. The following table summarizes the key features of the four generations of ILs.

Table 1: Key Characteristics of the Four Generations of Ionic Liquids

Generation	Primary Focus	Typical Cations	Typical Anions	Key Advantages	Major Limitations
First	Electrolytes & Green Solvents [16] [18]	Dialkylimidazolium, Alkylpyridinium [16]	Chloroaluminates [16] [18]	High thermal stability, low vapor pressure, broad liquidous range [18]	Air/water sensitive, corrosive, toxic, low biodegradability [16] [17]
Second	Tunable Physicochemical Properties [15] [16]	Ammonium, Phosphonium, Imidazolium, Pyridinium [16]	Tetrafluoroborate (BF₄⁻), Hexafluorophosphate (PF₆⁻) [16]	Air/water stable, highly tunable properties ("designer solvents") [15] [16]	Often exhibit cytotoxicity and phytotoxicity, low to moderate biodegradability [17]
Third	Biocompatibility & Low Toxicity [15] [16]	Cholinium, Amino Acids [19] [16]	Amino Acids, Carboxylic Acids [19] [16]	Derived from natural compounds, low toxicity, often readily biodegradable [19] [17]	May have narrower electrochemical windows or thermal stability
Fourth	Multifunctionality & Sustainability [15]	Bio-derived, Pharmaceutical Ions [20]	Bio-derived, Pharmaceutical Ions [20]	Inherently functional (e.g., catalytic, bioactive), sustainable, biodegradable [15]	Complex synthesis, higher cost, evolving regulatory landscape

From First to Fourth Generation

• First-Generation ILs: The modern concept of ILs began with the work on chloroaluminate-based salts, such as butylpyridinium chloroaluminate, for electrochemical applications [18]. While they demonstrated unique properties like low vapor pressure, their high reactivity with air and water limited their practical utility [16] [18].
• Second-Generation ILs: A breakthrough came with the development of air- and water-stable ILs, such as 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([EtMeim]BF₄) [18]. This opened the floodgates for research, positioning ILs as "designer solvents" whose properties could be finely tuned for specific applications in catalysis, separation, and electrochemistry [15] [16].
• Third-Generation ILs: As environmental and health considerations gained prominence, the focus shifted to designing ILs with reduced ecological impact. This generation utilizes ions derived from natural, biologically compatible sources, such as the vitamin B4 precursor choline and various amino acids [19] [16] [17]. A key advancement is the development of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient-Ionic Liquids (API-ILs), where the IL itself is the active drug, improving the physicochemical properties of poorly soluble pharmaceuticals [20].
• Fourth-Generation ILs: This emerging category represents a fusion of the previous generations' attributes. Fourth-generation ILs are designed to be not only biodegradable and non-toxic but also intrinsically multifunctional [15]. They combine the role of a solvent or catalyst with a specific biological function, such as antimicrobial activity or enhanced drug delivery, paving the way for advanced applications in biomedicine and green technology [20] [15].

Protocols for Synthesis and Biocompatibility Assessment

Protocol 1: Synthesis of a Cholinium-Based Biocompatible Ionic Liquid

This protocol outlines the synthesis of a cholinium carboxylate protic ionic liquid, a typical third-generation IL, via a simple acid-base neutralization reaction [19].

Principle: Choline hydroxide ([Ch][OH]) reacts stoichiometrically with a carboxylic acid (R-COOH) to form the cholinium carboxylate IL ([Ch][R]) and water.

Materials:

• Choline hydroxide aqueous solution (~45% w/w)
• Carboxylic acid (e.g., geranic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid)
• Methanol or ethanol (anhydrous)
• Ice bath
• Magnetic stirrer
• Rotary evaporator
• High-vacuum line

Procedure:

• Neutralization: Place an equimolar amount of the carboxylic acid in a round-bottom flask. Slowly add the aqueous choline hydroxide solution dropwise under constant magnetic stirring. Maintain the reaction mixture in an ice bath to control the mild exothermic reaction.
• Solvent Addition: Add a volume of methanol or ethanol equivalent to approximately twice the volume of the reaction mixture to form a homogeneous solution.
• Water Removal: Remove the water and the added solvent using a rotary evaporator at elevated temperature (e.g., 60°C) and reduced pressure.
• Drying: Further dry the resulting viscous liquid on a high-vacuum line (e.g., < 0.1 mbar) for at least 24-48 hours to remove any traces of water and solvent.
• Characterization: Confirm the structure and purity of the synthesized IL using ( ^1\text{H} ) NMR spectroscopy [19].

Protocol 2: Assessing Biodegradability via the BOD₅ Test

The Closed-Bottle Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD₅) Test is a standard method to evaluate the "inherent biodegradability" of chemical substances, such as ILs and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) [19].

Principle: The test measures the amount of oxygen consumed by microorganisms in a diluted sewage inoculum as they degrade the test substance over a 5-day period in the dark at 20°C. The result is expressed as a percentage of biodegradation.

Materials:

• Test substance (IL or DES)
• Mineral medium (containing inorganic nutrients)
• Acclimated microbial inoculum (from a wastewater treatment plant)
• BOD bottles (e.g., 250 mL)
• Positive control (e.g., sodium acetate)
• Blank (mineral medium and inoculum only)
• Oxygen meter or chemical kits for dissolved oxygen (DO) measurement
• Incubator or water bath (20°C, dark)

Procedure:

• Bottle Preparation: Fill several BOD bottles with a solution containing mineral medium, the microbial inoculum, and the test substance at a concentration of 2-5 mg/L of organic carbon. Prepare in triplicate.
• Control Setup: Prepare triplicate bottles for a positive control (readily degradable substance) and a blank (no test substance).
• Initial Measurement: Measure the initial dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in at least one bottle from each series immediately.
• Incubation: Seal the remaining bottles and incubate them in the dark at 20°C for 5 days.
• Final Measurement: After 5 days, measure the final DO concentration in all incubated bottles.
• Calculation:
  • Oxygen Consumption (OC) = DO_Blank - DO_Sample
  • Theoretical Oxygen Demand (ThOD) = (Theoretical amount of oxygen required to fully oxidize the test substance)
  • % Biodegradation = (OC / ThOD) × 100 A substance is typically considered "readily biodegradable" if it achieves >60% degradation within 28 days; some cholinium-based ILs can achieve >80% in just 5 days [19].

Protocol 3: Cytotoxicity Screening of ILs Using Cell Viability Assays

Systematic assessment of cytotoxicity is essential for developing biocompatible ILs. This protocol uses a cell viability assay to screen IL libraries [21].

Principle: The assay measures the metabolic activity of cells after exposure to ILs, which correlates with cell viability. Viability decreases as the cationic alkyl chain length of the IL increases [21].

Materials:

• Library of ILs with systematic structural variations (e.g., different cationic alkyl chain lengths)
• Mammalian cell lines (e.g., bEnd.3, HepG2, 4T1)
• Cell culture medium and reagents
• 96-well cell culture plates
• Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) or similar MTT-based assay kit
• Multi-mode microplate reader

Procedure:

• Cell Seeding: Seed cells in a 96-well plate at a standardized density and allow them to adhere for 24 hours.
• IL Exposure: Prepare a dilution series of each IL in the library in culture medium. Treat the cells with these solutions for a defined period (e.g., 24 hours).
• Viability Assay: Add the CCK-8 reagent to each well and incubate for 1-4 hours. Metabolically active cells convert the reagent into an orange-colored formazan product.
• Absorbance Measurement: Measure the absorbance of the formazan product at 450 nm using a microplate reader.
• Data Analysis:
  • % Cell Viability = (Abs_Sample / Abs_Control) × 100
  • Generate dose-response curves for each IL.
  • Use principal component analysis (PCA) or machine learning models to identify structure-activity relationships, confirming the dominant role of cationic alkyl chain length over other structural modules [21].

The structure-activity relationship governing the cytotoxicity of ILs, particularly the role of the cationic alkyl chain, is summarized below:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Ionic Liquid Synthesis and Application

Reagent/Material	Function & Application Notes	Examples / Specific Types
Choline Hydroxide	A common, biocompatible cation precursor for third-generation ILs. Essential for synthesizing low-toxicity ILs like choline-geranate (CAGE) [20] [19].	Often used as a ~45% aqueous solution.
Amino Acids	Serve as biocompatible anions or cation components. Enable creation of task-specific, biodegradable ILs with low ecological impact [16] [17].	e.g., Alanine, Glycine.
Imidazole Derivatives	The foundational scaffold for many first- and second-generation IL cations. Offers high tunability but often associated with higher toxicity [21] [16].	1-Alkyl-3-methylimidazolium salts.
Carboxylic Acids	Used as anions in protic ILs or as Hydrogen Bond Donors (HBDs) in Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs). Chain length influences biodegradability [19].	Geranic acid, Acetic acid, Succinic acid.
Microbial Inoculum	Required for biodegradability testing (BOD₅). Represents the natural microbial population responsible for environmental breakdown [19].	Acclimated sewage sludge.
Mammalian Cell Lines	Essential for in vitro cytotoxicity and biocompatibility screening of ILs prior to any biological application [21].	HepG2 (liver), bEnd.3 (endothelial).

The evolution of ionic liquids through four distinct generations marks a paradigm shift from mere utility to responsible design. The field has matured from exploiting the convenient physical properties of early ILs to a sophisticated engineering of multifunctional, biocompatible, and sustainable materials. For researchers in organic synthesis and drug development, this progression unlocks unprecedented opportunities. The modern toolkit of biocompatible ILs, particularly third- and fourth-generation, offers platforms as dual-purpose solvents/catalysts, drug delivery enhancers, and active pharmaceutical ingredients themselves. Adhering to standardized protocols for synthesis, biodegradability assessment, and cytotoxicity screening is crucial for the continued and responsible integration of these versatile compounds into the next generation of green and biomedical technologies.

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as a transformative class of materials in organic synthesis, offering unique physicochemical properties that include low volatility, high thermal stability, and tunable solubility and acidity [15]. Their design versatility allows for the creation of task-specific catalysts, particularly through functionalization of common cationic architectures such as imidazolium, pyridinium, and ammonium cores. These structures serve as powerful organocatalysts and multifunctional reaction media, enabling enhanced reaction rates, improved selectivity, and reduced environmental impact compared to conventional molecular solvents [22] [23]. This application note provides a structured comparison of these three IL families and detailed experimental protocols for their implementation in synthetic transformations, supporting their application within sustainable chemistry frameworks.

Comparative Analysis of IL Architectures

The catalytic performance of an ionic liquid is fundamentally governed by the interplay between its cationic core and the associated anion. The table below summarizes the key characteristics, advantages, and limitations of imidazolium, pyridinium, and ammonium-based ILs.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Imidazolium, Pyridinium, and Ammonium-based Ionic Liquids

Feature	Imidazolium-based ILs	Pyridinium-based ILs	Ammonium-based ILs
Structural Archetype	Heterocyclic, planar 5-membered ring with two nitrogen atoms [22]	Heterocyclic, planar 6-membered ring with one nitrogen atom [24]	Tetrahedral nitrogen center with four alkyl/aryl substituents [25]
Thermal Stability	High (e.g., N-SO₃H functionalized ILs stable up to 250–260°C with CF₃COO⁻/Cl⁻ anions) [25]	Good performance as stable bifunctional catalysts [24]	Generally high, but can be reduced by inductive effects of substituents [25]
Acidity (Brønsted)	Tunable via anion choice and ring substitution; can be functionalized with -SO₃H groups [25]	Can be designed as strong Brønsted acids; acidity enhanced by functionalization (e.g., -COOH) [24]	Acid strength can be reduced by the +I inductive effect of alkyl groups (e.g., N-butyl) [25]
Density	Higher densities due to compact packing of the imidazolium ring [25]	Information not specified in search results	Lower densities compared to imidazolium analogs due to lack of ring structure [25]
Electrochemical Window	Broad ESW, particularly in acetone [25]	Effective in electrochemical applications like CO₂ fixation [24]	Higher inherent redox stability compared to imidazolium ILs, but limited by higher viscosity [25]
Key Advantages	High thermal stability, tunable properties, high conductivity, low viscosity [25] [26]	Often less expensive than imidazolium ILs; efficient as bifunctional catalysts [24]	High electrochemical stability; simple synthetic preparation [25]
Common Limitations	Can be more expensive than other classes [24]	Lower chemical diversity compared to imidazolium ILs [24]	High viscosity can limit mass transfer and ionic conductivity [25]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Synthesis of a Brønsted Acidic Pyridinium IL, [CMDMAPy]Br

This protocol outlines the synthesis of 1-(carboxymethyl)-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium bromide ([CMDMAPy]Br), a bifunctional pyridinium IL catalyst effective for cycloaddition reactions under ambient CO₂ pressure [24].

Reagents and Equipment

• Round-bottom flask (50 mL)
• Ice bath
• Reflux condenser
• Bromoacetic acid (50 mmol, 6.94 g)
• 4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (50 mmol, 6.10 g)
• Ethanol (absolute), 8 mL
• Distillation apparatus

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Dissolution: In a 50 mL round-bottom flask, dissolve bromoacetic acid (50 mmol, 6.94 g) in 3 mL of ethanol.
• Cooling: Place the flask in an ice bath to cool the mixture.
• Addition: Over a period of 1 hour, slowly add a solution of DMAP (50 mmol, 6.10 g) in 5 mL of ethanol to the cooled mixture under constant stirring.
• Initial Stirring: Continue stirring the reaction mixture in the ice bath for an additional 1.5 hours.
• Reflux: Fit the flask with a reflux condenser and heat the mixture under reflux for 6 hours. The formation of a white precipitate should be observed during this period.
• Isolation: After cooling to room temperature, remove the ethanol solvent by distillation under reduced pressure.
• Drying: Dry the resulting white solid under vacuum to obtain the pure [CMDMAPy]Br ionic liquid.
• Characterization: Confirm the structure using ( ^1 \text{H NMR} ), ( ^{13}\text{C NMR} ), and FT-IR spectroscopy [24].

Protocol 2: Cycloaddition of CO₂ to Styrene Oxide Catalyzed by [CMDMAPy]Br

This application note details the use of the synthesized [CMDMAPy]Br IL to convert styrene oxide into styrene carbonate under mild, solvent-free conditions [24].

Reagents and Equipment

• Schlenk tube or pressure-resistant reaction vessel
• CO₂ balloon (1 atm pressure)
• Heating block or oil bath
• Magnetic stirrer
• Styrene oxide (1.0 mmol)
• [CMDMAPy]Br catalyst (3 mol%)
• Ethyl acetate (for workup)

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Reaction Setup: Charge the Schlenk tube with styrene oxide (1.0 mmol) and [CMDMAPy]Br catalyst (3 mol%).
• CO₂ Atmosphere: Purge the reaction vessel with CO₂ and maintain a CO₂ atmosphere at ambient pressure (using a balloon).
• Heating and Stirring: Seal the vessel and heat the mixture to 90 °C with vigorous stirring for 2.5 hours.
• Reaction Monitoring: Monitor the reaction progress by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) or ( ^1 \text{H NMR} ) spectroscopy.
• Work-up: After completion, allow the mixture to cool to room temperature. Add ethyl acetate ( ~5 mL) and wash the organic layer with brine to remove the catalyst.
• Product Isolation: Dry the organic phase over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filter, and concentrate under reduced pressure to obtain the crude styrene carbonate.
• Purification: Purify the product by recrystallization or column chromatography, if necessary.
• Analysis: The expected outcome is 100% conversion of styrene oxide with >99% selectivity for styrene carbonate. Analyze the product using ( ^1 \text{H NMR} ) to confirm identity and purity [24].

Catalyst Recycling

• The [CMDMAPy]Br IL can be recovered after the aqueous workup. Simply evaporate the water from the aqueous phase and dry the residual solid under high vacuum. The catalyst can be reused for at least four consecutive cycles without a significant loss in catalytic activity or selectivity [24].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents for Working with Functionalized Ionic Liquids

Reagent/Material	Function/Application Note
N-SO₃H Functionalized ILs	Task-specific Brønsted acidic catalysts that act as dual solvent-catalysts, e.g., in Michael additions and biomass conversion [25].
Imidazolium Salts (e.g., [BBim]Br₃)	Serve as recyclable catalysts and green reaction media for synthesizing N-substituted azepines and other heterocycles [23].
DMAP (4-Dimethylaminopyridine)	A key precursor for synthesizing pyridinium-based ILs; acts as a positive charge delocalizing agent in the final catalyst structure [24].
Molecular Solvents (MeOH, Acetone, MeCN)	Used in binary mixtures with ILs to modify properties like viscosity and conductivity for electrochemical studies and synthesis [25].
H₂O₂ (as oxidant)	A green oxidant used in conjunction with IL-functionalized catalysts for asymmetric oxidation reactions, such as sulfoxidation [27].

Workflow and Mechanistic Pathways

IL Synthesis and Application Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the general workflow from the synthesis of a functionalized ionic liquid to its application and recycling in a catalytic organic transformation.

IL Synthesis and Application Workflow: This chart outlines the key steps in developing and deploying a task-specific ionic liquid for sustainable synthesis.

Proposed Catalytic Cycle for CO₂ Cycloaddition

The diagram below illustrates the proposed mechanism for the cycloaddition of CO₂ to epoxides catalyzed by the bifunctional pyridinium IL, [CMDMAPy]Br, involving simultaneous activation of both reactants.

CO₂ Cycloaddition Catalytic Cycle: This mechanism shows how a bifunctional IL activates an epoxide and facilitates CO₂ insertion to form a cyclic carbonate.

Imidazolium, pyridinium, and ammonium-based ionic liquids each offer distinct advantages as catalytic architectures in organic synthesis. The choice of cation, coupled with appropriate anion selection and functionalization, allows for precise tuning of physicochemical properties to meet specific reaction requirements. The provided protocols for the synthesis and application of a bifunctional pyridinium IL in CO₂ fixation underscore the practical implementation of these principles, demonstrating high efficiency, selectivity, and catalyst recyclability under mild conditions. As the field advances, the continued development of these IL families is poised to further drive innovation in sustainable chemical processes.

Ionic Liquids (ILs) are a class of salts that exist in the liquid state at relatively low temperatures, often below 100 °C [28]. Their structure, composed entirely of organic cations and organic or inorganic anions, confers a unique set of physicochemical properties, including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable polarity [15] [29]. This tunability, which earns them the moniker "designer solvents," allows for their properties to be finely adjusted for specific tasks, creating task-specific ionic liquids (TSILs) [28]. Within the framework of green chemistry, ILs have emerged as powerful alternatives to conventional volatile organic solvents, mitigating environmental and safety concerns [22]. This application note details their dual functionality—serving as both sustainable solvent media and efficient catalysts—in organic synthesis, providing quantitative data and reproducible protocols for research scientists.

Quantitative Performance Data in Organic Synthesis

The efficacy of ILs in various chemical transformations is demonstrated by their ability to achieve high yields and selectivity, often under milder conditions compared to conventional methods. The table below summarizes their performance in several key reactions.

Table 1: Catalytic Performance of Ionic Liquids in Organic Synthesis

Reaction Type	Ionic Liquid Used	Role of IL	Yield (%)	Key Advantage	Source
Heck-Mizoroki Coupling	Glycerol-derived ILs [30]	Solvent & Reaction Medium	Quantitative	Recyclable media for Pd nanoparticles	[30]
Thiazole Synthesis	Not Specified [22]	Dual Solvent-Catalyst	High	Replaces toxic solvents, milder conditions	[22]
Friedel-Crafts Reactions	[EMIM]Cl-AlCl₃ [29]	Lewis Acid Catalyst	High	Pronounced Lewis acidity, high yield	[29]
Transesterification	[NMP][HSO₄] [29]	Brønsted Acid Catalyst	Enhanced	Significant yield and selectivity improvement	[29]
Diels-Alder Reaction	Quaternary Ammonium Zn-/Sn-ILs [29]	Catalyst	High	Water insensitive, recyclable	[29]

The properties of ILs can be strategically modified by altering their cationic and anionic structures. This structure-property relationship directly impacts their performance as solvents and catalysts.

Table 2: Tunable Properties of Ionic Liquids and Their Impacts

Structural Element	Tunable Property	Impact on Synthesis
Cation Alkyl Chain Length	Hydrophobicity/Lipophilicity	Solubility of substrates; Toxicity [31]
Anion Nucleophilicity	Hydrogen Bond Basicity	Solubilization of biopolymers (e.g., peptides) [32]
Cation/Anion Combination	Melting Point, Viscosity	Reaction temperature, Mass transfer rates [32]
Functionalized Side Chains	Task-Specificity (e.g., Acidity)	Direct catalytic activity [28]

Application Notes & Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Synthesis of Thiazole Derivatives

Background: Thiazole moieties are vital heterocycles found in numerous pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. Traditional synthesis often relies on toxic solvents and harsh conditions [22]. IL-mediated synthesis offers a greener, more efficient pathway.

Principle: This method utilizes an ionic liquid as a dual solvent-catalyst system to facilitate the condensation reaction between α-halocarbonyl compounds and thioamides or thioureas, following the classical Hantzsch thiazole synthesis pathway [22].

Workflow Diagram: Thiazole Synthesis in IL

Materials:

• α-Haloketone (e.g., phenacyl bromide)
• Thioamide (e.g., thiourea)
• Ionic Liquid (e.g., [BMIM][BF₄] or other task-specific IL)

Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: In a round-bottom flask, combine the α-haloketone (1.0 mmol) and thiourea (1.0 mmol).
• Addition of IL: Add the ionic liquid (5 mL) to the mixture, serving as both solvent and catalyst.
• Reaction Execution: Stir the reaction mixture at 60-80°C. Monitor the reaction progress by TLC or HPLC.
• Product Isolation: Upon completion, cool the mixture to room temperature. Add crushed ice to the reaction mixture with vigorous stirring. The solid product should precipitate out.
• Purification: Filter the precipitate and wash thoroughly with cold water. Recrystallize the crude product from ethanol to obtain the pure thiazole derivative.
• IL Recycling: The aqueous filtrate containing the ionic liquid can be evaporated under reduced pressure to recover the IL for subsequent runs. The IL's stability and catalytic activity should be assessed over multiple cycles.

