A Practical Guide to AGREE: Mastering Green Analytical Chemistry Metric Software

Abstract

This guide provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with a comprehensive resource for the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric software. It covers foundational principles, from understanding the 12 SIGNIFICANCE criteria of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) to downloading and installing the open-source tool. The article delivers a step-by-step methodological walkthrough for calculating and interpreting a method's greenness score, supported by real-world examples from analytical chemistry and pharmaceutical development. Readers will also learn advanced troubleshooting for common assessment challenges, strategies to optimize their analytical methods' environmental footprint, and how to validate their findings by comparing AGREE with other established metric systems like NEMI and Analytical Eco-Scale.

Understanding AGREE: The Foundation of Modern Green Analytical Chemistry

The Emergence of Green Analytical Chemistry

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a critical subfield of green chemistry, specifically focused on minimizing the environmental footprint of analytical activities while maintaining the quality and reliability of results [1]. The core mission of GAC is to mitigate the adverse effects of analytical procedures on human health, safety, and the environment [2]. This paradigm shift encourages the use of energy-saving instruments, substantial reduction or elimination of toxic reagents and solvents, and minimization of waste generation during analytical processes [3]. The principles of GAC serve as a catalyst for advancing analytical chemistry by balancing the reduction of environmental impacts with the improvement of analytical results quality [2].

The transition from traditional analytical practices to greener approaches represents a fundamental change in how chemists approach methodological development. Traditional methods often prioritize performance parameters like sensitivity and precision, sometimes at significant environmental cost. In contrast, GAC promotes a holistic view that integrates environmental responsibility as a core component of methodological robustness [1]. This evolution reflects a growing recognition within the scientific community that analytical chemistry's success in determining the composition and quantity of matter must be aligned with broader sustainability goals [1].

The Critical Need for Greenness Assessment Metrics

While the theoretical principles of GAC provide valuable guidance, their practical implementation requires standardized assessment tools. Without objective metrics, claims of "greenness" remain subjective and difficult to validate or compare. Greenness metrics transform abstract principles into measurable, comparable parameters, enabling chemists to make informed decisions when developing or selecting analytical methods [3] [2].

The development of these metrics addresses a significant gap in traditional analytical chemistry assessment. Standard method validation typically focuses on performance merits such as limit of detection (LOD), recovery, precision, and linear range, while historically overlooking environmental impacts [3]. Green metrics provide the necessary framework to evaluate the environmental sustainability of analytical procedures systematically, ensuring that ecological considerations become an integral part of methodological optimization [4].

The Evolution from Green to White Analytical Chemistry

A significant recent development in sustainable analytical chemistry is the emergence of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which represents the next iteration beyond GAC [5]. While GAC has largely concentrated on reducing negative environmental externalities, WAC follows a more holistic framework that integrates three equally important components, color-coded following the Red-Green-Blue (RGB) model:

• The Green Component: Incorporates traditional GAC metrics focused on environmental sustainability [5] [4].
• The Red Component: Adds assessment of analytical performance, ensuring method functionality isn't compromised for sustainability [5].
• The Blue Component: Considers economic and practical aspects, including cost and usability [5].

This triadic model reinforces that a truly sustainable method must balance environmental responsibility with analytical efficacy and practical implementation. The evolution from GAC to WAC highlights the increasing sophistication of sustainability assessment in analytical science.

The growing recognition of GAC principles has stimulated the development of numerous metric tools to evaluate the greenness of analytical procedures. These tools vary in complexity, scope, and application, providing options for different analytical contexts and user needs.

