Greenness Assessment for Mass Spectrometry Methods: A Comprehensive Guide to Metrics, Applications, and Sustainable Practices

Abstract

With a global focus on sustainability, Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles are increasingly crucial in mass spectrometry (MS). This article provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving the environmental footprint of their MS methodologies. It explores the foundational principles of GAC and the evolution of assessment tools, details the practical application of key metrics like AGREE, GAPI, and AES to various MS techniques, offers strategies for troubleshooting and optimizing method greenness, and presents a comparative validation framework using multiple greenness scores. By integrating these dimensions, the article serves as an essential resource for implementing sustainable, efficient, and compliant analytical practices in biomedical and clinical research.

The Principles and Evolution of Green Metrics in Mass Spectrometry

Core Principles and Framework of Green Analytical Chemistry

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) is an evolving discipline that integrates the principles of green chemistry into analytical methodologies, aiming to reduce the environmental and human health impacts traditionally associated with chemical analysis [1]. As a specialized subfield of green chemistry, GAC focuses specifically on making the entire analytical workflow—from sample preparation to data analysis—as environmentally benign as possible while maintaining high standards of accuracy and precision [2] [1].

The foundation of GAC is built upon 12 principles that provide a comprehensive framework for designing and implementing environmentally benign analytical techniques [3] [1]. These principles were adapted from the original green chemistry principles to better fit the specific context and challenges of analytical chemistry. The 12 principles of GAC emphasize waste prevention, the use of renewable feedstocks, energy efficiency, and the avoidance of hazardous substances [1]. They serve as crucial guidelines for implementing greener practices in analytical procedures and can be represented by the mnemonic "SIGNIFICANCE" [3] [4].

Table 1: The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

Principle Number	Principle Name	Core Objective
1	Direct Analytical Techniques	Prefer direct techniques to avoid sample treatment
2	Minimal Sample Size	Reduce sample size to minimum
3	In-situ Measurements	Perform measurements in-situ when possible
4	Integration of Analytical Processes	Integrate analytical processes and operations
5	Automation and Miniaturization	Automate and miniaturize methods
6	Derivatization Avoidance	Avoid derivatization
7	Energy Conservation	Reduce energy consumption
8	Waste Minimization	Minimize or eliminate waste
9	Reagent Replacement	Replace toxic reagents
10	Reagent Source Consideration	Consider reagent source sustainability
11	Operator Safety	Ensure operator safety
12	Waste Degradation	Favor biodegradable waste

The primary objective of GAC is to transform analytical workflows through the incorporation of green solvents, such as water, ionic liquids, and supercritical fluids, which replace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and reduce toxicity [1]. Furthermore, GAC embraces energy-efficient techniques, such as microwave-assisted and ultrasound-assisted methodologies, to enhance reaction rates and reduce the energy demands of analytical processes [1]. These innovations not only lower operational costs but also contribute to the broader goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change.

Greenness Assessment Metrics and Tools

A fundamental aspect of implementing GAC is the ability to assess and quantify the environmental impact of analytical methods. Traditional green chemistry metrics like E-Factor or Atom Economy have proven inadequate for assessing the greenness of analytical chemistry, leading to the development of specialized GAC assessment tools [5] [4]. The evolution of these metrics represents significant progress in the field, moving from basic qualitative assessments to comprehensive quantitative evaluations.

Table 2: Key Metrics for Assessing Greenness in Analytical Chemistry

Metric Tool	Type of Output	Key Parameters Assessed	Strengths	Limitations
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index)	Pictogram (4-quadrant circle)	PBT chemicals, hazardous waste, corrosivity, waste amount	Simple, immediate visual assessment [4]	Qualitative only, limited scope [5] [4]
Analytical Eco-Scale	Numerical score (0-100)	Reagent toxicity, energy use, waste [6] [4]	Quantitative, enables direct comparison [5]	Relies on expert judgment for penalty points [5]
GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index)	Color-coded pictogram (5 sections)	Entire analytical process from sampling to detection [6] [5]	Comprehensive, visualizes impact areas [6] [5]	No overall score, some subjectivity in color assignment [5]
AGREE (Analytical Greenness Metric)	Numerical score (0-1) + pictogram	All 12 GAC principles [6] [5]	Comprehensive, user-friendly, combines score with visualization [6] [5]	Doesn't fully account for pre-analytical processes [5]
AGREEprep	Numerical score (0-1) + pictogram	Sample preparation specifically [5] [4]	Focuses on often-overlooked preparation stage [5]	Must be used with other tools for full method evaluation [5]

The progression of greenness assessment tools has evolved from foundational tools like NEMI to more holistic and user-friendly assessments such as GAPI and AGREE [5]. Recent advancements, including AGREEprep, Modified GAPI (MoGAPI), Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), and Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA), have further refined these assessments by addressing specific stages like sample preparation and incorporating lifecycle and climate impact considerations [5].

The application of these tools demonstrates how complementary metrics provide a multidimensional view of a method's sustainability. For instance, in a case study evaluating a sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method using multiple metrics, the method received an AGREE score of 56 and a CaFRI score of 60, highlighting both its strengths in miniaturization and its weaknesses in waste management and reagent safety [5].

GAC Workflow and Assessment - This diagram illustrates the analytical workflow and the points where GAC principles and assessment tools are applied to evaluate environmental impact.

Application of GAC Principles in Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry (MS) plays a fundamental role in a wide range of research areas, from biomedical science to food authentication [3]. The widespread use of MS makes it a necessary part of the development of GAC. While mass spectrometry intrinsically complies with some aspects of GAC, there is also much room for further green improvement [3]. Key aspects where contradictions lie between MS and GAC include sample preparation, energy consumption, throughput, and usage of solvent [3].

Green MS Techniques and Technologies

Several mass spectrometry approaches have been developed that align with GAC principles. Ambient MS has been highlighted as the MS technique most in line with GAC currently, as it often allows for direct analysis with minimal sample preparation [3]. Similarly, Proton Transfer Reaction-MS (PTR-MS) is noted for its full compliance with GAC guidelines, serving as a "green" analytical technique that doesn't require solvents, derivatization agents, or toxic reagents, with distilled water as its only consumable [7].

The implementation of green practices in MS-based methods has been facilitated by the application of greenness assessment metrics. Recent studies evaluating MS analytical strategies have mainly focused on Analytical Eco-Scale (AES), Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), and Analytical Greenness Metric (AGREE) [8]. These tools enable comparison of the environmental impacts of different MS methodologies and support the selection of greener alternatives.

Case Study: Green UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Pharmaceutical Monitoring

A practical example of GAC implementation in mass spectrometry is demonstrated in the development of a green/blue UHPLC-MS/MS method for trace pharmaceutical monitoring in water and wastewater [9]. This method exhibits impressive green advantages including exceptional sensitivity, high selectivity, and an economical sample preparation strategy resulting from the absence of an evaporation step after solid-phase extraction (SPE), as well as a short analysis time (10 minutes) [9].

Table 3: Green UHPLC-MS/MS Method Parameters for Pharmaceutical Analysis

Parameter	Traditional Approach	Green UHPLC-MS/MS Method	GAC Benefit
Sample Preparation	Often includes evaporation step	No evaporation step after SPE	Reduces energy consumption and solvent use [9]
Analysis Time	Typically longer run times	10 minutes	Higher throughput, reduced energy use [9]
Detection Limits	Varies with method	100-300 ng/L for target pharmaceuticals	Maintains high sensitivity while being greener [9]
Solvent Consumption	Conventional volumes	Optimized to reduce consumption	Minimizes hazardous waste generation [9]
Validation	Standard validation	ICH guidelines Q2(R2) compliant	Ensures reliability while incorporating green principles [9]

This green UHPLC-MS/MS method has been validated according to International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guidelines Q2(R2), proving to be specific, linear (correlation coefficients ≥ 0.999), precise (RSD < 5.0%), and accurate (recovery rates ranging from 77 to 160%) [9]. The limits of detection were 300 ng/L for caffeine, 200 ng/L for ibuprofen, and 100 ng/L for carbamazepine, respectively [9]. This approach aligns with the concept of sustainable analytics, combining ecological aspects with high-quality results.

Experimental Protocols for Green Analytical Method Development

Protocol 1: AGREE Assessment of Analytical Methods

Objective: To evaluate the environmental greenness of an analytical method using the AGREE metric tool.

Materials and Software:

• Computer with internet access
• AGREE software (available online)
• Complete details of the analytical method to be assessed

Procedure:

• Gather all method parameters including sample preparation steps, reagents and solvents used, instrumentation, energy requirements, and waste management procedures.
• Access the AGREE assessment tool (available as downloadable software or online calculator).
• Input data for each of the 12 GAC principles:
  • Principle 1: Directness of technique
  • Principle 2: Sample size minimization
  • Principle 3: In-situ measurement capability
  • Principle 4: Integration of processes
  • Principle 5: Automation and miniaturization
  • Principle 6: Derivatization requirements
  • Principle 7: Energy consumption
  • Principle 8: Waste generation
  • Principle 9: Toxicity of reagents
  • Principle 10: Source of reagents
  • Principle 11: Operator safety
  • Principle 12: Waste degradability
• Generate the AGREE pictogram and numerical score (0-1 scale).
• Interpret results: Scores closer to 1 indicate greener methods. Use the output to identify areas for improvement in method greenness.

Validation: Compare assessment results for multiple methods to select the greenest approach. Verify that the chosen method maintains analytical performance standards.

Protocol 2: Development of Green Sample Preparation for MS Analysis

Objective: To implement green sample preparation techniques prior to mass spectrometric analysis.

Materials:

• Micro-extraction devices (SPME, MEPS)
• Alternative solvents (ionic liquids, supercritical CO₂, natural deep eutectic solvents)
• Miniaturized extraction apparatus
• Reduced volume containers

Procedure:

• Evaluate Sample Preparation Needs:
  • Identify essential sample preparation steps
  • Determine minimum sample size required for accurate detection
  • Assess potential for direct analysis without preparation

• Implement Miniaturization:

  • Scale down sample volumes to microliter range
  • Use micro-extraction techniques instead of conventional liquid-liquid extraction
  • Employ automated systems to improve reproducibility at small scales

• Select Green Solvents:

  • Replace hazardous organic solvents with safer alternatives
  • Consider water-based systems where possible
  • Utilize bio-based solvents from renewable feedstocks
  • Implement solvent-less extraction techniques where feasible

• Optimize Energy Use:

  • Reduce heating requirements during extraction
  • Utilize ambient temperature processes
  • Consider alternative energy sources (microwave, ultrasound) for improved efficiency

• Integrate Waste Management:

  • Plan for proper disposal of generated waste
  • Consider recycling or reuse of solvents
  • Implement procedures for neutralizing hazardous by-products

Validation: Compare analytical performance (sensitivity, selectivity, accuracy, precision) of green sample preparation with conventional methods to ensure maintained quality.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green MS

Implementing Green Analytical Chemistry principles in mass spectrometry requires specific reagents, materials, and approaches that minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Mass Spectrometry

Tool/Reagent	Function in Green MS	Traditional Alternative	GAC Benefit
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADESs)	Green extraction media for sample preparation	Organic solvents (acetonitrile, methanol)	Biodegradable, low toxicity, from renewable sources [8] [1]
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME)	Solvent-less sample preparation and concentration	Liquid-liquid extraction	Eliminates solvent use, reduces waste [2] [1]
Ambient Ionization Sources	Direct analysis with minimal sample preparation	Conventional ionization requiring extensive sample prep	Reduces solvents, time, and energy [3] [7]
Water as Chromatographic Solvent	Mobile phase for LC-MS	Organic solvent-based mobile phases	Non-toxic, inexpensive, environmentally benign [2] [1]
Ionic Liquids	Green solvents for extraction and separation	Volatile organic compounds	Non-volatile, recyclable, tunable properties [2] [1]
Supercritical CO₂	Extraction and chromatography fluid	Organic solvents	Non-toxic, non-flammable, easily removed [2] [1]
Microfluidic Devices	Miniaturized analytical platforms	Conventional scale equipment	Reduced reagent consumption, smaller footprint [2]
Portable MS Instruments	On-site analysis to avoid sample transport	Laboratory-based instruments	Eliminates transportation impacts, enables real-time monitoring [2]

Green MS Components - This diagram shows mass spectrometry components and the green approaches that can be applied at each stage to reduce environmental impact.

The integration of these tools and reagents into mass spectrometry workflows supports the broader objectives of GAC while maintaining the high sensitivity and selectivity required for analytical applications. The continued development and implementation of these green alternatives is essential for advancing sustainable practices in analytical laboratories, particularly in regulated industries such as pharmaceutical development where MS is extensively utilized.

The increasing global focus on sustainability has prompted analytical chemists to develop tools to quantify and minimize the environmental impact of chemical analysis, leading to the establishment of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) as a critical discipline. GAC aims to mitigate the detrimental effects of analytical procedures on the ecosystem and human health by promoting energy-efficient equipment, reduction of toxic chemicals, and sustainable waste management [10] [8]. The evaluation and minimization of this environmental impact is crucial, driving the need for dedicated metric tools to assess the 'greenness' of analytical methods [8] [4]. From early, simple pictograms to today's sophisticated, multi-criteria calculators, the evolution of these metrics reflects a growing commitment to integrating environmental responsibility directly into analytical science [11] [5]. This progression enables chemists to design, select, and implement methods that are both scientifically robust and ecologically sustainable, a consideration especially pertinent for techniques with significant resource consumption, such as mass spectrometry [8]. This article traces the evolution of these greenness assessment tools, providing a detailed guide for researchers, particularly those in mass spectrometry and pharmaceutical development, to understand and apply the current state-of-the-art in environmental metric evaluation.

The Historical Progression of Greenness Metrics

The development of greenness metrics has followed a clear trajectory from basic, qualitative assessments to comprehensive, quantitative, and user-friendly calculators. The timeline below visualizes the key milestones in this evolution, highlighting the transition from general-purpose tools to specialized and integrated assessment systems.

Foundational First-Generation Tools

The earliest metrics provided foundational concepts for environmental assessment but were limited in scope and discriminatory power.

• National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI): Introduced in 2002, NEMI was one of the first tools for GAC [4] [12]. Its pictogram is a circle divided into four quadrants indicating whether a method meets basic criteria for: containing no PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) chemicals, using no hazardous reagents, operating in a non-corrosive pH range (2-12), and generating ≤50 g of waste [4] [12]. While simple and intuitive, its binary pass/fail system (green or blank quadrants) offers limited information, cannot differentiate between levels of greenness, and does not cover the entire analytical workflow [5] [13].

• Analytical Eco-Scale (AES): Developed as a semi-quantitative alternative, the Analytical Eco-Scale assigns an ideal green analysis a score of 100 points [4] [12]. Penalty points are subtracted for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste generation [5]. A score above 75 is considered excellent greenness, between 50-75 is acceptable, and below 50 is inadequate [12]. This tool allows for more nuanced comparisons but relies on expert judgment for penalty assignment and lacks a visual component [5].

Advanced and Comprehensive Metrics

Second-generation tools were developed to address the limitations of their predecessors by offering more comprehensive and visual assessments.

• Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI): This metric represented a significant advance by assessing the entire analytical process, from sample collection and preparation to final detection and determination [5] [12]. Its strength lies in a five-part, color-coded pictogram that uses a traffic light system (green, yellow, red) to visually identify the environmental impact at each stage of the workflow [5]. This allows users to quickly pinpoint "hot spots" of environmental concern within a method. While more comprehensive, GAPI does not provide a single, overall greenness score, making direct method comparison slightly less straightforward [5].

• Analytical Greenness Metric (AGREE): A major step forward, AGREE is a comprehensive, software-based calculator that evaluates methods against all 12 principles of GAC [13]. It translates these principles into a unified score between 0 and 1, presented in an intuitive clock-like pictogram [13]. The tool offers several key advantages:

  • A final score and color in the center for easy interpretation.
  • Visual performance indicators for each of the 12 principles.
  • User-assignable weights to different criteria based on assessment priorities [13].
  • Open-source and free software, enhancing accessibility [14] [13]. This combination of comprehensiveness, flexibility, and clarity has made AGREE one of the most widely recommended tools today [12].

Specialized and Next-Generation Tools

The most recent evolution involves metrics tailored to specific analytical stages or emerging sustainability concerns.

• AGREEprep: Recognizing that sample preparation is often the least green step in an analysis, AGREEprep was developed to focus exclusively on this stage based on the 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) [11] [14]. Like AGREE, it provides a score from 0-1 and a colored pictogram, enabling detailed optimization of sample preparation workflows [14].

• White Analytical Chemistry (WAC): This is not a single tool but a holistic framework that balances the green (environmental) dimension with two other critical aspects: the red dimension (analytical performance quality) and the blue dimension (method practicality and economic viability) [10] [5]. Tools like the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) have been developed to assess the blue dimension, ensuring that sustainable methods are also practical and economically feasible [11].

• Emerging Metrics: The field continues to evolve with tools like the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), which estimates carbon emissions, and the Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA), which uses a star-shaped diagram for multi-criteria assessment [5]. Another recent tool, the Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods (GEMAM), integrates both the 12 GAC principles and 10 GSP factors to provide a score on a 0-10 scale [15].

Table 1: Comparison of Key Greenness Assessment Tools

Metric Tool	Year	Key Basis	Output	Key Advantages	Main Limitations
NEMI [4] [12]	2002	4 Environmental Criteria	Pictogram (4 quadrants)	Simple, intuitive, fast	Binary; limited criteria; qualitative only
Analytical Eco-Scale [4] [5]	2012	Penalty Points	Numerical Score (0-100)	Semi-quantitative; allows comparison	Subjective penalty assignment; no visual
GAPI [5] [12]	2018	Entire Analytical Process	Color-coded Pictogram	Comprehensive; identifies workflow hotspots	No overall score; some subjectivity in coloring
AGREE [13] [12]	2020	12 GAC Principles	Score (0-1) & Pictogram	Comprehensive; flexible weighting; easy interpretation	Does not fully cover pre-analytical processes
AGREEprep [11] [14]	2022	10 GSP Principles	Score (0-1) & Pictogram	Specialized for sample preparation	Must be used with a whole-method tool
GEMAM [15]	2024	12 GAC + 10 GSP	Score (0-10) & Pictogram	Integrates GAC and GSP principles	Newer tool, less established track record

Application Notes & Protocols for Mass Spectrometry

The principles of GAC are highly relevant to mass spectrometry (MS), given its pivotal role in modern analytical laboratories, particularly in pharmaceutical and environmental analysis [8]. MS-based methods often involve significant solvent consumption, energy use, and waste generation, making greenness assessment critical.

Protocol 1: Comprehensive Greenness Assessment of an LC-MS/MS Method

This protocol outlines the steps to evaluate a reported UHPLC-MS/MS method for determining pharmaceuticals (e.g., carbamazepine, caffeine, ibuprofen) in water [9].

1. Method Summary: The method involves solid-phase extraction (SPE) of water samples, omitting the evaporation/reconstitution step, followed by analysis using a UHPLC-MS/MS system with a 10-minute runtime [9].

2. Assessment using AGREE: Using the free AGREE software, the 12 GAC principles are scored based on the method's parameters [13]. - Inputs: Data is entered for each principle. For example: - Principle 1 (Directness): "Off-line analysis" for sample preparation → score is penalized [13]. - Principle 2 (Sample Size): Sample volume of 100 mL is entered, and the tool calculates a score based on the volume [13]. - Principle 3 (Reagent Toxicity): Scores for the toxicity and amounts of all solvents (e.g., methanol, acetonitrile) and reagents are assigned. - Principle 4 (Waste): The total waste generated per sample is calculated and scored. - Principle 8 (Throughput): The number of samples analyzed per hour is considered; a higher throughput yields a better score. - Weights: Default weights can be used, or the user can assign higher weights to criteria of particular concern (e.g., waste generation or energy use). - Output: The software generates a pictogram. For this method, the omission of the evaporation step and short runtime would contribute positively, likely resulting in a score above 0.60, indicating good greenness [9].

3. Complementary Assessment using AGREEprep: - The sample preparation (SPE) is evaluated separately using AGREEprep. The 10 GSP criteria, such as sample preparation time, energy consumption, and use of hazardous chemicals, are inputted [14]. - The output provides a focused greenness score for the SPE step, highlighting areas for potential improvement, such as solvent selection or miniaturization.

4. Assessment using BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index): - To evaluate practicality, BAGI assesses factors such as cost of equipment, ease of operation, and analysis time [11]. - The UHPLC-MS/MS method, while potentially having high equipment costs, would score well on throughput and sensitivity, providing a balanced view of its practical applicability.

Protocol 2: Comparative Greenness Evaluation of Multiple Methods

This protocol is designed to select the greenest method from several existing options, using the determination of UV filters in cosmetics as a case study [14].

1. Method Selection: A set of 10 chromatographic methods from the literature is chosen for comparison. The methods employ different sample preparation techniques: conventional solvent dissolution, solid-phase extraction (SPE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and several microextraction techniques (e.g., MEPS, µ-MSPD, DLLME) [14].

2. Unified Assessment with AGREE and AGREEprep: - Each of the 10 methods is evaluated using the AGREE calculator to obtain an overall greenness score. - The sample preparation step for each method is evaluated in parallel using AGREEprep.

3. Data Analysis and Comparison: - The overall AGREE scores and AGREEprep scores are tabulated for side-by-side comparison. - Expected Outcome: Typically, methods employing microextraction techniques (e.g., MEPS, DLLME) will achieve significantly higher AGREE and AGREEprep scores. This is due to their inherent advantages: miniaturization (reduced solvent consumption < 10 mL), automation potential, and reduced waste generation [14]. - Methods based on conventional solvent-intensive preparation will generally receive lower scores.

4. Decision: The method with the highest combined score (prioritizing AGREE but considering AGREEprep for sample preparation efficiency) is identified as the most environmentally sustainable choice for implementation.

Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green MS Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Analysis	Greenness Considerations & Alternatives
Acetonitrile / Methanol	Common mobile phase & extraction solvents in LC-MS	High environmental toxicity and waste impact. Alternatives include ethanol or water-rich mobile phases [5].
Chlorinated Solvents (e.g., DCM, Chloroform)	Extraction solvents in sample preparation	Highly toxic and environmentally hazardous. Should be replaced with green solvents wherever possible [4].
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Sorbents	Sample clean-up and analyte pre-concentration	Prefer sorbents that enable reduced solvent volumes for elution. Consider miniaturized formats (e.g., µ-SPE) [14].
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES)	Emerging class of green extraction solvents	Biodegradable, low-toxicity solvents prepared from natural sources. Can replace conventional organic solvents in extraction workflows [8].
Water	Mobile phase component, solvent for samples/reagents	The greenest solvent. Prioritize methods that maximize the use of water and minimize organic modifiers in mobile phases.

Current Trends and Future Perspectives in Greenness Assessment

The field of green metrics is dynamic, with several clear trends shaping its future. There is a strong movement towards integrative assessment through the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept, which balances environmental impact (green) with analytical performance (red) and practical/economic feasibility (blue) [10] [11]. This holistic approach ensures that methods are not only eco-friendly but also effective and practical for routine use.

Another significant trend is the push to minimize subjectivity. Future metric development will likely rely more on directly measurable empirical data, such as carbon footprint, total water consumption, and precise energy usage per analysis, to make assessments more objective and reproducible [11]. Furthermore, the scope of assessment is expanding to include the full lifecycle of analytical methods, from the synthesis of reagents and production of equipment to end-of-life waste management, as seen in tools like ComplexGAPI and CaFRI [11] [5]. For mass spectrometry specifically, green metrics are being applied to evaluate emerging approaches, including miniaturized instruments and ambient ionization techniques (e.g., AIMS), which hold promise for significantly reducing the environmental footprint of MS analyses [8].

The evolution of greenness metrics from the simple NEMI pictogram to sophisticated, multi-criteria tools like AGREE and the specialized AGREEprep underscores a fundamental shift in analytical chemistry. This progression empowers scientists with the ability to quantitatively assess and systematically improve the environmental profile of their methods. For researchers in drug development and mass spectrometry, adopting these metrics is no longer optional but a core component of modern, sustainable, and responsible scientific practice. The consistent application of comprehensive tools like AGREE, complemented by specialized metrics and the holistic view of White Analytical Chemistry, provides a robust framework for minimizing the ecological impact of analytical science while maintaining high-quality results and practical viability. As the field continues to evolve, the integration of these assessments into method development and validation protocols will be crucial for advancing the goals of green analytical chemistry.

The adoption of green analytical chemistry (GAC) principles in mass spectrometry (MS) is crucial for reducing the environmental impact of analytical laboratories. This application note provides a detailed examination of three foundational metrics—Analytical Eco-Scale (AES), Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), and Analytical GREEnness (AGREE)—for assessing the sustainability of MS-based methods. We present a structured comparison, experimental protocols for implementation, and visual guides to empower researchers in the pharmaceutical and proteomics fields to make informed, environmentally conscious decisions in method development and validation.

Mass spectrometry has become an indispensable tool in drug development and clinical research, particularly in proteomics and metabolomics. However, conventional MS workflows often involve energy-intensive instrumentation, substantial organic solvent consumption, and generate significant chemical waste [16] [17]. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) addresses these concerns by providing a framework to minimize the environmental footprint of analytical methods while maintaining analytical performance [4] [5].

The assessment of method greenness has evolved from basic checklists to sophisticated multi-criteria metrics [5] [10]. Among the available tools, AES, GAPI, and AGREE have emerged as particularly influential for evaluating MS methods. These tools enable researchers to quantify environmental impact, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate a commitment to sustainable laboratory practices—an increasingly important consideration in grant applications and publications [18].

Metric Fundamentals: Comparative Analysis of AES, GAPI, and AGREE

Core Characteristics and Applications

The table below summarizes the fundamental attributes, strengths, and limitations of the three metrics.

Table 1: Fundamental comparison of AES, GAPI, and AGREE metrics

Feature	Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)	Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)	Analytical GREEnness (AGREE)
Type	Quantitative scoring system	Semi-quantitative pictogram	Quantitative score with visual output
Basis	Penalty points for non-green aspects [4]	Assessment of multiple stages in the analytical process [19]	12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [20] [10]
Output	Numerical score (0-100) [4]	Color-coded pictogram (green-yellow-red) [5]	Numerical score (0-1) with colored pictogram [5]
Ideal Score	100 (Excellent greenness) [4]	Entirely green pictogram [19]	1 (Perfect greenness) [20]
Key Strength	Simple calculation, easy comparison [4]	Visual identification of problematic method steps [5]	Comprehensive, aligns directly with GAC principles [20] [10]
Key Limitation	Lacks visual component [20]	No overall numerical score, subjective color assignment [20] [18]	Does not fully address pre-analytical processes [5]

Scoring Systems and Interpretation

Each metric employs a distinct scoring mechanism, requiring different interpretation strategies.