Protocol 2: Heck-Mizoroki Coupling in Recyclable Glycerol-Derived ILs

Background: The Heck coupling is a pivotal carbon-carbon bond-forming reaction in medicinal chemistry and fine chemical synthesis. Using bio-based ILs as media enhances the sustainability profile of this reaction [30].

Principle: Glycerol-derived ILs provide a polar, stable environment that stabilizes Pd nanoparticles, facilitating the catalytic cycle and allowing for easy product separation and catalyst recycling.

Workflow Diagram: Heck Coupling in Bio-IL

Materials:

• Aryl halide (e.g., iodobenzene)
• Alkene (e.g., methyl acrylate)
• Base (e.g., triethylamine)
• Palladium Catalyst (e.g., Pd(OAc)₂)
• Glycerol-derived Ionic Liquid (e.g., [N20R]X series [30])

Procedure:

• Reaction Charge: Place the glycerol-derived ionic liquid (3 mL) in a Schlenk tube. Add the aryl halide (1.0 mmol), alkene (1.2 mmol), base (2.0 mmol), and palladium catalyst (0.5-1.0 mol%).
• Reaction Execution: Heat the mixture to 80-100°C with continuous stirring under an inert atmosphere (N₂ or Ar). Monitor the reaction until the starting material is consumed.
• Product Separation: After cooling, add diethyl ether or ethyl acetate (10 mL) and water to the reaction mixture. The coupling product should partition into the organic layer.
• Isolation & Analysis: Separate the organic layer. Dry over anhydrous MgSO₄, filter, and concentrate under reduced pressure to obtain the crude product. Purity by flash chromatography if necessary.
• Catalyst System Recycling: The remaining aqueous phase contains the ionic liquid and Pd nanoparticles. Remove water under vacuum to recover the IL-Pd system, which can be directly reused for subsequent reactions with minimal loss of activity, as demonstrated by quantitative yields over multiple cycles [30].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Ionic Liquids and Their Functions in Organic Synthesis

Reagent Solution	Chemical Structure Example	Primary Function	Typical Application Example
Imidazolium-based ILs	e.g., [BMIM][BF₄] / [BMIM][PF₆]	Polar solvent, Stabilizer for catalysts	Diels-Alder, Hydrogenation, Biocatalysis [28] [32]
Brønsted Acidic ILs	e.g., [NMP][HSO₄]	Acid catalyst, Solvent	Transesterification, Multi-component reactions [29]
Lewis Acidic ILs	e.g., [EMIM]Cl-AlCl₃	Lewis acid catalyst	Friedel-Crafts alkylation/acylation [29]
Bio-derived ILs	e.g., Glycerol-derived [N20R]X	Sustainable solvent & media	Heck coupling, Solubilization of natural acids [30]
Choline Amino Acid ILs	e.g., [Choline][Lys]	Biocompatible solvent	Biomass processing, Stabilization of enzymes [15] [32]

Ionic liquids successfully bridge the gap between high-performance catalysis and sustainable chemistry. Their inherent design flexibility allows them to be tailored as non-inflammable, recyclable reaction media and as highly efficient catalysts, surpassing the capabilities of many traditional molecular solvents. The provided protocols for thiazole synthesis and Heck coupling illustrate their practical utility and advantages in modern organic synthesis, including high yields, operational simplicity, and reduced environmental impact. As the field progresses, the development of even greener, bio-derived ILs and a deeper understanding of their toxicity profile [31] will further solidify their role as indispensable tools in research and industrial applications.

Advanced Methodologies and Cutting-Edge Applications in Drug Synthesis and Beyond

The pursuit of sustainable and efficient methodologies in synthetic organic chemistry is a cornerstone of modern drug discovery. This is particularly true for the construction of nitrogen and sulfur-containing heterocycles, which are privileged scaffolds in medicinal chemistry. Among these, the thiazole ring—a five-membered heterocycle featuring both sulfur and nitrogen atoms—is a fundamental structural component found in a vast array of bioactive molecules and approved drugs, including antibiotics, anticancer agents, and antivirals [22]. Traditional synthetic routes for these compounds, however, often rely on toxic solvents and harsh reaction conditions, raising significant environmental and safety concerns [33].

In this context, ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as powerful and versatile tools for advancing green synthesis. Composed entirely of ions and often liquid below 100°C, ILs are recognized for their negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, tunable polarity, and recyclability [33] [22] [34]. Their application as dual solvent-catalysts aligns with the principles of green chemistry, offering a pathway to reduce the ecological footprint of chemical synthesis. This article details specialized protocols and application notes for the synthesis of bioactive thiazoles and related scaffolds using ionic liquids, providing researchers with practical, sustainable methodologies tailored for drug development.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for Ionic Liquid-Mediated Synthesis

The following table catalogues key reagents and materials commonly employed in the ionic liquid-mediated synthesis of thiazole-based heterocycles.

Table 1: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Thiazole Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Key Characteristics
Imidazole-based ILs (e.g., [BMIM]I, [BMIM]OH) [34]	Versatile solvent and catalyst for cyclocondensation and multicomponent reactions.	Low vapor pressure, tunable properties, high thermal stability.
Bronsted Acidic ILs (e.g., [HMIM]HSO₄) [34]	Acid catalyst in reactions like Paal-Knorr condensation, facilitating cyclization.	Recyclable, replaces mineral acids, operates under mild conditions.
α-Halocarbonyl Compounds [22]	Key electrophilic precursor in Hantzsch thiazole synthesis.	Reacts with thioamides or thioureas to form the thiazole core.
Thioamides/Thioureas [22]	Key nucleophilic precursor providing the sulfur and nitrogen atoms for the thiazole ring.	Condenses with α-halocarbonyls in the Hantzsch synthesis.
Phenacyl Bromides [35]	Alkylating agent and reactant for constructing hybrid scaffolds like imidazole-thiazoles.	Electrophilic partner in cyclization and nucleophilic substitution reactions.
Merrifield Resin [36]	Solid support for combinatorial library synthesis of thiazolotriazinones.	Enables simplified purification and high-throughput synthesis.

Synthetic Protocols for Key Heterocyclic Scaffolds

Protocol 1: Ionic Liquid-Mediated Hantzsch Synthesis of 2,4-Disubstituted Thiazoles

The Hantzsch synthesis remains one of the most direct and widely used methods for constructing the thiazole core. This protocol describes its execution using a recyclable ionic liquid system [22].

Application Note: This method is ideal for the rapid generation of thiazole libraries for initial biological screening. It is characterized by its simplicity, high atom economy, and alignment with green chemistry principles.

Reagents:

• α-Chloroacetophenone (1 mmol)
• Thiobenzamide (1 mmol)
• 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ([BMIM]I, 1.5 g)

Procedure:

• In a round-bottom flask, combine α-chloroacetophenone (1 mmol) and thiobenzamide (1 mmol).
• Add the ionic liquid [BMIM]I (1.5 g) to the reaction mixture.
• Stir the reaction at room temperature, monitoring by TLC.
• Upon reaction completion (typically 1-2 hours), dilute the mixture with diethyl ether (15 mL).
• The desired 2,4-diphenylthiazole will precipitate out.
• Recover the product by simple filtration.
• Wash the recovered ionic liquid with diethyl ether and dry under vacuum for reuse in subsequent reaction cycles.

Yield & Green Metrics: This protocol typically provides yields >90%. The ionic liquid can be recycled and reused for at least three cycles without a significant loss in catalytic activity, minimizing waste generation [34].

Protocol 2: Synthesis of Imidazole-Thiazole Hybrid Scaffolds

Molecular hybrids incorporating multiple pharmacophores often exhibit enhanced or multifaceted biological activity. This protocol outlines the synthesis of novel imidazole-thiazole hybrids [35].

Application Note: This scaffold is of high interest in developing agents with concurrent antimicrobial and anticancer properties. The procedure involves a key cyclization step to form the thiazole ring.

Reagents:

• Imidazole-hydrazinecarbothioamide (1 mmol)
• Phenacyl bromide (derivative, 1 mmol)
• Ethanol (absolute, 10 mL)

Procedure:

• Dissolve imidazole-hydrazinecarbothioamide (1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (10 mL).
• Add the appropriate phenacyl bromide derivative (1 mmol) to the solution.
• Heat the reaction mixture under reflux for 4-6 hours.
• Monitor the reaction progress by TLC.
• After completion, cool the mixture to room temperature.
• Concentrate the solution under reduced pressure to obtain a crude solid.
• Purify the product via recrystallization from ethanol to yield the pure imidazole-thiazole hybrid.

Diagram: Synthetic Workflow for Imidazole-Thiazole Hybrids

Protocol 3: Solid-Phase Synthesis of a Thiazolotriazinone Library

For high-throughput drug discovery, solid-phase synthesis offers significant advantages in purification and efficiency. This protocol describes the construction of a thiazolotriazinone library using Merrifield resin [36].

Application Note: This method is exceptionally suited for generating diverse chemical libraries for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies. It features easy purification by simple filtration and washing.

Reagents:

• Merrifield resin (loading: 1.29 mmol/g)
• Intermediate thiazole-amid (compound 2 in source)
• Acetic acid (AcOH)
• Sodium nitrite (NaNO₂)
• m-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA)
• Various amines (e.g., n-butylamine)

Procedure:

• Immobilization: Couple the intermediate thiazole-amid to Merrifield resin in acetone to form the resin-bound thiazole intermediate. Monitor by FT-IR for the appearance of amide C=O stretch (~1600 cm⁻¹).
• Cyclization: Treat the resin-bound thiazole with NaNO₂ in acetic acid at room temperature to form the thiazolotriazinone core. FT-IR confirmation: disappearance of NH₂ stretches, appearance of amide C=O at ~1690 cm⁻¹.
• Oxidation: Oxidize the product with m-CPBA in DCM to yield the sulfone. FT-IR confirmation: S=O stretches at ~1340 and 1150 cm⁻¹.
• Cleavage & Functionalization: Treat the sulfone resin with a nucleophilic amine (e.g., n-butylamine). This step simultaneously performs a nucleophilic substitution and cleaves the final product from the solid support.
• Purification: The crude products released into solution require only simple column chromatography for final purification.

Yield: The overall yield for this multi-step solid-phase synthesis is approximately 48% [36].

Biological Applications & Evaluation

Synthesized thiazole derivatives demonstrate a broad and potent spectrum of biological activities. The quantitative biological data from recent studies are summarized in the table below.

Table 2: Biological Activity Profile of Novel Thiazole-Based Derivatives

Compound Class	Biological Activity	Model/Target	Potency (IC₅₀ / GI₅₀ / MIC)	Reference
Thiazole-Coumarin/Benzofuran (11d, 11f)	Anticancer	Dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 Inhibition	GI₅₀ = 27-30 nM (more potent than Erlotinib, GI₅₀ = 33 nM)	[37]
Thiazole-Coumarin/Benzofuran (11b, 11e)	Antibacterial	E. coli DNA Gyrase Inhibition	IC₅₀ = 182-190 nM (comparable to Novobiocin, IC₅₀ = 170 nM)	[37]
Imidazole-Thiazole Hybrid (5a)	Anticancer	MTT Cytotoxicity Assay	IC₅₀ = 33.52 μM	[35]
5-Phenyl-benzo[d]thiazole-2-carboxamide (7k)	Anti-Tubercular	M. tuberculosis H37Rv	MIC = 1.56 µg/mL (equipotent to Ethambutol)	[38]

Mechanism of Action: Targeting Oncogenic Signaling Pathways

The anticancer activity of many thiazole derivatives is often linked to the inhibition of key tyrosine kinases, such as the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). Dual inhibition of these targets provides a synergistic anti-tumor effect by simultaneously blocking tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis [37].

Diagram: Oncogenic Signaling Pathways Targeted by Thiazole Derivatives

The integration of ionic liquids as catalytic solvents provides a robust, sustainable, and efficient framework for synthesizing biologically relevant N/S-containing heterocycles. The protocols detailed herein—covering the synthesis of simple thiazoles, complex molecular hybrids, and solid-phase library construction—offer researchers practical tools that align with the green chemistry ethos. The promising biological data associated with these scaffolds, ranging from nanomolar anticancer activity to potent antibacterial effects, underscores their immense value in drug discovery.

Future research will likely focus on designing even more sophisticated "designer" ionic liquids tailored for specific transformations, integrating ILs with continuous flow systems for scalable synthesis, and further exploring the therapeutic potential of these heterocycles against emerging drug-resistant targets. The confluence of green synthetic methodologies and medicinal chemistry, as illustrated in these application notes, paves the way for the next generation of therapeutic agents.

Ionic liquids (ILs), organic salts with melting points below 100 °C, have emerged as versatile catalysts and solvents in organic synthesis, particularly for esterification and transesterification reactions. Their appeal lies in a unique set of properties, including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and widely tunable physicochemical characteristics, which can be customized for specific reactions by selecting different cation-anion combinations [39] [40]. This tunability positions them as superior "designer solvents" and multifunctional catalysts, offering solutions to challenges like product separation, catalyst recycling, and environmental compatibility faced by traditional homogeneous acid or base catalysts [39]. Within the broader thesis research on using ionic liquids as catalysts in organic synthesis, this document provides detailed application notes and experimental protocols for their use in synthesizing important compounds, from biodiesel to specialty esters.

Application Notes: ILs in Practice

The following section details specific, research-backed applications of ionic liquids, summarizing key performance data to aid in catalyst selection and process design.

Synthesis of Biodiesel from High Free Fatty Acid Feedstocks

Application: Esterification of oleic acid with methanol to produce fatty acid methyl esters (biodiesel), particularly suitable for low-grade feedstocks like waste cooking oil [41].

Catalyst: Amino-acid-functionalized methanesulfonate ionic liquids, notably [GluH][CH3SO3] (L-Glutamic acid methanesulfonate) [41].

Performance Summary: A summary of optimized performance metrics for various IL-catalyzed systems is provided in Table 1.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Selected IL Catalysts in Esterification and Transesterification

Ionic Liquid (IL)	Reaction	Optimal Conditions	Key Outcome	Reference
[GluH][CH3SO3]	Esterification of Oleic Acid with Methanol	12 wt% catalyst, 19.6:1 MR, 103°C, 3.5 h	96.8% oleic acid conversion	[41]
[N2222][Arg]	Transesterification of Soybean Oil	20 wt% catalyst, 10:1 MR, 100°C, 1 h	98.4% biodiesel conversion	[41]
[Ch][Arg]	Methanolysis of Sunflower Oil	Not Specified	99.8% biodiesel yield	[41]
MI-EC	Transesterification of Ethylene Carbonate	30 min, 85°C	EC Conversion: 50.4%; DMC Yield: 30.5%; TOF: 127.8 h⁻¹	[42]

Notes and Mechanisms: The high activity of [GluH][CH3SO3] is attributed to its strong acidity, which facilitates proton transfer to the carbonyl group of the fatty acid. The IL demonstrated exceptional stability, maintaining 88.9% conversion efficiency after ten consecutive reaction cycles, underscoring its reusability and economic potential [41]. The reaction kinetics were found to conform to a pseudo-first-order model with an activation energy of 9.86 kJ·mol⁻¹ [41].

Regioselective Synthesis of Sucrose Fatty Acid Esters

Application: Synthesis of sucrose-6-O-monoacyl esters, which are valuable non-ionic, bio-based surfactants. The challenge lies in the vastly different polarity of sucrose and fatty acid reactants [43].

Catalyst/Solvent System: Imidazolium-based ILs with basic anions, such as 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide ([Bmim][dca]), acting as a dual-function catalyst and solvent [43].

Performance Summary: Under optimized conditions (60 °C, vinyl palmitate with ≤3-fold excess over sucrose), the reaction proceeded with quantitative yield and high regioselectivity for the 6-O-monoacyl product (~70%) [43].

Notes and Mechanisms: The reaction efficiency stems from a cooperative mechanism: the imidazolium cation aids in solubilizing sucrose, while the basic anion (e.g., dica) provides catalytic facilitation for the (trans)esterification. The addition of a moderately polar protic co-solvent (e.g., 2-methyl-2-butanol) in a ~1:1 volume ratio with the IL was found to enhance the conversion significantly [43].

Synthesis of Organic Carbonates

Application: Transesterification of dialkyl carbonates (e.g., dimethyl carbonate, DMC) with diols to produce cyclic carbonates (e.g., ethylene carbonate, EC) or unsymmetrical carbonates, which are valuable monomers and green reagents [39] [42].

Catalyst: Various task-specific ILs, including novel zwitterionic types like MI-EC, and supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) catalysts [39] [42].

Performance Summary: As shown in Table 1, the IL MI-EC demonstrated high activity and a broad substrate scope, including carbonates, oxalates, and acetic esters. It could be reused six times without loss of catalytic activity or structural change [42].

Notes and Mechanisms: The catalysis is hypothesized to operate through a cooperative mechanism where the IL provides dual (electrophilic/nucleophilic) activation of the reactants [39]. For industrial processes, immobilization of ILs on solid supports like silica, magnetic nanoparticles, or polymers facilitates easy catalyst recovery and recycling [39].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Esterification of Oleic Acid with Methanol Catalyzed by [GluH][CH3SO3] IL

This protocol describes the procedure to achieve high conversion to biodiesel using a green amino acid-based ionic liquid catalyst [41].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents

Table 2: Essential Materials for Oleic Acid Esterification

Reagent/Material	Function	Specifications/Notes
[GluH][CH3SO3] IL	Dual-function acidic catalyst	Synthesized from L-glutamic acid and methanesulfonic acid [41].
Oleic Acid	Model free fatty acid (FFA) feedstock	Represents high-FFA low-grade oils.
Methanol	Esterifying alcohol & solvent	Anhydrous grade recommended.
Round-bottom Flask	Reaction vessel	Standard 50-100 mL, with neck for condenser.
Reflux Condenser	Prevents methanol loss	Ensures reaction occurs at constant composition.
Temperature-controlled Hot Plate with Magnetic Stirring	Provides heat and mixing	Accurate temperature control is critical.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: In a 100 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar, combine oleic acid (10 mmol, ~2.82 g), methanol (196 mmol, ~7.9 mL, corresponding to a 19.6:1 molar ratio), and [GluH][CH3SO3] IL (12% by total weight of the reaction mixture) [41].
• Heating and Stirring: Attach a reflux condenser to the flask. Heat the mixture to 103 °C with constant magnetic stirring for 3.5 hours [41].
• Reaction Monitoring: Monitor reaction progress by withdrawing small aliquots at regular intervals and analyzing via TLC or GC to track the consumption of oleic acid.
• Product Isolation: After the reaction is complete, cool the mixture to room temperature. Transfer the reaction mixture to a separatory funnel. The mixture will separate into two layers: a lower IL-rich layer and an upper ester-rich layer.
• Separation and Catalyst Recycling: Carefully separate the upper biodiesel layer. The lower [GluH][CH3SO3] IL catalyst layer can be reused directly after washing with a small amount of ether or water and drying under vacuum. The protocol demonstrates that the catalyst retains high activity for at least ten cycles [41].
• Purification: Wash the crude biodiesel (upper layer) with warm water to remove residual methanol and traces of IL. Dry the biodiesel product over anhydrous sodium sulfate.

Protocol: Regioselective Synthesis of Sucrose-6-O-Palmitate Using [Bmim][dca]

This protocol outlines the method for synthesizing a monoacyl sucrose ester using an IL as a combined solvent and catalyst, highlighting the regioselectivity achievable under mild conditions [43].

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Preparation of Reaction Medium: In a dried reaction vial, mix the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide ([Bmim][dca]) with the co-solvent 2-methyl-2-butanol in an approximate 1:1 volume ratio [43].
• Dissolution of Sucrose: Add sucrose to the IL/co-solvent mixture to achieve a final concentration of 50 mM. Stir and/or gently heat to dissolve the sucrose fully.
• Initiation of Esterification: Add vinyl palmitate (a highly reactive acyl donor) to the solution. Use a molar excess of up to 3-fold relative to sucrose [43].
• Reaction Incubation: Stir the reaction mixture at 60 °C and monitor progress. The reaction is notably selective for the 6-O-position of sucrose.
• Work-up and Isolation: Upon completion, the products can be isolated by extraction with an organic solvent like ethyl acetate. The IL solvent system can be recovered by removing the co-solvent and any volatile byproducts under reduced pressure and can be potentially reused.

Mechanistic Pathways and Workflow Visualizations

The high efficiency of ILs in these reactions stems from their ability to activate both reaction partners simultaneously. The following diagram illustrates the proposed cooperative mechanism for a general base-catalyzed transesterification in an IL medium.

Diagram 1: Cooperative Catalysis Mechanism in IL-mediated Transesterification. The IL anion (A⁻) acts as a base to activate the nucleophilic alcohol, while the IL cation (Q⁺) electrostatically stabilizes and activates the carbonyl ester substrate, facilitating the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate and subsequent product formation [39] [43].

The general workflow for conducting and optimizing an IL-catalyzed esterification/transesterification reaction, from catalyst selection to recycling, is summarized below.

Diagram 2: Workflow for IL-catalyzed Esterification/Transesterification. This flowchart outlines the key experimental stages, highlighting the iterative optimization process and the closed-loop recycling of the ionic liquid catalyst, a cornerstone of sustainable process design [39] [41].

The transition from fossil-based to sustainable bio-based economies is a central challenge in modern chemical research. Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), an abundant and renewable carbon source, presents a promising feedstock for producing biofuels and high-value chemicals. Its complex, recalcitrant structure, primarily composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, necessitates efficient pretreatment and conversion strategies [44] [45]. Among various advanced methods, ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as revolutionary "designer solvents" and catalysts for biomass processing due to their unique properties, including low vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable physicochemical characteristics [44] [46]. Their ability to disrupt the hydrogen-bonding network within cellulose and solubilize lignin underpins their effectiveness in fractionating lignocellulose, thereby enhancing subsequent enzymatic saccharification and catalytic conversion into valuable platform molecules [45] [47]. This Application Note details protocols for using ILs to catalyze the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into key platform chemicals such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) and furfural, framing these processes within the broader context of organic synthesis and drug development, where these molecules serve as precursors for fine chemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates [44] [48].

Key Platform Chemicals and Ionic Liquid Performance

The deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass via IL-mediated processes yields valuable platform chemicals. 5-HMF and furfural are particularly noteworthy, serving as versatile intermediates for producing solvents, polymers, resins, and fuel additives [48]. The table below summarizes typical yields achievable using IL-based catalytic systems.

Table 1: Yields of Platform Chemicals from Biomass Using Ionic Liquid Catalysts

Platform Chemical	Feedstock	Ionic Liquid System	Key Reaction Conditions	Reported Yield	Citation
5-HMF (5-Hydroxymethylfurfural)	Extracted Cellulose (e.g., from wheat straw, rice husk)	Silica-supported imidazolium-based acidic IL	80 °C, mild conditions	Up to 91%	[48]
Furfural	Extracted Hemicellulose (e.g., from wheat straw, rice husk)	Silica-supported imidazolium-based acidic IL	120 °C, mild conditions	Up to 86%	[48]
5-HMF	Cellulose, Glucose, Fructose	[BMIM]Cl with solid acid catalysts (e.g., sulfated zirconia)	Reactive vacuum distillation	Up to 82%	[44]
Levulinic Acid	Cellulose, Simple Sugars	IL-mediated hydrolysis and dehydration	80–180 °C	Up to 96.6%	[44]
Formic Acid	Cellulose, Glucose	IL-mediated oxidation (e.g., with polyoxometalate catalysts)	-	High selectivity reported	[44]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Synthesis of a Silica-Supported Acidic Ionic Liquid Catalyst

This protocol outlines the preparation of a heterogeneous, recyclable acidic IL catalyst for converting cellulose and hemicellulose into 5-HMF and furfural [48].

1. Reagents and Materials:

• Imidazolyl-propyl functionalized silica gel
• 1,3-Propane sultone
• Anhydrous ethanol or toluene (as a solvent)
• Diethyl ether (for washing)

2. Procedure: 1. Quaternization: In a round-bottom flask, suspend 5.0 g of imidazolyl-propyl functionalized silica gel in 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol or toluene. Add a slight molar excess of 1,3-propane sultone (e.g., 1.2 equivalents relative to the imidazole groups). Reflux the mixture with stirring for 24 hours under an inert atmosphere. 2. Filtration and Washing: After cooling to room temperature, isolate the solid by vacuum filtration. Wash the solid thoroughly with copious amounts of anhydrous ethanol, followed by diethyl ether, to remove any unreacted starting materials. 3. Drying: Dry the resulting silica-supported zwitterionic material under high vacuum at 60°C for 6-12 hours until a constant weight is achieved. 4. Acidification (Anion Exchange): To convert the zwitterionic material into the Brønsted acidic form, stir the dried solid in a 1 M aqueous sulfuric acid solution (or another mineral acid) for 2-4 hours. The solid is then filtered, washed with deionized water until the filtrate is neutral, and dried again under vacuum at 60°C. The final catalyst is denoted as Silica-[Im][HSO₄].

3. Characterization:

• FTIR: Confirm successful sulfonation by identifying characteristic bands for the sulfonic acid group (~1030 cm⁻¹, 1170 cm⁻¹).
• TGA: Assess thermal stability; these catalysts are typically stable up to ~200°C.
• Acidity Measurement: Quantify Brønsted acidity via back-titration. Typically, the acidity ranges from 1.5 to 2.5 meq H⁺/g [48].

Protocol 2: Catalytic Conversion of Extracted Biomass to 5-HMF and Furfural

This protocol describes the use of the synthesized catalyst for the valorization of real biomass-derived cellulose and hemicellulose [48].

1. Reagents and Materials:

• Extracted cellulose or hemicellulose (e.g., from wheat straw, rice husk, or bagasse)
• Silica-[Im][HSO₄] catalyst (from Protocol 1)
• [BMIM]Cl or other suitable IL as reaction medium
• Ethyl acetate (for product extraction)

2. Procedure: 1. Reaction Setup: In a reaction vial, combine 0.1 g of extracted cellulose (for 5-HMF) or hemicellulose (for furfural), 0.05 g of Silica-[Im][HSO₄] catalyst, and 2 g of [BMIM]Cl. 2. Heating and Stirring: Seal the vial and place it in a pre-heated oil bath or heating block with magnetic stirring. For cellulose, heat at 80 °C; for hemicellulose, heat at 120 °C. Monitor the reaction for 1-4 hours. 3. Termination and Separation: After the reaction time, cool the mixture to room temperature. Add 5 mL of water and 5 mL of ethyl acetate to the mixture to extract the products. The catalyst, being a solid, can be separated by centrifugation or filtration. 4. Product Recovery: Separate the organic (ethyl acetate) layer containing 5-HMF or furfural. The aqueous layer contains the IL, which can be recovered for subsequent recycling.

3. Analysis:

• Quantification: Analyze the ethyl acetate extract using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) equipped with a UV detector and a C18 reverse-phase column. Use a mobile phase of water and acetonitrile (e.g., 80:20 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Quantify yields by comparing against calibrated standard curves of authentic 5-HMF and furfural [48].

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the integrated experimental workflow for biomass fractionation and conversion using ionic liquids, from pretreatment to product isolation and solvent recycling.

Diagram 1: Integrated IL-based biomass valorization workflow.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of IL-based biomass conversion relies on specific reagents and materials. The following table details essential components for the featured protocols.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for IL-Based Biomass Conversion

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Application in Protocol
Imidazolyl-propyl functionalized silica gel	Solid support for heterogeneous catalyst synthesis; provides sites for ionic liquid immobilization.	Catalyst synthesis (Protocol 1)
1,3-Propane sultone	Sulfonating agent used to introduce the alkyl sulfonic acid group, creating the Brønsted acidic site on the IL.	Catalyst synthesis (Protocol 1)
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIM]Cl)	Aprotic ionic liquid solvent; effectively disrupts cellulose crystallinity by breaking hydrogen bonds.	Reaction medium (Protocol 2)
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM][OAc])	Protic ionic liquid; highly effective for biomass pretreatment and dissolution of lignin and hemicellulose.	Biomass pretreatment (Diagram 1)
Silica-[Im][HSO₄] catalyst	Heterogeneous Brønsted acidic catalyst; facilitates dehydration of sugars to 5-HMF and furfural; enables easy separation and recycling.	Primary catalyst (Protocol 2)
Ethyl Acetate	Organic solvent with good partition coefficients for furanics; used for liquid-liquid extraction of products from the IL-water mixture.	Product extraction (Protocol 2)

Ionic liquids provide a versatile and efficient platform for catalyzing the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into valuable platform chemicals. The protocols outlined herein for synthesizing a silica-supported IL catalyst and deploying it to achieve high yields of 5-HMF and furfural under mild conditions offer researchers a practical framework for exploring sustainable organic synthesis pathways. The integration of IL pretreatment, catalytic conversion, and solvent recycling, as visualized in the workflow, is crucial for developing economically viable and environmentally benign biorefining processes. This approach aligns with the principles of green chemistry and holds significant promise for supplying bio-based building blocks for the pharmaceutical and fine chemical industries.

The drive towards sustainable chemical processes has intensified the search for greener methodologies in organic synthesis. Within this context, ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as a versatile class of materials, serving as solvents, catalysts, and reagents due to their unique properties, including low volatility, high thermal stability, and tunable physicochemical characteristics [34]. This case study explores the integration of ILs with metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) to create composite materials for the sustainable synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), a crucial platform chemical derived from biomass [49]. The synergy between ILs and MOFs in IL/MOF composites combines the excellent catalytic properties of ILs with the high porosity and structural diversity of MOFs, offering enhanced performance in catalytic applications [49].

Theoretical Background

Ionic Liquids as Green Catalysts

Ionic liquids are salts that exist in the liquid state below 100 °C, comprising large, asymmetric organic cations and inorganic or organic anions [34]. Their versatility as "designer solvents" stems from the ability to tailor their properties by selecting different cation-anion combinations, making them ideal for specific chemical reactions [34]. ILs exhibit several advantageous properties for green synthesis, including:

• Non-volatility and low vapour pressure, reducing solvent emissions [34]
• High thermal stability, enabling high-temperature reactions [50]
• Excellent conductivity and non-flammability, enhancing process safety [34]
• Recyclability, minimizing waste generation [34]

In catalytic applications, ILs can act as both solvents and catalysts, facilitating reaction kinetics and improving product yields while aligning with green chemistry principles by reducing the use of hazardous reagents [34] [23].

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a Platform Chemical

HMF is a key bio-based intermediate obtained from the dehydration of carbohydrates, serving as a crucial link between biomass resources and the production of biofuels and value-added chemicals [51]. Its significance stems from the presence of reactive aldehyde and alcohol functional groups, making it a versatile precursor for compounds such as 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA), a renewable alternative to terephthalic acid in plastic production [51]. The transition from fossil resources to renewable biomass for chemical production positions HMF as a pivotal molecule in developing sustainable biorefinery concepts [51].

Supported Ionic Liquid Systems

Supported ionic liquid systems involve the immobilization of ILs onto solid substrates, combining the advantages of homogeneous catalysis with the ease of separation characteristic of heterogeneous systems [49]. Metal-organic frameworks, with their high surface area, tunable porosity, and structural diversity, serve as excellent supports for IL immobilization [49]. IL/MOF composites integrate the catalytic functionality of ILs with the enhanced surface area and selective adsorption properties of MOFs, creating synergistic effects that improve catalytic performance, stability, and reusability in reactions such as HMF synthesis [49].

Table 1: Advantages of IL/MOF Composites for HMF Synthesis

Feature	Benefit for HMF Synthesis
High Porosity	Increased active sites and improved mass transfer
Tunable Functionality	customizable catalytic activity and selectivity
Stability	Withstands dehydration reaction conditions
Recyclability	Reduced catalyst loss and waste generation
Synergistic Effects	Enhanced activity compared to individual components

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of IL/MOF Composites

The preparation of IL/MOF composites can be achieved through various methodologies, each offering distinct advantages for HMF synthesis applications.

Impregnation Method

This straightforward approach involves introducing the MOF into a solution containing the ionic liquid, allowing for the adsorption of the IL into the MOF pores through capillary forces [49].

• Activation: Dry and activate the MOF material (e.g., ZIF-8, UiO-66) at 150 °C under vacuum for 12 hours to remove solvent molecules and moisture.
• Solution Preparation: Dissolve the selected ionic liquid (e.g., 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, [BMIM]Cl) in a dry, volatile solvent such as methanol or dichloromethane to create a 0.1-0.5 M solution.
• Incubation: Combine the activated MOF with the IL solution under an inert atmosphere using a mass ratio of IL:MOF between 1:5 and 1:10. Stir the mixture for 6-12 hours at room temperature.
• Drying: Remove the solvent by rotary evaporation followed by drying under high vacuum at 60 °C for 24 hours to obtain the free-flowing IL/MOF composite.
• Characterization: Analyze the composite using techniques such as BET surface area analysis, FT-IR, XRD, and TGA to confirm successful incorporation and determine IL loading.

Chemical Immobilization (Covalent Grafting)

This method creates stronger interactions between the IL and MOF support by forming covalent bonds, reducing IL leaching during catalytic reactions [49].

• MOF Functionalization: Synthesize or purchase MOFs with reactive surface groups (e.g., -NH₂, -OH).
• IL Modification: Select or synthesize ILs containing complementary functional groups (e.g., -COOH, -NCO) that can react with the MOF surface.
• Grafting Reaction: Combine the functionalized MOF and IL in an appropriate solvent. Add a coupling agent if necessary and heat the mixture to 60-80 °C for 24-48 hours with stirring.
• Purification: Filter the resulting composite and wash thoroughly with solvent to remove any physisorbed IL.
• Drying and Characterization: Dry under vacuum and characterize as described in the impregnation method.

Synthesis Pathway for IL/MOF Composites

Catalytic Testing for HMF Production

The catalytic performance of IL/MOF composites is evaluated in the dehydration of carbohydrates to HMF. This protocol outlines a standard batch reaction system.

Reaction Setup

• Reactor Configuration: Utilize a biphasic reaction system in a sealed glass reactor equipped with magnetic stirring and temperature control.
• Reaction Phase: Prepare the reaction mixture containing:
  • Substrate: Fructose (0.5-1.0 M) as the carbohydrate source.
  • Catalyst: IL/MOF composite (5-10 wt% relative to substrate).
  • Solvent: Deep eutectic solvent (e.g., ChCl:Fru in 5:1 molar ratio) or aqueous system [51].
• Extraction Phase: Add an organic extraction solvent (e.g., acetonitrile, MIBK, ethyl acetate) with an organic-to-aqueous (O/A) volume ratio typically between 1:1 and 2:1 [52] [51].
• Reaction Conditions: Heat the biphasic mixture to 80-160 °C with constant stirring for 5-120 minutes, optimizing for maximum HMF yield [52] [51].

Analysis and Quantification

• Sampling: Periodically collect samples from both phases.
• Analysis Method: Analyze samples using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with a UV-vis detector or similar analytical techniques.
• Calculation: Determine fructose conversion, HMF yield, and selectivity using calibration curves from standard solutions.
  • Conversion (%) = (moles of initial substrate - moles of final substrate) / moles of initial substrate × 100
  • Yield (%) = (moles of HMF produced) / (theoretical moles of HMF) × 100
  • Selectivity (%) = (HMF yield / substrate conversion) × 100

Table 2: Standard Catalytic Reaction Conditions for HMF Synthesis

Parameter	Typical Range	Optimal Value	References
Temperature	80 - 160 °C	80 °C (with ChCl:Fru DES)	[51]
Reaction Time	5 - 240 min	12.5 min	[51]
Catalyst Loading	5 - 10 wt%	Optimize for specific composite	-
O/A Phase Ratio	1:1 - 2:1	2:1	[52]
Substrate Concentration	0.5 - 1.0 M	0.5 M	-

Application Notes and Results

Performance of IL/MOF Composites in HMF Synthesis

IL/MOF composites demonstrate enhanced performance in HMF synthesis compared to conventional catalytic systems. The confinement of ILs within MOF pores creates a unique micro-environment that improves catalytic activity and stability.

Table 3: Performance Comparison of Different Catalytic Systems for HMF Production

Catalytic System	Feedstock	Reaction Conditions	HMF Yield (%)	Selectivity (%)	References
IL/MOF Composite	Fructose	80 °C, 30 min, biphasic	85.6	92	[53] [49]
ChCl:MA DES	Glucose	150 °C, 30 min, MW	85.6	-	[53]
ChCl:Fru DES	Fructose	80 °C, 12.5 min, biphasic	76	83	[51]
AlCl₃ + HCl	Glucose	160 °C, 12 min, biphasic	55	-	[52]
H₂SO₄ in [EMIm]Cl	Fructose	80 °C, 180 min, monophasic	80	-	[51]
HCl in isopropanol	Fructose	120 °C, 60 min, monophasic	82	-	[51]

Process Optimization and Green Metrics

The implementation of IL/MOF composites in HMF synthesis aligns with green chemistry principles by improving process sustainability through several key aspects:

• Energy Efficiency: IL/MOF systems achieve high yields under milder temperature conditions (80 °C) compared to conventional systems requiring 120-160 °C, significantly reducing energy consumption [51].
• Reaction Kinetics: The composite catalysts facilitate shorter reaction times, with quantitative fructose conversion achieved in 12.5 minutes in optimized systems [51].
• Product Isolation: Biphasic systems with in situ extraction enable partition coefficients of 4-5 for HMF, facilitating efficient product separation and purification to >99% purity [51].
• Catalyst Recyclability: Supported IL systems demonstrate excellent stability, with minimal activity loss (∼6% decline in HMF yield) after five consecutive reaction cycles [53].
• Waste Reduction: The non-volatile nature of ILs minimizes solvent emissions, while catalyst reusability reduces hazardous waste generation [34].

Workflow for HMF Synthesis Using IL/MOF Composites

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 4: Key Research Reagents for IL/MOF-Mediated HMF Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples & Notes
Imidazolium-based ILs	Catalyst/Solvent: Acidic sites for dehydration	[BMIM]Cl, [EMIM]HSO₄; Adjust anion for acidity [34]
MOF Supports	Porous support for IL immobilization	ZIF-8, UiO-66, MIL-101; High surface area preferred [49]
Choline Chloride (ChCl)	DES component: Renewable, biodegradable	ChCl:MA or ChCl:Fru DES for reaction medium [53] [51]
Terpenoid Solvents	Extraction phase: High HMF affinity, reduces humins	Carvacrol, thymol; Outperform MIBK/ethyl acetate [52]
Heteropolyacids	Co-catalyst: Brønsted acidity enhances dehydration	H₄SiW₁₂O₄₀; Works synergistically with IL/MOF [51]
Fructose/Glucose	Substrate: Carbohydrate source for HMF production	High-purity (>98%) for reproducible results

This case study demonstrates the significant potential of supported ionic liquids, particularly IL/MOF composites, in advancing the green synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from biomass-derived carbohydrates. The integration of ILs with MOF supports creates synergistic catalytic systems that operate under milder conditions, enhance reaction rates, improve product selectivity, and facilitate catalyst recycling. The detailed experimental protocols and application notes provided herein serve as a foundation for researchers exploring sustainable pathways for HMF production, contributing to the broader transition toward environmentally benign chemical processes aligned with the principles of green chemistry and sustainable development.

Application Notes

Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysts (SILCs) and amphiphilic ionic liquids represent significant advancements in the application of ILs in catalysis, effectively bridging the gap between homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. Their development addresses key challenges in catalytic processes, including catalyst recovery, stability, and efficiency in continuous flow systems [54] [55].

Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysts (SILCs) in Biomass Valorization

SILCs have shown remarkable efficacy in the sustainable conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into high-value chemicals and fuels. They are particularly valuable for their ability to overcome the drawbacks associated with conventional ILs, such as high viscosity, difficult handling, and challenging separation from reaction mixtures [54].

• Application in Biofuel Precursors: SILCs facilitate the upgradation of bio-intermediates like pyrolysis oil into biofuels. For instance, they are used in the acetalization of bioglycerol to produce solketal, a valuable fuel additive. The process benefits from the SILC's tunable acid-base properties [54].
• Production of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): As a top platform chemical identified by the U.S. Department of Energy, HMF production from carbohydrates is efficiently catalyzed by SILCs. The supported catalysts enhance reaction kinetics and selectivity for HMF, minimizing side reactions [54].
• Hydrolysis of Cellulose to Reducing Sugars: The highly crystalline and stable nature of cellulose makes its hydrolysis difficult. Acid-functionalized SILCs provide excellent catalytic activity for breaking β-1,4-glycosidic bonds, yielding reducing sugars like glucose, which are pivotal feedstocks for biofuels and chemicals [54].

The quantitative performance of various SILCs in these applications is summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Performance of SILCs in Key Biomass Conversion Reactions

Biomass Conversion	SILC System Example	Key Performance Metric	Reported Value/Outcome
Acetalization to Solketal	SILC with sulfonic acid groups	High yield of solketal	~99% yield [54]
HMF Production from Fructose	SILC with Lewis/Brønsted acid sites	High HMF yield	~99% yield [54]
HMF Production from Glucose	Bimetallic SILC	High HMF yield	~51% yield [54]
Cellulose Hydrolysis	Acid-functionalized SILC	High TRS yield	~96% yield [54]

Amphiphilic Ionic Liquids in Polymer Synthesis

Amphiphilic ILs have emerged as powerful catalysts for constructing complex bio-based polymers. Their unique structure, containing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic components, allows for superior catalytic performance in specific reactions like nucleophilic hydrothiolation, a key step in thiol-ene "click" chemistry [56].

• Application in Optical Polymers: Amphiphilic ILs such as tetraethylammonium lactate ([TEA][Lac]) have been used to catalyze the synthesis of novel isosorbide-based poly(thioethers) (PITEs). These polymers are designed for high-performance biomedical optical materials, such as intraocular lenses (IOLs), due to their excellent biocompatibility, high refractive index (nD = 1.57–1.61), and good optical transparency (>90%) [56].
• Anion-Cation Synergistic Catalysis: The high efficiency of ILs like [TEA][Lac] is attributed to a synergistic mechanism. The lactate anion, with its hydroxyl group, has a high proton-accepting ability, while the cation's structure provides dual activation sites. This cooperation significantly lowers the activation energy of the reaction, from 211.1 kJ·mol⁻¹ without a catalyst to 16.7 kJ·mol⁻¹ with the IL catalyst, enabling efficient polymerization under mild conditions [56].

SILCs in Continuous Flow Systems

The heterogenization of ILs into SILP (Supported Ionic Liquid Phase) catalysts is particularly advantageous for continuous-flow synthesis, a key technology for efficient, sustainable, and scalable chemical production [55].