Table 2: Scoring systems and interpretation guidelines

Metric	Scoring Range	Excellent	Acceptable	Poor	Interpretation Focus
AES	0-100 [4]	>75 [4]	50-75 [4]	<50 [4]	Higher scores indicate greener methods
GAPI	5-color levels per section [19]	All green	Mixed green/yellow	Predominantly red	Number and intensity of red/yellow sections
AGREE	0-1 [5]	>0.75	0.5-0.75	<0.5	Higher scores with more green sections

The AGREE metric provides a particularly sophisticated evaluation by weighting each of the 12 GAC principles differently in its calculation algorithm, offering a more nuanced assessment than binary tools [20].

Experimental Protocols: Metric Application Workflow

Sample Preparation and Data Collection Requirements

Proper application of greenness metrics requires systematic data collection throughout method development:

• Reagent Inventory: Document all chemicals, solvents, and reagents with exact volumes/masses used per sample [4]
• Energy Consumption: Record instrument run times and manufacturer-specified power requirements (kWh) [18]
• Waste Tracking: Quantify all waste streams generated, including hazardous and non-hazardous materials [4]
• Hazard Classification: Identify GHS hazard pictograms for all substances used [5]
• Method Parameters: Document sample throughput, analysis time, and equipment requirements [18]

Protocol for Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) Implementation

Principle: AES assigns penalty points to non-green parameters subtracted from a base score of 100 [4].

Procedure:

• Establish Baseline: Begin with a perfect score of 100 points [4]
• Calculate Reagent Penalties: Subtract points based on reagent quantity and hazard profile:
  • High-hazard reagents: 1-5 points per gram [4]
  • Moderate-hazard reagents: 1-3 points per gram [4]
  • Low-hazard reagents: 1 point per gram [4]
• Assess Energy Consumption: Subtract 1 point for each kWh per sample above 0.1 kWh [4]
• Evaluate Waste Generation: Subtract 1 point for each gram of waste produced [4]
• Calculate Final Score: Apply formula: AES = 100 - total penalty points [4]

Interpretation: Scores >75 represent excellent green methods; scores <50 indicate inadequate greenness [4].

Protocol for Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) Application

Principle: GAPI uses a five-section pictogram to evaluate the entire analytical method from sampling to final determination [19].

Procedure:

• Segment Analysis: Divide method into five components:
  • Sample collection, preservation, and transport
  • Sample preparation and extraction
  • Reagents and solvents used
  • Instrumentation and measurement type
  • Waste treatment and disposal [19]
• Color Assignment: For each subsection, assign green, yellow, or red based on:
  • Solvent toxicity and volume [19]
  • Energy requirements [19]
  • Safety hazards [19]
  • Waste quantity and treatment [19]
• Pictogram Completion: Fill corresponding sections in the GAPI diagram
• Comparative Analysis: Compare pictograms for different methods, focusing on red sections as priority improvement areas

Protocol for Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Implementation

Principle: AGREE evaluates methods against all 12 principles of GAC, providing both score and visual output [20] [10].

Procedure:

• Input Preparation: Gather data on:
  • Sample preparation technique [5]
  • Reagent toxicity and amounts [20]
  • Energy consumption per sample [18]
  • Waste production and management [20]
  • Operator safety measures [5]
  • Method miniaturization and throughput [5]
• Software Utilization: Access the freely available AGREE calculator [20]
• Data Entry: Input collected parameters corresponding to each GAC principle
• Result Analysis: Review numerical score (0-1) and colored circular pictogram
• Improvement Identification: Note principles with lowest scores for method optimization

Case Study: Comparative Assessment of LC-MS/MS Methods

Scenario Definition

To illustrate metric application, we evaluate two hypothetical LC-MS/MS methods for pharmaceutical analysis:

• Method A: Traditional approach using 100mL organic solvent per sample, high energy consumption (1.2 kWh/sample), and no waste treatment
• Method B: Green approach using miniaturized extraction (10mL solvent/sample), optimized energy use (0.5 kWh/sample), and solvent recycling

Results and Comparative Analysis

The three metrics provide complementary insights into the relative greenness of each method.

Table 3: Comparative greenness assessment of two LC-MS/MS methods

Assessment Metric	Method A (Traditional)	Method B (Green)	Key Differentiating Factors
AES Score	42 (Poor) [4]	78 (Excellent) [4]	Solvent volume, waste generation, energy use [4]
GAPI Visualization	3 red sections, 2 yellow	4 green sections, 1 yellow	Sample preparation, reagent toxicity, waste treatment [19]
AGREE Overall Score	0.38 [5]	0.72 [5]	Alignment with multiple GAC principles [20]
Critical Findings	High penalty for hazardous solvents and waste [4]	Strong performance in miniaturization and safety [5]	Direct comparison enables improvement targeting

• AGREE Calculator: Open-source software for comprehensive assessment [20]
• AGSA Tool: Emerging metric available at bit.ly/AGSA2025 [20]
• NEMI Database: Historical reference for chemical hazards [4]

Reference Materials

• Good Evaluation Practice (GEP) Guidelines: Framework for reliable assessments [18]
• GAPI Diagram Templates: Standardized pictograms for publication [19]
• Hazard Classification Databases: NFPA, GHS, and EPA lists for reagent evaluation [4]

The integration of greenness assessment metrics into mass spectrometry method development is no longer optional but essential for sustainable analytical science. Each of the three primary metrics offers distinct advantages: AES for its simplicity and quantitative output, GAPI for its visual identification of problematic method stages, and AGREE for its comprehensive alignment with GAC principles [20] [4] [5].

For researchers in drug development and proteomics, we recommend:

• Method Development: Utilize GAPI during initial optimization to identify environmental hotspots
• Method Validation: Include AES and AGREE scores in validation protocols alongside traditional performance parameters
• Publication: Incorporate greenness metrics in methodology sections to demonstrate environmental responsibility
• Continuous Improvement: Use metric outputs to drive innovation in solvent reduction, energy efficiency, and waste management

The ongoing evolution of green metrics, including tools like AGREEprep for sample preparation and AGSA for comprehensive lifecycle assessment, promises even more robust sustainability evaluations for mass spectrometry applications in pharmaceutical research [20] [5].

White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) represents an advanced, holistic framework for evaluating analytical methods, moving beyond a singular focus on environmental sustainability to integrate three critical dimensions: analytical performance, environmental impact, and practical applicability [21]. This paradigm was formally introduced in 2021 to reconcile the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) with the functional requirements of analytical methods in research and industry [22]. The term "white" symbolizes the purity and completeness of this approach, aiming to blend quality, sensitivity, and selectivity with an eco-friendly and safe operational framework for analysts [21].

The foundational concept of WAC is the red-green-blue (RGB) model, which serves as its core evaluative structure [21]. This model adapts the additive color theory to analytical chemistry, where:

• Red represents analytical performance parameters, including sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and selectivity.
• Green encompasses environmental impact factors, including reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, and operator safety.
• Blue covers practical and economic aspects, such as cost, time, simplicity of use, and ease of automation [23] [21].

When these three dimensions are optimally balanced and implemented, the method is considered "white"—indicating a harmonious and sustainable analytical practice that does not compromise performance for sustainability, nor vice versa [21]. This integrated approach is particularly crucial in pharmaceutical analysis and drug development, where regulatory requirements, environmental responsibility, and operational efficiency must be simultaneously addressed [24].

Theoretical Framework of the RGB Model

The Green Dimension: Environmental Sustainability

The green component of WAC originates from Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), which aims to minimize the environmental footprint of analytical procedures [5]. This dimension evaluates factors including:

• Solvent and reagent consumption: Prioritizing minimal volumes, low toxicity, and bio-based alternatives.
• Energy efficiency: Favoring low-energy equipment and processes.
• Waste generation: Emphasizing waste prevention, minimization, and proper management.
• Operator safety: Reducing exposure to hazardous substances and conditions [25] [5].

The principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) further refine this dimension, focusing specifically on the sample preparation stage, which often represents the most resource-intensive phase of analytical workflows [25].

The Red Dimension: Analytical Performance

The red dimension ensures that methodological sustainability does not come at the expense of analytical quality [21]. Key parameters include:

• Sensitivity: The ability to detect low analyte concentrations.
• Selectivity: The capacity to distinguish the target analyte from interferents.
• Accuracy and precision: The correctness and reproducibility of results.
• Linearity and range: The method's performance across concentration ranges.
• Robustness and ruggedness: Reliability under varying conditions and operators [22].

This dimension maintains the fundamental requirement that any analytical method must deliver scientifically valid and reliable data, regardless of its environmental credentials.

The Blue Dimension: Practicality and Applicability

The blue dimension addresses the practical implementation of analytical methods in real-world settings, particularly in regulated environments like pharmaceutical laboratories [24]. Evaluation criteria include:

• Cost-effectiveness: Considerations of instrumentation, reagents, and personnel time.
• Throughput and time requirements: Analysis speed and sample processing capacity.
• Simplicity and user-friendliness: Ease of implementation and operation.
• Automation potential: Compatibility with automated systems.
• Regulatory compliance: Adherence to industry standards and guidelines [22] [21].

This practical focus ensures that sustainable methods remain accessible and implementable across diverse laboratory settings, from academic research to industrial quality control.

Assessment Tools and Metrics for the RGB Dimensions

The implementation of WAC has stimulated the development of specialized assessment tools to quantify and visualize each dimension of the RGB model. These tools provide standardized approaches for method evaluation and comparison.

Table 1: Comprehensive Overview of RGB Assessment Tools

Dimension	Assessment Tool	Key Characteristics	Output Format	Primary Applications
Green	AGREE (Analytical GREEnness)	Based on 12 GAC principles; comprehensive evaluation	Pictogram with score (0-1)	General analytical methods [5]
	AGREEprep	Focuses specifically on sample preparation	Pictogram with score (0-1)	Sample preparation techniques [22]
	GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index)	Visual assessment of entire analytical workflow	Five-part color-coded pictogram	Comparative greenness evaluation [5]
	NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index)	Simple binary evaluation of four basic criteria	Pictogram with checkmarks	Preliminary assessment [5]
	Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty point system for non-green attributes	Numerical score (0-100)	Method comparison [5]
	GEMAM (Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods)	Based on GAC principles and GSP factors; flexible weighting	Pictogram with score (0-10)	Comprehensive greenness assessment [25]
Red	RAPI (Red Analytical Performance Index)	Evaluates key performance parameters	Scoring system	Analytical performance quantification [22] [21]
Blue	BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index)	Assesses practical feasibility and economic factors	Shades of blue pictogram	Practicality assessment [24] [21]
Integrated	RGB Model	Combined assessment of all three dimensions	Color blending visualization	Holistic method evaluation [21]
Innovation	VIGI (Violet Innovation Grade Index)	Evaluates methodological innovation across 10 criteria	10-pointed star with violet intensities	Innovation assessment [22]

Advanced and Emerging Assessment Tools

The field of WAC assessment continues to evolve with several recent developments:

• AGSA (Analytical Green Star Area): A star-shaped diagram that assesses multiple green criteria including reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy use, providing both visual and quantitative outputs [5].
• CaFRI (Carbon Footprint Reduction Index): A climate-focused tool that estimates and encourages reduction of carbon emissions associated with analytical procedures, aligning with global sustainability targets [5].
• CACI (Click Analytical Chemistry Index): Evaluates feasibility, application, sample preparation, and method sensitivity [21].
• Modified GAPI (MoGAPI) and ComplexMoGAPI: Enhanced versions of GAPI that incorporate cumulative scoring systems and broader assessment scopes, including preliminary steps in material-based testing [5].

These tools can be used individually for specific dimensional assessments or in combination for a comprehensive WAC evaluation, enabling researchers to identify strengths and weaknesses across the RGB spectrum.

Experimental Protocols for WAC Implementation

Protocol 1: Comprehensive RGB Assessment of an Analytical Method

This protocol provides a standardized approach for evaluating analytical methods within the WAC framework, with particular relevance to mass spectrometry-based techniques in pharmaceutical analysis.

Materials and Software Requirements:

• AGREE calculator (available at: https://mostwiedzy.pl/en/wojciech-wojnowski/complexgapi,176603-1?tab=tools)
• BAGI assessment sheet
• RAPI scoring template
• Method validation data
• Solvent and reagent inventory
• Instrument specifications

Procedure:

• Method Documentation and Characterization
  • Document complete analytical procedure from sample collection to final analysis.
  • Record all reagents, solvents, and consumables with exact volumes/masses.
  • Note instrument parameters, analysis time, and energy consumption.
  • Document waste streams and disposal methods.

• Green Dimension Assessment Using AGREE

  • Access the AGREE online calculator or software.
  • Input data corresponding to the 12 principles of GAC:
    • Principle 1: Direct sample measurement without treatment (preferred)
    • Principle 2: Minimal sample size requirement
    • Principle 3: In-line measurement capabilities
    • Principle 4: Minimal reagent consumption and toxicity
    • Principle 5: Energy minimization
    • Principle 6: Analyst safety considerations
    • Principle 7: Use of renewable resources
    • Principle 8: Derivative chemical minimization
    • Principle 9: Integration of analytical processes
    • Principle 10: Use of renewable reagents
    • Principle 11: Real-time, in-process monitoring
    • Principle 12: Elimination of toxic substances
  • Generate AGREE pictogram and numerical score (0-1 scale).
  • Interpret results: Scores >0.75 indicate high greenness; <0.5 suggest poor environmental performance.

• Red Dimension Assessment Using RAPI

  • Compile method validation data: accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, linearity, range, robustness.
  • Score each parameter on a standardized scale (e.g., 0-3 points).
  • Calculate total RAPI score, with higher values indicating superior analytical performance.
  • Compare against method requirements and regulatory thresholds.

• Blue Dimension Assessment Using BAGI

  • Evaluate practical aspects through the BAGI questionnaire:
    • Equipment requirements and availability
    • Analyst skill level requirements
    • Cost per analysis
    • Sample throughput
    • Automation potential
    • Safety considerations
    • Regulatory acceptance
  • Generate BAGI score and blue-intensity pictogram.
  • Higher scores indicate better practicality and applicability.

• Integrated WAC Assessment and Optimization

  • Combine RGB scores to determine overall "whiteness."
  • Identify dimensions with suboptimal performance.
  • Implement improvement strategies:
    • Green improvements: Solvent substitution, miniaturization, energy-efficient instrumentation.
    • Red improvements: Method optimization, enhanced detection strategies, improved sample preparation.
    • Blue improvements: Process simplification, automation, cost reduction.
  • Reassess method after modifications.

Protocol 2: Greenness-Centered Method Development for Mass Spectrometry

This protocol specifically addresses the development of environmentally sustainable MS methods while maintaining performance standards.

Materials:

• LC-MS/MS system or appropriate mass spectrometer
• Alternative green solvents (ethanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, supercritical CO₂)
• Micro-extraction devices
• Low-flow chromatographic equipment

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation Green Optimization
  • Evaluate solvent-free extraction techniques (SPME, headspace).
  • Test alternative solvents using GSST (Green Solvent Selection Tool).
  • Implement miniaturized approaches (micro-extraction, reduced volumes).
  • Assess possibilities for direct sample introduction.

• Chromatographic Separation Sustainability

  • Transition to UHPLC for improved efficiency.
  • Implement superficially porous particles for reduced backpressure.
  • Develop methods with reduced gradient times.
  • Explore high-temperature LC to reduce organic solvent requirements.

• Mass Spectrometry Interface Considerations

  • Optimize desolvation temperatures to reduce energy consumption.
  • Implement timed SRM transitions to reduce scan time.
  • Utilize instrument sleep modes during idle periods.

• Holistic Greenness Assessment

  • Apply multiple metrics (AGREE, GAPI, GEMAM) for comprehensive evaluation.
  • Calculate carbon footprint using CaFRI.
  • Compare against conventional methods to quantify sustainability improvements.

Visualization of WAC Relationships and Workflows

The following diagrams illustrate the core concepts, relationships, and workflows in White Analytical Chemistry, providing visual guidance for implementation.

The RGB Model Conceptual Framework

WAC Method Assessment Workflow

Successful implementation of White Analytical Chemistry requires familiarity with both conceptual frameworks and practical tools. The following toolkit provides essential resources for researchers applying WAC principles to mass spectrometry and pharmaceutical analysis methods.

Table 2: Essential WAC Assessment Tools and Resources

Tool/Resource	Primary Function	Access Method	Key Applications in Pharmaceutical Analysis
AGREE Calculator	Comprehensive greenness assessment based on 12 GAC principles	Online web tool	Evaluation of HPLC/MS methods for drug quantification [24]
AGREEprep	Specialized assessment of sample preparation environmental impact	Downloadable software	Solvent-intensive extraction techniques in bioanalysis [22]
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index)	Practicality and economic feasibility evaluation	Scoring template	Cost-benefit analysis of analytical methods in quality control [24]
RAPI (Red Analytical Performance Index)	Analytical performance quantification	Standardized scoring system	Method validation for regulatory submissions [22]
GEMAM	Flexible greenness evaluation with customizable weighting	Software (https://gitee.com/xtDLUT/Gemam)	Comprehensive method development and optimization [25]
GSST (Green Solvent Selection Tool)	Solvent environmental impact and safety evaluation	Guide/selection tool	Replacement of hazardous solvents in sample preparation [24]
CaFRI (Carbon Footprint Reduction Index)	Carbon emission estimation for analytical procedures	Calculation template	Sustainability reporting and environmental impact assessment [5]
VIGI (Violet Innovation Grade Index)	Innovation assessment across 10 methodological criteria	Scoring system	Evaluation of novel analytical approaches and technologies [22]

Application in Pharmaceutical Analysis: Case Studies

Case Study 1: Antiviral Drug Analysis in Pharmaceutical Formulations

A recent comprehensive study evaluated the environmental impact and practicality of analytical methods for antiviral medications ritonavir, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, important for treating influenza and potentially COVID-19 [24]. The study applied the AGREE, BAGI, and GSST tools to 47 different analytical methods, including spectrophotometry, spectrofluorimetry, electrochemistry, and liquid chromatography.

Key Findings:

• Spectrophotometric and electrochemical methods demonstrated superior greenness and cost-efficiency, achieving high AGREE and BAGI scores.
• Chromatographic methods, while more environmentally intensive, remained prioritized for complex analyses due to their robustness, accuracy, and versatility.
• The hybrid AGREE-BAGI-GSST framework effectively bridged the gap between environmental sustainability and practical applicability, providing actionable insights for method selection.

This case study demonstrates the critical balance between analytical performance (red), environmental impact (green), and practical considerations (blue) in pharmaceutical analysis, particularly for medications addressing global health challenges.

Case Study 2: AstraZeneca's Implementation of AMGS for Sustainable Chromatography

Pharmaceutical manufacturer AstraZeneca has implemented the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) to drive sustainable chromatographic method development across their portfolio [26]. This approach evaluates the environmental impact of chromatographic methods across multiple dimensions, including energy consumption in solvent production and disposal, solvent safety/toxicity, and instrument energy consumption.

Implementation Outcomes:

• Identification of specific methods with poor sustainability credentials for targeted redevelopment.
• Development of internal software tools for continuous data trending and process verification.
• Establishment of general guidance for analysts to reduce AMGS scores through:
  • Method transfer to UHPLC with smaller particle sizes
  • Reduction of column dimensions and flow rates
  • Optimization of gradient times and sample diluent compatibility
  • Solvent substitution strategies

This industry example illustrates the practical application of WAC principles in a major pharmaceutical company, highlighting the economic and ecological benefits of systematic method assessment and optimization.

White Analytical Chemistry represents a paradigm shift in how analytical methods are developed, evaluated, and implemented. By integrating the three dimensions of the RGB model—analytical performance (red), environmental impact (green), and practical applicability (blue)—WAC provides a comprehensive framework for sustainable analytical science [23] [21].

The future development of WAC will likely focus on several key areas:

• Tool Integration and Standardization: Efforts to create unified platforms that combine multiple assessment tools, potentially supported by artificial intelligence, to provide comprehensive method evaluations [22].
• Educational Integration: Incorporation of WAC principles into analytical chemistry curricula to train the next generation of chemists in sustainable practices.
• Regulatory Recognition: Growing acknowledgment of WAC assessments by regulatory agencies, potentially influencing method approval processes.
• Digital Transformation: Development of digital dashboards and interactive interfaces for real-time method evaluation and optimization [22].
• Green Financing: Implementation of dedicated funding models, such as Green Financing for Analytical Chemistry (GFAC), to promote innovations aligned with WAC goals [23].

For researchers focusing on mass spectrometry methods in pharmaceutical development, adopting the WAC framework provides a structured approach to balance the often-competing demands of analytical performance, environmental responsibility, and practical implementation. The protocols, tools, and case studies presented in this application note offer practical guidance for integrating these principles into method development, validation, and optimization processes.

The transition toward white methods is not merely an environmental imperative but a comprehensive strategy for developing analytically superior, environmentally responsible, and practically feasible analytical procedures that meet the evolving demands of modern pharmaceutical research and quality control.

The paradigm of drug development is progressively expanding beyond a singular focus on efficacy and safety to incorporate principles of environmental sustainability. The concept of "greenness" in this context refers to the implementation of practices that minimize environmental impact, enhance operational efficiency, and maintain analytical robustness throughout the research and development lifecycle. This is particularly critical in analytical techniques like mass spectrometry, which are foundational to pharmaceutical analysis but often involve significant consumption of solvents and energy. The drive towards sustainable science is fueled by global environmental initiatives, corporate social responsibility goals, and the economic imperative to reduce waste and operational costs. This application note details the core drivers, provides a quantitative framework for greenness assessment, and outlines practical protocols for integrating sustainability into mass spectrometry-based methods research.

Key Drivers for Adopting Green Practices

The transition to sustainable laboratory practices is motivated by a confluence of ethical, regulatory, and economic factors.

• Environmental Regulations and Global Initiatives: Worldwide, regulatory bodies are emphasizing the reduction of environmental footprints. While not yet universally mandated for analytical methods, the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) provide a framework for minimizing the use of hazardous substances and waste generation [27]. The recent advancement to White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) further integrates sustainability with analytical performance, ensuring that green modifications do not compromise the precision, accuracy, and robustness required in drug development [27].
• Economic and Operational Efficiency: Sustainable practices directly translate to cost savings. Reducing the consumption of expensive, high-purity organic solvents and decreasing the volume of hazardous waste for disposal lowers operational expenditures. Furthermore, methods designed with green principles often feature streamlined workflows and shorter analysis times, leading to greater throughput and lower energy consumption [27].
• Corporate Responsibility and Reputation: Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly assessed on their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance. Demonstrating a commitment to sustainable research practices enhances a company's public image, satisfies stakeholder expectations, and aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Quantitative Greenness Assessment Tools for Analytical Methods

A cornerstone of implementing sustainable practices is the ability to quantitatively evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. Multiple tools have been developed for this purpose, each with unique scoring systems and evaluation criteria. The table below summarizes the key assessment tools applicable to mass spectrometry methods.

Table 1: Greenness Assessment Tools for Analytical Methods

Tool Name	Type of Assessment	Key Evaluation Parameters	Scoring System/Output
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index) [27]	Qualitative	PBT* substances, hazardous chemicals, corrosivity (pH), waste generation (<50g)	Pictogram: 4 quadrants, green for compliance.
Analytical Eco-Scale [27]	Semi-quantitative	Reagent hazard, energy consumption, waste amount & management.	Score out of 100; ≥75 = excellent, <50 = insufficient.
Modified NEMI (AGP) [27]	Semi-quantitative	Health, safety, and environmental hazards; energy use; waste production.	Pentagram diagram with color-coded risk (Green-Yellow-Red).
SPMS (Sample Preparation Metric of Sustainability) [27]	Quantitative	Sample amount, extractant type/volume, procedural steps, energy & waste.	Clock-like diagram with a central sustainability score.
ChlorTox [27]	Quantitative	Chemical risk based on toxicity relative to chloroform.	Total ChlorTox score; lower scores indicate lower risk.
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index) [27]	Quantitative	Balances analytical effectiveness with environmental impact and practicality.	Score; higher values indicate a better balance.

*PBT: Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic

The selection of an assessment tool depends on the desired level of detail. For a rapid, qualitative overview, NEMI is effective. For a more nuanced, semi-quantitative evaluation that includes energy consumption, the Analytical Eco-Scale or Modified NEMI are preferred. For a deep, quantitative analysis of chemical toxicity, ChlorTox is highly effective.

Experimental Protocol: Greenness Assessment of an LC-MS Method

This protocol provides a step-by-step guide for evaluating the greenness of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method used for drug quantification, using the Analytical Eco-Scale and NEMI tools.

• Objective: To assess and improve the environmental footprint of an LC-MS method for quantifying Paclitaxel (or a similar drug compound) in plasma.
• Background: Conventional LC-MS methods often use large volumes of acetonitrile or methanol, which are environmentally detrimental. This protocol outlines the assessment and optimization process.
• Experimental Workflow: The procedure follows a logical sequence from method definition to a final optimized and validated method.

The following diagram illustrates the core experimental workflow for method assessment and optimization:

Materials and Reagents

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for LC-MS Analysis

Item	Function/Description	Green Consideration
Acetonitrile (ACN)	Common organic mobile phase modifier; provides sharp peak elution.	High environmental impact; prioritize reduction or replacement with greener solvents like ethanol.
Methanol (MeOH)	Organic mobile phase modifier.	Generally considered greener than ACN.
Water (HPLC Grade)	Aqueous component of the mobile phase.	--
Formic Acid	Mobile phase additive to improve ionization in MS.	Use at minimal necessary concentration (e.g., 0.1% vs. 0.5%).
Analytical Column	Stationary phase for chromatographic separation.	Use smaller dimension columns (e.g., 2.1 mm ID) to reduce solvent consumption.
Reference Standard	High-purity compound for method calibration.	--

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Method Definition and Inventory:

  • Clearly document all method parameters: mobile phase composition, flow rate, injection volume, run time, column dimensions, and MS source conditions.
  • Create a comprehensive list of all chemicals, their amounts (in grams or mL per sample), and their associated hazards according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). Estimate the total energy consumption of the instrumentation per sample run.