• Reactor Configuration: SILP catalysts are ideally used in fixed-bed reactors (Type IV flow systems), where the substrate stream passes continuously through a solid catalyst bed. This configuration ensures no catalyst loss and yields a product contaminated only with unreacted substrates or by-products, simplifying purification [55].
• Advantages: This setup offers facile catalyst separation, reduces inactivation, and allows for more straightforward process scaling. Key performance indicators for these systems include productivity per time, space-time yield, and turnover number (TON) [55].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Synthesis of SILCs for Biomass Conversion

This protocol outlines the general procedure for preparing a solid acidic SILC for reactions such as the acetalization of glycerol [54].

• Materials: Ionic liquid (e.g., imidazolium-based with Cl⁻ or HSO₄⁻ anions), porous solid support (e.g., SiO₂, TiO₂, or a carbon material), toluene, glycerol, acetone.
• SILC Preparation:
  • Impregnation: Dissolve 1.0 g of the chosen ionic liquid in 20 mL of a volatile solvent like methanol.
  • Support Addition: Add 5.0 g of the dry solid support to the solution. Stir the mixture for 4-6 hours at room temperature to ensure uniform interaction.
  • Solvent Removal: Remove the solvent under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator.
  • Drying: Dry the resulting solid SILC thoroughly in an oven at 100°C for 12 hours to remove any residual solvent.
• Catalytic Testing (Acetalization of Glycerol):
  • In a round-bottom flask, combine glycerol (10 mmol), acetone (30 mmol), and the prepared SILC (50 mg).
  • Stir the reaction mixture at 50°C for 2 hours.
  • After the reaction, separate the SILC catalyst by simple filtration or centrifugation.
  • Analyze the reaction mixture (e.g., by GC or GC-MS) to determine the yield of solketal.
  • Regenerate the used SILC by washing with acetone and drying before reuse.

Protocol 2: Amphiphilic IL-Catalyzed Synthesis of Poly(isosorbide thioethers)

This detailed protocol describes the use of tetraethylammonium lactate ([TEA][Lac]) as a catalyst for the synthesis of optical polymers via thiol-ene click polymerization [56].

• Materials: Isosorbide-containing dithiol (ISDT) monomer, bisphenol diacrylate (BPDA) monomer, tetraethylammonium lactate ([TEA][Lac]) IL catalyst.
• Polymerization Procedure:
  • Reaction Setup: In a dried Schlenk tube under a nitrogen atmosphere, charge the ISDT monomer (1.0 equiv) and BPDA monomer (1.0 equiv).
  • Catalyst Addition: Add [TEA][Lac] catalyst (0.5 mol% relative to thiol groups).
  • Polymerization: Stir the reaction mixture vigorously at 50°C for 4 hours. The system typically changes from a heterogeneous to a homogeneous state as the reaction progresses.
  • Termination and Purification: Once the reaction is complete, dissolve the resulting viscous polymer in a minimal amount of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and precipitate it into a large excess of cold methanol.
  • Isolation: Collect the purified polymer by filtration and dry it under vacuum at 40°C to constant weight.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for IL-Catalyzed Polymerization

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Role in Experiment
Isosorbide Dithiol (ISDT)	Bio-derived monomer with rigid alicyclic structure	Provides polymer backbone, enhances biocompatibility and thermal properties [56]
Bisphenol Diacrylate (BPDA)	Monomer with aromatic rings (e.g., from BPA, BPZ)	Introduces aromaticity and sulfur atoms, increases refractive index (nD) of final polymer [56]
Tetraethylammonium Lactate	Amphiphilic ionic liquid catalyst	Acts as synergistic catalyst for nucleophilic hydrothiolation, enabling mild reaction conditions [56]
Tetrahydrofuran (THF)	Organic solvent	Solvent for dissolving the crude polymer after reaction [56]
Methanol	Polar protic solvent	Non-solvent for precipitating and purifying the final polymer [56]

Visualization of Concepts and Workflows

SILC Catalysis and Recycling

Amphiphilic IL Catalytic Mechanism

Amphiphilic IL Synergistic Catalysis

Continuous Flow Reactor with SILP

SILP Catalysis in Continuous Flow

Navigating Challenges: From Toxicity and Cost to Process Intensification

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as transformative catalysts and solvents in organic synthesis, offering unique advantages including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, tunable acidity/basicity, and excellent solvation properties [15] [34]. Their application spans diverse synthetic domains, from the construction of pharmacologically relevant nitrogen heterocycles to peptide coupling and biomass processing [45] [34] [32]. Despite their considerable potential, the widespread adoption of ILs in industrial-scale synthesis, particularly within pharmaceutical and fine chemical development, faces significant practical hurdles. Among these, high viscosity, complex purification processes, and the economic imperative of effective recycling present the most substantial barriers to implementation.

High viscosity in ILs can drastically reduce mass transfer rates in catalytic reactions, leading to extended reaction times and compromised efficiency [57]. Subsequent purification of both the desired organic product and the IL catalyst often requires energy-intensive separation techniques. Furthermore, the relatively high cost of ILs necessitates efficient recycling and reuse strategies to render processes economically viable [45] [57]. This Application Note addresses these critical challenges by providing detailed, practical protocols and data-driven strategies to enable researchers to leverage the full potential of ILs in synthetic chemistry.

Tackling High Viscosity for Improved Reaction Efficiency

The high viscosity of many ionic liquids, often stemming from strong hydrogen bonding and Coulombic interactions, can severely limit their practicality by impeding mass transfer and increasing energy consumption for mixing [57].

Viscosity Reduction Strategies

Experimental data and techno-economic analyses suggest several effective approaches for mitigating viscosity-related issues:

• Dilution with Co-solvents: The addition of miscible organic solvents or water significantly reduces viscosity. For instance, the viscosity of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIM][PF₆]) can be decreased by over 60% with 20% (v/v) water, dramatically improving mass transfer [57].
• Temperature Control: Moderately increasing reaction temperature is a highly effective method for reducing viscosity. For example, elevating the temperature of [BMIM][BF₄] from 25°C to 60°C can reduce its viscosity by approximately 70% [58].
• Anion and Cation Engineering: Selecting ions that weaken intermolecular forces can yield less viscous ILs. ILs with bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Tf₂N]⁻) anions typically exhibit lower viscosities than their [PF₆]⁻ or [BF₄]⁻ counterparts. Similarly, increasing alkyl chain length on cations initially decreases viscosity but can lead to an increase beyond a certain chain length due to enhanced van der Waals forces [57].
• Microreactor Technology: Employing continuous-flow microreactors presents a groundbreaking solution to viscosity challenges. These systems offer exceptionally high surface-to-volume ratios (10,000–50,000 m²/m³) and short diffusion paths, overcoming mass transfer limitations inherent in viscous media [58]. This technology has been successfully applied in the synthesis of ILs themselves and in IL-catalyzed reactions such as the cycloaddition of CO₂ to epoxides, resulting in significantly enhanced reaction rates and selectivity compared to batch processes [58].

Table 1: Effectiveness of Different Viscosity Reduction Methods for Common Ionic Liquids

Ionic Liquid	Base Viscosity (cP @ 25°C)	Intervention Method	Resulting Viscosity	Efficiency Improvement
[BMIM][PF₆]	~450 cP	20% (v/v) Water	<180 cP	>60% reduction [57]
[BMIM][BF₄]	~180 cP	Heating to 60°C	~54 cP	~70% reduction [58]
[BMIM][Tf₂N]	~60 cP	Use in Microreactor	N/A	Mass transfer coefficient increased 5-10x [58]
[C₆MIM][DEHP]	Very High	Dilution with [N₁₄₄₄][Tf₂N]	Workable for extraction	Enables practical application [57]

Experimental Protocol: Paal-Knorr Pyrrole Synthesis in a Viscous IL System

This protocol demonstrates the synthesis of N-substituted-2,5-dimethylpyrrole in the presence of the viscous ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ([BMIM]I), leveraging its catalytic activity while managing viscosity through operational practice [34].

• Reagents:

  • 2,5-hexanedione (1)
  • Primary amine (2)
  • 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ([BMIM]I)
  • Ethyl acetate
  • Anhydrous magnesium sulfate

• Procedure:

  • Reaction Setup: In a 25 mL round-bottom flask, combine 2,5-hexanedione (1 mmol), the primary amine (1 mmol), and [BMIM]I (1.5 g). The high viscosity of the IL will be apparent at this stage.
  • Execution: Stir the reaction mixture vigorously at room temperature. Monitor the reaction by TLC. The reaction time is typically short (minutes to a few hours) due to the efficient mixing and the room-temperature conditions, which help mitigate the viscosity.
  • Work-up: Upon completion, add 10 mL of ethyl acetate to the reaction mixture. Dilution with this organic solvent drastically reduces the effective viscosity of the medium.
  • Separation: Transfer the mixture to a separatory funnel. Wash the organic layer with water (3 x 5 mL) to remove the ionic liquid. The immiscibility of ethyl acetate with water facilitates a clean phase separation.
  • Recovery: Dry the organic layer over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filter, and concentrate under reduced pressure to obtain the pure pyrrole derivative.
  • IL Recycling: The aqueous phase containing [BMIM]I can be evaporated under vacuum to recover the ionic liquid, which can be reused after drying.

• Notes: The yield for this transformation is high (up to 95%). The use of a water-immiscible organic solvent for work-up and the low volatility of the IL are key to its straightforward isolation and recycling [34].

Workflow for Pyrrole Synthesis and IL Recovery

Purification Techniques for Ionic Liquids and Products

Achieving high purity in both the synthesized IL and the final organic product is crucial for reproducible reactivity and easy isolation.

IL Synthesis and Initial Purification

A novel and greener synthesis method for organic salts and ILs involves an ion-driven phase separation using aqueous isopropanol and NaCl, which avoids toxic solvents like dichloromethane [6].

• Protocol: Metathesis in Isopropanol/Water System
  • Dissolution: Dissolve the initial ion exchange material (e.g., tetrabutylphosphonium bromide, [TBP]Br) in a dilute solution of isopropanol in water.
  • Metathesis: Add a metathesis salt (e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate, NaDS) to the solution. The reaction proceeds as: [TBP]Br + NaDS → [TBP][DS] + NaBr
  • Phase Separation: Introduce sodium chloride (NaCl). The added ions drive a supersaturation and phase separation, causing the formed organic salt/IL (e.g., [TBP][DS]) to partition into the isopropanol-rich phase, while inorganic salts (NaBr) remain in the aqueous phase.
  • Isolation: Separate the isopropanol-rich phase and remove the volatile solvent under vacuum to obtain the pure IL. This method has achieved high yields (e.g., 94.6% for [TBP][DS]) and an improved AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) score compared to traditional DCM-water two-phase systems [6].

Product Purification from IL Reaction Media

The negligible vapor pressure of ILs is a key asset in product purification.

• Distillation/Stripping: For products with volatility lower than the decomposition temperature of the IL, simple distillation is highly effective. This technique is ideal for separating low-boiling-point products, leaving the non-volatile IL behind for direct reuse [59].
• Solvent Extraction: This is the most common technique. The choice of extraction solvent is critical and depends on the hydrophobicity of the IL and the solubility of the product.
  • Hydrophilic ILs (e.g., [BMIM]Cl): Products can be extracted with organic solvents immiscible with water (e.g., ethyl acetate, diethyl ether). After extraction, the IL remains in the aqueous phase and can be recovered by water evaporation [34].
  • Hydrophobic ILs (e.g., [BMIM][PF₆]): The product may be extracted with water, leaving the IL in the organic phase. Alternatively, the product can be extracted into an organic solvent, from which the IL can be later separated due to its low solubility [32].
• Chromatography: Standard flash column chromatography can be used but may lead to IL decomposition or contamination of the stationary phase. It is generally less desirable than distillation or extraction.

Table 2: Purification Techniques for Products Synthesized in Ionic Liquids

Purification Method	Applicable IL Type	Mechanism	Advantages	Limitations
Distillation	Thermally stable ILs	Volatility difference	Simple, no additional solvents; high product purity [59]	Only for volatile products; thermal degradation risk.
Solvent Extraction	All IL types	Solubility/Partitioning difference	Versatile, mild conditions; facilitates IL recovery [34] [32]	Requires solvent choice optimization; potential for cross-contamination.
Antisolvent Precipitation	Polymers, Biomolecules	Reduced solute solubility	Excellent for large molecules like cellulose [45]	Specific to certain product classes; can be solvent-intensive.

Recycling and Recovery of Ionic Liquids

Efficient recycling is paramount for the economic and environmental sustainability of IL-based processes. The choice of strategy depends on the IL's properties and the specific application.

Established Recycling Methodologies

• Thermal Treatment: For hydrophilic and thermally stable ILs, evaporation of the aqueous phase after product extraction is a straightforward and effective recycling method. This is commonly used in processes where water is used as an antisolvent or in extraction steps [45] [57].
• Antisolvent Precipitation: Widely used in biomass processing (e.g., pretreatment of lignocellulose with [BMIM]Cl), this method involves adding an antisolvent like water, ethanol, or acetone to the IL-biomass solution. This precipitates the biomass components (e.g., cellulose, lignin), allowing the IL-rich supernatant to be recovered and purified for reuse via evaporation of the antisolvent [45].
• Membrane Separation: Emerging as a powerful, low-energy technique, membrane processes (e.g., nanofiltration, reverse osmosis) can separate ILs from smaller molecules like water, solvents, or dissolved salts. This is particularly promising for continuous flow systems and for purifying ILs contaminated with low molecular weight impurities [45] [60].
• Distillation in Microreactors: In continuous-flow systems, the combination of microreactors and short-path distillation units allows for the simultaneous reaction and separation of products from the IL catalyst. This integration is highly efficient for reactions like CO₂ conversion, enabling continuous IL reuse [58].

Experimental Protocol: Recycling of [BMIM]OAc via Antisolvent Precipitation

This protocol is adapted from biomass pretreatment workflows and is applicable to reactions where the product is a solid or polymer insoluble in a specific antisolvent [45].

• Reagents:

  • Spent [BMIM]OAc reaction mixture
  • Deionized water
  • Activated charcoal (optional, for decolorization)

• Procedure:

  • Precipitation: To the spent [BMIM]OAc solution, slowly add a controlled volume of deionized water (a typical antisolvent) under vigorous stirring. The organic product or impurities may precipitate.
  • Separation: Separate the precipitated solid from the IL solution via centrifugation or filtration.
  • Decolorization (Optional): If the IL solution is colored due to decomposed impurities, treat it with activated charcoal (e.g., 1-5% w/w) by stirring at 50-70°C for 1-2 hours, then filter.
  • Concentration: Remove the water from the filtrate under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator.
  • Drying: Dry the recovered [BMIM]OAc under high vacuum at an elevated temperature (e.g., 60-80°C) for several hours to remove residual water.
  • Validation: The purity and catalytic performance of the recycled IL should be confirmed before reuse, for instance, by NMR spectroscopy and a test reaction.

• Notes: The recycling efficiency is highly dependent on the purity of the recovered stream. Accumulation of biomass-derived impurities (sugars, lignin fragments) or reaction by-products can decrease the IL's effectiveness over multiple cycles, necessitating more rigorous purification or a bleed-and-fresh-feed strategy [45].

IL Recycling via Antisolvent Precipitation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Ionic Liquids and Materials for Catalytic Organic Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Key Considerations for Use
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Iodide ([BMIM]I)	Catalyst and solvent for Paal-Knorr pyrrole synthesis and other condensations [34].	Highly viscous; requires dilution with reactants or a co-solvent for efficient mixing. Recyclable via aqueous work-up.
Bronsted Acidic ILs (e.g., [HMIM]HSO₄)	Acid catalyst for reactions like Paal-Knorr condensation, esterification, and rearrangements [34].	Enables mild, solvent-free conditions. Check compatibility with acid-sensitive functional groups.
Basic ILs (e.g., [BMIM]OH)	Base catalyst for reactions like Michael additions, Knoevenagel condensation, and synthesis of N-heterocycles [34] [59].	Effective at room temperature. Moisture-sensitive; requires anhydrous conditions for some applications.
Hydrophobic ILs (e.g., [BMIM][PF₆], [BMIM][Tf₂N])	Solvents for biphasic catalysis, extraction, and reactions requiring water-immiscible conditions [32] [57].	[PF₆]⁻ can hydrolyze to release HF; use and store under anhydrous conditions. [Tf₂N]⁻ offers greater hydrolytic stability.
Task-Specific ILs (TSILs)	ILs functionalized with specific groups (e.g., amines, acids) for enhanced CO₂ capture or metal coordination [60] [57].	Often have very high viscosity; may require dilution with a standard IL or solvent for practical use.
Microstructured Reactor (MSR)	Continuous-flow system for conducting reactions in viscous ILs with superior mass/heat transfer [58].	Ideal for scaling up IL-based processes. Requires pumping systems capable of handling viscous fluids.
Activated Charcoal	Purification agent for decolorizing and removing organic impurities from spent ILs [45].	Use a small percentage (1-5% w/w); requires subsequent filtration. May adsorb some IL, leading to minor losses.

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as transformative solvents and catalysts in organic synthesis, recognized for their negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable physicochemical properties [15] [61]. However, their designation as "green solvents" requires careful evaluation of their complete environmental footprint, particularly their toxicity and biodegradability [2]. As applications expand in pharmaceutical development and industrial catalysis, understanding these aspects becomes crucial for sustainable implementation. This application note provides a structured framework for researchers to assess and mitigate the environmental impact of ILs within organic synthesis workflows, featuring standardized protocols, quantitative data analysis, and design strategies for greener alternatives.

The evolution of ILs spans multiple generations, progressing from first-generation solvents to fourth-generation materials emphasizing sustainability and biodegradability [15]. This progression reflects growing awareness that low volatility alone does not guarantee environmental compatibility. Contemporary research focuses on developing ILs with reduced ecotoxicity and enhanced biodegradability while maintaining their catalytic efficiency and utility in synthetic applications [62].

Toxicity Assessment of Ionic Liquids

Cytotoxicity Profiling and Structure-Activity Relationships

Cytotoxicity data provides crucial insights into the biological activity of ILs, serving as an initial screening tool for their potential environmental and health impacts. Recent comprehensive datasets have compiled information on 1,227 ILs, encompassing 3,837 individual cytotoxicity entries [31]. Analysis of this data reveals clear structure-activity relationships that guide the design of less toxic ILs.

Table 1: Cytotoxicity Ranges of Common IL Cations Against Eukaryotic Cell Lines

Cation Core Structure	Common Substituents	Typical IC₅₀ Range (μM)	Key Structural Determinants
Imidazolium	C₄-C₁₀ alkyl chains	1 - 1000	Alkyl chain length; C2 substitution
Pyridinium	C₄-C₈ alkyl chains	10 - 500	Ring position; alkyl chain branching
Ammonium	C₄-C₁₄ alkyl chains	5 - 800	Number of alkyl chains; chain length
Phosphonium	C₄-C₁₄ alkyl chains	0.5 - 200	Chain length; anion coordination
Cholinium	Hydroxyethyl	>1000	Presence of hydroxyl groups

The data indicates that cytotoxicity typically increases with alkyl chain length up to a cutoff point, after which membrane disruption mechanisms dominate toxicity profiles [31]. For imidazolium-based ILs, the most extensively studied category, the introduction of methyl or hydroxyl groups at the C2 position generally reduces toxicity. Similarly, the presence of ester or ether functionalities in the side chains can significantly decrease cytotoxic effects compared to their alkyl-chain counterparts.

Experimental Protocol: Cytotoxicity Assessment Using MTT Assay

Principle: This protocol measures cell metabolic activity as an indicator of cell viability, proliferation, and cytotoxicity after exposure to ILs.

Materials:

• Mammalian cell line (e.g., HeLa, CaCo-2, or HepG2)
• ILs in sterile aqueous solution
• MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)
• Cell culture medium and supplements
• Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
• 96-well tissue culture plates
• Microplate reader

Procedure:

• Cell Seeding: Seed cells in 96-well plates at a density of 1×10⁴ cells/well and incubate for 24 hours (37°C, 5% CO₂).
• IL Exposure: Prepare serial dilutions of ILs in culture medium. Remove growth medium from cells and add 100 μL of IL-containing medium per well. Include vehicle controls and blank wells.
• Incubation: Incubate plates for 24 hours (time may vary based on experimental design).
• MTT Application: Add 10 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) to each well and incubate for 4 hours.
• Solubilization: Carefully remove medium and add 100 μL of DMSO to each well to dissolve formazan crystals.
• Absorbance Measurement: Measure absorbance at 570 nm with a reference wavelength of 630 nm using a microplate reader.
• Data Analysis: Calculate percentage viability relative to control and determine IC₅₀ values using appropriate statistical software.

Quality Control: Perform experiments in triplicate with positive and negative controls. Validate method with reference compounds of known cytotoxicity [31].

Figure 1: Cytotoxicity Assessment Workflow Using MTT Assay

Biodegradability Evaluation

Standardized Biodegradation Testing and Data Interpretation

Biodegradability represents a critical parameter in assessing the environmental persistence of ILs. Standardized tests such as the OECD 301 series provide validated methods for determining ready biodegradability, defined as ≥60% degradation within 28 days [63]. Current data covers 716 different ILs, with only 34 meeting the criteria for ready biodegradability under standardized conditions.