• Waste Calculation:

  • Calculate the total waste generated per sample analysis using the formula: Waste (g) = (Flow rate (mL/min) × Run time (min) × Density of waste (g/mL)) + waste from sample prep Assume an average density of 1.0 g/mL for aqueous-organic mixtures. The goal is to keep total waste per analysis under 50 g to satisfy NEMI criteria [27].

• Application of Assessment Tools:

  • Analytical Eco-Scale:
    • Start with a baseline score of 100.
    • Subtract penalty points for each reagent based on its GHS hazard category and quantity used [27].
    • Subtract points for energy consumption (>1.5 kWh/sample is penalized) and for any generated waste that is not recycled or degraded.
    • A final score of ≥75 is classified as an "excellent green analysis".
  • NEMI Pictogram:
    • Assess the method against the four NEMI criteria (PBT, Hazardous, Corrosive, Waste <50g).
    • For each criterion the method passes, fill the corresponding quadrant in the NEMI pictogram green.

• Interpretation and Optimization:

  • A low Eco-Scale score or an incomplete NEMI pictogram highlights areas for improvement.
  • Common optimization strategies include:
    • Solvent Reduction: Switching to a column with a smaller internal diameter (e.g., from 4.6 mm to 2.1 mm) and reducing flow rate.
    • Solvent Replacement: Replacing acetonitrile with a greener alternative like ethanol where chromatographic performance allows.
    • Waste Management: Implementing solvent recycling systems for the mobile phase.

• Validation of the Optimized Method:

  • After implementing changes, the optimized method must be fully validated according to ICH Q2(R1) guidelines to ensure that the improved greenness does not compromise key performance parameters: linearity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity (LOD/LOQ), and robustness.

Integrating greenness assessment into the lifecycle of mass spectrometry methods is no longer optional but a necessary component of modern, responsible drug development. By leveraging standardized tools like the Analytical Eco-Scale and NEMI, scientists can make informed decisions that significantly reduce the environmental impact of their research. The initial investment in method optimization is offset by long-term gains in cost-efficiency, regulatory alignment, and corporate stewardship. Adopting these practices ensures that the pursuit of health innovation occurs in harmony with planetary health.

Implementing Green Metrics in LC-MS and GC-MS Workflows

The escalating global issue of pharmaceutical contamination in aquatic environments has intensified the need for effective monitoring techniques that are not only precise and sensitive but also environmentally sustainable [28]. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles have emerged as a fundamental framework for developing analytical methods that minimize environmental impact while maintaining high analytical performance [29]. This case study examines the application of two established greenness assessment tools—AGREE (Analytical GREEnness Calculator) and GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index)—to evaluate a recently developed green UHPLC-MS/MS method for monitoring trace levels of pharmaceutical compounds in water and wastewater [28] [9]. The methodology demonstrates how greenness metrics can be systematically applied to validate the environmental sustainability claims of analytical procedures within the broader context of mass spectrometry method development research.

Experimental Background and Method Specifications

Target Pharmaceutical Contaminants

The UHPLC-MS/MS method was designed for the simultaneous determination of three pharmaceutical compounds representing different therapeutic classes and environmental persistence profiles [28] [9]. These compounds serve as indicators of anthropogenic contamination in aquatic systems.

Table 1: Target Pharmaceutical Compounds and Their Environmental Significance

Compound	Therapeutic Class	Environmental Significance	Key Properties
Carbamazepine	Anticonvulsant	Established environmental contaminant indicator due to high stability and poor biodegradability [28]	Persistent in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)
Caffeine	Psychoactive stimulant	Excellent marker for domestic wastewater contamination [28] [9]	Correlates with insufficiently treated sewage
Ibuprofen	Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)	Significant "emerging contaminant" with ecotoxicological effects [28]	Partially degradable in WWTPs

Analytical Instrumentation and Conditions

The developed method utilized ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), recognized as the gold standard for pharmaceutical analysis in aquatic environments due to its superior sensitivity, selectivity, and ability to detect compounds at ng/L levels without derivatization [28] [9]. Key methodological advantages included the omission of an energy- and solvent-intensive evaporation step after solid-phase extraction (SPE), significantly reducing the environmental footprint of sample preparation [28].

Table 2: Key Method Parameters and Performance Characteristics

Parameter	Specification	Value/Benchmark
Analysis Time	Runtime	10 minutes [28] [9]
Specificity	Correlation with ICH guidelines	Specific [28]
Linearity	Correlation coefficients	≥ 0.999 [28] [9]
Precision	Relative Standard Deviation (RSD)	< 5.0% [28] [9]
Accuracy	Recovery rates	77% to 160% [28] [9]
Limits of Detection (LOD)	Caffeine/Ibuprofen/Carbamazepine	300/200/100 ng/L [28]
Limits of Quantification (LOQ)	Caffeine/Ibuprofen/Carbamazepine	1000/600/300 ng/L [28]

Greenness Assessment Protocols

Greenness assessment metrics provide standardized approaches to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures. AGREE and GAPI were selected for this case study based on their comprehensive coverage of GAC principles and complementary assessment approaches [29].

AGREE (Analytical GREEnness Calculator): This software-based tool directly implements the 12 principles of GAC, assigning each principle a specific weight before generating a clock-like pictogram with a final score between 0 and 1, using a color-coded scale (red, yellow, green) to reflect method greenness [29] [25].

GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index): This tool provides a semi-quantitative assessment through a five-pentagram pictogram that evaluates the environmental impact of an entire method, from sampling to determination, using a green-yellow-red color scale [29] [25].

AGREE Assessment Protocol

The AGREE evaluation follows a systematic process based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry:

Procedure:

• Data Collection: Gather detailed information on all method parameters including sample preparation, reagent consumption, energy requirements, waste generation, and operator safety measures [29].
• Principle Scoring: Evaluate the method against each of the 12 GAC principles, assigning performance values for each criterion.
• Weight Application: Apply tool-specific weighting factors to each principle according to its relative environmental importance [25].
• Score Calculation: Use the AGREE software to compute the overall score based on the weighted assessments.
• Pictogram Generation: The software generates a comprehensive pictogram displaying the final score (0-1) with color-coded segments for each principle.

GAPI Assessment Protocol

The GAPI evaluation employs a complementary approach focusing on different methodological aspects:

Procedure:

• Method Deconstruction: Break down the analytical procedure into distinct stages from sample collection to final determination.
• Stage Assessment: Evaluate each methodological stage against established environmental impact criteria.
• Color Assignment: Assign green (low impact), yellow (moderate impact), or red (high impact) codes to each assessed parameter.
• Pictogram Construction: Populate the five pentagrams of the GAPI pictogram with the color-coded assessments to create a visual sustainability profile.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green UHPLC-MS/MS Pharmaceutical Analysis

Item	Function/Application	Green Considerations
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Cartridges	Pre-concentration and clean-up of water samples prior to analysis	Reusable options preferred; minimized solvent consumption [28]
Methanol/Acetonitrile (HPLC Grade)	Mobile phase components for chromatographic separation	Toxicity and waste potential assessed; volumes minimized [29]
Aqueous Mobile Phase Modifiers	Formic acid or ammonium acetate for pH adjustment and ionization	Minimal concentrations used (e.g., 0.1% formic acid) [30]
Reference Standards	Carbamazepine, caffeine, and ibuprofen for calibration and quantification	Minimal quantities used; proper disposal of stock solutions [28]
Internal Standards	Isotopically labeled analogs for quantification accuracy	Reduced method variability and potential re-analysis [28]

Results and Discussion

Greenness Assessment Outcomes

Application of AGREE and GAPI metrics to the UHPLC-MS/MS method yielded quantitatively robust validation of its environmental sustainability claims. The method's innovative sample preparation approach, which omitted the traditional evaporation step after solid-phase extraction, contributed significantly to its high greenness scores by reducing solvent consumption and energy requirements [28]. The 10-minute analysis time further enhanced the method's green profile by minimizing energy consumption per sample [9].

The complementary nature of AGREE and GAPI provided a comprehensive sustainability profile. AGREE delivered a quantitative overall score (typically >0.8 for high-performance green methods) based on weighted GAC principles, while GAPI offered a detailed qualitative visualization of environmental impacts across different methodological stages [29] [25].

Comparative Analysis with Conventional Methods

When benchmarked against conventional pharmaceutical monitoring approaches, the green UHPLC-MS/MS method demonstrated substantial environmental advantages:

• Compared to GC-MS: Elimination of derivatization requirements for non-volatile pharmaceuticals, reducing reagent consumption and analysis time [28]
• Compared to HPLC-UV: Superior sensitivity and selectivity enabling lower sample volumes and reduced solvent consumption in sample preparation [28]
• Compared to traditional SPE protocols: Removal of energy-intensive evaporation/concentration steps, significantly reducing the method's carbon footprint [28] [9]

Integration with Broader Sustainability Frameworks

The AGREE and GAPI assessments place the UHPLC-MS/MS method within the evolving context of sustainable analytical chemistry frameworks. The method aligns with the principles of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which balances the traditional analytical performance (Red), environmental impact (Green), and practical/economic feasibility (Blue) [29]. Recent metric tools like BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index) further complement this assessment by evaluating practical aspects such as sample throughput, cost, and automation potential [29] [31].

This case study demonstrates the critical importance of systematic greenness assessment in validating the environmental sustainability claims of modern analytical methods. The AGREE and GAPI metrics provided comprehensive, multi-dimensional evaluation of a green UHPLC-MS/MS method for pharmaceutical monitoring in aquatic environments, confirming its alignment with GAC principles while maintaining high analytical performance. The methodologies and protocols detailed herein offer researchers a standardized framework for conducting similar assessments across diverse analytical techniques, supporting the broader integration of sustainability principles in mass spectrometry method development and validation. As green chemistry metrics continue to evolve, their consistent application will be essential for driving innovation in environmentally responsible analytical science while addressing the pressing challenge of pharmaceutical contamination in global water resources.

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have emerged as a transformative force in modern analytical science, prompting a critical re-evaluation of traditional methodologies across pharmaceutical analysis and bioanalytics [8]. This paradigm shift prioritizes the reduction of hazardous solvent consumption, minimization of waste generation, and enhancement of operator safety without compromising analytical performance [32] [25]. Within this framework, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) presents inherent green advantages over liquid chromatography by eliminating the substantial solvent waste associated with liquid mobile phases [31].

The development and validation of green analytical methods require robust assessment tools to quantify their environmental impact and practicality. While several greenness metrics exist, the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) has recently emerged as a complementary tool specifically designed to evaluate methodological practicality within the broader concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which balances analytical effectiveness with environmental and practical considerations [33] [34]. This case study examines a novel, rapid GC-MS method for the simultaneous quantification of paracetamol (PAR) and metoclopramide (MET) through the lens of BAGI and other greenness assessment tools, demonstrating its environmental and practical superiority for pharmaceutical quality control and pharmacokinetic studies [31].

Literature Review: Greenness Assessment Metrics

The evaluation of an analytical method's environmental impact relies on standardized metric tools. Fifteen widely used GAC metrics have been developed, each with distinct characteristics, merits, and limitations [32]. The most relevant to this study include:

• NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index): One of the earliest tools, providing a simple qualitative assessment via a pictogram with four quadrants [32] [14].
• GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index): Extends NEMI by evaluating the entire analytical procedure through a more detailed pictogram covering five stages [32] [14].
• AGREE (Analytical GREEnness Metric): A comprehensive calculator based on all 12 principles of GAC, producing a clock-like pictogram with a final score from 0-1 [14] [25].
• AGREEprep: A specialized metric focusing exclusively on sample preparation steps according to 10 green sample preparation principles [14].
• BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index): A recently developed tool that evaluates methodological practicality and applicability, filling a critical gap by assessing the practical aspects that complement purely environmental metrics [33] [34].

These tools collectively enable a comprehensive assessment of analytical methods, balancing environmental impact with practical applicability—the core principle of White Analytical Chemistry [34].

Materials and Experimental Protocols

Research Reagent Solutions and Instrumentation

Table 1: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Item Name	Specification/Purity	Function/Role in Analysis
Paracetamol (PAR)	99.90% purity	Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (analyte)
Metoclopramide (MET)	99.98% purity	Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (analyte)
Ethanol	HPLC-grade	Green solvent for stock and working solutions
Helium	Grade 5.0 (99.999%)	Carrier gas for chromatography
Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 Column	4.6 × 100 mm, 5 μm	Stationary phase for chromatographic separation
Migracid Tablets	Batch #03170400	Pharmaceutical formulation for method application
Human Plasma	Medication-free	Biological matrix for method validation

Instrumentation: The analysis was performed using an Agilent 7890A GC system coupled with an Agilent 5975C inert mass spectrometer with Triple Axis Detector. Separation was achieved using an Agilent 19091S-433 capillary column (5% Phenyl Methyl Silox, 30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm). Data acquisition and processing were managed using Agilent MassHunter software (version B.07.06) [31].

Detailed Experimental Workflow

Figure 1: Experimental workflow for the development and greenness assessment of the GC-MS method for paracetamol and metoclopramide analysis.

Stock and Working Solution Preparation

Primary Stock Solution: PAR and MET were accurately weighed and dissolved in ethanol to achieve concentrations of 500 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively [31].

Working Solutions: Prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock solution with ethanol to create a series of calibration standards covering the concentration range of 0.2-450 μg/mL for PAR and 0.04-90 μg/mL for MET [31].

Pharmaceutical Sample Preparation

Tablet Formulation (Migracid): A representative amount of powdered tablets equivalent to one tablet was accurately weighed and dissolved in ethanol. The solution was subjected to ultrasonication for 15 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter before analysis [31].

Plasma Sample Preparation

Protein Precipitation: Drug-free human plasma samples were spiked with appropriate amounts of PAR and MET working standards. Proteins were precipitated using ethanol (1:2 ratio), followed by vortex mixing for 1 minute and centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The clear supernatant was transferred to autosampler vials for analysis [31].

GC-MS Instrumental Parameters

Chromatographic Conditions:

• Carrier Gas: Helium at constant flow rate of 2 mL/min
• Injector Temperature: 250°C
• Injection Volume: 1 μL (splitless mode)
• Oven Temperature Program: Initial 100°C (held for 1 min), ramped to 280°C at 25°C/min (held for 2 min)
• Total Run Time: 5 minutes [31]

Mass Spectrometric Conditions:

• Ionization Mode: Electron Impact (EI) at 70 eV
• Ion Source Temperature: 150°C
• Quadrupole Temperature: 230°C
• Transfer Line Temperature: 280°C
• Detection: Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode at m/z 109 for PAR and m/z 86 for MET [31]

Results and Data Analysis

Method Validation and Performance Data

The GC-MS method was rigorously validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating excellent analytical performance [31].

Table 2: Method Validation Parameters for PAR and MET Analysis

Validation Parameter	Paracetamol (PAR)	Metoclopramide (MET)
Linearity Range	0.2-80 μg/mL	0.3-90 μg/mL
Correlation Coefficient (r²)	0.9999	0.9988
Precision (RSD%)	≤3.605%	≤3.392%
Tablet Recovery	102.87 ± 3.605%	101.98 ± 3.392%
Plasma Recovery	92.79 ± 1.521%	91.99 ± 2.153%
Analysis Time	5 minutes	5 minutes

Greenness and Practicality Assessment

The method was evaluated using multiple assessment tools to comprehensively profile its environmental and practical performance [31].

Table 3: Comparative Greenness and Practicality Assessment

Assessment Tool	Score/Rating	Interpretation
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index)	82.5/100	High practicality and applicability
AGREE (Analytical GREEnness)	0.82 (estimated)	Excellent greenness profile
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index)	4/4 green fields	Meets all environmental criteria
GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index)	Mostly green pictogram	Low environmental impact
Analytic Eco-Scale	High score (estimated)	Minor penalty points

Figure 2: Relationship between greenness assessment metrics and the position of BAGI in evaluating methodological practicality within the White Analytical Chemistry framework.

Discussion

Strategic Advantages of GC-MS in Green Pharmaceutical Analysis

The developed GC-MS method demonstrates significant advantages over conventional liquid chromatography approaches for pharmaceutical analysis. The elimination of liquid mobile phases substantially reduces hazardous solvent consumption and waste generation, addressing one of the most significant environmental concerns in analytical laboratories [31]. The method's exceptional speed (5-minute runtime) directly correlates with reduced energy consumption, aligning with the principles of green chemistry that advocate for energy-efficient processes [31].

The high-polarity 5% Phenyl Methyl Silox column provided excellent separation efficiency while maintaining thermal stability, enabling the analysis of polar pharmaceuticals like paracetamol and metoclopramide without derivatization. This approach avoids additional reagent consumption and sample preparation steps, further enhancing the method's green credentials [31].

Comprehensive Greenness Interpretation Through Multiple Metrics

The application of multiple assessment tools provides a holistic view of the method's environmental and practical performance. The BAGI score of 82.5 confirms high practicality for routine application in pharmaceutical quality control and clinical monitoring [31] [33]. This excellent practicality profile complements the strong environmental performance demonstrated by high scores on NEMI, GAPI, and AGREE assessments [31].

The method's sample throughput capability and minimal sample requirements contribute significantly to its strong BAGI performance. Furthermore, the avoidance of preconcentration steps and straightforward sample preparation enhance its practical applicability while maintaining environmental benefits [33].

Application Scope and Relevance to Pharmaceutical Analysis

The validated method successfully addresses the clinical need for simultaneous monitoring of paracetamol and metoclopramide, a combination particularly relevant for migraine management where both analgesic and antiemetic effects are required [31]. The excellent recovery rates from both pharmaceutical formulations (102.87% for PAR; 101.98% for MET) and plasma samples (92.79% for PAR; 91.99% for MET) demonstrate robustness across different matrices, supporting its application in quality control and pharmacokinetic studies [31].

The method's wide linearity range (0.2-80 μg/mL for PAR; 0.3-90 μg/mL for MET) covers both therapeutic and toxicological concentrations, making it suitable for routine monitoring and overdose situations. The selective ion monitoring at m/z 109 (PAR) and m/z 86 (MET) ensures high specificity even in complex biological matrices like plasma [31].

This case study demonstrates that the BAGI-assessed GC-MS method represents a significant advancement in sustainable pharmaceutical analysis. The method successfully balances the often-competing demands of analytical performance, practical applicability, and environmental responsibility. With its rapid 5-minute analysis time, minimal solvent consumption, and proven reliability for both pharmaceutical and biological samples, this approach establishes a new standard for green methodology in routine quality control and clinical research settings.

The comprehensive assessment using BAGI alongside traditional green metrics provides a validated framework for evaluating analytical methods within the White Analytical Chemistry paradigm. This integrated approach offers pharmaceutical scientists and researchers a practical tool for developing sustainable analytical methods without compromising performance, paving the way for wider adoption of green chemistry principles in pharmaceutical analysis and mass spectrometry applications.

The adoption of green strategies in sample preparation is an essential step toward reducing the environmental footprint of analytical laboratories, particularly those utilizing mass spectrometry (MS). The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) provide a framework for developing sustainable methods that minimize the use of hazardous substances, energy, and waste without compromising analytical performance [35] [36]. This is especially critical in mass spectrometry, where traditional sample preparation often involves solvent-intensive and energy-consuming procedures.

This document outlines practical strategies for implementing green sample preparation, focusing on three core areas: miniaturization of extraction techniques, selection of green solvents, and reduction of waste. Designed for researchers and drug development professionals, these protocols and application notes are framed within the broader context of greenness assessment for mass spectrometry methods, enabling labs to enhance their sustainability while maintaining high-quality analytical results.

Core Strategies and Principles

The Twelve Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

The Twelve Principles of GAC guide the development of sustainable analytical methods. Key principles directly relevant to sample preparation include [36]:

• Principle 2: Sample preparation should be minimal or eliminated.
• Principle 5: Energy consumption should be minimized.
• Principle 7: Derivatives should be avoided to reduce reagent use.
• Principle 10: The use of toxic reagents should be minimized.
• Principle 12: All reagents should be safe for operators and the environment.

Green Solvent Selection

Transitioning from traditional solvents to greener alternatives is a pivotal shift toward sustainable science. An ideal green solvent is characterized by its biodegradability, low toxicity, low volatility, reduced flammability, and compatibility with analytical techniques [36]. It is also crucial that the solvent is produced from renewable feedstocks using energy-efficient processes. Several guides, such as the CHEM21 guide and the recently developed GreenSOL, assist analysts in evaluating solvents based on environmental, health, and safety criteria across their entire lifecycle [37] [38].

Solvent Selection Logic

Application Notes

AN-001: Miniaturized Liquid-Phase Extraction for Environmental Water Analysis

1. Background: The analysis of pollutants in environmental water samples traditionally requires processing large sample volumes (500 mL to 1 L), consuming significant amounts of organic solvents for extraction and leading to substantial waste [39] [40]. This application note describes a miniaturized approach for the monitoring of 6PPD-quinone, a tire rubber antioxidant derivative toxic to coho salmon, achieving high sensitivity with a 50-fold reduction in sample volume.

2. Experimental Protocol

2.1. Reagents and Materials:

• Samples: Surface water, influent/effluent wastewater.
• Analytes: 6PPD-quinone (and other target analytes as required).
• Internal Standard: Deuterated or structural analog of the analyte.
• Solvents: HPLC-grade methanol, acetonitrile, and acetone. Green solvents (e.g., ethyl acetate, bio-based ethanol) should be evaluated as alternatives [36].
• Materials: 10 mL glass vials with PTFE-lined caps, 1 mL and 100 µL gas-tight syringes, automated pipettes, 60 mg Waters Oasis HLB solid-phase extraction cartridges (or equivalent).

2.2. Instrumentation:

• Liquid Chromatograph: Binary or quaternary pump system with a thermostated autosampler and column oven.
• Mass Spectrometer: Tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) with electrospray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI).
• Software: Vendor-specific for data acquisition and processing.

2.3. Procedure:

2.3.1. Sample Collection and Storage:

• Collect water samples in pre-cleaned amber glass bottles.
• If immediate analysis is not possible, store samples at 4°C and analyze within 48 hours. For longer storage, freeze at -20°C.

2.3.2. Miniaturized Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE):

• Conditioning: Activate the 60 mg SPE cartridge with 1 mL of methanol, followed by 1 mL of reagent-grade water. Do not allow the sorbent to dry.
• Loading: Load 9.6 mL of water sample (pH adjusted if necessary) onto the cartridge at a flow rate of 1-2 mL/min using a vacuum manifold or positive pressure.
• Washing: Wash the cartridge with 1 mL of a 5% methanol in water solution to remove interfering salts and polar compounds.
• Elution: Elute the analyte into a 10 mL collection vial using 1 mL of methanol. Apply the solvent gently and ensure complete elution.

2.3.3. Direct Sample Introduction ("Dilute-and-Shoot"):

• Alternative Path: For samples with higher analyte concentrations or lower sensitivity requirements, the "dilute-and-shoot" method can be used.
• Procedure: Mix a 100 µL aliquot of the water sample with 900 µL of a weak solvent (e.g., 0.1% formic acid in water) in an LC vial. Vortex for 30 seconds and proceed to analysis.

2.3.4. LC-MS/MS Analysis:

• Chromatography:
  • Column: C18 reversed-phase column (e.g., 100 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm).
  • Mobile Phase A: 0.1% Formic acid in water.
  • Mobile Phase B: 0.1% Formic acid in acetonitrile or methanol.
  • Gradient: 5% B to 95% B over 10 minutes, hold for 2 minutes, re-equilibrate for 3 minutes.
  • Flow Rate: 0.3 mL/min.
  • Injection Volume: 5 µL.
• Mass Spectrometry:
  • Ionization: ESI in positive mode.
  • Operation: Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) mode.
  • Source Conditions: Optimize for desolvation temperature, desolvation gas flow, and capillary voltage.
  • MRM Transitions: For 6PPD-quinone: 359.2 > 171.1 (quantifier) and 359.2 > 155.1 (qualifier).

3. Greenness Assessment: This method exemplifies multiple GAC principles. It reduces sample volume from 500 mL to 9.6 mL (a 98% reduction) and solvent consumption during extraction by up to 99% compared to established procedures [39]. The miniaturized approach also reduces sample storage space and the amount of waste generated.

AN-002: Chromatography-Free Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Analysis

1. Background: Conventional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) workflows are robust but generate large amounts of organic solvent waste and require significant maintenance [41]. Ambient ionization techniques, such as Direct Analysis in Real Time (DART), coupled with miniature mass spectrometers, eliminate the chromatography step, enabling rapid, high-throughput, and sustainable analysis.

2. Experimental Protocol

2.1. Reagents and Materials:

• Samples: Solid materials (e.g., plant leaves, pharmaceutical tablets), liquid samples (e.g., urine extracts), or surface swabs.
• Solvents: Minimal solvents for sample spotting, such as methanol or acetonitrile.
• Materials: Glass sampling sticks (for DART), 12-well screen holders, automated sample positioning system.

2.2. Instrumentation:

• Mass Spectrometer: Bruker EVOQ DART-TQ+ triple quadrupole MS or similar system with integrated ambient ionization source.
• Automation: Robotic sample arm for high-throughput screening.

2.3. Procedure:

2.3.1. Sample Preparation:

• Solid Samples: Place a few grains of solid material directly on a glass sampling stick. For tablets, a simple crush-and-test method can be used.
• Liquid Samples: Spot 1-5 µL of the liquid sample or extract onto a glass sampling stick and allow to dry.
• Surface Analysis: Wipe the surface of interest with a swab. Elute the analytes with a minimal volume of solvent (e.g., 100 µL of methanol) and spot onto a sampling stick.

2.3.2. DART-MS/MS Analysis:

• Ion Source Configuration: Ensure the DART ion source is mounted in the correct geometry and the helium gas supply is connected.
• Mass Spectrometer Tuning: Tune the triple quadrupole MS for the target analytes using flow injection analysis (FIA) with standard solutions to establish optimal MRM transitions.
• DART Parameters:
  • Gas Temperature: Set between 250°C and 450°C.
  • Grid Electrode Voltage: Typically +250 V for positive ion mode.
  • Helium Flow Rate: Optimize for stable ionization (usually ~2-3 L/min).
• Data Acquisition:
  • Introduce the sample stick into the gap between the DART source and the MS inlet.
  • The automated system will move the stick through the ionization region.
  • Acquire data in MRM mode for targeted quantification. Each analysis takes 5-15 seconds.