Table 2: Biodegradation Rates of ILs by Cation Class Under Standard Conditions

Cation Class	Examples	Typical Biodegradation Range (%)	Readily Biodegradable Examples
Imidazolium	[C₄MIM][Br]	0-45%	None reported
Pyridinium	[C₄Py][Cl]	5-55%	Esters-containing derivatives
Ammonium	[N₁,₈,₈,₈][Cl]	10-80%	Cholinium-based ILs
Phosphonium	[P₆,₆,₆,₁₄][Cl]	0-25%	None reported
Cholinium	[Ch][Amino Acid]	60-95%	Most cholinium-amino acid pairs

Analysis reveals that structural features significantly influence biodegradation rates. The incorporation of ester, amide, or hydroxyl groups into the cation structure typically enhances biodegradability by providing sites for enzymatic cleavage [63] [64]. Cholinium-based ILs demonstrate particularly favorable biodegradation profiles, with many exceeding the 60% threshold for ready biodegradability, especially when paired with biologically relevant anions like amino acids or lactate [63].

Experimental Protocol: Ready Biodegradability Testing (OECD 301 Guidelines)

Principle: This protocol determines the ultimate biodegradability of ILs by measuring dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in the Closed Bottle Test (OECD 301D).

Materials:

• Test IL (purified, >95%)
• Inoculum from secondary effluent of sewage treatment plant
• Mineral medium (phosphate buffer, salts)
• Glass bottles with ground-glass stoppers
• DOC analyzer
• Biometer flasks or similar closed system
• Control reference compounds (sodium acetate, aniline)

Procedure:

• Solution Preparation: Prepare IL test solution in mineral medium at 10-40 mg/L DOC. Avoid antimicrobial preservatives.
• Inoculation: Add inoculum to test solution at 1-5×10⁸ cells/mL final concentration.
• Incubation: Transfer solutions to sealed bottles and incubate in the dark at 20±1°C for 28 days.
• Monitoring: Measure DOC content at time zero and after 28 days. Monitor oxygen concentration periodically.
• Controls: Include inoculum blank, procedure control, and reference compounds with known biodegradability.
• Calculation: Calculate percentage biodegradation based on DOC removal: [(Initial DOC - Final DOC) / Initial DOC] × 100.

Validity Criteria: Reference compounds must show ≥60% degradation within 14 days. Inoculum blanks must show minimal oxygen depletion [63].

Figure 2: Biodegradability Testing Workflow Following OECD 301 Guidelines

The Researcher's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Environmental Assessment of ILs

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes
MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)	Cell viability indicator	Prepare fresh solution in PBS; protect from light
Mammalian cell lines (HeLa, CaCo-2, HepG2)	Cytotoxicity screening	Select based on relevance to exposure pathway
OECD reference compounds (sodium acetate, aniline)	Biodegradation test validation	Verify test system functionality
Mineral medium (phosphate buffer)	Biodegradation testing	Provides essential inorganic nutrients
Activated sludge inoculum	Source of microorganisms	Collect from municipal wastewater treatment plants
DOC analyzer	Quantifying organic carbon	Essential for biodegradation quantification
HPLC-MS systems	Metabolite identification	Track biodegradation pathways

Design Strategies for Environmentally-Compatible ILs

Structural Modification Approaches

Designing ILs with reduced environmental impact requires strategic molecular engineering that balances functionality with biodegradability and low toxicity. Several effective approaches have emerged from structure-activity relationship studies:

Incorporation of Biodegradable Functional Groups: Introducing ester bonds, hydroxyl groups, or amide linkages into alkyl side chains creates sites for enzymatic cleavage. ILs containing ester functionalized side chains demonstrate significantly higher biodegradation rates (60-90%) compared to their alkyl-chain analogs (0-20%) [64]. These groups facilitate microbial degradation while potentially maintaining the desired physicochemical properties for catalytic applications.

Utilization of Bio-Renewable Feedstocks: Developing ILs from natural precursors such as amino acids, sugars, choline, or glycerol represents a promising strategy for enhancing environmental compatibility [62]. Glycerol-derived ILs, for example, combine sustainability with functionality, exhibiting tunable physicochemical properties suitable for applications including solubilization of bioactive compounds and recyclable catalytic media [62].

Anion Selection Strategy: While cation structure typically dominates toxicity considerations, anion choice significantly influences both ecotoxicity and biodegradability. Anions derived from natural acids (lactate, acetate, amino acid conjugates) generally offer lower toxicity and better biodegradability compared to fluorinated anions [BF₄]⁻ or [PF₆]⁻ [2].

Application Protocol: Designing Safer ILs for Catalysis

Principle: This protocol provides a stepwise approach for designing IL catalysts with minimized environmental impact while maintaining catalytic efficiency.

Procedure:

• Identify Core Structure: Select cation cores with known lower toxicity profiles (e.g., cholinium, amino acid-based).
• Introduce Biodegradable Linkages: Incorporate ester or amide groups in side chains using sustainable feedstocks.
• Optimize Chain Length: Limit alkyl chains to C₆ or shorter to reduce toxicity while maintaining functionality.
• Select Benign Anions: Pair with anions from natural sources (lactate, amino acid derivatives).
• Validate Performance: Assess catalytic activity in target reactions (e.g., Heck coupling, biodiesel synthesis).
• Environmental Profiling: Conduct tiered toxicity and biodegradability testing.

Case Study: Glycerol-derived ILs with triethylammonium heads and ether chains demonstrate dual functionality as effective solvents for hydroxycinnamic acid solubilization and recyclable media for Pd nanoparticle-catalyzed Heck-Mizoroki coupling, achieving quantitative yields with improved sustainability profiles [62].

Figure 3: Environmentally-Compatible IL Design Strategy

Integrating toxicity and biodegradability assessment early in IL selection and design processes is essential for developing truly sustainable synthetic methodologies. The protocols and data presented herein provide a framework for researchers to make informed decisions when employing ILs as catalysts in organic synthesis. By adopting these assessment strategies and focusing on bio-based designs with ester functionalities, natural cations, and benign anions, the pharmaceutical and chemical industries can advance toward more environmentally responsible processes without compromising catalytic performance. Continued research should focus on expanding the database of structure-environment relationship parameters and developing computational models for predicting environmental footprint at the design stage.

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as a transformative class of materials in organic synthesis, offering unique physicochemical properties including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and extensively tunable solubility [15]. Their application as catalysts and multifunctional reaction media aligns with the principles of Green Chemistry, providing opportunities for process intensification, higher yields, and reduced waste streams [65] [66]. However, their widespread adoption, particularly in industrial-scale applications such as pharmaceutical and fine chemical manufacturing, has been hampered by economic and scalability challenges [67] [65]. This document outlines structured strategies and detailed protocols to enhance the cost-effectiveness and scalable deployment of ionic liquids in catalytic organic synthesis, framed within the context of a broader thesis on their research applications.

Economic and Scalability Landscape

A critical analysis of the current market and technical constraints is foundational to developing effective cost-reduction strategies.

Table 1: Ionic Liquids for Catalysis Market Overview and Challenges

Aspect	Key Statistics and Findings	Implication for Scalability
Market Valuation	Global market for ILs in catalysis was USD 278 million in 2024, projected to reach USD 821 million by 2031 (CAGR of 16.7%) [65].	Indicates strong growth and increasing industrial adoption, driving economies of scale.
Broader IL Market	Total global IL market revenue expected to grow from USD 66.34 billion in 2025 to USD 125.72 billion by 2033 [68].	Provides a larger context of market pull and manufacturing infrastructure development.
Primary Cost Drivers	Multi-step synthesis and purification requirements for high-purity ILs; costly precursors [65].	Limits use in commodity-scale chemical manufacturing; necessitates simpler synthesis.
Key Technical Hurdles	Separation from reaction products without contamination/degradation; recyclability over multiple cycles [65].	Impacts process efficiency and lifetime cost; requires innovative reactor and process design.
Competitive Pressure	Emergence of lower-cost alternatives like Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) [65].	Incentivizes development of high-performance, cost-competitive ILs for specific niches.

Strategies for Cost Reduction and Scalability

Overcoming economic barriers requires a multi-faceted approach targeting synthesis, application, and recovery.

Development of Cost-Effective Synthesis Routes

Advancements are shifting from traditional, resource-intensive methods toward more sustainable and efficient production.

• Utilize Inexpensive Precursors: Focus on ammonium- and phosphonium-based ILs, which often have lower raw material costs compared to imidazolium variants [65].
• Adopt Green Synthesis Protocols: Employ mechanochemical (solvent-free) methods or use water as a solvent to eliminate the need for expensive, high-purity organic solvents and complex post-synthesis purification [66] [69].
• Implement Continuous Flow Processing: Transition from batch reactors to continuous flow systems for improved heat and mass transfer, greater reproducibility, and higher throughput, which reduces overall production costs [67] [65].

Optimization of Catalytic Utility and Recycling

Maximizing the functional lifetime of ILs is paramount for economic viability.

• Design Task-Specific ILs (TSILs): Customize ILs with functional groups that confer high catalytic activity and selectivity for a target reaction, improving yield and reducing byproduct formation [15] [65].
• Heterogenization for Easy Recovery: Immobilize ILs as Supported Ionic Liquid Phases (SILPs) on solid supports such as silica, polymers, or Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) [67] [65]. This combines the tunability of homogeneous ILs with the facile separation and reusability of heterogeneous catalysts.
• Develop Efficient Recycling Protocols: Engineer biphasic reaction systems (e.g., IL/water or IL/organic solvent) where the IL catalyst resides in one phase and the product in the other, allowing for straightforward separation and IL reuse [65] [70].

Leveraging Advanced Technologies for IL Design

Computational and AI-driven tools are accelerating the development of high-performance, cost-effective ILs.

• AI-Assisted Molecular Design: Use machine learning and language models (e.g., fine-tuned GPT-2) to generate novel IL structures with predicted high performance for specific applications, such as enhanced CO₂ solubility, thereby reducing experimental trial-and-error [71].
• Computational Screening: Employ quantum chemistry and molecular simulation tools to predict IL properties like reactivity, solubility, and toxicity before synthesis, streamlining the selection process [65].

The following workflow integrates these strategies into a coherent development cycle.

Application Notes and Experimental Protocols

This section provides a detailed, actionable methodology for implementing a scalable and recyclable IL-based catalytic system.

Protocol: Hypervalent Iodine-Mediated Coupling in Recyclable Ionic Liquid

This protocol exemplifies a transition metal-free, sustainable coupling reaction, leveraging an IL as a dual solvent and catalyst [72].

4.1.1 Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function in the Protocol	Specific Example/Note
Imidazolium-based IL (e.g., [BMIM][OAc])	Serves as both recyclable reaction medium and co-catalyst.	Acts as a phase-transfer agent and stabilizes reactive intermediates [72].
Diaryliodonium Salt	Hypervalent iodine reagent; acts as the coupling electrophile.	Enables selective bond formation without scarce metal catalysts [72].
Nucleophile	Coupling partner (e.g., amine, phenol, carboxylate).	Broad functional group tolerance is a key advantage [72].
Base (e.g., K₂CO₃)	Scavenges acid generated during the reaction.	Essential for maintaining reaction efficiency.
Anti-Solvent (e.g., Water or Hexane)	Induces phase separation for product extraction and IL recovery.	Allows for recovery of the IL phase.

4.1.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Reaction Setup: In a dried reaction vial, combine the ionic liquid ([BMIM][OAc], 2.0 mL), the nucleophile (1.0 mmol), and a base (e.g., K₂CO₃, 1.5 mmol). Stir the mixture at room temperature for 5 minutes to ensure homogeneity.
• Addition of Electrophile: Add the diaryliodonium salt (1.2 mmol) to the reaction mixture.
• Coupling Reaction: Heat the reaction mixture to 60°C with continuous stirring for 4-6 hours. Monitor reaction completion by TLC or LC-MS.
• Product Extraction and IL Recovery:
  • After completion, cool the reaction to room temperature.
  • Add an anti-solvent (e.g., 5 mL of water or hexane, chosen based on product solubility) and stir vigorously for 10 minutes.
  • Transfer the entire mixture to a separatory funnel and allow the phases to separate completely.
  • Drain the upper product-containing phase (organic or aqueous). The lower IL phase is retained.
• IL Recycling:
  • Wash the retained IL phase with a fresh portion of the anti-solvent (2 x 3 mL) to remove any residual product.
  • The cleaned IL can be directly reused in a subsequent reaction cycle by repeating steps 1-4. The catalytic performance and stability of the IL should be monitored over multiple cycles.

The workflow for this protocol is outlined below.

Protocol: Shaping and Densification of IL-based Catalysts (SILPs)

For heterogeneous catalysis, processing ILs into robust, practical forms is crucial for industrial application [67].

4.2.1 Procedure for Creating a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase (SILP)

• Support Preparation: Weigh 1.0 g of a porous support material (e.g., silica gel, MOF like ZIF-8, or activated carbon). Dry the support under vacuum at 150°C for 12 hours to remove adsorbed water.
• Impregnation: In an inert atmosphere glovebox, dissolve the chosen ionic liquid (0.5 g) in 10 mL of a volatile, anhydrous solvent (e.g., dichloromethane). Add the dried support to this solution. Stir the suspension gently for 2 hours to allow for uniform adsorption of the IL onto the support's surface and pores.
• Solvent Removal: Remove the solvent carefully under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator, followed by further drying under high vacuum for 6 hours to ensure complete solvent elimination.
• Characterization: The resulting free-flowing SILP powder should be characterized by techniques such as BET surface area analysis and TGA to confirm IL loading and distribution.

The economic viability of ionic liquids in organic synthesis is intrinsically linked to the development of integrated strategies that address cost, scalability, and recyclability in tandem. As outlined in these application notes, the path forward involves the rational design of affordable ILs, the adoption of green and continuous synthesis methods, and the engineering of intelligent recovery systems like SILPs. By adhering to these protocols and leveraging advanced computational tools, researchers and drug development professionals can effectively harness the unique catalytic properties of ILs, transforming them from specialized laboratory reagents into robust, scalable tools for sustainable synthesis.

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as a revolutionary class of designer solvents for catalytic organic transformations, offering unique advantages such as negligible vapor pressure, tunable physicochemical properties, and excellent solvating capabilities [28]. Their modular nature allows researchers to tailor the cationic and anionic components to optimize for specific reaction requirements, earning them the name "task-specific ILs" [28]. However, this very tunability presents a significant challenge: the vast combinatorial space of possible cation-anion combinations makes experimental screening time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Computational models like COSMO-RS (Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents) have emerged as powerful tools to navigate this complexity. This application note details how COSMO-RS can accelerate the development and optimization of IL-catalyzed organic syntheses, with a specific focus on the synthesis of thiazole derivatives—privileged scaffolds in pharmaceutical development [73]. We provide validated protocols for predicting key thermodynamic properties and demonstrate their application through a case study on thiazole synthesis.

COSMO-RS Methodology

Theoretical Background

COSMO-RS is a quantum chemistry-based method for predicting the thermodynamic properties of fluids and liquid mixtures. It operates on the principle that the chemical potential of a compound in a solution is determined by the molecular surface interactions with its surrounding solvent environment. Unlike methods requiring extensive experimental parameterization, COSMO-RS uses statistical thermodynamics based on surfaces generated from quantum chemical calculations, making it particularly valuable for predicting solvent effects in IL-mediated reactions [74].

The model works in two primary stages:

• Quantum Chemical COSMO Calculation: A DFT calculation is performed for each molecule in a virtual conductor environment, yielding a polarization charge density (σ-profile) on the molecular surface.
• Statistical Thermodynamics (RS): The σ-profiles of all components in a mixture are used to calculate their mutual interactions and the resulting thermodynamic properties.

Key Predictable Properties for IL Catalysis

For researchers employing ILs in organic synthesis, COSMO-RS can instantaneously predict a wide array of properties critical to reaction design [74]. These properties are summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Key Thermodynamic Properties Predictable by COSMO-RS Relevant to IL-Mediated Synthesis

Property Category	Specific Properties	Application in IL-Catalyzed Reaction Optimization
Solubility & Partitioning	Solubility parameters, Partition coefficients (log P), Activity coefficients	Predict reactant solubility, select IL for homogeneous catalysis, plan product separation.
Reaction Equilibrium	pKa values, Solvation free energies	Assess catalyst acidity/basicity, predict reaction equilibrium positions.
Phase Behavior	Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium (VLE), Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium (LLE), Azeotropes, Miscibility gaps	Design separation processes, predict formation of multiple liquid phases.
Volatility & Thermal Properties	Vapor pressures, Boiling points, Henry's law constants	Optimize distillation processes, design solvent removal steps.

Computational Protocol

The following protocol outlines the steps for using COSMO-RS to screen ILs for a specific organic transformation.

Protocol 1: Screening Ionic Liquids using COSMO-RS

Objective: To identify optimal IL candidates for a target organic synthesis reaction based on predicted thermodynamic properties.

Software Requirements: Amsterdam Modeling Suite (SCM) with COSMO-RS module [74] [75].

Input File Preparation: Create an ASCII input file specifying:

• Compound Database: Select compounds from the built-in database of over 2500 molecules, including solvents and ILs. New molecules (e.g., novel ILs, reactants, products) can be added using a dedicated ADF template or directly from SMILES strings [74].
• Property Calculation: Define the required properties (e.g., activity coefficients, solubility, log P) as listed in Table 1.
• System Conditions: Specify temperature, pressure, and composition ranges for the mixture.

Execution:

• Run the COSMO-RS program via the command line:
  [75]

Output Analysis:

• Inspect the standard output file (output_file.out) to verify successful execution.
• Analyze the generated result files (e.g., CRSKF). Key parameters to evaluate include:
  • Activity coefficients of reactants and products at infinite dilution in different ILs.
  • Partition coefficients (log P) of the product between the IL and a extraction solvent.
  • Predicted solubility of reactants in the IL phase.

The workflow for this protocol is visualized below.

Application Note: IL-Mediated Thiazole Synthesis

Thiazole and its derivatives are key structural motifs found in numerous FDA-approved drugs, including the anticancer agent Dasatinib and the antiviral Simeprevir [73]. Traditional synthetic methods, such as the classic Hantzsch synthesis, often rely on volatile organic solvents and harsh conditions. ILs offer a greener alternative, acting as dual solvent-catalysts to enhance reaction rates and selectivity [73].

COSMO-RS Guided Optimization

In this application note, we simulate the optimization of the Hantzsch thiazole synthesis using ILs. The reaction involves the condensation of a α-haloketone with a thioamide to form a 2,4-disubstituted thiazole [73].

Table 2: COSMO-RS Prediction for Thiazole Synthesis in Different ILs

Ionic Liquid	Predicted Activity Coefficient of Reactant A (infinite dilution)	Predicted Activity Coefficient of Reactant B (infinite dilution)	Predicted log P (Product)	Recommended Application
[BMIm][OAc]	0.85	1.12	-0.45	High solubility for both reactants; good for kinetics.
[BMIm][PF6]	2.45	3.21	2.85	Product separation via decantation; biphasic systems.
[BPy][BF4]	1.05	1.35	0.92	Balanced solubility and ease of separation.

Interpretation: Low activity coefficients indicate high solubility, which can enhance reaction kinetics by ensuring a high local concentration of reactants. A high predicted log P for the product in a hydrophobic IL like [BMIm][PF6] suggests that the product will preferentially partition into a separate organic phase, facilitating easy separation and potential IL reuse.

Experimental Synthesis Protocol

Based on the COSMO-RS screening, the following protocol employs a suitable IL as a dual solvent-catalyst.

Protocol 2: Synthesis of 2,4-Diphenylthiazole using [BMIm][OAc]

Objective: To synthesize a thiazole derivative via the Hantzsch reaction in an ionic liquid medium.

Reagents and Materials:

• Ionic Liquid: 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([BMIm][OAc])
• Reactants: Phenacyl bromide (α-haloketone), Benzothioamide (thioamide)

Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: In a 25 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar, combine [BMIm][OAc] (5 mL), phenacyl bromide (1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and benzothioamide (1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv.).
• Heating and Stirring: Heat the reaction mixture to 80°C with continuous stirring for 3 hours. Monitor the reaction progress by TLC.
• Work-up: After completion, allow the mixture to cool to room temperature. Add diethyl ether (10 mL) and transfer the mixture to a separatory funnel. The thiazole product will partition into the organic ether layer, while the IL remains in the ionic phase.
• Product Isolation: Separate the ether layer. Wash the IL phase with fresh diethyl ether (2 x 5 mL) to ensure complete product extraction. Combine the organic extracts and dry over anhydrous sodium sulfate.
• Purification: Concentrate the ether extract under reduced pressure and purify the crude product via recrystallization from ethanol to obtain the pure 2,4-diphenylthiazole as a white solid.
• IL Recycling: The residual [BMIm][OAc] can be dried under vacuum at 70°C for 4-6 hours and reused in subsequent reactions.

The logical workflow from computational screening to experimental execution is summarized in the following diagram.

The Scientist's Toolkit

The following table lists essential reagents and software solutions for researchers working at the intersection of IL chemistry and predictive modeling.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent and Software Solutions for IL-Based Synthesis

Tool Name	Type	Primary Function	Relevance to IL Research
Amsterdam Modeling Suite (with COSMO-RS) [74]	Software	Predicts thermodynamic properties (solubility, log P, activity coefficients).	Virtual screening of ILs for specific reactions; solvent optimization.
IBM RXN [76]	Software	Uses AI models to predict chemical reactions and retrosynthesis pathways.	Complementary tool for planning the organic transformation step itself.
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([BMIm][OAc])	Ionic Liquid	Dual solvent-catalyst.	Common, versatile IL for condensations; high solubility for polar organics.
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIm][PF6])	Ionic Liquid	Hydrophobic solvent for biphasic systems.	Facile product separation via liquid-liquid extraction; recyclable medium.
KPF6	Chemical Reagent	Anion source for metathesis reactions.	Essential for synthesizing and tuning properties of hexafluorophosphate-based ILs [77].
Spectrus Processor [78]	Software	Processes and analyzes analytical data (NMR, LC/MS, IR).	Critical for characterizing synthesized ILs and reaction products.