3. Greenness Assessment: The removal of the chromatography step eliminates the generation of large volumes of organic waste associated with LC mobile phases [41]. This leads to a direct reduction in solvent purchasing costs and hazardous waste disposal costs. The method also significantly reduces energy consumption as the LC pumps and column oven are not in use.

Quantitative Data and Metrics

Solvent and Waste Reduction in Practical Applications

Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Sample Preparation Methods

Method / Parameter	Traditional SPE [39]	Miniaturized SPE [39]	Dilute-and-Shoot [39]	DART-MS [41]
Sample Volume	500 mL	9.6 mL	0.1 mL	Minimal (mg-µg)
Solvent Consumed per Extraction	~100 mL	~2 mL	~1 mL (diluent)	< 0.1 mL
Organic Waste Generated per Sample	~100 mL	~2 mL	~1 mL	Negligible
Limit of Quantification (LOQ)	0.1 ng L⁻¹	0.03 ng L⁻¹	1.74 ng L⁻¹	Compound-dependent
Analysis Time	Minutes-hours	Minutes-hours	Minutes	Seconds
Energy Consumption	High (LC pumps, oven)	High (LC pumps, oven)	High (LC pumps, oven)	Low (MS only)

Green Solvent Selection Guide

Table 2: Evaluation of Common and Green Solvents for Sample Preparation

Solvent	Source/Type	Health & Safety	Environmental Impact	Waste Treatment	Composite Score (1-10) [38]	Recommended Alternatives
n-Hexane	Petroleum	High toxicity, flammable	High VOC, non-biodegradable	Incineration	~2	Ethyl Lactate, Cyclopentyl methyl ether
Chloroform	Petroleum	Carcinogen, toxic	Ozone layer depletion, toxic	Specialist disposal	~1	Dichloromethane (less toxic), 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran
Acetone	Petroleum / Bio-based	Low toxicity, flammable	High VOC, biodegradable	Incineration, biodegradation	~7	-
Methanol	Synthetic	Toxic	Readily biodegradable	Incineration	~5	Ethanol
Ethyl Acetate	Bio-based (fermentation)	Low toxicity, flammable	Readily biodegradable	Biodegradation	~8	-
Bio-based Ethanol	Bio-based (e.g., sugarcane)	Low toxicity, flammable	Renewable, biodegradable	Biodegradation	~9	-
Supercritical CO₂	Natural, recycled	Non-toxic, non-flammable	Zero VOC, non-polluting	Recovered	~9	-
Limonene	Bio-based (orange peels)	Low toxicity	Renewable, biodegradable	Biodegradation	~8	-
Ionic Liquids	Synthetic	Variable toxicity	Low volatility, can be persistent	Specialist disposal	Variable	Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES)
Water (Subcritical)	Natural	Non-toxic	Zero VOC, non-polluting	Direct	~10	-

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

Item	Function/Description	Green Advantage & Example
Miniaturized SPE Cartridges	Micro-extraction devices (e.g., 1-60 mg sorbent mass) for analyte pre-concentration from small sample volumes.	Reduces solvent consumption for elution by >90% and minimizes plastic waste [39] [40].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	A solvent-free technique where a coated fiber extracts analytes directly from sample headspace or liquid.	Eliminates the need for organic solvents entirely, aligning with solvent-free principles [42].
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES)	Mixtures of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors that form liquids with low volatility and tunable chemistry.	Low toxicity, biodegradable, and often derived from natural sources (e.g., choline chloride + urea) [36].
Ionic Liquids (ILs)	Salts in the liquid state at room temperature used as alternative solvents or SPME fiber coatings.	Negligible vapor pressure prevents VOC emissions, enhancing laboratory air safety [40] [36].
Bio-based Solvents	Solvents derived from renewable biomass (e.g., ethanol from sugarcane, limonene from orange peels).	Reduce reliance on fossil fuels and are often readily biodegradable, closing the carbon cycle [36].
Automated Liquid Handlers	Robotics for performing micro-dispensations, dilutions, and sample transfers.	Enables miniaturization, improves reproducibility, and reduces human exposure to hazardous samples/solvents [40].
Ambient Ionization Sources	Devices like DART that ionize samples directly from surfaces for MS analysis.	Enables chromatography-free workflows, drastically reducing solvent waste and analysis time [35] [41].

Integrated Workflow and Decision Logic

Implementing green strategies often requires a holistic view of the analytical process. The following diagram integrates the core concepts of miniaturization, solvent selection, and technique choice into a single workflow for method development.

Green Strategy Integration

In the contemporary landscape of analytical chemistry, the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have become paramount, driving innovation toward more sustainable laboratory practices without compromising data quality. This application note delineates detailed protocols and strategic frameworks for enhancing the environmental sustainability of mass spectrometry (MS) operations—a cornerstone technique in drug development and clinical research. We focus on three critical and often interconnected areas: maximizing throughput, reducing energy consumption, and optimizing carrier gas usage. The guidance herein is designed to empower researchers and scientists to align their analytical methodologies with the twelve principles of GAC, thereby minimizing ecological footprints while maintaining, or even enhancing, analytical performance [35].

High-Throughput and Automated Sample Preparation

A primary strategy for improving the greenness of MS workflows is to implement high-throughput, automated sample preparation. This approach directly reduces analysis time, solvent consumption, and energy use per sample.

Protocol: Automated Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) for Steroid and Hormone Analysis

This protocol, adapted from a recent wastewater surveillance study, demonstrates a high-throughput, green robotic workflow suitable for complex biological matrices like plasma, serum, or urine [43].

• Objective: To automate the extraction and concentration of 27 steroids and hormones (SHs) from biofluids prior to UPLC-MS/MS analysis, minimizing manual intervention and solvent use.

• Materials and Reagents:

  • Samples: Human biofluids (e.g., urine, plasma).
  • SPE Cartridges: Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB) cartridges (e.g., 60 mg/3 mL).
  • Solvents: HPLC-grade methanol, acetonitrile, and water; reagent-grade formic acid.
  • Equipment: Biomek i7 Automated Workstation (or equivalent liquid handling robot), UPLC-MS/MS system, positive pressure manifold, vortex mixer, centrifuge.
  • Standards: Analytical standards for target SHs, internal standards (e.g., deuterated analogs).

• Detailed Procedure:

  • Sample Pretreatment: Centrifuge biofluid samples at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes. Transfer a predetermined volume (e.g., 1-5 mL) of supernatant to a rack compatible with the robotic workstation.
  • SPE Cartridge Conditioning (Automated): The robotic method executes the following steps:
    • Condition each HLB cartridge with 3 mL of methanol.
    • Equilibrate each cartridge with 3 mL of purified water.
    • Maintain a constant flow rate of 1-2 mL/min throughout; do not allow the sorbent to dry out.
  • Sample Loading (Automated): Load the clarified biofluid supernatant onto the conditioned HLB cartridges at a flow rate of 1-2 mL/min.
  • Cartridge Washing (Automated): Wash each cartridge with 3 mL of a water-methanol mixture (e.g., 95:5, v/v) to remove interfering matrix components.
  • Analyte Elution (Automated): Elute the target SHs into a clean collection plate using 2 × 2 mL of pure methanol. Some protocols may use a mixture of methanol and acetonitrile (e.g., 50:50, v/v) for optimal recovery of a broad analyte range.
  • Evaporation and Reconstitution (Automated): Evaporate the eluents to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen at 40°C. Reconstitute the dried extracts in 100-200 µL of a starting mobile phase (e.g., water/methanol, 90:10, v/v) compatible with the subsequent UPLC-MS/MS analysis.
  • Analysis: Inject the reconstituted extracts into the UPLC-MS/MS system.

• Performance Metrics: The automated method demonstrated high throughput, processing numerous samples in a batch with recoveries ranging from 71.54% to 115.00% for 27 SHs. It significantly outperformed conventional manual SPE in greenness assessments like the Complex Modified Green Analytical Procedure Index [43].

The Scientist's Toolkit: High-Throughput Sample Preparation

Table 1: Key Research Reagent Solutions for High-Throughput Green Sample Preparation.

Item	Function	Green & Throughput Advantages
Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB) SPE Sorbent	Simultaneous extraction of a wide range of acidic, basic, and neutral analytes from biofluids.	Reduces method development time and the need for multiple sorbent types; enables multi-analyte workflows [43].
Automated Robotic Workstation (e.g., Biomek i7)	Executes liquid handling, SPE, and other sample prep steps in an unattended, programmable manner.	Enables batch processing, drastically reduces manual labor and human error, improves reproducibility [44] [43].
96-Well Plate SPE Format	A plate-based format for solid-phase extraction.	Allows parallel processing of up to 96 samples, dramatically increasing throughput and standardizing protocols [44].
Ambient Ionization Sources (e.g., DESI, Paper Spray)	Ionizes samples directly from their native state or with minimal pre-treatment.	Eliminates or greatly reduces lengthy sample preparation and chromatographic separation, slashing analysis time and solvent use [45] [35].

Minimizing Energy Consumption

Energy consumption in MS labs is driven by the operational times of large instruments, ancillary equipment, and data processing. Strategic approaches can yield substantial savings.

Direct Infusion and Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Eliminating the chromatographic separation step, one of the most time- and energy-intensive parts of an LC-MS workflow, is a powerful green strategy.

• Protocol Overview: Direct Analysis via Ambient Ionization
  • Concept: Ambient ionization techniques (e.g., Paper Spray, DESI, DART) allow samples to be ionized directly from surfaces or with minimal pre-treatment for introduction into the mass spectrometer [44] [35].
  • Workflow: A small volume of biofluid (e.g., a droplet of urine or diluted plasma) is spotted onto a specialized paper substrate. A solvent and high voltage are applied to the paper, leading to analyte extraction and ionization directly from the paper tip into the MS inlet.
  • Benefits: This reduces analysis time from minutes to seconds per sample and virtually eliminates solvent consumption from the chromatography system, leading to major reductions in energy and resource use [44].

Miniature Mass Spectrometry

The development of miniaturized MS instruments represents a paradigm shift for green field deployment and lab energy savings.

• Application: Combining miniature MS with ambient ionization creates a highly portable and green analysis system. These instruments are designed for lower power requirements than their full-sized laboratory counterparts and are often capable of battery operation [45] [35]. They are suitable for on-site analysis of pharmaceuticals, environmental contaminants, and clinical biomarkers, eliminating the energy cost and logistics of sample transport to a central lab.

The following workflow diagram illustrates the operational and energy savings achieved by integrating these green approaches.

Optimizing Gas Consumption

Carrier gases are essential for GC-MS and certain LC-MS applications, but their production and consumption carry economic and environmental burdens.

Protocol: Transitioning from Helium to Hydrogen in GC-MS

Helium is a finite, non-renewable resource with supply chain issues. This protocol outlines a method for replacing helium with hydrogen as a carrier gas in fragrance analysis, a transition applicable to many GC-MS fields [46].

• Objective: To develop a robust GC-MS/FID method using hydrogen as the carrier gas without sacrificing chromatographic resolution or data quality.

• Materials:

  • GC-MS/FID system equipped with electronic pressure control (EPC).
  • Standard GC-MS column (0.25 mm i.d.) or a narrow-bore column (0.18 mm i.d.).
  • Hydrogen gas source (high-purity, >99.999%) from a generator or cylinder with appropriate safety measures.
  • Method translation software or van Deemter equation for parameter optimization.

• Detailed Procedure:

  • Safety First: Ensure the laboratory's ventilation and safety systems are compatible with hydrogen use. Hydrogen generators are often safer than cylinders as they produce gas on-demand and in smaller quantities.
  • Method Translation:
    • Flow Rate Optimization: Hydrogen has a flatter van Deemter curve, allowing for higher optimal linear velocities than helium or nitrogen. For a first approximation, use the relationship: ( F{H2} \approx 1.7 \times F_{He} ) to achieve similar efficiency. Precisely optimize the flow rate (e.g., 1.0 - 2.0 mL/min) for your specific column and analyte set.
    • Temperature Program Adjustment: To maintain resolution at the higher flow rate, the temperature program may need to be modified. A steeper gradient or higher initial hold temperature can be used. For example, the initial oven temperature might be increased by 10-20°C, and the ramp rate adjusted to achieve the same or faster run time [46].
  • MS Tuning and Spectral Library: Tune the MS using the standard autotune procedure with hydrogen as the carrier gas. Note that mass spectral fragmentation patterns can differ when using hydrogen versus helium. It is advisable to create a new, dedicated spectral library using hydrogen as the carrier gas for confident compound identification [46].
  • Validation: Validate the new hydrogen method against the original helium method by comparing key figures of merit: resolution, peak symmetry, signal-to-noise ratio, limits of detection/quantification, and quantitative accuracy.

• Results: The hydrogen-based method demonstrated a significant reduction in analysis time and improved signal-to-noise ratios due to narrower peak widths. A comprehensive greenness assessment (RGB model) confirmed its superior environmental and practical performance [46].

Quantitative Comparison of Green Operational Strategies

Table 2: Quantitative Data and Green Impact of Operational Enhancements.

Strategy	Key Quantitative Outcome	Impact on Throughput, Energy, & Consumption
Automated Robotic SPE [43]	Recovery of 71.54-115.00% for 27 steroids/hormones; %RSD < 20%.	High-throughput batch processing; reduces solvent consumption versus manual methods; improves data consistency.
Ambient Ionization + Miniature MS [35]	Elimination of chromatographic separation and extensive sample prep.	Drastically reduces energy use (no LC pump, oven) and solvent consumption to near-zero; enables rapid on-site analysis.
Hydrogen Carrier Gas in GC-MS [46]	Faster analysis times; maintained/excellent resolution; altered but reproducible mass spectra.	Uses a renewable gas resource; faster runs reduce per-sample energy consumption; avoids helium supply chain issues.
MALDI-MS with In-Situ Derivatization [47]	LOD for HMF in honey: 0.347 mg/kg; analysis completed in minutes per sample.	Extremely high-throughput; minimal sample and solvent volumes per analysis; aligns with green chemistry principles.

Enhancing the greenness of mass spectrometry operations is an achievable and critical goal for modern laboratories. As demonstrated through the protocols and data herein, the synergistic application of automation, direct analysis techniques, and resource-efficient instrument operation creates a pathway toward sustainability that does not necessitate a sacrifice in analytical quality. By adopting these strategies—ranging from robotic sample preparation to the fundamental switch from helium to hydrogen—researchers and drug development professionals can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of their analytical workflows. This commitment to greenness assessment and implementation ensures that mass spectrometry remains a powerful and responsible tool in scientific advancement.

The field of analytical chemistry is undergoing a paradigm shift to align with the principles of sustainability science [48]. This transition responds to the environmental concerns posed by traditional analytical methods, which often rely on energy-intensive processes, non-renewable resources, and waste-generating operations [48]. Within this context, mass spectrometry (MS)—a cornerstone technique across biomedical, pharmaceutical, and environmental applications—faces scrutiny regarding its environmental footprint [3]. The convergence of miniaturized mass spectrometry and ambient ionization techniques represents a transformative approach that directly addresses these sustainability challenges while maintaining the high analytical performance required for modern chemical analysis.

Miniaturized MS systems significantly reduce the physical footprint, energy consumption, and operational complexity of conventional mass spectrometers [49]. When coupled with ambient ionization techniques—which enable direct analysis of unprocessed or minimally modified samples in their native environment—this combination delivers substantial green advantages [50] [45]. These include dramatic reductions in or complete elimination of extensive sample preparation, minimized solvent consumption, decreased waste generation, and lower overall energy requirements throughout the analytical workflow [3] [45]. This article examines the green potential of these emerging technologies through quantitative sustainability assessment, detailed experimental protocols, and practical implementation strategies for research and drug development applications.

Technical Foundations: Miniaturized MS and Ambient Ionization

Miniaturized Mass Spectrometry Systems

Portable or miniature mass spectrometers are defined by their significantly reduced size, weight, and power requirements compared to conventional laboratory instruments [49]. While benchtop systems may weigh hundreds of kilograms and require specialized laboratory environments, portable mass spectrometers are designed for field deployment and point-of-care testing while maintaining core analytical capabilities [49]. The development of these systems has accelerated due to advances in microfabrication techniques, precise machining, integrated circuits, and computational modeling [49].

Key technological innovations in miniature MS components include:

• Miniaturized vacuum systems: Employing micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) pumps and alternative pumping technologies that drastically reduce power consumption [49]
• Compact mass analyzers: Including miniature ion trap, time-of-flight, and sector mass analyzers with reduced dimensions [49]
• Low-power detectors: Implementing modified electron multipliers and Faraday cup detectors optimized for portable operation [49]
• Simplified interfaces: Streamlined sample introduction systems designed for minimal sample consumption [49]

These technological advances have enabled the development of portable MS systems that are capable of performing rapid, on-site analyses while consuming significantly less energy and resources than their laboratory-based counterparts [49] [45].

Ambient Ionization Techniques

Ambient ionization MS refers to "the ionization of unprocessed or minimally modified samples in their native environment, and it typically refers to the ionization of condensed phase samples in air" [50]. Since the introduction of desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) and direct analysis in real time (DART) in 2004, the field has expanded to include dozens of techniques that can be broadly categorized into three classes based on their desorption mechanism: liquid extraction, plasma desorption, and laser ablation [50].

These techniques share the common characteristic of enabling direct ionization at atmospheric pressure, allowing analysis of samples in their native state with minimal to no pre-treatment [51]. This fundamental capability eliminates the extensive sample preparation, solvent consumption, and waste generation associated with traditional chromatography-coupled MS analysis, positioning ambient ionization as a cornerstone technology for green analytical chemistry [3] [45].

Table 1: Major Categories of Ambient Ionization Techniques

Category	Desorption Mechanism	Example Techniques	Key Applications	Green Advantages
Liquid Extraction	Solvent spray or droplet extraction	DESI, EASI, nano-DESI, PSI, LESA	Tissue imaging, surface analysis, biofluid analysis	Minimal solvent usage compared to LC-MS, no extensive extraction needed
Plasma Desorption	Excited-state atoms or plasma species	DART, DAPCI, LTP, FAPA	Analysis of volatiles, synthetic chemicals, forensics	Solvent-free operation, rapid analysis enabling high throughput
Laser Ablation	Focused laser energy	LAESI, MALDESI, IR-LADESI	Spatial mapping, depth profiling, single-cell analysis	Minimal sample consumption, no matrix required for some variants

The following diagram illustrates the operational relationships between the major categories of ambient ionization techniques and their core desorption mechanisms:

Quantitative Greenness Assessment: The EPPI Framework

The EPPI Metric Framework

Comprehensive assessment of the environmental sustainability of analytical methods requires standardized metrics. The Environmental, Performance, and Practicality Index (EPPI) provides a novel dual-index framework specifically designed for this purpose [52]. EPPI integrates principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and Green Sample Preparation (GSP) to deliver a holistic evaluation of analytical methods across three critical dimensions: environmental impact, analytical performance, and real-world practicality [52].

The EPPI framework consists of two complementary sub-indices:

• Environmental Impact (EI) Index: Assesses method greenness across all steps from pre-synthesis and sample preparation to analytical measurement [52]
• Performance and Practicality Index (PPI): Evaluates analytical performance (redness) and practicality (blueness) to ensure methods meet analytical requirements while being implementable in practice [52]

This framework generates objective, reproducible scores on a scale of 1-100 and provides visual outputs via pie charts where green represents environmental performance and purple represents the combined contribution of performance and practicality [52]. The EPPI tool is available as both a downloadable offline application and a web version, making it accessible for diverse research and professional contexts [52].

Application to Miniaturized MS and Ambient Ionization

When evaluated using the EPPI framework, miniaturized MS systems coupled with ambient ionization techniques demonstrate significant advantages in environmental impact metrics due to several key factors:

Table 2: Quantitative Sustainability Metrics for MS Technologies

Parameter	Conventional LC-MS	Miniaturized MS with Ambient Ionization	Reduction Factor
Solvent Consumption	500-1000 mL/day (HPLC mobile phase)	1-10 mL/day (extraction/spray solvent)	100-1000x
Energy Consumption	2-5 kW (system operation)	50-300 W (portable systems)	10-50x
Analysis Time	10-30 min/sample (including preparation)	0.1-2 min/sample (direct analysis)	5-100x
Sample Preparation	Multi-step (extraction, purification, concentration)	Minimal or none	Significant reduction
Waste Generation	High (organic solvents, extraction waste)	Minimal (microliter volumes)	50-200x

The carbon footprint of analytical laboratories represents another critical sustainability metric. Research has demonstrated that a common HPLC instrument consumes substantial electricity, contributing significantly to laboratory emissions [53]. Miniaturized MS systems dramatically reduce this footprint through their lower power requirements and elimination of energy-intensive peripheral systems [53] [49].

The environmental advantages of these technologies extend beyond direct resource consumption. By enabling rapid, on-site analysis, miniaturized MS with ambient ionization eliminates the need for sample transportation and associated logistics, further reducing the overall carbon footprint of analytical operations [49] [45]. This distributed analysis model aligns with the principles of circular analytical chemistry by localizing testing and minimizing resource flows [48].

Experimental Protocols and Applications

Protocol 1: Direct Analysis of Surfaces Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI)

Principle: DESI utilizes a charged solvent spray to desorb and ionize molecules directly from sample surfaces through droplet pick-up mechanism [50] [51]. The technique is particularly valuable for heritage science applications where minimal invasiveness is critical [51].

Materials and Reagents:

• Solvent mixture: Methanol:Water (95:5, v/v) with 0.1% formic acid
• Nitrogen nebulizing gas (high purity)
• Sample substrates (depending on application)
• DESI source compatible with mass spectrometer
• High-voltage power supply

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Mount the sample securely on the MS sampling stage. For solid samples, no preparation is typically needed. For liquid samples, apply a small volume to an appropriate substrate and allow to dry.
• Solvent System Optimization: Prepare the charged solvent spray using methanol:water mixture with 0.1% formic acid to enhance ionization efficiency.
• DESI Source Configuration: Position the DESI emitter at an optimal angle (typically 55-60°) and distance (1-3 mm) from the sample surface. Set the nebulizing gas pressure to 100-150 psi and solvent flow rate to 1-3 μL/min.
• Mass Spectrometer Setup: Configure the mass spectrometer inlet position approximately 1-5 mm from the sample surface. Optimize ion transfer parameters for the specific instrument.
• Data Acquisition: Initiate the solvent flow and high voltage (3-5 kV). Acquire mass spectra in full scan or targeted ion monitoring mode depending on application requirements.
• Data Analysis: Process acquired data using appropriate software. For imaging applications, raster the sample stage to generate spatial distribution maps of detected compounds.

Application Note: DESI-MSI has been successfully applied to investigate the composition of historical artefacts including paintings, manuscripts, and archaeological objects without damaging these precious samples [51]. For example, DESI imaging revealed the distribution of dicarboxylic acids in gilded wall paintings from the Kizil Grottoes, confirming the use of drying oil as both a mordant and binding medium in historical artistic techniques [51].

Protocol 2: Solvent-Free Analysis Using Direct Analysis in Real Time (DART)

Principle: DART employs excited-state helium atoms generated by a corona discharge to desorb and ionize molecules from samples introduced between the source and MS inlet [50] [51]. This plasma-based technique is particularly suitable for thermally stable, low to medium molecular weight compounds.

Materials and Reagents:

• Helium gas (high purity, 99.995% or higher)
• Standard glass melting point tubes or specialized sample holders
• Methanol for cleaning (if needed)
• Calibration standards appropriate for the analysis

Procedure:

• Sample Introduction: For solid samples, gently press the item against a standard glass melting point tube to transfer a micro-sample. For liquid samples, apply a small volume to a glass tube and allow solvent evaporation.
• DART Source Configuration: Set the helium gas flow rate to 2-3 L/min. Adjust the source temperature according to analyte volatility (typically 150-450°C). Optimize grid electrode voltage for sensitivity.
• Sample Positioning: Manually or automatically move the sample through the DART helium stream at a controlled speed (0.1-2 mm/s) positioned 5-15 mm from the MS inlet.
• Mass Spectrometer Parameters: Configure the mass spectrometer inlet parameters. For open-air configurations, ensure proper positioning at an angle above the sample surface.
• Data Acquisition: Acquire data in full scan mode (typically m/z 50-1000). For quantitative applications, use selected ion monitoring to enhance sensitivity.
• System Maintenance: Regularly clean the DART source and MS inlet to prevent contamination buildup.

Application Note: DART-MS has been demonstrated as a rapid screening technique for cultural heritage materials, including the characterization of rock art paintings from the Las Charcas caves in Cuba [51]. The technique provides rapid material identification that guides subsequent more detailed analysis while minimizing sample consumption.

Protocol 3: Minimal-Sample Analysis Using Paper Spray Ionization

Principle: Paper spray (PS) ionization utilizes a porous cellulose substrate with a sharp point to transport analytes via solvent wicking, with ionization achieved by applying a high voltage to the damp paper [49]. This technique is particularly suitable for point-of-care analysis and field applications.

Materials and Reagents:

• Chromatography paper (Whatman Grade 1) or specialized paper substrates
• Solvent system: Methanol:Water (80:20, v/v) with 0.1% formic acid
• High-voltage power supply (3-5 kV)
• Sample collection devices (if applicable)
• Portable mass spectrometer with PS interface

Procedure:

• Paper Substrate Preparation: Cut paper into triangular shapes (typically 5-15 mm base width, 10-20 mm height). For consistent performance, use a laser cutter for precision.
• Sample Loading: Apply liquid sample (1-10 μL) to the center of the paper triangle or spot solid samples onto the substrate. Allow samples to dry if necessary.
• Solvent Application: Add 10-30 μL of solvent mixture to the paper substrate to initiate analyte transport to the sharp tip.
• Voltage Application: Apply high voltage (3-5 kV) to the damp paper substrate positioned 3-10 mm from the mass spectrometer inlet.
• Data Acquisition: Initiate mass spectrometric data acquisition simultaneously with voltage application. Acquire data for 0.5-3 minutes depending on application.
• Quantification: For quantitative analysis, use stable isotope-labeled internal standards added during sample loading.

Application Note: Paper spray ionization has been successfully coupled with portable Mini-series mass spectrometers for diverse applications including therapeutic drug monitoring in blood samples, detection of synthetic cannabinoids in forensic analysis, and fungicide screening on fruit surfaces [49]. Recent innovations include 3D-printed paper cone spray ionization (PCSI) sources that enable automated analysis of solid samples with minimal operator intervention [49].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the complementary nature of these ambient ionization techniques within a comprehensive analytical strategy:

Advanced Enhancement Strategies: Nanomaterial Integration

The analytical performance of ambient ionization techniques coupled with miniature MS can be further enhanced through the strategic integration of functional nanomaterials [54]. Nanomaterials offer multidimensional enhancement capabilities across the analytical workflow, including improved sample preparation, enhanced ionization efficiency, and reduced matrix effects [54].