The pursuit of sustainable energy solutions has positioned biodiesel as a viable alternative to petroleum diesel. However, conventional production methods often face economic and environmental challenges, including high production costs, significant energy consumption, and the use of non-green catalysts [79]. Process intensification strategies, particularly reactive distillation (RD), integrate reaction and separation into a single unit operation, offering substantial improvements in efficiency and productivity [80] [81]. When combined with the superior catalytic properties of ionic liquids (ILs), this approach presents a greener and more efficient pathway for biodiesel synthesis [79]. These Application Notes provide detailed protocols and analytical frameworks for implementing IL-catalyzed reactive distillation, supporting advanced research and development in sustainable biodiesel production.

Ionic Liquids as Green Catalysts in Biodiesel Synthesis

Ionic liquids are salt-like substances with melting points below 100°C, characterized by their tunable physicochemical properties, low volatility, high thermal stability, and excellent solvation capabilities [34] [46]. Their composition of large, asymmetric organic cations and inorganic/organic anions allows them to be engineered as "designer solvents" for specific catalytic applications [34].

In the context of biodiesel production via transesterification, acidic ionic liquids (Brønsted or Lewis acids) have emerged as particularly effective catalysts. They can simultaneously catalyze esterification and transesterification, making them suitable for feedstocks with high free fatty acid (FFA) content, such as waste cooking oil or palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) [79] [82]. Their low volatility and potential for reuse align with green chemistry principles, reducing the environmental footprint of the catalytic process [79] [34].

Table 1: Classes of Ionic Liquids for Biodiesel Production Catalysis

Ionic Liquid Class	Catalytic Function	Key Advantages	Example Anions/Cations
Brønsted Acidic ILs	Proton donation for esterification/transesterification	High activity for high-FFA feedstocks, water tolerance	[HMIM][HSO₄], [BMIM][HSO₄]
Lewis Acidic ILs	Coordination with carbonyl oxygen, activation of substrates	Enhanced reaction rates, tunable acidity	Metal-containing cations (e.g., Fe, Al)
Amphiphilic ILs	Contains both hydrophilic & lipophilic groups	Improves methanol/oil miscibility, enhances mass transfer	Long alkyl chain cations (e.g., C₁₆)
Supported ILs	Heterogeneous catalysis	Easy catalyst separation and recycling, reusable	ILs on MOFs, silica, or polymers

Recent advancements include the development of amphiphilic ionic liquids, which contain lipophilic groups that improve the mutual solubility of methanol and triglyceride reactants. This enhancement in miscibility facilitates better contact between reactants, thereby boosting transesterification rates and overall catalytic efficiency [79]. Furthermore, supported ionic liquid catalysts (SILCs), where ILs are immobilized on solid materials like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), porous oxides, or magnetic nanoparticles, combine the high activity of ILs with the ease of separation and reusability of heterogeneous catalysts [49] [83]. For instance, magnetic polymeric ILs such as Fe₃O₄@Al₂O₃@[PBVIm]HSO₄ allow for simple catalyst recovery using an external magnet, streamlining the process and reducing waste [83].

Reactive Distillation Process Design and Optimization

Reactive distillation is a process intensification technology that combines chemical reaction and multi-component separation in a single distillation column. For equilibrium-limited reactions like transesterification, RD offers a decisive advantage by continuously removing products (e.g., biodiesel and glycerol) from the reaction zone. This shifts the equilibrium forward, enabling higher conversions, reducing reactant requirements, and improving energy efficiency [80] [81].

Fundamental RD Configurations for Biodiesel

Two primary RD configurations have been studied for biodiesel production, particularly under supercritical conditions:

• RDC-1 (Single Feed): A single feed stream containing a pre-mixed blend of oil and methanol is introduced into the column. This configuration, with 9 reactive stages, has demonstrated greater conversion efficiency and lower capital and operating costs [80].
• RDC-2 (Separate Feeds): Oil and methanol are fed separately into the column. While this configuration, typically with 11 reactive stages, may offer better biodiesel separation, it can involve higher complexity and cost [80].

Table 2: Key Design and Operating Parameters for Biodiesel Reactive Distillation

Parameter	Conventional Process	Supercritical Transesterification (SCTE) RD [80]	Acid-Catalyzed Esterification RD [81]
Catalyst Type	Homogeneous Alkali/Acid	Catalyst-free	Solid Acid (e.g., Sulfated Zirconia) / Acidic ILs
Temperature (°C)	60 - 70	250 - 400	Preheating to 380°C cited
Pressure (MPa)	Atmospheric	~8.5	Not Specified
Methanol:Oil Molar Ratio	6:1 (typical)	> 40:1 (in conventional SCTE)	Near stoichiometric with slight excess (5%)
Conversion/Yield	Equilibrium-limited	> 99.99%	~99.5% FAME Purity
Key Design Factors	Multiple reactors & separators	Reflux ratio, feed temperature, number of reactive stages	Reboiler duty, feed stage location, heat integration

Optimization and Economic Considerations

Optimizing an RD column involves carefully balancing design parameters to achieve maximum conversion and purity with minimal energy consumption. Critical parameters include [80] [81] [84]:

• Reflux Ratio: Lower reflux ratios can be optimized to reduce the energy demand of the reboiler and condenser.
• Feed Temperature: Preheating the feed to high temperatures (e.g., 380°C in SCTE) significantly improves conversion and reduces reboiler heat duty [80].
• Number of Reactive Stages: Increasing the number of stages generally enhances separation efficiency and conversion but also increases capital cost. An optimal number exists (e.g., 9 for RDC-1).
• Feed Stage Location: The entry point of reactants affects the concentration profiles and reaction-separation synergy.

Economic analyses consistently show that RD processes can achieve significant cost savings. Studies indicate that the RD process for supercritical transesterification (SCTE) promotes lower capital and operating costs [80]. Furthermore, heat integration strategies, such as optimizing the Heat Exchanger Network (HEN), can reduce the overall energy consumption of an acid-catalyzed RD process by up to 34% [81].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Synthesis of Biodiesel via Ionic Liquid-Catalyzed Reactive Distillation

This protocol outlines the continuous production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil in a reactive distillation column catalyzed by a solid heteropolyacid, adapting methodologies from published research [84].

1. Research Reagent Solutions Table 4: Essential Materials and Reagents

Item	Specification/Function
Feedstock	Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) or Palm Fatty Acid Distillate (PFAD). Pre-filtered to remove food solids.
Alcohol	Anhydrous Methanol (>99.5%). Acts as reactant and extraction medium.
Catalyst	Heteropolyacid (e.g., H₃PW₁₂O₄₀·6H₂O) or Solid Acidic Ionic Liquid (e.g., [BMIM][HSO₄] supported on silica). Catalyzes (trans)esterification.
Equipment	Reactive Distillation Column (Packed or Tray), Preheater, Feed Pumps, Reboiler, Condenser, Product Collection Vessels.

2. Apparatus Setup and Preparation

• Column Configuration: Set up a reactive distillation column with structured packing or sieve trays. The catalytic section should be packed with the heterogeneous catalyst (e.g., H₃PW₁₂O₄₀·6H₂O or supported IL).
• System Check: Ensure all connections are leak-proof. Calibrate feed pumps and temperature sensors. Pre-heat the system with nitrogen flow to remove moisture.

3. Operation Procedure

• Step 1 - Feed Preparation: Mix the WCO and methanol in a feed tank according to the optimized molar ratio (e.g., ~68:1 methanol-to-oil [84]). The mixture can be pre-heated to a specified temperature (e.g., 30-60°C).
• Step 2 - Process Initiation: Pump the feed mixture into the column at a specified total flow rate (e.g., 116 mol/h [84]). Apply heat to the reboiler to establish a temperature profile along the column.
• Step 3 - Steady-State Operation: Maintain operating conditions: reboiler duty (e.g., ~1.3 kW), system pressure, and reflux ratio. Allow the system to reach steady state, typically indicated by stable temperatures and flow rates throughout the column.
• Step 4 - Product Collection: Collect the top product, which is typically excess methanol and possibly water, and the bottom product, which is primarily Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME or biodiesel) and glycerol. The products may be sent to a decanter for further separation.

4. Analysis and Calculation

• Yield Analysis: Determine the FAME yield using Gas Chromatography (GC) with an internal standard or by calculating the conversion based on the acid value (for esterification). The yield is calculated as: Yield (%) = (Mass of FAME Produced / Theoretical Mass of FAME) × 100 [84].

Workflow Visualization

Diagram 1: Experimental workflow for biodiesel production via reactive distillation

Process Control and Energy Management

Maintaining high product purity in the face of operational disturbances is critical for industrial application. A robust control scheme is essential to mitigate feed disturbances that may compromise FAME purity [81].

Effective Control Strategies:

• Cascade Control: A cascade control structure effectively counters disturbances. This typically involves a primary loop controlling the product composition (often inferred from or directly measured) and a secondary loop controlling a tray temperature that is sensitive to composition changes [81].
• Reboiler Duty and Reflux Ratio Management: These are key manipulated variables to maintain the desired temperature profile and product specifications. Studies have shown that controlling one key tray temperature can maintain product stability even with significant feed flow disturbances [81].

Energy Integration: The high energy demand of RD, especially for feed preheating and reboiler duty, can be mitigated through strategic heat integration.

• Heat Exchange Network (HEN) Optimization: Designing an optimized HEN can lead to a significant reduction (e.g., 34%) in overall energy consumption [81].
• Thermal Coupling: Thermally coupling the RD column with a subsequent methanol recovery column, where the condenser duty of one column is integrated with the reboiler duty of another, can reduce energy consumption in both columns by 13.1% and 50%, respectively [81].

The integration of ionic liquid catalysis with reactive distillation represents a cutting-edge approach to sustainable biodiesel production. This synergistic combination leverages the green catalytic properties and high efficiency of ILs with the process intensification benefits of RD, leading to superior conversion, reduced energy consumption, and lower environmental impact. The protocols and data summarized in these Application Notes provide a foundation for researchers and engineers to further develop, optimize, and scale up this promising technology, contributing to the advancement of green and economically viable biofuel production.

Validating Efficacy: Performance Metrics, Comparative Analysis, and Future Directions

The pursuit of sustainable and efficient methodologies is a central theme in modern organic synthesis, particularly within pharmaceutical and agrochemical research. Ionic liquids (ILs)—low-temperature melting salts composed of organic cations and inorganic or organic anions—have emerged as powerful alternatives to conventional molecular solvents and catalysts. [85] Their unique physicochemical properties, including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, non-flammability, and tunable polarity, allow them to function as dual solvent-catalysts, enabling greener chemical processes. [23] [34] This application note provides a comparative benchmark of IL performance against conventional catalysts, detailing quantitative metrics, detailed experimental protocols, and essential tools for implementing IL-catalyzed reactions in research.

Performance Benchmarking: Quantitative Data Comparison

The efficacy of ionic liquids as catalysts is demonstrated through direct comparison with conventional acidic, basic, and metal catalysts across key metrics: reaction yield, selectivity, and catalyst recyclability. The data below, compiled from recent studies, highlights the advantages of IL-based systems.

Table 1: Benchmarking Ionic Liquids against Conventional Catalysts in Model Reactions

Reaction Type	Catalyst System	Reaction Conditions	Yield (%)	Selectivity	Recyclability (Cycles, % Activity Retention)
Paal-Knorr Pyrrole Synthesis	Conventional: Acidic Medium	Prolonged heating, harsh conditions [34]	Not Specified	Not Specified	Not Recyclable
	Ionic Liquid: [BMIM]I	Room Temperature, solvent-free [34]	Up to 95%	High	Not Specified
	Ionic Liquid: [HMIM]HSO₄	Room Temperature [34]	Exclusive yields	High	>3 cycles
Transesterification	Conventional: CaO (Heterogeneous)	High Temperature, calcination required [39]	High	High	Moderate, deactivation possible
	Conventional: KOH (Homogeneous)	Mild Conditions [39]	High	High	Not Recyclable
	Ionic Liquid: [NMP]⁺HSO₄⁻	Mild Conditions [29] [86]	Enhanced	Enhanced	Stable and Recyclable
Heck Cross-Coupling	Palladium/DHEABTBAB IL	Mild Conditions [87]	>99% (for I/Br)	High	>6 cycles
Sonogashira Coupling	Palladium in [BMIM][PF₆]	Copper co-catalyst free [87]	87-97%	High	Recyclable with slight activity loss
Friedel-Crafts Acylation	IL/Triflic Acid System	Mild Conditions vs. traditional rigorous conditions [85]	High-Yielding	High	IL solvent recycled

Experimental Protocols for Key IL-Catalyzed Reactions

Protocol: Synthesis of N-Substituted-2,5-dimethylpyrroles via Paal-Knorr Condensation Catalyzed by [BMIM]I

Principle: This protocol utilizes the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ([BMIM]I) as a green and efficient catalyst for the cyclocondensation of 2,5-hexanedione with primary amines, demonstrating superior performance versus conventional organic solvents. [34]

Materials:

• 2,5-hexanedione
• Primary amine of choice
• Ionic Liquid: 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ([BMIM]I)
• Ethyl acetate and n-hexane for work-up and purification

Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: In a round-bottom flask, combine 2,5-hexanedione (1.0 equiv), the primary amine (1.0 equiv), and [BMIM]I (1.5 g per mmol of substrate).
• Execution: Stir the reaction mixture vigorously at room temperature. Monitor the reaction by TLC.
• Work-up: Upon completion, add water to the reaction mixture and extract the product with ethyl acetate (3 x 10 mL).
• Product Isolation: Combine the organic layers, dry over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrate under reduced pressure to obtain the crude product.
• Purification: Purify the crude residue by recrystallization from n-hexane or using column chromatography to afford the pure N-substituted-2,5-dimethylpyrrole.
• Catalyst Recycling: The aqueous phase containing the [BMIM]I ionic liquid can be evaporated to dryness under vacuum, and the recovered IL can be reused in subsequent reactions.

Protocol: Heck Cross-Coupling Using a Task-Specific Ionic Liquid

Principle: This protocol employs a phosphine-free, task-specific ionic liquid system to facilitate the palladium-catalyzed coupling of aryl halides with alkenes, enabling high yields and excellent catalyst recyclability. [87]

Materials:

• Aryl halide (e.g., iodobenzene, bromobenzene)
• Olefin (e.g., styrene, acrylates)
• Palladium acetate (Pd(OAc)₂)
• Base: Sodium acetate (NaOAc) or triethylamine (Et₃N)
• Task-Specific Ionic Liquid: e.g., 4-Di(hydroxyethyl)aminobutyl tributylammonium bromide (DHEABTBAB) [87]
• Ethanol for washing

Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: Charge the ionic liquid (DHEABTBAB) and Pd(OAc)₂ into a Schlenk tube under an inert atmosphere. Add the aryl halide, olefin, and base.
• Execution: Heat the reaction mixture to 90-110 °C with stirring for the required time (typically 2-12 hours, depending on the substrate).
• Work-up: After cooling to room temperature, add diethyl ether to the mixture. The product dissolves in the ether phase, while the palladium catalyst remains in the ionic liquid phase.
• Product Isolation: Separate the ether layer. Wash the ether layer with water and brine, dry over Na₂SO₄, and concentrate to obtain the crude coupled product. Purify further by recrystallization or column chromatography if needed.
• Catalyst Recycling: The remaining ionic liquid phase containing the palladium catalyst can be directly reused for the next run by adding fresh substrates and base. This system has been shown to maintain high activity for at least 6 cycles. [87]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of IL-catalyzed reactions requires careful selection of reagents. The following table details key ionic liquids and their applications in organic synthesis.

Table 2: Essential Ionic Liquid Reagents for Catalytic Organic Synthesis

Reagent Solution	Chemical Class	Primary Function in Synthesis	Exemplary Applications
Imidazolium Salts (e.g., [BMIM]I)	Halide-based Ionic Liquid	Catalyst & Solvent	Paal-Knorr reaction, nucleophilic substitutions [34]
Brønsted Acidic ILs (e.g., [HMIM]HSO₄, [NMP]⁺HSO₄⁻)	Sulfate-based Ionic Liquid	Dual Solvent-Brønsted Acid Catalyst	Condensation reactions, synthesis of naphthol derivatives [29] [34] [86]
Lewis Acidic ILs (e.g., [EMIM]Cl-AlCl₃)	Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquid	Lewis Acid Catalyst	Friedel-Crafts alkylation and acylation [29]
Palladium-Immobilized ILs	Task-Specific Ionic Liquid	Catalyst Support & Stabilizer	Heck, Sonogashira, and Suzuki cross-coupling reactions [87]
Chiral ILs (e.g., Thiazolinium-based)	Chiral-Pool Derived Ionic Liquid	Chiral Solvent/Promoter	Asymmetric synthesis and resolution of racemates [85]
Supported ILs (SILs/PILs)	Immobilized Ionic Liquid	Heterogeneous Catalyst	Facile recovery and reuse; transesterification, biodiesel production [39]

Workflow and Performance Analysis Diagrams

The following diagrams illustrate the experimental workflow for a typical IL-catalyzed reaction and a comparative analysis framework for benchmarking performance.

The quantitative data and protocols presented confirm that ionic liquids are high-performance catalysts that frequently surpass conventional systems in yield, selectivity, and operational simplicity, while offering unmatched recyclability. Their tunable nature allows for the design of "task-specific" catalysts, providing a powerful strategy for optimizing synthetic routes in pharmaceutical and fine chemical development. Future research will focus on deepening the mechanistic understanding of IL catalysis, developing more robust and biodegradable IL structures, and scaling these promising systems for industrial manufacturing.

Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of IL-based Processes

The assessment of ionic liquids (ILs) in organic synthesis requires rigorous Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate their economic viability and environmental sustainability. ILs are ionic compounds with cationic organic moieties and inorganic or organic anions, possessing properties such as non-flammability, thermal stability, negligible vapour pressure, and wide electrochemical windows that make them attractive for various applications [88]. However, comprehensive assessments are crucial because claims about ILs being "green solvents" based solely on negligible volatility are often misleading, as their synthesis frequently involves volatile organic solvents and may result in higher life-cycle environmental impacts compared to conventional organic solvents [88].

For researchers in organic synthesis, integrating TEA and LCA provides critical insights into both the economic feasibility and environmental performance of IL-based catalytic processes. These assessments are particularly challenging for ILs due to their complex chemical structures, numerous precursor options, and the early development stage of many applications [88] [89]. The technology readiness level (TRL) framework is essential for contextualizing these assessments, as it evaluates maturity from basic principles (TRL 1) to full-scale operation (TRL 9) [90]. This protocol outlines standardized methodologies for conducting TEA and LCA specific to IL-based processes in organic synthesis research.

Methodological Framework for Integrated TEA and LCA

Goal and Scope Definition

The initial phase requires clearly defining the assessment objectives, system boundaries, and functional units. For IL-based organic synthesis processes, the system boundaries should encompass all stages from raw material extraction (cradle) through IL production, use in catalytic reactions, and ultimately disposal or recycling (grave) [90]. The functional unit must reflect both the mass of product and its functionality, such as "per kg of catalytic cycle completed" or "per mole of product synthesized" [91].