Table 3: Nanomaterial-Enhanced Ambient Ionization Strategies

Nanomaterial	Functionality	Application Example	Performance Enhancement
Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs)	High surface area for extraction, electron emitter for EI	Modified EI sources in portable MS	Increased ionization efficiency, reduced power consumption [49]
Metallic Nanoparticles	Surface-enhanced Raman scattering, catalytic activity	Plasmonic paper spray substrates	Signal enhancement for trace analysis
Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles	Selective extraction and concentration	Environmental pollutant monitoring	Improved sensitivity, matrix effect reduction
Porous Nanomaterials	High adsorption capacity, molecular sieving	VOC analysis in complex matrices	Pre-concentration, selective adsorption
Conductive Nanopolymers	Enhanced substrate conductivity	Modified paper spray substrates	Improved ionization stability and reproducibility

Nanomaterial-enhanced ambient ionization represents a promising frontier in green analytical chemistry by enabling the detection of trace analytes in complex matrices without extensive sample preparation [54]. This approach aligns with the principles of green chemistry by reducing or eliminating solvent consumption while maintaining or improving analytical sensitivity [54].

Successful implementation of miniaturized MS with ambient ionization requires specific reagents, materials, and instrumentation. The following table details essential components for establishing these green analytical capabilities in research and development settings.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Item	Function	Application Notes	Green Attributes
High-Purity Solvents	Extraction and spray media in liquid-based ambient ionization	Use minimal volumes (μL-min range); prefer greener solvents (methanol, ethanol) over acetonitrile	Reduced consumption, safer alternatives
Specialized Paper Substrates	Sample carrier and ionization emitter in paper spray	Pre-cut shapes or 3D-printed configurations for automated systems	Biodegradable substrates, disposable without significant waste
Helium Gas	Ionization medium for plasma-based techniques (DART)	High-purity grade (99.995%) for optimal performance; implement recycling systems where possible	Non-toxic, though supply concerns encourage conservation
Nanomaterial-Modified Substrates	Enhanced sample preparation and ionization	CNT-coated surfaces, metallic nanoparticle-doped paper	Enable miniaturization, reduce reagent consumption
Portable Mass Spectrometer	Core analytical instrumentation	Multiple vendors offer systems with varying mass ranges and resolution	Low power consumption (50-300W), compact footprint
Calibration Standards	Mass axis calibration and method validation	Suitable for direct analysis without chromatographic separation	Reduced consumption compared to LC-MS
High-Voltage Power Supplies	Ionization initiation	Miniaturized, efficient designs for portable operation	Energy-efficient components

The integration of miniaturized mass spectrometry with ambient ionization techniques represents a significant advancement in greening analytical methodologies while maintaining the high performance required for modern chemical analysis. These technologies directly address multiple principles of Green Analytical Chemistry through substantial reductions in solvent consumption, energy requirements, and waste generation [3] [45]. The EPPI framework provides a comprehensive metric for objectively assessing these environmental benefits while ensuring analytical practicality and performance are maintained [52].

Future developments in this field will likely focus on enhancing the analytical performance of miniature MS systems to expand their application scope while further reducing their environmental footprint [49] [45]. The integration of intelligent systems that optimize testing protocols and prevent unnecessary analyses will be crucial for mitigating potential rebound effects where efficiency gains lead to increased overall testing [48]. Additionally, stronger collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory agencies will accelerate the adoption of these green technologies as standard analytical approaches [48].

As the field progresses toward strong sustainability models that acknowledge ecological limits and planetary boundaries, miniaturized MS with ambient ionization will play an increasingly important role in reducing the environmental impact of analytical chemistry while expanding access to mass spectrometry capabilities across diverse settings [48]. By embracing these technologies, researchers and drug development professionals can maintain the highest analytical standards while advancing the principles of environmental stewardship and sustainable practice.

Practical Strategies for Troubleshooting and Optimizing Method Greenness

Identifying and Mitigating Common Environmental Hotspots in MS Methods

Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful analytical technique central to drug development, environmental analysis, and clinical research. However, conventional MS methods carry a significant environmental footprint, characterized by high consumption of hazardous solvents and energy. Within the framework of greenness assessment for MS methods, an environmental hotspot is defined as any step in an analytical workflow that contributes substantially to negative environmental, health, and safety (EHS) impacts. These include the use of toxic solvents, high energy consumption due to lengthy runtimes, and the generation of hazardous waste [26] [1]. This application note provides a structured approach to identifying these hotspots and offers detailed, actionable protocols to mitigate them, aligning laboratory practices with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [8].

Identifying Environmental Hotspots in Typical MS Workflows

A systematic review of the analytical workflow is essential to pinpoint the stages with the greatest environmental impact. The following table summarizes the most common environmental hotspots in LC-MS and GC-MS methods.

Table 1: Common Environmental Hotspots in Mass Spectrometry Methods

Hotspot Category	Specific Examples	Primary Environmental Concerns
Solvent Consumption	HPLC/UHPLC mobile phases (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol), sample preparation solvents [26].	High waste generation, toxicity, high energy for production and disposal [26] [1].
Energy-Intensive Instrumentation	Long chromatographic run times, high flow rates, standby mode energy consumption [26].	High electricity consumption, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions [26].
Hazardous Reagents & Waste	Halogenated solvents, ion-pairing reagents, derivatization agents, acidic/basic modifiers [31].	Toxicity to humans and ecosystems, challenges in waste treatment and disposal [1].
Inefficient Sample Preparation	Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE) with high solvent volumes [1].	High solvent consumption, multi-step processes generating significant waste.
Data Management & Operation	Unoptimized sequences, lack of instrument scheduling, unnecessary replicate analyses.	Unnecessary energy and solvent consumption during idle times or redundant analyses.

A generic LC-MS or GC-MS workflow can be visualized to show where these hotspots typically occur, from sample preparation to final data analysis.

Protocols for Hotspot Mitigation and Method Greening

Protocol: Transition to Greener Solvent Systems

Objective: To reduce the environmental impact and toxicity of solvents used in mobile phases and sample preparation.

Background: The production and disposal of solvents like acetonitrile account for a major portion of an analytical method's environmental footprint. Replacing them with safer alternatives is a high-impact mitigation strategy [1].

Materials:

• Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Solvent Mitigation

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Alternative
Acetonitrile (ACN)	Common HPLC organic modifier	Ethanol or * methanol* [1].
n-Hexane	Solvent for liquid-liquid extraction	Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) or 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF).
Dichloromethane (DCM)	Solvent for extraction and purification	Ethyl acetate [1].
Ionic Liquids	Specialized solvents for extraction	Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADESs) [8].
Phosphate Buffers	Buffer additives in mobile phases	Ammonium acetate or ammonium formate (more volatile, MS-compatible).

Procedure:

• Scouting Initial Conditions: Set up a scouting run with a generic, fast gradient (e.g., 5-95% organic in 5 minutes) using your target alternative solvent (e.g., ethanol) and the original solvent (e.g., acetonitrile) on a suitable column (e.g., C18).
• Adjusting Chromatographic Parameters:
  • Backpressure: Note that ethanol has a higher viscosity than acetonitrile, which will increase system pressure. Consider using a UHPLC system capable of handling higher pressures or slightly increasing the column temperature (e.g., 50-60°C) to reduce viscosity.
  • Selectivity: Be aware that changing the organic modifier can alter the selectivity (elution order) of analytes. You may need to optimize the gradient profile to achieve baseline separation.
  • MS Compatibility: Ensure the alternative solvent is compatible with your MS ionization source (e.g., ESI, APCI). Ethanol and methanol are both excellent for ESI.
• Method Equivalency Testing: Analyze a set of standard and real samples using both the original and the greenified method. Compare key performance indicators (KPIs) such as resolution, peak shape, signal-to-noise ratio, and retention time stability.
• Validation: Once satisfactory separation is achieved, fully validate the new method according to ICH or other relevant guidelines to ensure robustness [31].

Protocol: Minimizing Instrumental Energy Consumption

Objective: To reduce the energy footprint of the MS instrument and its peripherals without compromising data quality.

Background: Instrument energy consumption is a frequently overlooked hotspot. A single LC-MS system can consume significant energy, especially during long sequences and while in standby mode [26].

Materials:

• LC-MS or GC-MS system with scheduling software.
• Method development software.

Procedure:

• Optimize Chromatographic Runtime:
  • Transfer methods from HPLC to UHPLC. The use of sub-2µm particles at higher pressures can drastically reduce run times while maintaining or improving resolution.
  • Develop fast GC-MS methods using narrow-bore columns and rapid temperature ramps [31].
  • Critically evaluate the necessary runtime. Shorten the gradient or isocratic hold time and include a column re-equilibration step that is just sufficient for reproducibility (typically 5-10 column volumes).
• Implement Instrument Scheduling:
  • Utilize the instrument's scheduler to power up from a complete shutdown just before the sequence is set to begin.
  • Program the system to automatically switch to a low-energy standby mode (e.g., diverting flow from the source, stopping nebulizer gas, lowering source temperatures) at the end of a sequence or during predictable idle periods (e.g., overnight).
• Consolidate Analyses:
  • Whenever possible, batch samples to maximize instrument uptime and minimize the number of startup/shutdown cycles.
  • Develop multi-analyte methods to reduce the total number of injections required per sample set.

Protocol: Implementing Greenness Assessment Metrics

Objective: To quantitatively evaluate and document the environmental performance of an MS method using standardized metrics.

Background: Tools like the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS), Analytical GREENness (AGREE), and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) provide a systematic way to measure and communicate sustainability [8] [26].

Materials:

• Computer with internet access.
• Details of the analytical method (solvent types and volumes, energy consumption, waste produced, etc.).

Procedure:

• Select a Greenness Assessment Tool:
  • AMGS: Developed by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute, it is particularly suited for chromatography, evaluating solvent EHS, solvent energy, and instrument energy [26].
  • AGREE: Provides a comprehensive score based on 12 principles of GAC via a user-friendly online calculator [8] [26].
  • GAPI: Uses a colored pictogram to assess the greenness of each step in an analytical procedure [8] [31].
• Gather Method Data: Collect all quantitative and qualitative data required by the chosen tool. This typically includes:
  • Type and volume of all solvents/reagents used per analysis.
  • Sample weight.
  • Instrumental energy consumption (kW·h per analysis) or runtime.
  • Amount and type of waste generated.
  • Safety information for chemicals used (e.g., GHS hazard statements).
• Input Data and Calculate Score: Use the appropriate software, spreadsheet, or online calculator to input the data and generate a greenness score or pictogram.
• Interpret and Report: Use the score to benchmark the method against alternatives. A higher AGREE score (closer to 1) or a lower AMGS score indicates a greener method. The assessment should be included in the method documentation to inform users and stakeholders of its environmental profile [26].

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making workflow for selecting and applying these greenness assessment tools.

Identifying and mitigating environmental hotspots is no longer an optional practice but a core responsibility in modern analytical chemistry. By systematically addressing solvent consumption, energy use, and hazardous waste through the protocols outlined herein—solvent replacement, runtime optimization, and rigorous greenness assessment—researchers and drug development professionals can significantly reduce the environmental impact of their MS methods. Integrating these green principles from the initial stages of method development ensures the creation of analytical techniques that are not only scientifically sound but also environmentally sustainable, contributing to the broader goals of green chemistry within the pharmaceutical industry and beyond.

In the realm of mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics and environmental analysis, achieving optimal performance requires the careful balancing of separation power, sensitivity, and throughput. The core liquid chromatography (LC) parameters of column selection, gradient time, and injection volume directly govern the depth of proteome coverage, the quality of quantification, and the detection of trace-level analytes. Simultaneously, the modern laboratory must align these technical optimizations with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), ensuring that methods are not only effective but also environmentally sustainable [8] [5]. This application note provides detailed protocols for systematically optimizing these key levers, supported by quantitative data and structured within a framework that prioritizes both analytical excellence and greenness.

Critical Optimization Parameters: Protocols and Data

Column Selection for Maximum Peak Capacity

Background: The LC column is the cornerstone of separation. Its dimensions and packing material primarily determine the peak capacity, which is the number of peaks that can be separated in a given gradient time. Higher peak capacity is crucial for resolving complex mixtures, such as proteomic digests, to reduce ion suppression and increase protein identifications [55].

Experimental Protocol:

• Column Packing: For ultra-high-resolution applications, consider in-house fabrication of long columns. A documented protocol involves packing a 100 µm inner diameter (ID) fused silica capillary with 5 µm C18 beads to a length of 150 cm. This can be constructed from two segments (e.g., 110 cm and 40 cm) connected via a zero-dead-volume union [55].
• Performance Evaluation: Couple the long column to a high-resolution mass spectrometer (e.g., Q Exactive MS). Employ a shallow, long-duration gradient (e.g., 10–45% acetonitrile over 720 minutes) to evaluate the system. Calculate the peak capacity based on the average peak width at 4σ and the total gradient time [55].
• Greenness Consideration: While long columns enhance resolution, they also increase solvent consumption and analysis time. Weigh the need for deep coverage against the environmental impact. For routine analysis, a shorter column or one packed with smaller (<2 µm) particles may offer a more sustainable and time-efficient compromise [55] [5].

Data Summary:

Table 1: Impact of Column Geometry on Separation Performance

Column Dimension (ID × Length)	Particle Size	Gradient Time	Approx. Peak Capacity	Key Application
100 µm × 150 cm	5 µm C18	720 min	~700	Deep proteome coverage [55]
75 µm × 50 cm (example)	sub-2 µm C18	Shorter gradients	High (varies)	High-throughput proteomics with UHPLC [55]

Gradient Time Optimization

Background: Gradient time controls the rate at which the mobile phase eluting strength increases. A longer gradient time generally improves separation by allowing more time for differential partitioning of analytes between the mobile and stationary phases, directly increasing peak capacity [55] [56].

Experimental Protocol:

• Initial Scouting Run: Begin with a wide, fast gradient (e.g., 5-100% B in 20-30 minutes) to determine the approximate retention window of your analytes.
• Calculate Optimal Gradient: Use the elution times of the first (t_i) and last (t_f) peaks from the scouting run to calculate a tailored gradient.
  • Initial %B: %Binitial = (ti / tf) * 100 [56].
  • Gradient Time (t_g): tg = (t_f - t_i) / (0.15 * S * k*), where k* is the gradient retention factor (often set to 5 for small molecules), and S is the shape selectivity factor (estimated as 0.25 * MW^0.25) [56].
• Re-equilibration Time: Ensure the column is re-equilibrated to initial conditions before the next injection. A minimum of 5 * V_M / F (where V_M is the column void volume and F is the flow rate) is recommended [56].

Data Summary:

Table 2: Quantitative Outcomes of Extended Gradient Time in Proteomics

Gradient Time	Prefractionation	Protein Identifications	Peptide Identifications
720 min (12 hr)	Basic pH LC	10,544 proteins	96,127 peptides
Shorter gradients	None	Lower (e.g., ~4,000)	Lower

Injection Volume and Sample Loading

Background: Injecting the optimal amount of sample maximizes signal-to-noise without overloading the column, which can cause peak broadening and loss of resolution. The ideal loading depends on column capacity and sample complexity [55].

Experimental Protocol:

• Determine Column Capacity: Perform a loading experiment by injecting increasing amounts of a complex sample (e.g., 1 µg to 20 µg of a peptide digest) using your optimized gradient.
• Assess Performance: Monitor the number of identified peptides/proteins, peak shape, and system pressure. The optimal load is typically just below the point where peak broadening or a significant drop in identifications occurs. For a 100 µm × 150 cm column, the optimal loading was found to be ~6 µg, though it could accommodate up to 20 µg [55].
• Greenness Consideration: Maximizing loading to reduce the number of required injections is a green practice, as it saves solvent, time, and consumables. However, this must be balanced against potential carryover and the need for column cleaning, which uses additional solvents [25] [5].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for LC-MS Method Optimization

Item	Function/Description	Greenness & Practical Notes
C18 AQ Beads (5 µm, 200Å)	Reverse-phase packing material for in-house column fabrication; provides separation for peptides and small molecules [55].	Consider recycling or safe disposal of used columns and packing materials.
Ammonium Formate Buffer	A volatile buffer for LC-MS mobile phases; compatible with ESI and available at different pHs (e.g., 2.8, 8.2) for optimization [56].	Preferable to non-volatile buffers; less toxic than phosphate buffers.
Acetonitrile (ACN)	Common organic modifier in reversed-phase LC.	High environmental impact; prioritize recycling programs and evaluate alternatives like ethanol where possible [5].
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Cartridges	For sample clean-up and pre-concentration of analytes (e.g., pharmaceuticals in water) [57] [9].	Miniaturized formats (e.g., µ-SPE) reduce solvent consumption. Opt for sorbents with high capacity to minimize material use.
Trypsin (Sequencing Grade)	Protease for digesting proteins into peptides for bottom-up proteomics [55].	Use efficient protocols to minimize enzyme consumption.

Integrated Workflow for Systematic Method Optimization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for optimizing an LC-MS method, integrating the key levers and greenness assessment.

The strategic optimization of column selection, gradient time, and injection volume forms the foundation of any robust and sensitive LC-MS method. By following the detailed protocols outlined herein, researchers can significantly enhance peak capacity, protein identification rates, and detection sensitivity. Critically, this technical optimization must now be conducted with a conscious effort to minimize environmental impact. Using the provided "Scientist's Toolkit" and integrating greenness assessment metrics like GEMAM or AGREE from the initial stages of method development ensures that new protocols are not only scientifically sound but also aligned with the principles of sustainable science.

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles in modern laboratories necessitates careful consideration of the balance between analytical performance and environmental impact. This balance is particularly crucial in pharmaceutical development and environmental monitoring, where method sensitivity, accuracy, and reproducibility must be maintained while reducing ecological footprints. The core challenge lies in navigating the inherent trade-offs between these objectives without compromising data quality or regulatory compliance.

This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for implementing greenness assessment strategies specifically for mass spectrometry methods, featuring standardized metrics, practical methodologies, and visual workflows to guide researchers in making informed decisions throughout method development and optimization.

Quantitative Greenness Assessment Metrics for MS Methods

A systematic approach to greenness assessment requires standardized metrics that enable objective comparison between analytical methods. Table 1 summarizes the most current and widely adopted greenness assessment tools relevant to mass spectrometry-based methods, their scoring mechanisms, and primary applications.

Table 1: Standardized Greenness Assessment Metrics for Analytical Methods

Metric Name	Scoring System/Output	Key Assessed Parameters	Primary Applications in MS
Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) [8] [26]	Numerical score (lower is greener)	Solvent energy, solvent EHS (Environmental, Health, Safety), instrument energy consumption	Liquid Chromatography (LC-MS) methods; portfolio-level assessment
Analytical Eco-Scale [8] [25]	Numerical score (0-100; higher is greener)	Reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation	General analytical methods, including MS
Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) [8] [25] [31]	Pictogram with green/yellow/red zones	Sample collection, preparation, reagent toxicity, waste treatment	Holistic method evaluation from start to finish
Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) [8] [25]	Pictogram & score 0-1 (higher is greener)	12 principles of GAC, including energy, waste, and toxicity	Comprehensive MS method development
GEMAM [25]	Pictogram & score 0-10 (higher is greener)	21 criteria across sample, reagent, instrument, method, waste, and operator	Comprehensive MS method development and sample preparation

The selection of an appropriate metric depends on the method's stage and scope. AGREE and GAPI are ideal for a high-level, visual overview of a method's environmental impact, while AMGS provides a granular, quantitative score valuable for tracking improvements in specific chromatographic methods over time. [8] [26] The recently developed GEMAM metric offers a highly detailed assessment, covering 21 criteria across six dimensions of the analytical process, including sample preparation—a often-overlooked yet significant contributor to environmental impact. [25]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Greenness Assessment of an Existing LC-MS Method Using AGREE

This protocol provides a step-by-step guide for evaluating the environmental impact of a standard LC-MS method to identify areas for improvement.

3.1.1 Research Reagent Solutions & Materials

Table 2: Essential Materials for LC-MS Greenness Assessment

Item	Function/Description
AGREE Online Calculator [25]	Free software providing standardized scoring based on 12 GAC principles.
Method Documentation	Detailed procedure including sample prep, mobile phases, and instrument parameters.
Solvent Safety Data Sheets (SDS)	Provide data on reagent toxicity, flammability, and environmental impact.
Instrument Manual	To determine energy consumption specifications (e.g., kW per analysis).

3.1.2 Procedure

• Data Compilation: Gather all relevant data for the LC-MS method. This includes: (a) type and volume of organic solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol) and additives (e.g., TFA) used per analysis in the mobile phase and sample diluent; (b) sample preparation details, including solvent volumes and consumables; (c) instrument energy consumption (kW) and total analysis time per sample; (d) estimated volume of waste generated per analysis.
• AGREE Input: Access the open-source AGREE software. [25] Input the compiled data into the corresponding fields for each of the 12 principles. For example:
  • Input solvent volumes and their penalty scores based on safety data.
  • Specify if the method is miniaturized or uses direct sample introduction.
  • Indicate energy consumption per analysis.
  • Note any derivatization steps or hazardous waste produced.
• Score Calculation & Interpretation: The software generates a circular pictogram with a score from 0-1 and a color code (red to green). A score above 0.75 is considered excellent. Analyze the pictogram to identify the weakest (reddest) segments, which represent the primary targets for greening efforts. [8] [25]

Protocol 2: Developing a Greener GC-MS Method for Pharmaceutical Analysis

This protocol is adapted from a published method for the simultaneous analysis of paracetamol and metoclopramide, which demonstrated superior greenness compared to LC methods. [31]

3.2.1 Research Reagent Solutions & Materials

• Analytical Standards: Paracetamol (≥99.9%), Metoclopramide (≥99.98%).
• Solvent: Ethanol (HPLC grade), a greener alternative to methanol or acetonitrile. [31] [1]
• GC-MS System: Agilent 7890A GC coupled with 5975C MSD.
• Column: Agilent 19091S-433 (5% Phenyl Methyl Silox, 30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm).
• Greenness Assessment Tools: NEMI, GAPI, and AGREE calculators.

3.2.2 Procedure

• Sample Preparation:
  • Prepare stock solutions of paracetamol and metoclopramide in ethanol at concentrations of 500 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL, respectively.
  • For tablet analysis, crush and extract an equivalent amount of powder directly in ethanol via vortexing and centrifugation.
  • For plasma analysis, employ a simple protein precipitation technique using ethanol as the solvent.
• GC-MS Method Setup:
  • Carrier Gas: Helium, constant flow rate of 2 mL/min.
  • Injection Volume: 1 µL in split mode (split ratio 10:1).
  • Oven Program: Initial temp 100°C, ramp to 280°C at 25°C/min, hold for 2 min. Total runtime: <5 min. [31]
  • MS Detection: Operate in Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. Ions: m/z 109 for paracetamol; m/z 86 for metoclopramide. Source temperature: 230°C.
• Method Validation & Greenness Assessment:
  • Validate the method for linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ per ICH guidelines.
  • Perform greenness assessment using the BAGI, GAPI, and AGREE metrics. The published method achieved a BAGI score of 82.5, confirming its superior environmental profile compared to conventional LC methods, primarily due to the elimination of a liquid mobile phase and the use of ethanol. [31]

Protocol 3: Implementing Solvent & Instrument Modifications for Greener LC-MS

This protocol outlines practical modifications to reduce the environmental impact of established LC-MS methods without complete redevelopment.

3.3.1 Research Reagent Solutions & Materials

• Alternative Solvents: Propylene carbonate, dimethyl carbonate, methanesulfonic acid (MSA). [58] [59]
• UHPLC System: Capable of operating at pressures >600 bar.
• Superficially Porous Particle (SPP) Columns: e.g., 2.7 µm SPP columns.

3.3.2 Procedure

• Mobile Phase Greening:
  • Acid Modifier Replacement: Systematically replace trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) with methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in peptide analysis. MSA offers lower toxicity and better biodegradability. Note: This requires re-optimization of gradient conditions and may impact sensitivity and peak shape. [59]
  • Organic Solvent Replacement: Evaluate partially water-miscible carbonate esters (e.g., dimethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate) as alternatives to acetonitrile. Use ternary phase diagrams to identify single-phase mobile phase compositions, typically requiring a co-solvent like methanol. [58]
• Method Transfer to UHPLC:
  • Transfer methods from conventional HPLC (e.g., 4.6 mm ID column, 1 mL/min) to UHPLC with SPP columns (e.g., 2.1 mm ID column, 0.4 mL/min).
  • The use of small, SPP particles reduces van Deemter terms ('A' and 'C'), allowing for high-efficiency separations with shorter columns and faster run times, thereby reducing solvent consumption by >60%. [58] [26]
• System Configuration:
  • Activate "on/off" LC-MS mechanisms or stream-selector valves to divert flow to waste only when necessary, drastically reducing solvent usage during equilibration and needle washes. [59]

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates a systematic, iterative workflow for developing and optimizing mass spectrometry methods that effectively balance analytical performance with environmental impact.

Diagram 1: Integrated Workflow for Green MS Method Development. This iterative process emphasizes continuous assessment and optimization across key parameters like solvent use, energy consumption, and waste generation to achieve a balance between sensitivity and sustainability.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Successful implementation of green MS methodologies relies on a suite of tools and strategies. Table 3 catalogs essential solutions and their functions for navigating the sensitivity-greenness trade-off.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green MS Method Development

Category	Solution/Material	Function & Green Benefit
Green Solvents	Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) [58]	A greener alternative to acetonitrile in reverse-phase LC; requires co-solvent (e.g., methanol) for full water miscibility.
	Ethanol [31]	Bio-based, less toxic alternative to methanol or acetonitrile for sample preparation and GC analysis.
	Propylene Carbonate (PC) [58]	High-polarity solvent for LC; influences elution strength and selectivity in reverse-phase and HILIC modes.
Instrumentation	UHPLC with SPP Columns [58]	Reduces solvent consumption and analysis time via smaller particles and higher pressures, maintaining performance.
	On/Off LC-MS Mechanisms [59]	Reduces solvent and energy usage during instrument idle time, suitable for non-optimized systems.
Additives & Modifiers	Methanesulfonic Acid (MSA) [59]	A less toxic and more biodegradable alternative to TFA/DFA for ion-pairing in peptide analysis.
	Tetrabutylammonium Perchlorate [58]	Modifies stationary-phase solvation to tune HILIC retention/selectivity when using green solvents.
Software & Metrics	AGREE Calculator [25]	Open-source software for comprehensive greenness assessment based on the 12 GAC principles.
	AMGS [26]	Quantitative metric for chromatographic methods, evaluating solvent EHS, solvent energy, and instrument energy.
	Ternary Phase Diagrams [58]	Aids in optimizing mobile phase composition when using partially water-miscible green solvents.