Table: Key Elements for Goal and Scope Definition in IL Assessments

Element	Description	IL-Specific Considerations
Objective	Purpose of assessment	Compare IL catalysts to conventional catalysts; identify improvement opportunities
System Boundaries	Processes included in assessment	Cradle-to-gate for IL production; gate-to-gate for catalytic applications; end-of-life for IL recycling/disposal
Functional Unit	Reference for input/output quantification	Mass-based (kg IL), functionality-based (catalytic cycles), or output-based (kg product)
Technical Scope	Technology maturity level	Specify TRL (1-9) with appropriate assessment methods
Stakeholders	Intended audience	Researchers, process developers, funding agencies, journal reviewers

Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Compilation

The LCI phase involves collecting data on all mass and energy flows within the defined system boundaries. For IL-based processes, this presents particular challenges due to the limited availability of inventory data for IL precursors and synthesis pathways [88]. Recommended approaches include:

• Laboratory-scale data scaling: Using detailed process simulators (e.g., Aspen-HYSYS) to model industrial-scale production from laboratory data [92]
• Life cycle tree construction: Mapping all precursor chemicals back to basic resources where data are available [89]
• Proxy data utilization: Employing data for chemically similar compounds when specific IL data are unavailable [92]

For organic synthesis applications, the inventory must specifically account for:

• IL synthesis pathways and purification steps
• Energy requirements for IL recovery and recycling
• Solvent use in both IL synthesis and catalytic applications
• Catalyst lifetime and deactivation factors
• Waste streams from both IL production and use phases

Figure 1: Life Cycle Inventory Development Workflow for IL Processes

Techno-Economic Analysis Protocol

Cost Assessment Methodology

TEA for IL-based processes should follow a structured approach to evaluate economic viability:

• Capital Cost Estimation

  • Equipment costs for IL synthesis and purification
  • Reactor systems designed for IL catalysts
  • Recovery and recycling infrastructure
  • Contingency factors (30-50% for early-stage technologies)

• Operating Cost Estimation

  • Raw materials for IL synthesis (cation and precursor sources)
  • Energy requirements for IL production and regeneration
  • Labor, maintenance, and overhead costs
  • Waste disposal and treatment costs

• Revenue Considerations

  • Value of primary products from organic synthesis
  • Credits for catalyst recycling and reuse
  • Potential premium for environmentally preferable processes

Table: Techno-Economic Parameters for IL-Based Catalytic Processes

Cost Category	Parameters	Data Sources	Uncertainty Range
Capital Costs	Equipment sizing, cost curves, installation factors	Process simulations, vendor quotes, literature data	±30-50% for TRL < 6
Raw Materials	IL precursor costs, solvent prices, catalyst reagents	Chemical suppliers, market studies, literature	±20-40%
Utilities	Energy, cooling water, process heating	Plant simulations, utility rates	±15-25%
IL Lifetime	Recycling cycles, degradation rates	Laboratory testing, literature analogs	±30-50%
Product Value	Market price, purity premiums	Market reports, industry consultation	±20-35%

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis

Given the early development stage of many IL applications, comprehensive uncertainty analysis is essential:

• One-at-a-time sensitivity: Varying key parameters individually to assess impact on economic indicators [92]
• Global sensitivity analysis: Evaluating parameter interactions using methods like Sobol indices [92]
• Monte Carlo simulation: Propagating uncertainty through the economic model to generate probability distributions for key metrics like net present value and minimum selling price

Critical uncertain parameters for IL processes include:

• IL synthesis yields and purity
• Catalyst lifetime and recycling efficiency
• Energy requirements for IL recovery
• Raw material costs, especially for specialized precursors
• Product selectivity and reaction rates in organic synthesis

Life Cycle Assessment Protocol

Impact Assessment Methodology

The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) translates inventory data into environmental impacts. For IL-based processes, the following impact categories are particularly relevant:

• Global Warming Potential (kg CO₂-equivalent)
• Resource Depletion (kg Sb-equivalent)
• Human Toxicity Potential (kg 1,4-DCB-equivalent)
• Freshwater Ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DCB-equivalent)
• Energy Demand (MJ)

The LCIA faces specific limitations for ILs, including a shortage of characterization factors for many ILs in human toxicity and ecotoxicity impact categories [88]. When unavailable, researchers should:

• Use characterization factors for chemically similar compounds
• Clearly document all proxy choices and assumptions
• Conduct sensitivity analysis on characterization factor selection

Figure 2: Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology for ILs

Interpretation and Hotspot Identification

The interpretation phase identifies environmental hotspots and improvement opportunities specific to IL-based processes:

• Contribution Analysis: Quantifying the relative importance of different process stages to overall environmental impacts
• Hotspot Identification: Pinpointing specific operations with disproportionate environmental burdens
• Uncertainty Assessment: Evaluating the robustness of conclusions given data limitations

For IL production, significant environmental hotspots often include:

• Energy-intensive synthesis and purification steps
• Resource-intensive precursor chemicals
• Solvent use in IL production
• End-of-life management when recycling isn't feasible

Integrated TEA-LCA Assessment Framework

Combined Methodology

Integrating TEA and LCA provides a comprehensive sustainability assessment for IL-based organic synthesis processes:

• Parallel Assessment Structure

  • Consistent system boundaries and functional units
  • Synchronized data collection for economic and environmental inventories
  • Coordinated sensitivity and uncertainty analyses

• Trade-off Analysis

  • Identifying conflicts between economic and environmental objectives
  • Evaluating cost-environment relationships (e.g., premium for greener alternatives)
  • Assessing economic implications of environmental improvement strategies

Table: Integrated Sustainability Indicators for IL-Based Processes

Indicator Category	Specific Metrics	Calculation Method	Interpretation
Economic Performance	Net Present Value (NPV), Minimum Selling Price (MSP), Return on Investment (ROI)	Discounted cash flow analysis	Positive NPV indicates economic viability
Environmental Performance	Global Warming Potential, Cumulative Energy Demand, Eco-toxicity Potential	LCIA methods (ReCiPe, TRACI)	Lower values indicate better environmental performance
Resource Efficiency	Mass Intensity, Carbon Efficiency, IL Utilization Efficiency	Mass of inputs/mass of product	Higher values indicate better resource use
Process Efficiency	IL Recycling Rate, Energy Productivity, Space-Time Yield	Operational metrics	Higher values indicate more efficient processes

Technology ReadLevel Considerations

Assessment methodologies must be adapted to the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of the IL-based process:

• Low TRL (1-4): Simplified assessments focusing on screening alternatives, using stoichiometric calculations, literature data, and proxy processes
• Medium TRL (5-7): More detailed assessments incorporating pilot-scale data, preliminary engineering designs, and initial environmental measurements
• High TRL (8-9): Comprehensive assessments based on operational data, detailed engineering, and commercial-scale information

For early-stage technologies, the assessment should explicitly:

• Acknowledge higher uncertainty ranges
• Focus on identifying critical parameters for further research
• Use scenario analysis to explore different development pathways
• Avoid over-interpretation of absolute results while still supporting decision-making

Experimental Protocols and Data Requirements

Laboratory-Scale Data Collection

For early-stage TEA and LCA of IL-based organic synthesis, comprehensive laboratory data collection is essential:

Protocol 1: IL Synthesis and Characterization

• Synthesis Pathway Documentation
  • Record all precursors, solvents, and catalysts used
  • Quantify reaction yields and purification efficiencies
  • Document energy inputs (heating, stirring, purification)
  • Measure and report IL purity and key physicochemical properties

• Catalytic Performance Testing
  • Determine reaction kinetics and conversion rates under standardized conditions
  • Quantify substrate selectivity and product yields
  • Assess catalyst lifetime through recycling experiments
  • Evaluate IL stability under reaction conditions

Protocol 2: IL Recovery and Recycling

• Sepability Assessment
  • Develop and optimize separation protocols (extraction, distillation, etc.)
  • Quantify recovery yields for multiple cycles
  • Analyze IL purity after recovery
  • Assess performance maintenance across cycles

Scale-up Projection Methods

For translating laboratory data to industrial scale:

• Process Simulation Approach

  • Use commercial simulators (Aspen Plus, ChemCAD) to model industrial-scale processes
  • Incorporate unit operations for IL synthesis, purification, and recovery
  • Implement heat and mass integration opportunities
  • Generate scaled-up mass and energy balances

• Equipment Sizing and Costing

  • Size major equipment items based on simulated throughputs
  • Apply appropriate scaling factors and cost exponents
  • Include ancillary systems and infrastructure requirements

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table: Essential Materials for IL-Based Organic Synthesis Research

Reagent/Material	Function in Research	Application Notes	Sustainability Considerations
Imidazolium Salts	Cation precursor for IL synthesis	Versatile cations with tunable properties	Consider bio-based alternatives when available
Phosphonium Salts	Alternative cation sources	Thermal stability for high-temperature applications	Lower toxicity options preferred
Amino Acid Derivatives	Anion sources for greener ILs	Biodegradable options with functional groups	Reduced environmental impact potential
Metal Salts	Anion precursors (e.g., [BF₄]⁻, [PF₆]⁻)	Common for catalytic applications	Potential toxicity concerns with hydrolysis
Green Solvents	Reaction media for IL synthesis	Bio-based solvents (e.g., 2-MeTHF, cyclopentyl methyl ether)	Reduced environmental footprint
Activated Carbon	Purification agent	Removal of impurities and color bodies	Regenerable with proper treatment
Molecular Sieves	Drying agents for IL purification	Achieve low water content for moisture-sensitive applications	Reusable with proper regeneration

Uncertainty Quantification Protocol

A structured approach to uncertainty quantification is essential for reliable TEA and LCA of IL-based processes:

• Parameter Uncertainty Characterization

  • Statistical analysis of experimental variability
  • Literature ranges for analogous processes
  • Expert elicitation for poorly characterized parameters

• Uncertainty Propagation Methods

  • Monte Carlo simulation for complex models
  • Analytical uncertainty propagation for simpler models
  • Scenario analysis for discrete alternatives

• Global Sensitivity Analysis

  • Variance-based methods (Sobol indices) to identify dominant uncertainty sources
  • Regional sensitivity analysis for factor interactions
  • Prioritization of data refinement efforts

This protocol emphasizes that transparent uncertainty reporting is particularly crucial for IL assessments given the data limitations and early development stage of many applications.

Ionic liquids (ILs), salts that are liquid below 100 °C, have evolved from laboratory curiosities to versatile tools in industrial catalysis. Their unique properties—including negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable physicochemical character—make them attractive for sustainable chemical processes [15]. The evolution of ILs is categorized into four generations: first-generation ILs as green solvents; second-generation ILs designed for specific applications in catalysis and electrochemical systems; third-generation ILs incorporating bio-derived and task-specific functionalities; and fourth-generation ILs focusing on sustainability and biodegradability [15]. This application note documents successful industrial and pilot-scale implementations of ionic liquid catalysis, providing researchers with validated protocols and case studies that bridge academic research and industrial application.

Industrial Application Areas

Established Industrial Processes

Ionic liquids have been implemented across various industries, demonstrating their commercial viability and operational advantages. The table below summarizes key industrial application areas.

Table 1: Industrial Applications of Ionic Liquids

Application Area	Industry Sector	Key Advantages	Scale of Implementation
Petrochemical Processing	Petrochemicals	Enhanced selectivity, reduced energy consumption	Full industrial scale [15]
Biodiesel Production	Biofuels & Energy	Recyclability, high efficiency, mild conditions	Pilot to industrial scale [93] [15]
Pharmaceutical Synthesis	Pharmaceuticals	Improved purity, solvent reduction, tunable selectivity	Pilot to industrial scale [15] [34]
Gas Separation & CO₂ Capture	Environmental	High CO₂ selectivity, low volatility	Pilot scale [15] [58]
Metal Extraction	Mining & Resources	Selective extraction, reduced environmental impact	Industrial scale [15]

While numerous processes have been established in industry, some implementations have encountered "unintelligible aberrance or degradation of so-called task-specific ILs occurring in reaction processes and on the pilot plant scale" [94], highlighting the importance of robust IL selection and process optimization.

Silica-Supported Ionic Liquids (SSILs) in Sustainable Catalysis

Silica-supported ionic liquids (SSILs) represent a significant advancement for industrial catalysis, combining the advantages of homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. SSILs contribute to sustainable catalysis by promoting greener reaction pathways and minimizing waste [93]. Their fixed-bed compatibility enables continuous operation, while their recyclability reduces catalyst consumption and hazardous waste generation [93]. These systems are particularly valuable in biodiesel production, where they facilitate easy separation and reuse while operating under mild conditions that decrease energy consumption [93].

Detailed Protocols for Ionic Liquid Catalysis

Green Synthesis of Ionic Liquids via Ion-Driven Phase Separation

This protocol describes a novel, environmentally benign synthesis method for organic salts and ionic liquids (OS-ILs) using aqueous isopropanol and NaCl, achieving high yields with improved green metrics [6].

Table 2: Reagents and Equipment for IL Synthesis

Item	Specification	Function/Purpose
Isopropanol	Aqueous solution, dilute	Green solvent medium for metathesis
Sodium Chloride (NaCl)	Laboratory grade	Induces ion-driven phase separation
Precursor Salts	e.g., Tetrabutylphosphonium ([TBP]) or 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([BMIm])	Provides target cations and anions
Characterization	NMR, FT-IR, ESI-MS, TGA, XRD	Confirms structure, phase, and thermal properties

Experimental Procedure:

• Reaction Setup: Dissolve equimolar amounts of precursor salts in dilute aqueous isopropanol within a stirred reactor at ambient temperature.
• Metathesis Reaction: Continue stirring for 2-4 hours to allow complete ion exchange and formation of the target ionic liquid.
• Phase Separation: Add sodium chloride to induce supersaturation, triggering phase separation where the ionic liquid partitions from the isopropanol-water mixture.
• Isolation: Separate the ionic liquid-rich phase via decantation or separation funnel.
• Purification: Wash the isolated ionic liquid with small volumes of cold isopropanol to remove residual salts and concentrate under reduced pressure if necessary.
• Characterization: Analyze the product using NMR spectroscopy, FT-IR, and ESI-MS to confirm chemical structure and purity. Perform TGA to determine thermal stability.

Process Notes: This method increases the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric by +0.10 compared to traditional DCM-Water two-phase metathesis by cutting solvent toxicity, waste, energy use, and operator risk [6]. The protocol achieved high yields of [TBP][DS] (94.6%) and [BMIm][OAc] (73.2%), demonstrating efficient and reproducible OS-IL synthesis [6].

Synthesis of Ionic Liquids in Microstructured Reactors

Microstructured reactors (MSRs) enable continuous, efficient synthesis of ionic liquids with enhanced heat and mass transfer characteristics, offering significant advantages over traditional batch methods for pilot-scale production [58].

Table 3: Microreactor Synthesis Parameters and Performance

Parameter	Batch Reactor (Traditional)	Microstructured Reactor
Reaction Time	50-70 hours [58]	Significantly reduced (minutes to few hours)
Space-Time Yield (STY)	~10 g·min⁻¹·L⁻¹ [58]	Greatly enhanced
Temperature Control	Less precise, requires dilution for heat control [58]	Excellent due to high surface-to-volume ratio
Solvent Requirement	Often required (e.g., 1,1,1-trichloroethane) [58]	Solvent-free operation possible
Purification Steps	Extensive due to solvent use	Simplified

Experimental Procedure:

• System Setup: Connect reagent reservoirs containing ionic liquid precursors to a microstructured reactor (e.g., single microtubes, serpentine microreactors, or parallel microreactor arrays) using precision pumps.
• Reaction Execution: Pump reactants through the microchannels at controlled flow rates. Maintain reactor temperature using a thermostatic bath or integrated heating system.
• Residence Time Control: Adjust flow rates to achieve desired residence time, typically significantly shorter than batch processes.
• Product Collection: Collect the reacted mixture continuously at the outlet.
• Post-Processing: Subject the product mixture to phase separation or direct purification as needed.

Process Notes: MSRs provide substantial interfacial contact areas (10,000-50,000 m²·m⁻³) and short diffusion pathways, resulting in higher yields, selectivities, and improved product qualities compared to traditional lab reactors [58]. This approach is particularly valuable for scaling up industrially relevant ionic liquids like 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([Bmim]Cl) [58].

Application Protocol: CO₂ Capture Using Ionic Liquids

This protocol outlines the use of ionic liquids as physical solvents for carbon dioxide capture within continuous microreactor platforms, leveraging the synergistic advantages of IL properties and microreactor engineering [58].

Experimental Procedure:

• System Configuration: Set up a gas-liquid contactor microreactor system with precise temperature and pressure controls.
• Absorption Process: Introduce the CO₂-containing gas stream and the ionic liquid solvent into the microreactor, ensuring efficient interphase contact.
• Flow Optimization: Utilize the microreactor's high surface area-to-volume ratio to maximize mass transfer and CO₂ absorption kinetics.
• Separation: After absorption, separate the CO₂-rich ionic liquid from the treated gas stream.
• Regeneration: Apply heat or pressure reduction to desorb the captured CO₂ from the ionic liquid, regenerating the solvent for reuse.
• Analysis: Quantify CO₂ capture capacity using gas chromatography or gravimetric analysis.

Process Notes: Ionic liquids demonstrate high solubility and selectivity for CO₂ over other gases such as H₂, O₂, N₂, and CH₄ [58]. While conventional ILs primarily capture CO₂ through physical absorption, functionalized ILs (e.g., with amine groups) can significantly increase capacity through chemical interactions [58]. The combination of ILs with microreactors enhances process intensification for CO₂ capture applications.

Visualization of Experimental Workflows

Ionic Liquid Synthesis and Application Workflow

SSIL Catalytic Mechanism in Organic Synthesis

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Key Research Reagents for Ionic Liquid Catalysis

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples & Notes
Imidazolium-Based ILs	Versatile solvents/catalysts for organic synthesis	[BMIM]I (Pyrrole synthesis [34]), [BMIM]OH (Multicomponent reactions [34])
Brønsted Acidic ILs	Acid catalysis in condensation reactions	[HMIM]HSO₄ (Paal-Knorr condensation [34])
Supported IL Systems	Heterogeneous catalysis with easy recovery	SSILs [93], Bi(OTf)₃/[BMIM]BF₄ (Immobilized systems [34])
Functionalized ILs	Task-specific applications including CO₂ capture	Amine-functionalized ILs for enhanced CO₂ capacity [58]
Microstructured Reactors	Enhanced heat/mass transfer for IL synthesis & applications	Single microtubes, serpentine, parallel microreactors [58]

Industrial and pilot-scale applications of ionic liquid catalysis demonstrate significant progress in transitioning from academic research to commercial implementation. Success stories span petrochemical processing, biodiesel production, pharmaceutical synthesis, and CO₂ capture, showcasing the versatility and sustainability benefits of IL-based systems [15]. The development of supported ionic liquid phases (SSILs) and continuous flow systems using microstructured reactors addresses key challenges in catalyst recovery, process intensification, and scalability [93] [58].

Future research directions focus on developing smarter, biodegradable, and recyclable ILs with tailored functionalities for next-generation applications [15]. Innovations in IL-based energy storage, precision medicine, and sustainable industrial processes will further expand their potential. Advances in microwave- and ultrasound-assisted synthesis, bio-derived ILs, and magnetic ILs represent emerging frontiers that will enhance the industrial applicability of ionic liquid catalysis [15]. As research progresses, ionic liquids are poised to play an increasingly important role in enabling sustainable chemical technologies across diverse industrial sectors.

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as powerful tools in organic synthesis, serving as solvents, additives, promoters, electrolytes, and catalysts for various transformations, including the synthesis and functionalization of heterocycles and carbocycles through C–H activation reactions [3]. Their unique properties—high stability, intrinsic conductivity, non-volatility, and recyclability—make them appealing alternatives to traditional organic solvents in sustainable organic synthesis [3]. However, the practical application of many ILs remains constrained by unfavorable melting points (Tm), which limit operating temperatures and affect transport properties [95]. Similarly, identifying ILs with superior catalytic performance from the vast chemical space (approximately 10¹⁸ possible combinations) presents a monumental challenge [95] [96]. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are now revolutionizing IL design by enabling accurate prediction of these critical properties, thereby accelerating the development of efficient, task-specific ILs for catalytic applications.

Machine Learning for Predicting Ionic Liquid Melting Points

The Melting Point Prediction Challenge

The melting point of an IL is a critical determinant of its liquid range and practical applicability. It is governed by complex factors including molecular structures of the anion and cation, their combinations, crystalline packing, molecular symmetry, and intermolecular interactions such as electrostatics, van der Waals forces, and hydrogen bonding [95]. This complexity makes a priori prediction via rigorous thermodynamic approaches computationally expensive and often infeasible for high-throughput screening [95].

A Deep-Learning Approach for Tm Prediction

A robust deep-learning (DL) model has been developed to predict the melting points of diverse ILs with high accuracy [95]. The methodology, performance, and significant molecular descriptors identified from this approach are summarized below.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of the Deep-Learning Model for Melting Point Prediction [95]

Metric	Value	Interpretation
R² Score	0.90	Indicates a high degree of variance explained by the model.
RMSE	~32 K	Root Mean Square Error; the average prediction error.
Dataset Size	1253 ILs	Number of ionic liquids from the ILThermo database.
Descriptor Pool	5272	Initial molecular descriptors calculated via Dragon7 software.
Selected Features	137	Final number of significant molecular descriptors used in the model.

Experimental Protocol: Deep-Learning Model for Melting Point Prediction [95]

• Data Collection: Extract melting point data and IL structures from the ILThermo database (v2.0) using the pyilt2 Python library.
• Structure Representation: Convert IUPAC names of ILs into SMILES representations using the OPSIN library.
• Descriptor Calculation: Compute 5272 molecular descriptors for each IL based on a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) using Dragon7 software.
• Feature Selection:
  • Remove descriptors with low variance or missing values.
  • Apply Pearson correlation analysis to exclude features with low correlation (<0.20) and high inter-correlation (>0.90) with the melting point.
  • Finalize a set of 137 significant molecular descriptors for model training.
• Data Preprocessing: Normalize the selected molecular descriptors. Randomly split the dataset into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets.
• Model Architecture & Training:
  • Implement a sequential DL model using Keras and TensorFlow.
  • The network architecture comprises:
    • Input Layer: 137 neurons
    • Hidden Layer 1: 512 neurons
    • Hidden Layer 2: 512 neurons
    • Hidden Layer 3: 512 neurons
    • Hidden Layer 4: 256 neurons
    • Hidden Layer 5: 64 neurons
    • Output Layer: 1 neuron
  • Train the model using the Adam (Adaptive Moment Estimation) optimizer to iteratively update network weights.

Machine Learning for Predicting Catalytic Activity in CO2 Cycloaddition

Screening for Efficient IL Catalysts

The cycloaddition of CO₂ to epoxides to form cyclic carbonates is an atom-efficient and environmentally promising reaction. ILs have shown great potential as catalysts for this transformation, but their vast combinatorial space makes targeted design difficult [96]. A machine learning-assisted framework has been successfully implemented to screen ILs for high catalytic performance in this reaction [96].

Table 2: Performance of ML Classification Models for Predicting CO2 Cycloaddition Yield [96]

Model	Predictive Accuracy	Key Findings
Random Forest (RF)	Superior and Stable	Identified 13 cation and 8 anion structures with superior catalytic properties from 1344 candidate ILs.
Support Vector Machine (SVM)	Superior and Stable	Effective in classifying IL catalytic performance.
Decision Tree (DT)	Superior and Stable	Provides interpretable rules for classification.
Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost)	Superior and Stable	Ensemble method that improves upon weak classifiers.
K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)	Lower than others	Less effective compared to the other four algorithms.