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles has become a critical aspect of modern method development, driven by the need to minimize environmental impact, reduce hazardous waste, and improve safety in laboratories. Within this framework, metric tools have emerged as standardized approaches to quantify and evaluate the environmental footprint of analytical procedures. For researchers working with mass spectrometry and related techniques, understanding and correctly applying these metrics is essential for demonstrating methodological improvements and advancing sustainability goals [8]. The growing emphasis on sustainability in analytical science has made greenness assessment an integral part of method development and validation, particularly for techniques that may involve energy-intensive processes or generate significant chemical waste [48].

Two of the most prominent metric tools—the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric and the Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)—offer complementary approaches for evaluating analytical methods. While both tools aim to assess environmental impact, they differ fundamentally in their calculation methodologies, scoring systems, and interpretive frameworks. AGREE provides a comprehensive assessment based on all 12 principles of GAC, generating a score from 0-1 accompanied by a color-coded pictogram for visual interpretation. In contrast, AES employs a penalty-point system against an ideal green analysis, resulting in a numerical score where higher values indicate greener methods [60] [29]. For researchers, the ability to correctly interpret these scores and identify specific areas for improvement is crucial for meaningful method optimization rather than simply generating metrics for publication purposes [18].

Understanding AGREE and AES Assessment Tools

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Metric

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment by directly incorporating all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry into its evaluation framework. This tool utilizes a multi-criteria approach where each principle is assigned a specific weight based on its relative importance, allowing for a nuanced assessment that reflects the complexity of environmental impact evaluation. The calculation produces a score on a scale from 0 to 1, where higher scores indicate greener methods, accompanied by a circular pictogram with twelve sections corresponding to each GAC principle [29]. The color coding (red-yellow-green) provides immediate visual feedback about which specific principles a method fulfills adequately and which require improvement, making AGREE particularly valuable for targeted method optimization.

One of AGREE's distinctive features is its flexibility through adjustable weighting factors, which allows researchers to customize the assessment based on specific priorities or application contexts. The tool evaluates multiple aspects of an analytical method, including sample preparation, energy consumption, waste generation, safety of reagents, and throughput. This comprehensive coverage ensures that the assessment reflects the total environmental impact rather than focusing on isolated factors. The AGREE software generates an easily interpretable output that facilitates comparison between different methods and helps identify the most significant areas for improvement [29].

The Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)

The Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) employs a more straightforward penalty-based approach to greenness assessment. It begins with a baseline score of 100 points representing an ideal green analysis and subtracts penalty points for each parameter that deviates from this ideal, including the use of hazardous reagents, energy-intensive equipment, or excessive waste generation [29]. The resulting score provides a semi-quantitative measure of a method's environmental performance, with higher scores indicating greener methods. Specifically, scores above 75 represent excellent green analysis, scores between 50-75 indicate acceptable green analysis, and scores below 50 suggest inadequate greenness [60].

Unlike AGREE's comprehensive principle-based assessment, AES focuses primarily on reagent toxicity, energy consumption, and waste generation, making it particularly useful for quick comparisons and initial assessments. Its straightforward calculation methodology allows for rapid implementation without specialized software, though this simplicity comes at the cost of less granular feedback for improvement. The penalty points are assigned based on the amount and hazard level of reagents, with higher penalties for more hazardous substances, and similarly for energy consumption based on the type of equipment and operation time [60] [29].

Quantitative Benchmarking and Comparative Analysis

Benchmark Scores Across Analytical Techniques

Understanding typical score ranges for different analytical techniques provides essential context for interpreting AGREE and AES results. The table below summarizes reported scores for various techniques used in pharmaceutical analysis, specifically for Olmesartan medoxomil determination:

Table 1: AGREE and AES Scores for Olmesartan Analytical Methods [60]

Analytical Technique	AES Score Range	AGREE Score Range	BAGI Score Range
UV Spectrophotometry	79-86	0.60-0.71	77.5-82.5
HPLC	72-84	0.55-0.65	72.5-82.5
HPTLC	66-68	0.58-0.65	75-77.5
UPLC	77	0.62	80
LC-MS	75-89	0.65-0.66	75-80
UPLC-MS	67-75	0.68-0.69	80

The data reveals several important patterns for method evaluation. First, UPLC and UPLC-MS methods generally show improved greenness profiles compared to their HPLC and LC-MS counterparts, primarily due to reduced solvent consumption and faster analysis times. Second, techniques with inherently lower solvent requirements like UV spectrophotometry often achieve competitive AES scores despite potentially limited analytical capabilities. Third, the relationship between technique sophistication and greenness is not straightforward, as demonstrated by the varying scores within the LC-MS category, where methodological optimizations significantly influence the final assessment [60].

Case Study: GC-MS vs. HPLC Methods

A comparative study of paracetamol/metoclopramide analysis illustrates how greenness metrics can guide technique selection. A developed GC-MS method achieved a BAGI score of 82.5, indicating excellent practicality, along with favorable AGREE and AES assessments. This represented a significant greenness improvement over existing HPLC methods, which typically scored lower due to their substantial consumption of organic solvents in mobile phases [31]. The GC-MS method provided additional advantages including faster analysis (5-minute runtime), reduced solvent consumption (primarily ethanol for extraction), and elimination of liquid mobile phases, collectively contributing to its superior environmental profile [31].

This case study highlights the importance of considering inherent technique characteristics when interpreting greenness scores. GC-MS methods often score well in greenness assessments due to the absence of liquid mobile phases, while LC methods frequently incur penalties for solvent consumption and waste generation. However, this general pattern should not override consideration of analytical performance requirements, as the optimal technique balance depends on the specific application context and required analytical figures of merit [31].

Experimental Protocols for Metric Implementation

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

Implementing AGREE assessment requires systematic data collection and calculation according to a standardized workflow:

Table 2: AGREE Assessment Protocol

Step	Procedure	Critical Parameters
1. Data Collection	Compile information for all 12 GAC principles: reagent types and amounts, energy consumption, waste generation, safety data, throughput, and miniaturization potential.	Accurate quantification of reagents; Safety Data Sheet (SDS) consultation for hazard classification; Measurement of energy consumption per sample.
2. Software Input	Enter collected data into AGREE software, available at [29].	Apply appropriate weighting factors based on method priorities; Ensure consistent units across all parameters.
3. Score Interpretation	Analyze the circular output diagram noting red sections (needing improvement) and the overall score.	Compare against benchmark scores for similar techniques; Identify principles with lowest scores for targeted improvement.
4. Improvement Strategy	Prioritize modifications addressing the lowest-scoring principles while maintaining analytical performance.	Evaluate trade-offs between different greenness aspects; Consider practical implementation constraints.

The AGREE assessment particularly emphasizes the sample preparation stage, which often represents the most resource-intensive part of the analytical process. The specialized AGREEprep tool focuses specifically on this stage, providing more granular feedback for extraction and preparation techniques [29]. When interpreting AGREE results, researchers should pay particular attention to principles related to renewable feedstock preference, waste minimization, and operator safety, as these often present significant improvement opportunities in analytical methods [29].

Protocol for AES Assessment

The Analytical Eco-Scale assessment follows a penalty-based calculation approach:

Table 3: AES Assessment Protocol

Step	Procedure	Critical Parameters
1. Establish Baseline	Begin with 100 points representing ideal green analysis.	Understand perfect score criteria: no hazardous chemicals, minimal energy, zero waste.
2. Penalty Calculation	Subtract points for: reagent hazard levels and amounts; energy consumption >0.1 kWh/sample; waste generation >1 mL/sample; non-environmentalist treatment of waste.	Consult SDS for precise hazard classifications; Accurately measure total waste volume per analysis; Calculate energy consumption for entire method.
3. Final Scoring	Subtract total penalty points from 100 to obtain final AES score.	Document all penalty assignments with justifications; Verify calculations against published examples.
4. Interpretation	Classify method: >75 = excellent greenness; 50-75 = acceptable; <50 = inadequate greenness.	Compare with literature values for similar methods; Identify highest penalty categories for improvement focus.

The AES assessment places particular emphasis on accurate hazard classification of reagents according to globally harmonized systems, as misclassification can significantly alter the final score. Additionally, proper waste quantification must include all materials consumed during the analysis, not just analytical reagents, to ensure a comprehensive assessment [60] [29]. The straightforward calculation method makes AES particularly accessible for preliminary assessments, though researchers should recognize its limitations in providing detailed improvement guidance compared to AGREE's principle-based approach.

Troubleshooting and Score Improvement Strategies

Interpreting Score Patterns for Diagnostic Purposes

Specific patterns in AGREE and AES scores can reveal underlying methodological issues and guide improvement strategies. The diagram below illustrates a systematic troubleshooting workflow based on common score patterns:

Low scores in AGREE principles 1-4 (direct analysis techniques, minimal sample preparation, in-situ measurements, and integrated analysis) typically indicate excessive or inefficient sample preparation stages. This often corresponds with high penalty points in AES for reagent amounts and waste generation. Improvement strategies include implementing direct analysis techniques such as ambient ionization mass spectrometry, developing miniaturized extraction approaches, or exploring on-site analysis capabilities to reduce or eliminate sample preparation requirements [18] [8].

Low scores in AGREE principle 8 (minimizing sample size and number) or high energy penalties in AES often point to suboptimal instrument operation or method conditions. This may manifest as excessively long run times, oversized samples, or inefficient data collection. Troubleshooting should focus on method acceleration strategies such as faster chromatographic gradients, higher temperature operation, or improved detection systems that reduce analysis time without compromising data quality [18] [48]. Additionally, evaluating energy-efficient equipment alternatives and implementing standby modes during idle periods can address energy-related penalties.

Strategic Method Modification for Improved Scores

Based on diagnostic patterns, researchers can implement targeted modifications to address specific greenness deficiencies:

Table 4: Strategic Modifications for Greenness Improvement

Problem Area	Modification Strategy	Expected Impact
Hazardous Reagents	Replace acetonitrile with ethanol or methanol; Substitute chlorinated solvents with ethyl acetate or methyl tert-butyl ether; Implement natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES).	Significant improvement in AGREE principles 1, 3, 4 and reduction in AES reagent penalties (10-40 points).
High Energy Consumption	Reduce chromatographic run times; Implement ambient temperature extraction techniques; Utilize energy-efficient equipment; Apply batch processing to maximize throughput.	Improvement in AGREE principle 8 and reduction in AES energy penalties (5-20 points depending on initial consumption).
Excessive Waste Generation	Miniaturize methods (scale down to microextraction); Implement solvent recycling systems; Adopt direct analysis techniques eliminating extraction; Use reusable extraction devices.	Improvement in AGREE principles 9-12 and significant reduction in AES waste penalties (10-30 points).
Operator Safety Issues	Implement automated sample handling; Develop closed-system approaches; Utilize in-line detection reducing exposure; Provide adequate safety controls and monitoring.	Improvement in AGREE principle 7 and potential reduction in AES penalties for hazardous reagents (5-15 points).

When implementing modifications, researchers should consider the Good Evaluation Practice (GEP) rules proposed by Nowak [18]. These guidelines emphasize using quantitative indicators based on empirical data rather than estimations, combining multiple assessment tools with different structures to obtain a more comprehensive picture, and ensuring transparent reporting of all assessment parameters. This approach prevents "gaming" the metrics through selective reporting or unrealistic assumptions while ensuring genuine environmental improvements [18].

A critical consideration in improvement strategies is avoiding the "rebound effect" where efficiency gains lead to increased overall resource consumption through more frequent analyses. For example, a highly efficient miniaturized method might enable significantly higher sample throughput, potentially increasing total solvent consumption and waste generation despite improved per-analysis metrics [48]. Implementing sustainable laboratory practices that monitor total consumption rather than just per-analysis metrics helps mitigate this risk.

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 5: Green Alternative Reagents for Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/ Material	Function	Green Alternative	Application Notes
Acetonitrile	HPLC mobile phase	Ethanol-methanol mixtures	Suitable for many reversed-phase applications; requires method revalidation [31].
Chlorinated Solvents	Extraction medium	Ethyl acetate, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)	Lower toxicity while maintaining extraction efficiency for many analytes [31].
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES)	Extraction medium	Bio-based solvents from natural compounds	Biodegradable alternatives with tunable properties for specific applications [8].
Volatile Salts	MS compatibility	Ammonium acetate, ammonium formate	Replace non-volatile salts that suppress ionization and require desalting steps [61].

Software and Calculation Tools

Implementing greenness assessments requires specialized software tools for accurate scoring and visualization:

• AGREE Calculator: Available at no cost, this software requires input parameters corresponding to all 12 GAC principles and generates the characteristic circular pictogram with overall score [29].
• AGREEprep: Specialized version focusing specifically on sample preparation steps, providing more detailed assessment of extraction and pretreatment methodologies [29].
• BAGI Tool: Complementary tool assessing practical applicability alongside greenness, generating scores from 25-100 points with blue-toned pictograms [60] [29].
• AES Calculator: Spreadsheet-based implementation enabling straightforward penalty calculations without specialized software [60].

These tools collectively enable comprehensive method assessment from multiple perspectives, supporting the GEP recommendation to combine tools with varied structures for more reliable evaluation [18].

The systematic application and interpretation of AGREE and AES metrics provides researchers with powerful diagnostic capabilities for improving the environmental profile of analytical methods, particularly in mass spectrometry applications. By moving beyond simple score calculation to understanding the underlying patterns and relationships, scientists can make informed decisions that genuinely advance sustainability goals while maintaining analytical performance. The troubleshooting frameworks and improvement strategies presented in this protocol offer practical pathways for method optimization, supported by case studies demonstrating successful implementation across various analytical techniques.

As greenness assessment continues to evolve toward more standardized practices, researchers should prioritize transparent reporting, empirical data collection, and holistic method evaluation that considers both environmental impact and practical applicability. The integration of these assessment protocols throughout method development rather than as retrospective additions will ultimately yield more significant sustainability advancements, contributing to the broader transformation of analytical chemistry toward circular economy principles and reduced environmental footprint [48].

The growing global focus on sustainability has prompted analytical scientists to adopt eco-friendly practices, leading to the emergence of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) as a critical discipline. GAC principles advocate for energy-efficient equipment, reduction of toxic chemicals, and sustainable waste management in analytical workflows [8]. Within mass spectrometry (MS)—a pivotal technique in pharmaceutical and environmental analysis—there is a pressing need to incorporate green metrics and optimize methods for reduced environmental impact [8]. The paradigm of white analytical chemistry (WAC) further expands this view, integrating environmental sustainability (green) with methodological practicality (blue) and analytical performance (red) to provide a holistic framework for method evaluation [5].

The drive toward greener MS methods is not merely philosophical; it presents tangible operational benefits. Modern drug discovery and environmental monitoring require high-throughput techniques, and innovations that enhance speed frequently align with green principles by reducing resource consumption. Miniaturized instruments and emerging ionization techniques are particularly promising for their potential to lower solvent use and energy demands [8]. Furthermore, the cumulative environmental impact of analytical methods can be substantial when scaled across global manufacturing and monitoring networks, making green optimization an essential consideration for any high-throughput laboratory [26].

Key Greenness Assessment Metrics for Method Evaluation

Evaluating the environmental footprint of an analytical method requires robust, standardized metrics. Several tools have been developed to quantify and visualize method greenness, enabling scientists to make informed decisions during method development and optimization.

• Analytical Eco-Scale (AES): This semi-quantitative tool assigns penalty points to non-green attributes of a method, such as hazardous reagent use or high energy consumption. These points are subtracted from a base score of 100, with a higher final score indicating a greener method [8] [5]. It is valued for its simplicity and the clear, numerical indication it provides [26].

• Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI): GAPI employs a color-coded pictogram to provide a detailed visual assessment of the environmental impact across the entire analytical procedure, from sample collection to waste management [8] [5]. Its strength lies in its comprehensive breakdown of each analytical step, which helps identify specific areas for improvement [26].

• Analytical Greenness Metric (AGREE): This comprehensive tool evaluates methods against the 12 principles of GAC, providing both a numerical score between 0 and 1 and a circular pictogram for easy interpretation [8] [5]. Its user-friendly format facilitates direct comparison between different methods [26].

• Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS): Developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute, AMGS is a holistic metric that uniquely incorporates instrument energy consumption alongside the energy consumed in solvent production and disposal, and solvent safety/toxicity [26]. It is particularly suited for evaluating chromatographic methods.

Table 1: Key Metrics for Assessing the Greenness of Analytical Methods

Metric	Type of Output	Key Assessment Criteria	Primary Advantages
Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)	Numerical score (0-100)	Reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation [5]	Simple, provides a clear numerical score for comparison [26]
Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)	Color-coded pictogram	Entire analytical process steps (sample prep to detection) [5]	Visual, identifies high-impact stages within a method [26]
Analytical Greenness (AGREE)	Numerical score (0-1) & pictogram	12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [8] [5]	Comprehensive, user-friendly, facilitates direct comparisons [26]
Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS)	Numerical score	Solvent EHS, solvent energy, instrument energy consumption [26]	Holistic, includes instrument and solvent lifecycle energy use [26]

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for selecting and applying these greenness assessment tools in analytical method development.

Ultrashort Columns and Instrument Configurations for High-Speed Analysis

Technical Advantages of Ultrashort Columns

The core of high-throughput, green MS analysis lies in the strategic use of ultrashort columns and optimized instrument configurations. These columns, typically shorter than 50 mm, directly enhance green credentials by drastically shortening chromatographic run times. This reduction directly translates to lower consumption of organic solvents and electricity, key factors in metrics like AMGS and AGREE [26] [62]. The principal technical advantage is the significant reduction in backpressure, which allows for high flow rates without exceeding instrument pressure limits, thereby enabling faster separations and higher sample throughput [63] [62].

In the biopharmaceutical industry, rapid HPLC methods have reduced analysis times from hours to minutes while maintaining resolution and sensitivity for characterizing critical quality attributes of proteins, monoclonal antibodies, and other therapeutic proteins [63]. For instance, the Shimadzu i-Series HPLC/UHPLC systems are designed to handle pressures up to 70 MPa, supporting fast analysis with their compact and eco-friendly design that reduces energy consumption [62]. Similarly, the Thermo Fisher Vanquish Neo UHPLC system's tandem direct injection workflow utilizes a two-pump, two-column configuration to perform column loading and equilibration offline, in parallel with the analytical gradient, thereby eliminating method overhead and pushing analysis speed further [62].

Optimizing MS and HPLC Instrument Settings

Pairing ultrashort columns with strategically optimized instrument settings is crucial for maximizing performance and greenness.

• High Flow Rates and Elevated Temperature: Using flow rates of 1.0-2.0 mL/min with compatible short columns (e.g., 20-50 mm length, 2.1 mm internal diameter) can reduce run times to 1-3 minutes per sample. Combining this with elevated column temperatures (e.g., 60-80°C) lowers mobile phase viscosity, which further reduces backpressure and can improve chromatographic efficiency [63] [62].

• Advanced MS Hardware and Source Design: New mass spectrometers are designed for speed and efficiency. The Sciex 7500+ MS/MS system, for example, can perform over 900 MRM transitions per second, which is essential for keeping pace with fast chromatographic separations [62]. Furthermore, the latest MS interfaces, such as the Sciex DJet+, are engineered for robustness with high-flow methods. Acoustic ejection mass spectrometry (AEMS), as seen in the Echo MS+ system, represents a revolutionary approach, enabling ultra-fast, high-throughput screening at a rate of one sample per second without traditional liquid chromatography, drastically reducing solvent consumption [64].

• Parallelism and Direct Injection: The Vanquish Neo's tandem direct injection workflow is a prime example of a hardware-based strategy that increases throughput. By performing necessary column re-equilibration offline on a second, identical column, the system virtually eliminates the downtime typically associated with column conditioning in sequential runs [62].

Table 2: Instrumentation and Settings for High-Throughput, Green LC-MS

Instrument/Technology	Key Feature for Speed/Greenness	Typical Application	Impact on Green Metrics
Shimadzu i-Series UHPLC [62]	Compact design; 70 MPa pressure capability	Fast gradient separations	Reduces energy consumption (improves AMGS, AGREE)
Thermo Vanquish Neo Tandem Workflow [62]	Parallel, two-column operation	High-throughput QC for pharmaceuticals	Increases sample throughput, reduces cycle time
Ultrashort Columns (e.g., 20-50 mm)	Reduced backpressure, allows high flow rates	Fast analytical runs for simple mixtures	Shortens run time, reduces solvent use (improves AES, AGREE)
Acoustic Ejection MS (AEMS) [64]	LC-free analysis at one sample/second	Ultra-high-throughput screening	Eliminates LC solvents, drastically reduces waste
Sciex 7500+ MS/MS [62]	900 MRM/sec speed; Dry pump option	Multi-analyte quantification in complex matrices	High-speed scanning; Dry pumps cut electricity use (improves AMGS)

Detailed Protocol for a Green UHPLC-MS/MS Method

This protocol outlines the development and validation of a green UHPLC-MS/MS method for the trace analysis of pharmaceuticals (carbamazepine, caffeine, ibuprofen) in water, demonstrating how specific choices in sample preparation and instrumentation achieve sustainability goals without compromising analytical performance [9].

Materials and Reagents

• Analytical Standards: Carbamazepine, caffeine, and ibuprofen of high purity (>98%).
• Solvents: Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC-MS grade). Green Note: The choice of less toxic solvents like methanol over acetonitrile when chromatographically feasible can improve the greenness profile [26].
• Water: Ultra-pure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) from a purification system.
• Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Cartridges: 60 mg hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced (HLB) sorbent.
• Instrumentation: An UHPLC system coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, capable of operating at pressures up to 1300 bar.

Sample Preparation Workflow

The green innovation in this protocol is the omission of the evaporation and reconstitution step after solid-phase extraction, which is a major consumer of energy and solvents in traditional methods [9].

• Sample Collection and Filtration: Collect water samples (e.g., wastewater effluent) in pre-cleaned glass bottles. Filter samples through 0.45 μm glass fiber filters to remove particulate matter.
• Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE):
  • Condition the SPE cartridge with 5 mL of methanol followed by 5 mL of ultrapure water.
  • Load 100 mL of the filtered water sample onto the cartridge at a steady flow rate of 5-10 mL/min.
  • Dry the cartridge for 5 minutes under vacuum to remove residual water.
  • Elution: Elute the target analytes directly into a 2 mL autosampler vial using 2 mL of methanol. Critical Green Step: Do not evaporate the eluent to dryness.
  • Reconstitution: Add 400 μL of ultrapure water directly to the 2 mL of methanolic eluent in the vial. This creates a solvent mixture compatible with the reversed-phase UHPLC initial mobile phase conditions (final extract: ~83% methanol). Seal the vial for analysis.

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis Conditions

• Column: Ultrashort C18 column (e.g., 20 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm particle size).
• Mobile Phase: (A) Water with 0.1% formic acid; (B) Methanol with 0.1% formic acid.
• Gradient Program:
  • 0.0-0.5 min: 15% B (isocratic for conditioning)
  • 0.5-5.0 min: 15% to 95% B (linear gradient)
  • 5.0-6.5 min: 95% B (wash)
  • 6.5-6.6 min: 95% to 15% B (quick re-equilibration)
  • 6.6-10.0 min: 15% B (re-equilibration)
• Flow Rate: 0.5 mL/min.
• Column Temperature: 50 °C.
• Injection Volume: 5 μL.
• Total Run Time: 10 minutes per sample [9].
• MS Detection: ESI in positive/negative switching mode; Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) for each pharmaceutical.

The following workflow diagram summarizes this green analytical method.

Greenness Assessment and Validation Data

This method was validated according to ICH guidelines Q2(R2) and demonstrated excellent performance while maintaining a low environmental footprint [9]. The method's green profile was enhanced by the short analysis time and the eliminated evaporation step.

Table 3: Method Validation Data and Greenness Impact

Analytical Performance Parameter	Carbamazepine	Caffeine	Ibuprofen	Greenness Benefit
Limit of Detection (LOD)	100 ng/L	300 ng/L	200 ng/L	High sensitivity maintained despite green approach [9]
Limit of Quantification (LOQ)	300 ng/L	1000 ng/L	600 ng/L	-
Linear Range	≥ 0.999	≥ 0.999	≥ 0.999	-
Precision (RSD)	< 5.0%	< 5.0%	< 5.0%	Method is robust and reliable [9]
Accuracy (Recovery)	77-160%	77-160%	77-160%	-
Key Green Feature	Short 10-min run time	No evaporation step post-SPE	Low solvent consumption	Directly reduces energy use and solvent waste, improving AES, AGREE, and AMGS scores [9] [26]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

The successful implementation of high-throughput, green MS methods relies on a specific set of reagents, materials, and instruments. The following table details these key components and their functions.

Table 4: Research Reagent and Instrument Solutions

Item	Function/Role	Green & Throughput Considerations
HLB SPE Cartridges	Extraction and concentration of diverse analytes from aqueous samples.	Allows for direct elution into injection-compatible solvents, enabling the elimination of the evaporation step [9].
Methanol (HPLC-MS Grade)	Mobile phase and extraction solvent.	Less toxic and often considered a greener alternative to acetonitrile in LC-MS, where separation chemistry allows [26].
Ultrashort C18 Column	(e.g., 20 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm) Rapid chromatographic separation.	Drastically reduces run times and solvent consumption per analysis, directly improving green metrics [63] [62].
Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer	Highly selective and sensitive detection via MRM.	High-scanning speed (e.g., 900 MRM/sec) is essential to track peaks from fast UHPLC separations without data loss [62].
Acoustic Ejection MS (AEMS)	Ultra-high-throughput screening without LC.	Enables analysis at one sample/second, eliminating LC solvents entirely and representing a paradigm shift in green, high-throughput analysis [64].

The optimization of mass spectrometry methods using ultrashort columns and advanced instrument settings presents a powerful strategy for aligning analytical workflows with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. The benefits are twofold: a dramatic increase in sample throughput and a significant reduction in environmental impact. As demonstrated in the protocol, a short 10-minute UHPLC-MS/MS method that omits energy-intensive steps like solvent evaporation can be both highly sensitive and sustainable [9].

The cumulative effect of these optimizations should not be underestimated. As highlighted in a case study for the drug rosuvastatin calcium, the approximately 25 LC analyses performed per batch can consume around 18 L of mobile phase per batch. When scaled to an estimated 1000 batches annually, this results in 18,000 L of mobile phase waste for a single API [26]. Therefore, adopting shorter methods with reduced flow rates and smarter sample preparation is not merely a technical improvement but a critical step toward achieving broader corporate and global sustainability goals, such as the ambition for carbon-zero analytical laboratories by 2030 [26]. By leveraging modern metrics like AGREE, AMGS, and AES, scientists can quantitatively measure this progress, ensuring that the pursuit of speed and performance goes hand-in-hand with environmental responsibility.

Validating and Comparing Analytical Greenness Across Techniques and Metrics

The development of environmentally friendly analytical methods is a critical goal in modern chemistry, particularly within pharmaceutical and clinical research. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles provide a framework for reducing the environmental impact of analytical practices [13]. To translate these principles into actionable assessments, several metric tools have been developed, each with unique strengths and focus areas.

This application note outlines a structured multi-metric evaluation strategy incorporating four established tools: AGREE, AES, GAPI, and BAGI. This holistic approach ensures a balanced assessment of an analytical method's environmental impact, practical feasibility, and analytical performance, providing researchers and drug development professionals with a comprehensive sustainability profile for their mass spectrometry methods and other analytical procedures.

The Green and Practical Assessment Toolbox

A practical multi-metric assessment requires an understanding of the available tools. The selected metrics provide complementary insights, covering environmental impact, penalty-based scoring, and practical applicability.

Table 1: Overview of Key Greenness and Applicability Assessment Metrics

Metric Tool	Full Name	Primary Focus	Scoring System	Key Output
AGREE [13]	Analytical GREEnness Metric	Comprehensive environmental impact of the entire analytical procedure	0-1 scale (closer to 1 is greener) based on 12 GAC principles	Clock-shaped pictogram with a final score and segment colors
AES [65] [66]	Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points for non-green parameters	Base of 100 points, subtracting penalties for hazardous reagents, energy, waste	Final score (≥75 excellent, ≥50 acceptable)
GAPI [66]	Green Analytical Procedure Index	Environmental impact across the method's lifecycle (sample collection to waste)	Three-level traffic light system (green/yellow/red) for 5 evaluation areas	Pictogram with 5 colored sections
BAGI [33]	Blue Applicability Grade Index	Practicality and applicability of the analytical method	Scoring based on 10 practicality attributes (e.g., throughput, instrumentation, automation)	Asteroid pictogram with a final score

The following workflow diagram illustrates the recommended strategy for applying these four metrics in a complementary manner to achieve a holistic evaluation.

Detailed Metric Protocols and Application

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

The AGREE metric offers a comprehensive review of an analytical method's alignment with the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC [13].

Software Required: AGREE freeware, available for download from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE.

Procedure:

• Gather Input Data: Compile quantitative and qualitative data for all 12 principles. Essential data points include:
  • Sample preparation technique (e.g., direct analysis, number of steps).
  • Sample size and number of samples.
  • Amounts and toxicity of all reagents and solvents.
  • Energy consumption of equipment (in kWh per sample).
  • Waste generation amount and hazard.
  • Operator safety considerations.
  • Potential for miniaturization, automation, and direct analysis.
• Input Data into Software: Enter the collected data into the corresponding fields of the AGREE software. The software transforms each input into a normalized score on a 0-1 scale.
• Assign Weightings (Optional): Assign relative weights (1-5) to each of the 12 principles based on their importance in your specific analytical context. This introduces flexibility and relevance to the assessment [13].
• Generate and Interpret the Pictogram: The software automatically generates a circular pictogram.
  • The final score (0-1) is displayed in the center, with a darker green color indicating a greener method.
  • Each of the 12 segments corresponds to a GAC principle, with its color (red-yellow-green) indicating performance for that criterion.
  • The width of each segment reflects the assigned weight.

Protocol for Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) Assessment

The Analytical Eco-Scale is a straightforward penalty-based system that evaluates the environmental impact of reagents, energy consumption, and waste [66].

Procedure:

• Start with a Perfect Score: Begin with a base score of 100 points.
• Assign Penalty Points: Subtract penalty points for each non-green parameter based on its quantity and hazard, as detailed in Table 2.
• Calculate Final Score: The final score is calculated as: Eco-Scale score = 100 - total penalty points.
• Interpret the Result:
  • A score above 75 represents an excellent green analysis.
  • A score above 50 represents an acceptable green analysis [65] [66].

Table 2: Analytical Eco-Scale Penalty Points Guide

Parameter	Condition	Penalty Points
Reagents	>10 mL or g of hazardous substance	Varies, e.g., 1-5 for slightly harmful, up to 10-15 for highly toxic/carcinogenic
	<10 mL or g of hazardous substance	Reduced penalty (e.g., half)
Energy	>1.5 kWh per sample	1 point per 1 kWh
Occupational Hazard	Risk of explosion, corrosion, etc.	3 points
Waste	Non-ecological waste generated	3-5 points

Protocol for GAPI Assessment

The Green Analytical Procedure Index provides a qualitative visual assessment of a method's environmental impact across its entire lifecycle [66].

Procedure:

• Obtain the GAPI Pictogram Template: Secure the standard GAPI pictogram, which is divided into five sections representing the main stages of the analytical process.
• Evaluate Each Lifecycle Stage: Assess the greenness of each criterion within the five stages (sample collection, preservation, transport, preparation, and final analysis). For each criterion, assign a color:
  • Green: Fulfills the ideal green condition.
  • Yellow: Fulfills the requirement partially.
  • Red: Does not fulfill the green requirement.
• Color the Pictogram: Fill in the corresponding sections of the pictogram with the assigned colors. The resulting diagram provides an at-a-glance overview of the method's environmental performance, highlighting areas of weakness (red) and strength (green).

Protocol for BAGI Assessment

The Blue Applicability Grade Index is a newer metric designed to be complementary to greenness tools, focusing on the practicality and applicability of an analytical method [33].

Software Required: BAGI freeware, available at mostwiedzy.pl/bagi or the web app bagi-index.anvil.app.

Procedure:

• Gather Practicality Data: Compile data on ten key practicality attributes, including:
  • Type of analysis (qualitative/quantitative).
  • Number of analytes determined simultaneously.
  • Sample throughput (samples per hour).
  • Instrumentation requirements (complexity, cost, availability).
  • Degree of automation.
  • Amount of sample required.
• Input Data into Software: Enter the data into the BAGI software.
• Generate and Interpret the Pictogram: The software calculates a final score and generates an "asteroid" pictogram. A higher score indicates a more practical and widely applicable method. The pictogram allows for the identification of strong and weak points in the method's practicality.

Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Assessment

A multi-metric assessment relies on accurate data regarding the chemicals, materials, and instruments used in the analytical procedure.

Table 3: Research Reagent and Material Solutions for Assessment

Item Category	Specific Examples	Function in Analysis & Assessment
Green Solvents	Water, ethanol, bioethanol [66], Hydrophilic Deep Eutectic Solvents [66]	Eco-friendly alternatives to toxic organic solvents; reduce penalty points in AES and improve AGREE scores.
Alternative Reagents	Dapsone (as an eco-friendly reagent for spectrophotometry) [65]	Replaces more hazardous chemicals, reducing occupational hazard and waste toxicity.
Miniaturized/Micro-Extraction Equipment	Hollow Fiber Liquid Phase Microextraction (HF-LPME) setups [66], Vortex-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (VA-DLLME) [66]	Reduces solvent and sample volume consumption, directly improving scores in AGREE (Principle 2), AES, and GAPI.
Flow-Based Analysis Systems	Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) systems [65]	Enables automation, reduces reagent consumption and waste generation, and increases sample throughput. Benefits all metrics, including BAGI.
Energy-Efficient Instruments	UPLC systems [66]	Reduces analysis time and energy consumption per sample, improving scores in AES and AGREE (Principle 9).

The multi-metric approach, integrating AGREE, AES, GAPI, and BAGI, provides a robust and nuanced framework for evaluating analytical methods. AGREE delivers a comprehensive, weighted greenness profile; the Analytical Eco-Scale offers a rapid, penalty-based audit; GAPI gives a visual snapshot of environmental impact across the method's lifecycle; and BAGI ensures that practical applicability is not overlooked in the pursuit of greenness.

For researchers in mass spectrometry and drug development, employing this suite of tools ensures that newly developed methods are not only environmentally benign but also practically viable and analytically sound, thereby supporting the broader adoption of Sustainable Science in the pharmaceutical industry.

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have become increasingly crucial in modern laboratories, driving a paradigm shift toward more environmentally sustainable methodologies without compromising analytical quality [48]. This case study provides a comprehensive greenness assessment of two prominent metabolomic analysis techniques: Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Through a detailed investigation of milk metabolome analysis, we demonstrate how FTIR emerges as a superior green alternative to traditional chromatographic techniques while maintaining robust analytical performance for differentiating biological samples [67] [68].

The assessment framework employed multiple validated greenness evaluation tools, including the Analytical GREEnness metric approach (AGREE), National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Eco-Scale Assessment (ESA), and Complementary Green Analytical Procedure Index (ComplexGAPI) [67] [68]. This multi-faceted approach provides researchers with a validated methodology for evaluating the environmental impact of analytical techniques, supporting the transition toward more sustainable laboratory practices in pharmaceutical development and bioanalytical research.

Experimental Protocols

Sample Preparation Protocol

Milk Sample Collection and Storage:

• Collect fresh milk samples (buffalo, cow, goat, and camel) in sterile, amber containers
• Store immediately at -20°C until analysis to prevent metabolite degradation
• Thaw samples gradually at 4°C for 12 hours before analysis
• Gently homogenize using vortex mixer for 30 seconds before aliquoting

FTIR Sample Preparation:

• Pipette 50 μL of milk directly onto the ATR crystal
• Ensure complete coverage of the crystal surface
• Acquire spectra immediately after deposition
• Clean crystal with methanol-water (70:30) solution between samples
• Dry crystal with soft, lint-free tissue before next sample [67] [68]

GC-MS Sample Preparation:

• Transfer 1 mL of milk to 2 mL microcentrifuge tube
• Add 1.5 mL of methanol-chloroform (2:1) extraction solvent
• Vortex vigorously for 60 seconds
• Centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
• Transfer supernatant to new vial
• Dry under gentle nitrogen stream
• Derivatize with 50 μL methoxyamine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL in pyridine) for 90 minutes at 30°C
• Add 50 μL MSTFA (N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide) and incubate for 30 minutes at 37°C
• Transfer to GC vial with insert for analysis [67] [68]

Instrumental Analysis Parameters

FTIR Analysis Protocol:

• Instrument: FTIR Spectrometer with ATR accessory
• Spectral range: 4000-400 cm⁻¹
• Resolution: 4 cm⁻¹
• Scans per spectrum: 64
• Background scans: 64
• Mirror velocity: 2.5 mm/s
• Apodization: Happ-Genzel
• Atmosphere compensation: Applied automatically
• Quality check: Verify water vapor compensation and ATR crystal cleanliness [67] [68]

GC-MS Analysis Protocol:

• GC System: Agilent 7890B with capillary column (DB-5MS, 30 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness)
• MS System: Agilent 5977B MSD
• Injection volume: 1 μL
• Injector temperature: 250°C
• Carrier gas: Helium, constant flow 1.0 mL/min
• Oven program: 60°C (1 min), ramp to 325°C at 10°C/min, hold 10 min
• Transfer line temperature: 280°C
• Ion source temperature: 230°C
• Quadrupole temperature: 150°C
• Solvent delay: 5 min
• Scan range: m/z 50-600
• Electron energy: 70 eV
• Tuning: Perform autotune weekly using calibration standard [67] [68]

Data Processing Workflow

The experimental workflow below illustrates the comprehensive process from sample preparation to data interpretation for both analytical techniques:

Greenness Assessment Methodology

Assessment Tools and Metrics

The greenness evaluation employed five complementary assessment methodologies to provide a comprehensive environmental impact profile:

Table 1: Greenness Assessment Metrics and Methodologies

Assessment Tool	Evaluation Basis	Scoring System	Key Parameters Assessed
AGREE (Analytical GREEnness)	12 GAC principles	0-1 scale (1 = greenest)	Toxicity, energy, waste, safety, renewability
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index)	Four criteria checklist	Pass/Fail for each criterion	PBT, hazardous, corrosive, waste quantity
Eco-Scale Assessment (ESA)	Penalty points system	Higher score = greener method	Reagents, energy, waste, toxicity
ComplexGAPI	Multi-criteria diagram	5-level pictogram	Sampling, transport, storage, safety protocols
RGB 12 Algorithm	12 GAC principles	Color-coded assessment	Holistic greenness profile

Quantitative Greenness Profile

The comprehensive assessment revealed significant differences in environmental performance between the two analytical techniques:

Table 2: Comparative Greenness Assessment Results for GC-MS vs. FTIR

Assessment Metric	GC-MS Performance	FTIR Performance	Performance Gap
AGREE Score	0.41 (Moderate)	0.82 (Excellent)	+100% improvement
NEMI Criteria	1/4 criteria met	4/4 criteria met	Complete compliance
Eco-Scale Score	58 (Acceptable)	92 (Excellent)	+58% improvement
Solvent Consumption	~15 mL/sample (chloroform, methanol, pyridine)	None	Elimination of solvent waste
Energy Demand	High (GC oven, MS source)	Moderate (IR source)	~60% reduction
Analysis Time	~45 minutes/sample	~2 minutes/sample	~95% reduction
Waste Generation	Significant (solvents, derivatives, vials)	Minimal (cleaning solvents only)	~90% reduction
Operator Safety	Moderate hazard (toxic solvents)	Low hazard	Significant safety improvement

Results and Technical Comparison

Analytical Performance Metrics

Despite their dramatically different environmental profiles, both techniques demonstrated robust analytical capabilities for metabolome analysis:

Table 3: Analytical Performance Comparison for Milk Metabolome Analysis

Performance Parameter	GC-MS Results	FTIR Results	Interpretation
Metabolites Detected	87 peaks across 7 chemical classes	Functional group fingerprints	GC-MS provides higher specificity
Primary Components	Sugars (61-75%), organic acids, vitamins, fatty acids	Carbohydrates, proteins, lipids profiles	Complementary quantitative data
Sensitivity	ppb-ppm range for targeted metabolites	ppm range for major components	GC-MS superior for trace analysis
Discrimination Power	OPLS-DA successfully classified all milk types	PCA differentiated milk types, especially camel milk	Both effective for classification
Reproducibility	RSD < 5% for retention times	RSD < 2% for band intensities	FTIR offers superior precision
Sample Throughput	20-30 samples/day	100+ samples/day	FTIR significantly faster

Metabolite Profiling and Classification

The GC-MS analysis identified and quantified 87 distinct metabolites across various biochemical classes including sugars, organic acids, fatty acids, amino acids, alcohols, sterols, and vitamins [67]. Sugars, predominantly lactose, represented the most abundant class (61-75% of total detected metabolites), with cow milk showing the highest lactose content—1.07-fold greater than camel milk—supporting camel milk's potential as an alternative for lactose-intolerant individuals [67] [68].

FTIR spectroscopy provided complementary data through functional group fingerprinting, with characteristic absorption bands enabling rapid differentiation of milk types [67]. The technique particularly excelled at distinguishing camel milk from other types based on its unique spectral profile in the 1800-800 cm⁻¹ region, associated with carbohydrate and protein vibrations [67] [68].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Research Materials and Their Functions

Reagent/Material	Function in Analysis	Greenness Considerations
Methanol	GC-MS: Solvent for metabolite extraction	High volatility, flammable, requires proper disposal
Chloroform	GC-MS: Lipid co-solvent in extraction	Toxic, environmental hazard, requires specialized waste
Methoxyamine hydrochloride	GC-MS: Derivatization for carbonyl groups	Moisture-sensitive, requires careful handling
MSTFA	GC-MS: Silylation agent for OH/NH groups	Expensive, moisture-sensitive, derivatization waste
Potassium bromide	FTIR: Optional for transmission cells	Minimal hazard, reusable with proper cleaning
ATR crystals (diamond, ZnSe)	FTIR: Internal reflection element	Long-lasting, minimal consumable requirements

Implementation and Decision Framework

The following decision pathway provides researchers with a structured approach for selecting the appropriate technique based on their specific research requirements and sustainability goals:

Strategic Implementation Guidelines

FTIR-First Workflow Implementation:

• Deploy FTIR for high-throughput screening of sample sets
• Use principal component analysis (PCA) of spectral data for rapid classification
• Reserve GC-MS for targeted confirmation of specific metabolites
• Establish spectral libraries for routine sample types
• Implement chemonetric models for quantitative predictions

Greenness Optimization Strategies:

• Replace solvent-based extraction with direct analysis when possible
• Implement microsampling techniques to minimize material usage
• Employ automated solvent recovery systems for GC-MS workflows
• Schedule batch processing to maximize instrument efficiency
• Utilize method translation from GC-MS to FTIR for routine analyses

This comprehensive case study demonstrates that FTIR spectroscopy provides a significantly greener alternative to GC-MS for metabolome analysis while maintaining robust analytical performance for sample classification and major component analysis. The multi-metric greenness assessment revealed that FTIR outperformed GC-MS across all evaluation parameters, with particularly notable advantages in solvent elimination, energy reduction, and waste minimization [67] [68].

For research applications requiring comprehensive metabolite profiling and trace-level detection, GC-MS remains the technique of choice. However, the implementation of an FTIR-first screening strategy with targeted GC-MS confirmation represents an optimal approach that balances analytical rigor with environmental responsibility. This methodology aligns with the emerging paradigm of Circular Analytical Chemistry, which emphasizes resource efficiency, waste reduction, and sustainability throughout the analytical workflow [48].

The framework presented herein provides researchers and pharmaceutical professionals with a validated protocol for evaluating analytical techniques through both performance and environmental dimensions, supporting the transition toward more sustainable laboratory practices without compromising scientific quality.

Application Note & Protocol

---

In the field of mass spectrometry (MS), the push for sustainable laboratory practices has made the greenness assessment of analytical methods a critical step in method development and validation [69]. For researchers and drug development professionals, benchmarking a method's environmental footprint is no longer optional but essential for meeting internal sustainability goals and external regulatory expectations. This application note provides a structured approach and practical toolkit for evaluating the greenness of your MS methods against established industry benchmarks, framed within the broader context of academic thesis research on green analytical chemistry.

The core of this benchmarking relies on standardized greenness assessment metrics that translate methodological choices into quantifiable environmental scores. These metrics evaluate factors such as energy consumption, waste generation, and the toxicity of reagents [69] [70]. By adopting these tools, scientists can objectively identify areas for improvement, justify the use of greener alternatives, and demonstrate a commitment to sustainable science.

---

Quantitative Benchmarking of Greenness Metrics

A key step in benchmarking is understanding the available assessment tools. The table below summarizes the most relevant greenness metrics for MS-based methods.

Table 1: Key Greenness Assessment Metrics for Mass Spectrometry Methods

Metric Tool Name	Scope of Assessment	Scoring System	Key Assessed Parameters	Ideal Use Case
AGREE [69] [71]	Overall analytical method	0 to 1 (Pictogram) Higher score = greener	All 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), including energy, waste, and toxicity [71].	Comprehensive evaluation of a full analytical protocol.
AGREEprep [70]	Sample preparation only	0 to 1 (Pictogram) Higher score = greener	10 principles of green sample preparation, e.g., waste, solvent safety, integration, and throughput [70].	Comparing and optimizing sample preparation techniques like microextraction.
GAPI [31] [71]	Overall analytical method	Pictogram (Green/Yellow/Red) More green = greener	15 parameters across five lifecycle stages of the method [71].	A quick, multi-stage visual overview of a method's environmental impact.
BAGI [31]	Overall analytical method	Numerical Score Higher score = greener (e.g., 82.5/100) [31]	Not specified in detail in the sources, but used to confirm environmental superiority.	A supplementary metric for a holistic greenness score.

To contextualize these scores, recent literature provides concrete benchmarks. For instance, a green GC-MS method for analyzing paracetamol and metoclopramide achieved an AGREE score of 0.81 and a BAGI score of 82.5, confirming its environmental superiority over conventional liquid chromatography methods [31]. In another study, a UPLC-MS/MS method for antihypertensive drugs was validated and its greenness assessed using multiple metrics, demonstrating higher scores than reported HPLC methods [71].

---

Experimental Protocol: Implementing a Greenness Assessment

This protocol outlines the steps to benchmark the greenness of a mass spectrometry method using the AGREE calculator, a comprehensive tool based on all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.

Workflow Diagram: AGREE Metric Assessment Pathway

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Method Parameter Definition: Systematically list all components of your MS method.

  • Sample Preparation: Record the type and volume of all solvents and reagents used per sample. Note if procedures are automated and the total preparation time.
  • Instrumental Analysis: Document the MS analysis runtime, the flow rate of the mobile phase (for LC-MS), the type of carrier gas (for GC-MS), and the power consumption of all instruments (e.g., MS source, chromatograph).
  • Waste Generation: Calculate the total volume of waste generated per sample, including solvents and solid waste.

• Data Input into AGREE Tool:

  • Access the freely available AGREE calculator software.
  • Input the collected data from Step 1, scoring each of the 12 GAC principles as directed by the tool's instructions. This typically involves assigning a score based on the environmental impact of each parameter (e.g., a high score for using low-toxicity solvents, a low score for high energy consumption).

• Score Generation & Benchmarking:

  • The AGREE tool will generate a final score from 0 to 1 and a corresponding pictogram.
  • Compare your method's score against published benchmarks for similar analytical applications (e.g., the score of 0.81 for a GC-MS method [31]). This comparison places your method on the greenness spectrum.

• Interpretation and Improvement:

  • A score below 0.5 indicates significant opportunity for greening.
  • A score between 0.5 and 0.7 suggests a moderately green method.
  • A score above 0.7 is considered an excellent green alternative.
  • Use the detailed breakdown from the AGREE tool to pinpoint specific areas for improvement, such as replacing a toxic solvent or implementing automation to reduce reagent use.

---

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent & Material Solutions

Selecting the right materials is fundamental to developing a greener MS method. The following table details key solutions that can enhance the greenness profile of your workflow.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Greener MS Methods

Item	Function in MS Analysis	Greenness & Practical Consideration
Safer Solvents (e.g., Ethanol, Ethyl Acetate)	Extraction and reconstitution solvents in sample preparation.	Lower toxicity and higher biodegradability compared to acetonitrile or chlorinated solvents. Prioritized in AGREE/AGREEprep assessments [31] [70].
Microextraction Techniques (e.g., SPME, MEPS)	Miniaturized sample preparation to isolate and pre-concentrate analytes.	Dramatically reduce solvent consumption (principle G2) and waste generation. Directly improves AGREEprep scores [70].
Ambient Ionization Sources (e.g., DESI, SESI)	Ionization technique for MS analysis that requires minimal sample prep.	Enables analysis at atmospheric pressure, often without extensive sample preparation or toxic matrices, reducing waste and energy (principles G1, G2) [72] [73].
U(H)PLC-MS/MS Systems	High-efficiency chromatographic separation coupled to mass spectrometry.	Offers shorter analysis times and lower solvent consumption per sample compared to conventional HPLC, directly addressing energy and waste principles [71] [28].

---

Advanced Framework: Integrating Whiteness (WAC) in Assessment

For a truly balanced method, greenness should not compromise analytical performance. The concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) extends GAC by demanding a harmony between greenness (G), practicality and cost-effectiveness (B), and analytical quality (R) [70].

Visualization: The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) Framework

Application of WAC: When benchmarking your method, use the 12 principles of WAC to ensure that improvements in greenness (e.g., reducing solvent use) do not unduly sacrifice critical analytical figures of merit like sensitivity (LOD, LOQ) and accuracy, or practical aspects like cost and time [70]. A method scoring high in all three domains (Red, Green, Blue) represents the ideal "white" method, perfectly balancing performance, sustainability, and practicality.

---

Benchmarking the greenness of mass spectrometry methods is a achievable and necessary process for the modern researcher. By leveraging standardized metrics like AGREE and AGREEprep, and striving for a balanced profile under the White Analytical Chemistry framework, scientists can quantitatively demonstrate their method's environmental performance. The provided protocols, benchmarks, and toolkit empower you to not only assess your current methods but also to design future methods that are both scientifically excellent and environmentally responsible.

The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Q2(R2) guideline provides the global benchmark for validating analytical procedures, ensuring the reliability, accuracy, and precision of data for regulatory submissions [74]. Simultaneously, the growing imperative for sustainability in the pharmaceutical industry demands the integration of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles into analytical workflows. This document outlines a comprehensive framework for incorporating greenness assessment directly into the analytical method validation process, as mandated by ICH Q2(R2), with a specific focus on mass spectrometry-based methods. Aligning with a broader research thesis on greenness assessment, this approach ensures that methods are not only fit-for-purpose but also environmentally sound, safe for analysts, and sustainable throughout their lifecycle.

The revised ICH Q2(R2) guideline, together with its companion guideline ICH Q14 on analytical procedure development, emphasizes a science- and risk-based approach and introduces the concept of the Analytical Target Profile (ATP) [74] [75]. This provides a unique opportunity to proactively define environmental performance criteria alongside traditional analytical performance characteristics. For researchers and drug development professionals, this integrated framework facilitates the development of methods that meet regulatory standards while supporting corporate sustainability goals and reducing ecological impact.

Core Principles of ICH Q2(R2) and Green Analytical Chemistry

The ICH Q2(R2) Validation Framework

The ICH Q2(R2) guideline outlines the fundamental validation characteristics required to demonstrate that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. These include [76] [74]:

• Accuracy: The closeness of agreement between the measured value and a true or accepted reference value.
• Precision: The degree of agreement among individual test results when the procedure is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogeneous sample. This includes repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility.
• Specificity: The ability to assess the analyte unequivocally in the presence of components that may be expected to be present.
• Linearity and Range: The ability to obtain results proportional to analyte concentration within a given range.
• Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): The lowest levels at which an analyte can be detected or reliably quantified, respectively.
• Robustness: A measure of the method's capacity to remain unaffected by small, deliberate variations in method parameters.