Experimental Protocol: ML-Assisted Screening for CO2 Cycloaddition Catalysts [96]

• Data Curation:
  • Collect experimental data from literature on IL-catalyzed CO₂ cycloaddition reactions.
  • Apply strict criteria: reactions must use epoxides as substrates without solvents or co-catalysts.
  • The final dataset contains 433 data points involving 170 different ILs, 112 cations, 12 anions, and 8 substrates.
• Data Labeling: Categorize data into two classes based on reaction yield: "High Yield" (≥90%) and "Low Yield" (<90%).
• Descriptor Generation: Employ simple descriptors derived from the ion pair structures of the ILs as model inputs.
• Model Training & Validation:
  • Train five ML classification algorithms (RF, SVM, DT, AdaBoost, KNN) to predict the yield category.
  • Compare model performance to identify the most accurate and stable predictors (RF, SVM, DT, AdaBoost showed superior performance).
• High-Throughput Screening:
  • Apply the trained ML models to predict the catalytic performance of 1344 hypothetically combined ILs.
  • Identify promising cation and anion structures.
• DFT Validation: Perform Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations on the ML-shortlisted ILs to estimate reaction energy barriers and validate the feasibility of high catalytic performance.

Advanced Hybrid Models and Emerging Techniques

Beyond the specific applications above, advanced modeling techniques are continuously being developed to improve the accuracy and scope of IL property prediction.

Table 3: Advanced ML Models for Predicting IL and DES Properties

Model	Property Predicted	System	Performance	Key Innovation
HS-Optimized Extra Trees (ET) [97]	Surface Tension	ILs (1042 data points)	R² = 0.979, MAPE = 2.05E-02	Hybrid ML model (ET) optimized with Harmony Search (HS) algorithm.
Integrated Stacked Model [98]	Melting Points	Deep Eutectic Solvents (2315 data points)	R² = 0.99, AARD = 1.2402%	Stacking of MLP, MLR, SVR, KNN, and RFR models into one unified predictor.
CatBoost with FSD [99]	CO₂ Solubility	ILs	R² = 0.9945, MAE = 0.0108	Uses new Functional Structure Descriptors (FSD) and the CORE descriptor for efficient screening.
XGBoost for Structural Transitions [100]	Hydration-driven state (AGG/CIP/SIP)	IL-Water Mixtures	High Classification Accuracy	Identifies Hirshfeld atomic charge as a critical descriptor for hydration-driven structural transitions.

Table 4: Key Research Reagents and Computational Tools for ML-Driven IL Design

Item	Function/Description	Relevance in ML-Driven IL Design
ILThermo Database (NIST) [95]	A comprehensive database of thermodynamic properties of ionic liquids.	Primary source for curated, experimental data for training and validating ML models (e.g., melting points).
Dragon7 Software [95]	Calculates thousands of molecular descriptors based on QSPR.	Generates the feature set (descriptors) from IL molecular structures that serve as input for ML models.
OPSIN Library [95]	Open Parser for Systematic IUPAC Nomenclature.	Converts IUPAC names of ILs into SMILES representations, facilitating automated descriptor calculation.
Python Libraries (scikit-learn, TensorFlow, Keras) [95]	Open-source libraries for machine learning and deep learning.	Provide the algorithmic backbone for building, training, and validating predictive models (e.g., DL, RF, SVM).
COSMO-RS Descriptors [98]	Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents.	Provides quantum-chemically derived descriptors that encode molecular interaction information, used as features in ML models for properties like melting points.
Aqueous Isopropanol & NaCl [6]	Green solvent system for IL synthesis via ion-driven phase separation.	Enables environmentally friendly synthesis of novel ILs identified through ML screening (AGREE score increased by 0.10).
DFT Calculations [96]	Density Functional Theory for computing electronic structure.	Used to validate ML predictions, estimate energy barriers, and provide atomistic insights into catalytic performance or structural transitions.

The integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence into the design of ionic liquids is fundamentally changing the research paradigm from one of serendipitous discovery to one of rational, data-driven engineering. As demonstrated, ML models can predict critical properties like melting points and catalytic activity with remarkable accuracy, efficiently navigating the immense combinatorial space of potential ILs. These protocols for deep learning-based melting point prediction and classification-based catalytic screening provide researchers with clear roadmaps for implementation. Coupled with emerging techniques such as hybrid modeling, advanced descriptors, and synergistic ML-DFT validation, these tools empower scientists to rapidly identify and synthesize highly task-specific ILs. This significantly accelerates the development of efficient, sustainable catalysts for advanced organic synthesis, including C–H activation and CO₂ utilization, aligning with the broader goals of green chemistry.

Within organic synthesis, the pursuit of greener and more efficient methodologies is paramount. This application note provides a detailed comparative case study on the synthesis of thiazole, a privileged scaffold found in over 20 FDA-approved drugs [22]. Thiazole rings are integral to pharmaceuticals like the antibiotic Cefotaxime, the antiviral Simeprevir, and the anticancer agent Dasatinib [22]. The study quantitatively compares traditional synthetic routes with modern protocols employing Ionic Liquids (ILs) as dual solvent-catalysts, aligning with the broader thesis of using ILs as sustainable catalysts in organic synthesis. ILs are salts with melting points below 100°C, characterized by negligible vapor pressure, thermal stability, and structural tunability, making them ideal green media [101] [11].

Background and Significance

Thiazole as a Critical Drug Intermediate

The thiazole moiety is a five-membered heterocycle containing nitrogen and sulfur, exhibiting considerable aromatic character and structural versatility [22]. Its derivatives are pivotal not only in drug development but also in agricultural formulations and advanced materials such as sensors, dyes, and catalysts [22]. The widespread biological activity of thiazole-containing compounds underscores their importance as candidates for new therapeutics.

Ionic Liquids as Green Catalysts and Solvents

Ionic liquids fit the principles of green chemistry by replacing volatile organic solvents. Their negligible vapor pressure reduces air pollution and inhalation risks, while their high thermal stability and recyclability minimize waste [33] [11]. A key advantage is their structural tunability; by selecting appropriate cation-anion pairs, properties like polarity, hydrophobicity, and acidity can be customized for specific reactions, allowing them to function as task-specific solvents and catalysts [22] [102].

Comparative Synthetic Methodologies

This section outlines experimental protocols for traditional and IL-mediated synthesis of 2,4-disubstituted thiazoles, followed by quantitative comparisons.

Traditional Hantzsch Synthesis Protocol

The Hantzsch synthesis, first reported in 1887, remains a classical and widely used method for thiazole ring formation [22].

• Reaction Principle: The reaction involves the condensation of an α-haloketone (or α-haloaldehyde) with a thioamide (or thiourea) [22]. The mechanism proceeds via a nucleophilic attack of the thioamide sulfur on the α-carbon of the halo carbonyl, followed by dehydration to form the thiazole ring.
• Detailed Experimental Procedure:
  • Reaction Setup: In a 100 mL round-bottom flask, equip with a magnetic stir bar, combine 10 mmol of α-chloroketone and 10 mmol of thiourea in 30 mL of a volatile organic solvent (e.g., acetone or dichloromethane).
  • Reaction Execution: Reflux the reaction mixture with vigorous stirring for 4-12 hours. Monitor reaction progress by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
  • Work-up Procedure: After completion, cool the reaction mixture to room temperature. Transfer to a separatory funnel and wash sequentially with water (2 × 20 mL) and brine (1 × 20 mL).
  • Purification: Dry the organic layer over anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄), filter, and concentrate under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator. Purify the crude product by recrystallization from a suitable solvent (e.g., ethanol) or by flash column chromatography.
• Key Limitations: This method often employs toxic solvents, requires lengthy reaction times, and generates aqueous waste during work-up, leading to lower atom economy and higher environmental impact [22].

IL-mediated Green Synthesis Protocol

Ionic liquids can serve as dual solvent-catalysts, simplifying the reaction and work-up process [22].

• Reaction Principle: The same Hantzsch condensation is performed, but the ionic liquid acts as both the reaction medium and a promoter, often facilitating higher rates and yields through unique solvation and potential catalytic activation.
• Detailed Experimental Procedure:
  • Reaction Setup: In a 50 mL round-bottom flask, add 10 mmol of α-chloroketone and 10 mmol of thiourea.
  • Addition of IL: Add 5 mL of a suitable ionic liquid, such as 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMIM][BF₄]), at room temperature.
  • Reaction Execution: Stir the reaction mixture vigorously at 60-80°C for 20-40 minutes. Monitor by TLC.
  • Work-up Procedure: Upon completion, cool the mixture to room temperature. Add 15 mL of diethyl ether or water to precipitate the product. Separate the crude product by simple filtration or decantation.
  • IL Recycling: Wash the ionic liquid layer with a small amount of ether to remove any organic residues, dry under vacuum, and reuse for subsequent reactions.
• Key Advantages: The protocol is catalyst-free, uses a recyclable solvent (IL), and involves a simple work-up that avoids extensive aqueous waste [22].

The following workflow diagrams illustrate the procedural and environmental differences between the two methods.

Workflow: Traditional vs IL-mediated Synthesis

Quantitative Data Comparison

The following tables summarize key performance metrics for the synthesis of a model 2,4-disubstituted thiazole derivative using both methodologies.

Table 1: Comparison of Reaction Conditions and Performance

Parameter	Traditional Hantzsch Protocol	IL-mediated Protocol
Reaction Time	4 - 12 hours [22]	20 - 40 minutes [22]
Temperature	Reflux (~60-80°C) [22]	60 - 80°C [22]
Isolated Yield	60 - 75%	90 - 95% [22]
Solvent System	Volatile Organic Solvents (VOS)	Ionic Liquid (e.g., [BMIM][BF₄]) [22]
Catalyst	Not required	Not required (IL acts as medium) [22]
Work-up	Multi-step aqueous extraction	Simple precipitation and filtration [22]

Table 2: Green Chemistry Metrics Analysis

Metric	Traditional Hantzsch Protocol	IL-mediated Protocol	Environmental Impact
Atom Economy	Moderate	Moderate to High	IL method minimizes waste generation [22].
Solvent E-Factor	High (VOS, single-use)	Low (IL, recyclable)	IL recyclability drastically reduces solvent waste [22] [11].
VOC Emissions	High	Negligible [11]	ILs' non-volatility improves workplace safety and air quality [11].
Energy Consumption	High (long reflux times)	Lower (shorter reaction times)	Faster kinetics in ILs reduce energy input [22].
Solvent Recycling	Difficult or impossible	High potential for reuse [22]	IL recovery enhances process sustainability and cost-effectiveness.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

This table details essential materials and their specific functions in the described IL-mediated synthesis.

Table 3: Essential Reagents for IL-mediated Thiazole Synthesis

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Specific Example & Notes
Ionic Liquid (IL)	Serves as a dual solvent and catalyst, enabling faster reaction rates and easier product separation.	[BMIM][BF₄]: A commonly used, relatively stable, and effective IL for this synthesis. Its polarity and solvation power can be tuned [22] [11].
α-Halocarbonyl Compound	Acts as a key electrophilic reactant in the Hantzsch condensation.	α-Chloroacetophenone: A representative substrate. The halogen acts as a leaving group for ring closure [22].
Thioamide/Thiourea	Acts as the nucleophilic reactant, providing the sulfur and nitrogen atoms for the thiazole ring.	Thiourea: A cheap and readily available starting material [22].
Diethyl Ether / Water	Anti-solvent used to precipitate the product from the ionic liquid matrix post-reaction.	Enables simple product isolation via filtration and prepares the IL for recycling [22].

This comparative case study demonstrates that ionic liquid-mediated synthesis offers a superior and greener alternative to traditional methods for preparing thiazole-based drug intermediates. The quantitative data confirms significant advantages in reaction efficiency (reduced time from hours to minutes), operational simplicity (easy work-up), and environmental profile (non-volatile, recyclable solvent). The successful application of ILs in this context validates their role as powerful, versatile tools in modern organic synthesis, contributing to the development of more sustainable and economically viable industrial processes. Future work should focus on expanding the scope of ILs to other heterocyclic syntheses and optimizing large-scale recycling protocols.

Conclusion

Ionic liquids present a transformative platform for organic synthesis, merging the benefits of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis with the principles of green chemistry. Their unparalleled tunability allows for the design of task-specific catalysts that enhance reaction efficiency, selectivity, and sustainability in pharmaceutical synthesis. While challenges in cost, toxicity, and process integration remain, advancements in supported IL systems, predictive process simulation, and machine learning are paving the way for scalable solutions. Future research should focus on developing third-generation, biodegradable ILs and deepening their integration into continuous manufacturing and biomedical applications, such as drug formulation and delivery. The ongoing evolution of IL technology holds significant promise for driving innovation in drug development and establishing more environmentally benign industrial processes.

References

• 1. Environmental fate and toxicity of ionic liquids: A review [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409006137]
• 2. Ionic Liquids Toxicity—Benefits and Threats - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7504185/]
• 3. Ionic liquids in C–H activation: synthesis and ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ob/d4ob02109f]
• 4. Some examples of the use of ionic liquids in organic ... [https://iolitec.de/en/node/655]
• 5. Design and synthesis of novel ionic liquids with unique ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258891332400053X]
• 6. A novel synthesis of organic salts and ionic liquids (OS-ILs) ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167732225018458]
• 7. Synthesis and evaluation of amino acid ionic liquid for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-85560-8]
• 8. The Use of Supported Acidic Ionic Liquids in Organic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6271805/]
• 9. Emerging impacts of ionic liquids on eco-environmental ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/cs/d1cs00946j]
• 10. Vapor Pressure of Ionic Liquids with a Common ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6040]
• 11. Ionic liquids: A green solvent for organic synthesis [https://ctppc.org/article-details/19007]
• 12. Ionic liquids: a pitocin for next-generation electronic ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/im/d5im00098j]
• 13. Adsorption and Thermal Stability of Ionic Liquid Multilayers ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9637/8/2/29]
• 14. Amino Acid Ionic Liquid Activation of Biomimetic Magnetic ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41074932/]
• 15. A review on the evolution of ionic liquids: Sustainable ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589234725000892]
• 16. Ionic Liquids in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818567/]
• 17. Progress in the applications of biocompatible ionic liquids: ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/gc/d3gc03693f]
• 18. Thirty years of ionic liquids: a personal perspective [https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2025-0440/html?recommended=sidebar&srsltid=AfmBOoq-ErPvQ16JOg1YB7kVeNmrRZBlLnorhS-PQx--SKH9JSFPd2LX]
• 19. Synthesis and evaluation of the biodegradability potential ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167732225017520]
• 20. Ionic liquids revolutionizing drug delivery [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365925009691]
• 21. Cationic alkyl chain length and nanoaggregate form of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62206-x]
• 22. Recent trends in ionic liquid-mediated synthesis of thiazoles [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12558384/]
• 23. Recent trends in ionic-liquids mediated synthesis of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403925002989]
• 24. Acidic pyridinium ionic liquid: an efficient bifunctional ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468823123000755]
• 25. Comparative study on the physicochemical properties of N ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167732223018470]
• 26. New insight into viscosity prediction of imidazolium-based ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08947-7]
• 27. Imidazolium-based ionic liquid functionalized chiral metal ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ra/d4ra07458k]
• 28. A review of ionic liquids: Applications towards catalytic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167732216319432]
• 29. (PDF) Applications of ionic in liquids and organic synthesis catalysis [https://www.academia.edu/22316629/Applications_of_ionic_liquids_in_organic_synthesis_and_catalysis]
• 30. a new family of high-potential renewable ionic solvents [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/su/d5su00393h]
• 31. A comprehensive dataset on cytotoxicity of ionic liquids [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-04190-3]
• 32. Ionic Liquid Applications in Peptide Chemistry: Synthesis ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6268249/]
• 33. Recent trends in ionic liquid-mediated synthesis of thiazoles [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ra/d5ra05665a]
• 34. Catalytic Application of Ionic Liquids for the Green ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/15/10/931]
• 35. Synthesis, characterization and in silico studies of novel ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-93249-1]
• 36. Solid-Phase Synthesis for Constructing Thiazolotriazinone- ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/18/3838]
• 37. Design, synthesis, and biological investigation of new thiazole ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12088962/]
• 38. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022286025029370]
• 39. Ionic liquids as transesterification catalysts: applications for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5082448/]
• 40. A Review of the State of the Art on Ionic Liquids and Their ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4053]
• 41. Amino-acid-functionalized methanesulfonate ionic liquids ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214993724003701]
• 42. Design and synthesis of novel ionic liquids with unique ... [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025CarRC...800264W/abstract]
• 43. Ionic liquid as dual-function catalyst and solvent for efficient ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468823122002577]
• 44. Integrating ionic liquids and catalytic processes for enhanced ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra06648d]
• 45. Advances in ionic liquid recycling for lignocellulosic biomass ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc03051j?page=search]
• 46. Ionic liquid catalysis in synthesizing pyrazoles and triazoles [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772422025000357]
• 47. Unlocking the potential of ionic liquid assisted fractionation ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479725035650]
• 48. Efficient biomass valorization using silica supported ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-17712-9]
• 49. Ionic-liquid/metal–organic-framework composites [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/qi/d4qi02383h]
• 50. Ionic Liquids Market Size to Hit USD 136.18 Million by 2034 [https://www.precedenceresearch.com/ionic-liquids-market]
• 51. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) synthesis in a deep eutectic ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/su/d4su00733f]
• 52. Green production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894725049125]
• 53. Green synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from biomass ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186422004059]
• 54. Recent advances in supported ionic liquid catalysts for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894722035185]
• 55. Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Catalysts Dedicated for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10004067/]
• 56. Amphiphilic ionic liquids as catalysts for efficient synthesis ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724012002]
• 57. Application of Ionic Liquids for the Recycling and Recovery ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/628]
• 58. Progress in Synthesis and Application of Ionic Liquids ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213343725037807]
• 59. A Brief Review of Ionic Liquids: Synthesis and Applications [https://www.auctoresonline.org/article/a-brief-review-of-ionic-liquids-synthesis-and-applications]
• 60. New recycled polyethylene terephthalate imidazolium ionic ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-15433-7]
• 61. Ionic liquids synthesis and applications: An overview [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167732219333719]
• 62. Glycerol-derived ionic liquids: a new family of high-potential ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/su/d5su00393h]
• 63. Inventory of biodegradation data of ionic liquids [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653522008785]
• 64. Biodegradation of ionic liquids – a critical review [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/cs/c5cs00444f]
• 65. Ionic Liquids for Catalysis Market Size and Forecasts 2031 [https://mobilityforesights.com/product/ionic-liquids-for-catalysis-market]
• 66. Ionic liquids in polymer technology - RSC Publishing [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d4gc05445h]
• 67. Recent progress in the synthesis, scaling, processing and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927796X25002013]
• 68. Global Ionic Liquids Market Growth and Insights [https://www.precedenceresearch.com/press-release/ionic-liquids-market]
• 69. Green and Scalable Synthesis of Metal-Organic ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41014217/]
• 70. Green innovations in C–H bond functionalisation [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc00278h]
• 71. Generating eco-friendly ionic liquids with enhanced CO2 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949747725000065]
• 72. Rethinking Coupling Methods for More Sustainable ... [https://en.ritsumei.ac.jp/news/detail/?id=1039]
• 73. Recent trends in ionic liquid-mediated synthesis of thiazoles [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra05665a?page=search]
• 74. COSMO-RS - SCM [https://www.scm.com/amsterdam-modeling-suite/cosmo-rs/]
• 75. Running the COSMO-RS program - SCM [https://www.scm.com/doc/COSMO-RS/Running_the_COSMO-RS_program.html]
• 76. List of computer-assisted organic synthesis software [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer-assisted_organic_synthesis_software]
• 77. Synthesis of novel functional ionic liquids and their ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9072004/]
• 78. Software for Synthetic, Organic & Medicinal Chemists [https://www.acdlabs.com/solutions/synthetic-chemistry/]
• 79. Challenges and perspectives on using acidic ionic liquids ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/gc/d4gc01526f]
• 80. Design and optimization of reactive distillation for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0255270124002150]
• 81. Energy Optimization and Effective Control of Reactive ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/8/1340]
• 82. Process intensification approach for design and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8111092/]
• 83. Magnetic polymeric ionic liquid for both catalysis ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-86751-z]
• 84. Continuous production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil in a ... [https://www.researchwithrowan.com/en/publications/continuous-production-of-biodiesel-from-waste-cooking-oil-in-a-re]
• 85. in Ionic Liquids Organic Synthesis [https://cen.acs.org/articles/82/i45/IONIC-LIQUIDS-ORGANIC-SYNTHESIS.html]
• 86. Applications of ionic in liquids and catalysis organic synthesis [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10098-013-0660-0]
• 87. Safer and Greener Catalysts – Design of High Performance ... [https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41100]
• 88. State-of-the-art and limitations in the life cycle assessment ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652619301507]
• 89. A novel methodology for assessing the environmental ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/fd/c6fd00054a]
• 90. Life-Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment of Early ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.841907/full]
• 91. Integration of LCA, TEA, Process Simulation and Optimization [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623009629]
• 92. Global Sensitivity Analysis in Life-Cycle Assessment of Early ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10170515/]
• 93. Silica-supported ionic liquids as versatile catalysts: A case ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167732224013631]
• 94. Applications of ionic liquids in organic synthesis and catalysis [https://pure.kfupm.edu.sa/en/publications/applications-of-ionic-liquids-in-organic-synthesis-and-catalysis]
• 95. Machine-Learning Model Prediction of Ionic Liquids ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/5/2408]
• 96. Machine learning-assisted screening of efficient ionic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468823124008125]
• 97. Advanced hybrid machine learning based modeling for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-04450-1]
• 98. An integrated ML model for the prediction of the melting ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009250925000685]
• 99. Machine learning with new functional structure descriptors ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/cp/d5cp01972a]
• 100. Machine learning-guided identification of critical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009250925010048]
• 101. Advances in Synthesis and Ignition Performance of Ionic ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/8/1789]
• 102. Ionic liquid-based transdermal drug delivery systems for ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/cc/d5cc03935e]