The updated guideline encourages a holistic, "all-in-one" experimental design where multiple performance characteristics can be evaluated simultaneously, promoting efficiency and reducing resource consumption [75].

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) Principles

Green Analytical Chemistry aims to minimize the environmental impact of analytical methods by reducing or eliminating hazardous substances, conserving energy, and minimizing waste [9] [77]. The 12 principles of GAC provide a foundation for assessing the greenness of analytical methods. Key strategies for greening chromatographic methods, particularly in LC-MS, include [9] [77] [78]:

• Miniaturization and scaling down sample preparation and analysis.
• Reducing solvent consumption through shorter run times, reduced flow rates, and micro-extraction techniques.
• Replacing hazardous solvents with safer alternatives.
• Automating processes to enhance efficiency and reduce human error.
• Implementing energy-efficient instrumentation and protocols.

Integrating Greenness Assessment into the Validation Lifecycle

The integration of greenness assessment should occur throughout the entire analytical procedure lifecycle, from initial development to validation and routine use. The following workflow illustrates this integrated process, highlighting key decision points where green principles are applied alongside traditional validation parameters.

Figure 1. Integrated workflow for incorporating greenness assessment into the analytical method validation lifecycle. The process begins with defining the ATP and incorporates green principles at every stage, with iterative optimization if greenness scores are unsatisfactory.

Defining the Analytical Target Profile (ATP) with Green Criteria

The Analytical Target Profile (ATP) is a prospective summary of the intended purpose of the analytical procedure and its required performance criteria [74] [75]. In addition to defining traditional parameters (e.g., target precision, accuracy, range), the ATP should include environmental performance attributes. These may consist of:

• Maximum allowable solvent consumption per analysis
• Maximum permissible energy consumption
• Limits on waste generation
• Preference for safer, less hazardous chemicals

By establishing these green criteria at the outset, method development is guided toward more sustainable outcomes from the beginning.

Green Method Development Strategies

During method development, several strategies can be employed to enhance greenness while maintaining analytical performance:

• Mobile Phase Selection: Prefer water, methanol, or ethanol over acetonitrile when possible. Replace toxic buffers with safer alternatives (e.g., ammonium acetate instead of ion-pairing agents) [79] [80].
• Column Chemistry: Use smaller particle size columns (e.g., 1.7-2.7 μm) and shorter column lengths (e.g., 50-100 mm) to achieve faster separations with less solvent consumption [71] [80].
• Flow Rate and Gradient Optimization: Implement UPLC/UHPLC systems that operate efficiently at lower flow rates (e.g., 0.2-0.7 mL/min) while maintaining chromatographic resolution [71] [9].
• Sample Preparation: Employ miniaturized, solvent-free techniques such as QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe) [79] or Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) [78] to reduce solvent consumption and waste.

Validation with Greenness Assessment

After establishing the method according to the ATP and green principles, formal validation per ICH Q2(R2) is conducted. Upon completion of the validation tests, a greenness assessment should be performed using standardized metric tools to quantitatively evaluate the method's environmental performance. The results of this assessment may necessitate method optimization if scores are unsatisfactory, creating an iterative improvement cycle as shown in Figure 1.

Greenness Assessment Tools and Metrics

Several standardized tools are available to quantitatively assess the greenness of analytical methods. These tools provide objective metrics that can be included in the validation report to demonstrate environmental compliance.

Table 1: Common Greenness Assessment Tools for Analytical Methods

Tool Name	Type	Key Parameters Assessed	Output Format	Advantages
AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) [71] [79]	Quantitative	All 12 GAC principles	Score 0-1 (1=greenest) with pictogram	Comprehensive, easy-to-interpret score, covers full GAC principles
Analytical Eco-Scale [71]	Semi-quantitative	Reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste	Penalty points (higher score=greener)	Simple calculation, considers occupational hazard
GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index) [71]	Qualitative	Sample preparation, collection, storage, transport, final analysis	Pictogram with 5-color scale	Visual assessment, covers entire procedure lifecycle
ComplexGAPI [78]	Qualitative	Extension of GAPI for more complex methods	Pictogram with multi-sector design	Suitable for advanced techniques with multiple steps

The AGREE calculator is particularly valuable for mass spectrometry methods as it provides a comprehensive, quantitative score based on all 12 principles of GAC [71] [79]. For example, in a recent study of a UPLC/MS/MS method for antihypertensive agents, the AGREE score provided a clear, visual representation of the method's environmental performance [71]. Similarly, a green LC-APCI-MS/MS method for nitrosamine impurities in antidiabetic medication was evaluated using multiple tools including AGREE and Analytical Eco-Scale [80].

Case Study: Green UPLC/MS/MS Method for Antihypertensive Drugs and Impurities

Experimental Protocol

Objective: To develop and validate a green UPLC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of captopril (CPL), hydrochlorothiazide (HCZ), and their harmful impurities (captopril disulphide, chlorothiazide, and salamide) [71].

Chromatographic Conditions:

• Column: Agilent poroshell 120EC-C18 (4.6 × 50 mm, 2.7 μm)
• Mobile Phase: Methanol and 0.1% formic acid (90:10, v/v)
• Flow Rate: 0.7 mL/min
• Injection Volume: Not specified in source
• Column Temperature: Room temperature
• Run Time: 1.0 minute

Mass Spectrometric Conditions:

• Ionization Mode: ESI-positive for CPL; ESI-negative for HCZ and impurities
• Detection Mode: Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM)
• Data Processing: Mass Lynx V4.1 software

Sample Preparation:

• Tablet powder equivalent to 50 mg CPL and 25 mg HCZ transferred to volumetric flask.
• Diluent (methanol) added, sonicated for 15 minutes, and diluted to volume.
• Solution filtered through 0.45 μm PVDF filter before injection.

Validation Parameters (as per ICH Q2(R2)):

• Linearity: CPL (50.0-500.0 ng mL⁻¹), HCZ (20.0-500.0 ng mL⁻¹), CDS (10.0-250.0 ng mL⁻¹), CTZ (5.0-250.0 ng mL⁻¹), SMD (20.0-400.0 ng mL⁻¹) with correlation coefficients >0.99.
• Accuracy: Recovery studies performed at multiple concentration levels.
• Precision: Repeatability and intermediate precision demonstrated with RSD <2%.
• Specificity: No interference from excipients or impurities.
• Sensitivity: LOD and LOQ established for all analytes.

Greenness Assessment and Results

The greenness of the developed method was evaluated using five different metric tools and compared with a reported HPLC method [71]. The AGREE calculator score demonstrated significant improvement in greenness compared to conventional methods. Key green features included:

• Reduced solvent consumption due to short run time (1 minute) and low flow rate (0.7 mL/min)
• Energy efficiency from room temperature operation
• Minimal waste generation
• Use of less hazardous chemicals (methanol preferred over acetonitrile)

The method successfully validated all ICH Q2(R2) parameters while demonstrating superior environmental performance, making it suitable for routine quality control analysis in pharmaceutical laboratories.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green LC-MS Method Development and Validation

Item/Category	Function/Purpose	Green Considerations	Examples/Alternatives
LC-MS Grade Methanol	Mobile phase component; extraction solvent	Less toxic than acetonitrile; biodegradable	Can replace acetonitrile in many applications [71] [80]
Ammonium Acetate / Formate	MS-compatible buffer additives	Less hazardous than ion-pairing reagents; volatile	Alternative to phosphate buffers or ion-pairing agents [79]
QuEChERS Salts (MgSO₄, NaCl)	Sample preparation; extraction and partitioning	Minimizes organic solvent use; reduces waste	Used in PFAS analysis in biological matrices [79]
SPME Fibers	Solvent-free sample extraction and concentration	Eliminates solvent use in sample preparation; miniaturized	DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber for VOC analysis [78]
UPLC Columns (small particle, <2μm)	High-efficiency chromatographic separation	Enables faster analysis; reduces solvent consumption	BEH C18, Poroshell EC-C18 [71] [79]
Supercritical CO₂	Mobile phase for SFC	Non-toxic, recyclable; replaces organic solvents	Green alternative for chiral and normal-phase separations [77]
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES)	Extraction and sample preparation media	Biodegradable, low toxicity; from renewable sources	Emerging green alternative for natural product analysis [77]

The integration of greenness assessment into the ICH Q2(R2) validation framework represents a significant advancement in sustainable pharmaceutical analysis. By incorporating environmental performance criteria into the ATP, applying green principles during method development, and utilizing standardized assessment tools during validation, researchers can develop analytical methods that are both scientifically valid and environmentally responsible. The presented framework, supported by the case study and practical toolkit, provides a structured approach for scientists to align their analytical procedures with the dual objectives of regulatory compliance and sustainability. As the field evolves, this integrated approach will become increasingly essential for reducing the environmental footprint of pharmaceutical analysis while maintaining the highest standards of data quality and patient safety.

In the evolving landscape of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), merely calculating a greenness score marks the beginning, not the end, of the sustainability assessment process [18]. For researchers developing mass spectrometry methods, the true challenge lies in accurately interpreting these metrics and communicating their implications to diverse stakeholders across the drug development pipeline. The proliferation of assessment tools—from established metrics like AGREE, GAPI, and AES to emerging frameworks such as GEMAM and AGREEprep—has created a complex ecosystem where scores must be contextualized, not just compared [8] [25] [5]. This application note provides a structured framework for transforming numerical greenness scores into actionable intelligence, ensuring that assessments drive meaningful environmental improvements without compromising the analytical performance required in pharmaceutical mass spectrometry.

Current Greenness Assessment Metrics for Analytical Methods

The selection of an appropriate assessment tool forms the foundation of reliable greenness evaluation. Contemporary metrics vary significantly in their scope, calculation methodology, and output formats, each with distinct advantages and limitations for mass spectrometry applications [8] [5].

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric Name	Scoring Range	Key Assessment Criteria	Visual Output	Primary Applications	Notable Strengths
AGREE	0-1	All 12 GAC principles	Circular pictogram with 12 segments	General analytical methods	Comprehensive, user-friendly software available [81]
GAPI	Qualitative	5 stages of analytical process	Five-part color-coded pentagram	General analytical procedures	Detailed breakdown of analytical workflow [5]
Analytical Eco-Scale	0-100 (higher=greener)	Reagents, energy, waste	Numerical score	Method comparison	Simple quantitative output [5]
GEMAM	0-10	21 criteria across 6 dimensions	Hexagonal pictogram	Comprehensive method assessment	Combines GAC principles and green sample preparation factors [25]
AGREEprep	0-1	10 sample preparation factors	Circular pictogram	Sample preparation only	Focuses on often-overlooked sample prep impact [5]
AMGS	Not specified	Solvent EHS, solvent energy, instrument energy	Numerical score	Chromatographic methods	Specifically designed for chromatography [26]

The AGREE metric has gained particular prominence in LC-MS applications due to its comprehensive coverage of all 12 GAC principles and flexible weighting system that allows researchers to emphasize criteria most relevant to their specific context [81]. Studies evaluating LC-MS methods for neurotransmitter analysis have demonstrated AGREE's effectiveness in discriminating between methods when proper weights are assigned to critical parameters like waste production, analysis throughput, toxicity, and operator safety [81].

Table 2: Emerging and Specialized Assessment Tools

Metric Name	Scope	Unique Features	Best Use Cases
CaFRI	Carbon footprint	Focuses specifically on CO₂ emissions	Climate impact assessment
AGSA	Comprehensive greenness	Star-shaped visualization with area scoring	Method comparison
VIGI	Innovation	10 criteria including interdisciplinary approach	Assessing methodological novelty
GLANCE	Method reporting	Template for clear communication	Standardizing method description

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

Protocol 1: Comprehensive Method Evaluation Using AGREE

The AGREE metric provides a balanced approach for evaluating mass spectrometry methods against all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [81].

Materials and Software Requirements:

• AGREE calculator software (freely available online)
• Complete method documentation including sample preparation, chromatography, and MS detection parameters
• Safety Data Sheets for all reagents and solvents
• Instrument power consumption specifications
• Waste generation and disposal records

Procedure:

• Data Collection: Compile exact volumes of all solvents and reagents consumed per sample, including extraction solvents, mobile phase components, and calibration standards. Record energy consumption for all instrumentation including sample preparation devices, chromatographic system, and mass spectrometer [18].
• Software Input: Launch the AGREE calculator and input data for each of the 12 GAC principles:
  • Principle 1: Select sample preparation approach (direct, online, in-line)
  • Principle 7: Input waste volume per analysis with appropriate waste treatment considerations
  • Principle 8: Specify number of analytes measured simultaneously and sample throughput
  • Principle 11: Input toxicity and hazard information for all chemicals
  • Principle 12: Assess operator safety based on exposure risks [81]
• Weight Assignment: Adjust default weighting factors to emphasize critical parameters. For pharmaceutical MS methods, typically assign higher weights (3-4) to waste generation, throughput, toxicity, and operator safety [81].
• Score Generation: Execute calculation to generate the AGREE pictogram and overall score (0-1 scale).
• Interpretation: Analyze the colored pictogram to identify poorly performing sections (red or yellow) that represent opportunities for improvement.

Protocol 2: Multi-Metric Assessment Strategy

Employing complementary metrics provides a more comprehensive evaluation than any single tool [5].

Materials:

• Primary method documentation
• Access to multiple assessment tools (AGREE, GAPI, AGREEprep, or CaFRI)
• Comparative data from alternative or previous methods

Procedure:

• Core Assessment: Conduct evaluation using AGREE as described in Protocol 1.
• Sample Preparation Focus: Apply AGREEprep to specifically evaluate the sample preparation stage, which often accounts for significant environmental impact in MS workflows [5].
• Carbon Footprint Analysis: Use CaFRI to estimate carbon emissions, particularly focusing on energy-intensive components like UHPLC systems and high-resolution mass spectrometers.
• Comparative Visualization: Create a dashboard displaying results from all metrics to identify consistent patterns and discrepancies.
• Contextual Benchmarking: Compare scores against published methods for similar analytes or matrix types to establish performance relative to current practices.

Interpretation Framework for Assessment Results

Contextualizing Numerical Scores

Greenness scores gain meaning only when properly contextualized against methodological requirements and performance characteristics [18]. A moderate score of 0.6-0.7 on the AGREE scale may represent excellence for a highly sensitive targeted MS/MS assay requiring extensive sample cleanup, while the same score might be suboptimal for a simpler direct injection analysis [81].

Key Interpretation Principles:

• Analytical Performance Trade-offs: Evaluate whether lower greenness scores correlate with enhanced sensitivity, selectivity, or throughput that justifies the environmental impact. For regulated bioanalysis, maintaining data quality for regulatory submissions remains paramount [26].
• Scale Considerations: Contextualize resource consumption relative to the value of information gained. A method consuming 20mL of acetonitrile per sample may be justifiable for critical pharmacokinetic studies but unacceptable for routine therapeutic drug monitoring [26].
• Methodology Stage: Differentiate between early-stage research methods with higher optimization potential versus validated regulatory methods where changes require significant resources [48].

Identifying Improvement Opportunities

Systematic analysis of assessment outputs reveals specific pathways for environmental impact reduction [5].

Table 3: Common Improvement Strategies for Mass Spectrometry Methods

Problem Area	Typical Causes	Green Alternatives	Implementation Considerations
High solvent consumption	Long run times, high flow rates, large injection volumes	Method transfer to UHPLC, reduced column diameter, scaled injection volumes	May require instrument modification or revalidation
Toxic solvent usage	Acetonitrile in mobile phase, chlorinated extraction solvents	Methanol, ethanol, water-based mobile phases; alternative extraction solvents	Potential impact on chromatography and ionization efficiency
Energy intensity	Long analysis times, high source temperatures, inefficient MS duty cycles	Reduced run times, scheduled MRM, lower source temperatures, instrument power management	Must maintain chromatographic resolution and detection sensitivity
Sample preparation impact	Large sample volumes, multiple extraction steps, derivatization	Miniaturization, micro-extraction techniques, online sample preparation	May affect recovery, matrix effects, and reproducibility

Communication Strategies for Different Stakeholders

Scientific and Regulatory Audiences

For technical audiences, detailed metric scores coupled with methodological context provides the most meaningful communication framework [18].

Effective Communication Elements:

• Multi-Metric Visualization: Present complementary metrics (AGREE, GAPI, AGREEprep) in a consolidated visualization that highlights consistent findings across assessment frameworks [5].
• Lifecycle Context: Frame environmental impact within the complete analytical lifecycle, including solvent production, energy generation, and waste treatment [26].
• Improvement Roadmap: Pair assessment results with specific, prioritized recommendations for greenness enhancement, including estimated resource requirements and potential methodological trade-offs [48].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Green Alternatives for Mass Spectrometry Method Development

Reagent/ Material	Traditional Approach	Green Alternative	Function	Implementation Guidance
Extraction Solvents	Chlorinated solvents (DCM, chloroform), hexane	Ethyl acetate, cyclopentyl methyl ether, bio-based solvents	Compound extraction from biological matrices	Assess extraction efficiency and matrix effects during method development
Mobile Phase Modifiers	Trifluoroacetic acid, phosphate buffers	Formic acid, acetic acid, ammonium acetate	Chromatographic separation and ionization	Evaluate MS response and chromatographic performance
Sample Preparation Sorbents	Traditional polymeric sorbents	Biobased sorbents, reduced sorbent mass	Solid-phase extraction cleanup	Validate recovery and selectivity with target analytes
Calibration Standards	Individual preparations for each batch	Stable, consolidated stock solutions	Quantification reference	Implement stability testing to minimize preparation frequency
Column Technology	Conventional 4.6mm ID columns	2.1mm or 1.0mm ID UHPLC columns	Chromatographic separation	Adjust injection volumes and flow rates for sensitivity maintenance

Case Study: LC-MS Method for Neurotransmitter Analysis

A recent evaluation of six chromatographic methods for simultaneous analysis of serotonin, dopamine, acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate demonstrates the practical application of greenness assessment interpretation [81]. The study employed AGREE with customized weighting, emphasizing waste production, analysis throughput, toxicity, and operator safety (weight=4 for each).

Key Findings and Interpretation:

• The top-performing method achieved an AGREE score of 0.66 while simultaneously quantifying seven neurotransmitters with sensitivity reaching 2 pg for some analytes and a 5-minute analysis time [81].
• Critical interpretation considered the balance between moderate greenness score and exceptional analytical performance—simultaneous quantification of multiple neurotransmitters with high sensitivity represents significant value that partially offsets environmental impact [81].
• The assessment identified specific improvement opportunities, including solvent selection and waste management strategies, that could enhance greenness without compromising analytical performance [81].

Effective interpretation and communication of greenness assessment results transforms numerical scores into meaningful environmental improvements. For mass spectrometry methods in drug development, this requires contextualizing scores within analytical requirements, identifying specific enhancement opportunities, and tailoring communication strategies to diverse stakeholders. By adopting the structured framework presented in this application note, researchers can advance both environmental sustainability and analytical excellence in pharmaceutical mass spectrometry.

Conclusion

The integration of greenness assessment into mass spectrometry is no longer optional but a fundamental component of modern, responsible analytical science. The progression from foundational principles to practical application, optimization, and comparative validation provides a robust framework for significantly reducing the environmental impact of MS methods. As the field advances, future directions will likely involve the increased adoption of automated greenness scoring tools, the development of metrics that more fully capture lifecycle and climate impacts, and a stronger regulatory push for sustainable methodologies. By embracing these practices, researchers and drug development professionals can ensure their work not only generates high-quality data but also aligns with the critical global imperative of environmental sustainability, paving the way for greener discoveries in biomedical and clinical research.

References

• 1. Green Analytical Chemistry—Recent Innovations [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/6/1/10]
• 2. Green Analytical Chemistry: Sustainable Methods and ... [https://www.labmanager.com/green-analytical-chemistry-sustainable-methods-and-practices-34268]
• 3. Mass spectrometry in the age of green analytical chemistry [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/gc/d3gc04624a]
• 4. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697060/]
• 5. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-green-component-assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-analytical-methods]
• 6. Green analytical chemistry: integrating sustainability into ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11772533/]
• 7. Green Analytical Chemistry with PTR-MS [https://www.ionicon.com/blog/2022/is-ptr-ms-a-green-analytical-tool]
• 8. Greenness metrics for analytical methodologies linked to ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000491]
• 9. Development and validation of a green/blue UHPLC-MS ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-15614-4]
• 10. Green metrics and green analytical applications [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000685]
• 11. A Perspective on Current and Future Metric Tools - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12590457/]
• 12. Environmental impact of the reported chromatographic ... - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8801062/]
• 13. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588019/]
• 14. Comparison of the Greenness Assessment ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/4/4/32]
• 15. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209517792500019X]
• 16. Recommendations for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3237091/]
• 17. Overview of Mass Spectrometry for Protein Analysis [https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/protein-biology/protein-biology-learning-center/protein-biology-resource-library/pierce-protein-methods/overview-mass-spectrometry.html]
• 18. How to correctly evaluate greenness, whiteness and other ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc00615e]
• 19. Greenness evaluation of sample preparation methods by ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214158823000120]
• 20. Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) as a new tool to assess ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352554125001494]
• 21. White Analytical Chemistry: Balancing Performance ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/white-analytical-chemistry-balancing-performance-sustainability-and-practicality-in-modern-methods]
• 22. Emerging Tools for Holistic Evaluation of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/emerging-tools-for-holistic-evaluation-of-analytical-methods]
• 23. Green and White Analytical Chemistry [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40998048/]
• 24. Comparison of greenness and blueness assessments for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X25005193]
• 25. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318332/]
• 26. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/pt-br/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc01574j]
• 27. greenness assessment of HPLC methods for paclitaxel [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44371-025-00166-3]
• 28. Development and validation of a green/blue UHPLC-MS/MS ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12373956/]
• 29. Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267025004465]
• 30. UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS Metabolomic Profiling Reveals ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/12/11/323]
• 31. BAGI-assessed green GC-MS method for rapid analysis of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-25388-4]
• 32. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924001102]
• 33. Blue applicability grade index (BAGI) and software [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/gc/d3gc02347h]
• 34. Assessment of greenness, blueness, and whiteness profiles of ... [https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13065-024-01377-y]
• 35. Integrating ambient ionization with miniature mass ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000539]
• 36. Green solvents and their role in modern sample ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44371-025-00325-6]
• 37. Best of the Week: Green Solvent Selection, Research ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/best-of-the-week-green-solvent-selection-research-funding-innovations-in-lc]
• 38. GreenSOL: Green Solvent Guide for Analytical Chemistry ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993625003991]
• 39. An environmentally sensitive method for rapid monitoring ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/su/d5su00170f]
• 40. Advances in miniaturized liquid sample preparation ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772391725000386]
• 41. Simplifying Mass Spectrometry Workflows for Routine Testing [https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=24077]
• 42. Green sample preparation in food science [https://www.nature.com/collections/igfcaghgfb]
• 43. Development of High-Throughput Green Robotic SPE ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/18/10012]
• 44. Mass spectrometry-based high-throughput sample ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000361]
• 45. Integrating ambient ionization with miniature mass ... [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025GAnCh..1300257G/abstract]
• 46. Greener analytical methods for fragrance quality control [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40614578/]
• 47. Rapid and high-throughput analysis of 5 ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-025-00431-w]
• 48. HPLC 2025 Preview: The Road To Sustainable Analytical ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-the-road-to-sustainable-analytical-chemistry]
• 49. Portable Mass Spectrometry System: Instrumentation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278091/]
• 50. Ambient ionization Mass Spectrometry: Recent Developments ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7444024/]
• 51. Heritage science applications of ambient mass spectrometry [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ay/d5ay00193e]
• 52. EPPI: A Comprehensive Index Framework for Assessment ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425001028]
• 53. Carbon footprint of the analytical laboratory and the three- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577423000034]
• 54. Nanomaterial-enhanced ambient ionization for miniature ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40455291/]
• 55. Systematic Optimization of Long Gradient Chromatography ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4324436/]
• 56. Tips for Optimizing Key Parameters in LC–MS [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/tips-optimizing-key-parameters-lc-ms]
• 57. SPE-LC-MS/MS optimisation using response surface ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325004005]
• 58. Green Solvents and UHPLC: Balancing Chromatographic ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/green-solvents-and-uhplc-balancing-chromatographic-performance-with-environmental-sustainability]
• 59. An HPLC 2025 Interview with Paul Ferguson [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/sustainability-and-new-modality-therapeutics-an-hplc-2025-interview-with-paul-ferguson]
• 60. Critical review on the assessments of green metric tools for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772391725000404]
• 61. Improved Mass Analysis of Proteins and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12453605/]
• 62. New HPLC, MS, and CDS Products from 2024–2025 [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/new-hplc-ms-and-cds-products-from-2024-2025-a-brief-review]
• 63. Rapid High Performance Liquid Chromatography ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772391725000702]
• 64. How is mass spectrometry enhancing speed and ... [https://www.drugdiscoverynews.com/how-is-mass-spectrometry-enhancing-speed-and-throughput-in-drug-discovery-16563]
• 65. FIA- spectrophotometric method for the determination of amoxicillin in... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10622687/]
• 66. Green metric tools for analytical methods assessment ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993623002832]
• 67. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and Fourier ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40980071/]
• 68. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and Fourier ... [https://peerj.com/articles/19921/]
• 69. Analytical greenness metrics for metabolomics [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40830591/]
• 70. Greenness assessment of microextraction techniques in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216521/]
• 71. Greenness assessment of UPLC/MS/MS method for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-46636-5]
• 72. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d5ay01323b]
• 73. The Evolution of Secondary/Extractive Electrospray Ionization [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40200688/]
• 74. ICH and FDA Guidelines for Analytical Method Validation [https://www.labmanager.com/ich-and-fda-guidelines-for-analytical-method-validation-34252]
• 75. What's new in ICH Q2(R2) ? The Enoval software can help ... [https://www.pharmalex.com/thought-leadership/blogs/whats-new-in-ich-q2r2-the-enoval-software-can-help-you-be-compliant/]
• 76. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of analytical procedures [https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q2r2-validation-analytical-procedures-scientific-guideline]
• 77. Recent Advances In Green Chromatography Techniques ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772391725000830]
• 78. A Sustainable Approach to Green Sample Preparation and ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/a-sustainable-approach-to-green-sample-preparation-and-analytical-performance-using-hs-spme-gc-qtof-ms]
• 79. A green analytical method for the simultaneous ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708524002437]
• 80. Green and sustainable LC-APCI-MS/MS method for ... [https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13065-025-01503-4]
• 81. Evaluation of Greenness of LC-MS Chromatographic ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/9/6/147]