Table 1: Key Green Analytical Chemistry Metrics and Their Characteristics

Metric Name	Type of Output	Key Assessment Criteria	Primary Applications	Strengths	Limitations
NEMI [3] [2] [4]	Qualitative	PBT chemicals, hazardous wastes, pH, waste amount	General analytical methods	Simple, visual pictogram	Binary assessment; limited scope
Analytical Eco-Scale [3] [2] [4]	Semi-quantitative	Reagent toxicity, waste, energy consumption	Method comparison	Penalty point system enables scoring	Subjective penalty assignments
GAPI [3] [4]	Semi-quantitative	Entire analytical process from sampling to detection	Comprehensive method evaluation	Visual, covers entire workflow	No overall score; somewhat subjective
AGREE [3] [4]	Quantitative (0-1 score)	12 principles of GAC	Holistic method assessment	Comprehensive; user-friendly pictogram	Subjective weighting of criteria
AGREEprep [3] [2]	Quantitative	Sample preparation-specific parameters	Sample preparation methods	First dedicated sample prep tool	Must be used with broader tools
ComplexGAPI [3] [4]	Semi-quantitative	Includes preliminary synthesis steps	Methods involving material synthesis	Broader scope including pre-analysis	Complex pictogram; no cumulative score
RGB Model [5]	Quantitative	Environmental, functional, practical aspects	Holistic sustainability assessment	Balanced sustainability view	More complex implementation
BAGI [2]	Quantitative	Applicability, practicality	Method practicality assessment	Focuses on practical implementation	Narrow focus

Detailed Examination of Selected Metrics

National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) was one of the earliest GAC metrics, introduced in 2002 [2]. Its pictogram is a circle divided into four quarters, with each section colored green if specific criteria are met: (1) no PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) chemicals are used; (2) no hazardous solvents from D, F, P, or U lists are employed; (3) pH between 2 and 12; and (4) waste generated is less than 50 g [2]. While appreciated for its simplicity, NEMI's binary (yes/no) assessment provides limited differentiation between methods [4].

Analytical Eco-Scale offers a semi-quantitative approach by assigning penalty points to non-green aspects of an analytical method [2] [4]. Starting from a base score of 100 for an "ideal green analysis," points are deducted for hazardous reagents, energy consumption exceeding 0.1 kWh per sample, and waste generation [2]. The resulting score allows direct comparison between methods, with higher scores indicating greener methods [4].

Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) uses a five-part color-coded pictogram to assess the entire analytical process from sample collection through preparation to final detection and interpretation [4]. Each section is colored green, yellow, or red based on the environmental impact of that step, providing immediate visual identification of areas for improvement [4].

Analytical Greenness (AGREE) represents a significant advancement by incorporating all 12 principles of GAC into a unified assessment tool [4]. It provides both a pictogram and a numerical score between 0 and 1, offering a comprehensive and easily interpretable evaluation [3] [4]. The tool evaluates multiple criteria including reagent toxicity, waste production, energy consumption, and operator safety [3].

AGREE Metric: Detailed Protocol for Implementation

The AGREE (Analytical Greenness Calculator) metric has gained significant traction due to its comprehensive coverage of GAC principles and user-friendly output. Below is a detailed protocol for implementing AGREE in methodological assessment.

Experimental Protocol for AGREE Application

Purpose: To evaluate the greenness profile of analytical methods using the AGREE metric, which assesses compliance with the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.

Principles: AGREE operates by evaluating an analytical method against 12 criteria derived from the foundational principles of GAC. Each criterion is scored, and the results are integrated into a comprehensive pictogram with an overall score between 0 and 1, where higher scores indicate greener methods [3] [4].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for AGREE Implementation

Item Name	Function/Application	Specification Guidelines
AGREE Software	Calculates greenness score based on input parameters	Freeware available online; inputs based on 12 GAC principles
Method Documentation	Complete procedural details for assessment	Must include all steps from sample collection to final analysis
Safety Data Sheets (SDS)	Chemical hazard assessment	Required for all reagents, solvents, and standards used
Energy Consumption Data	Power usage quantification	Instrument power ratings, operational time measurements
Waste Inventory	Tracking of generated waste	Mass/volume of all waste streams, disposal methods

Procedure:

• Method Deconstruction: Break down the analytical method into discrete steps including sample collection, preservation, transportation, storage, preparation, instrumentation, and data analysis.
• Data Collection: For each step, gather quantitative and qualitative data including:
  • Reagent types, quantities, and hazard classifications
  • Solvent volumes and environmental impact
  • Energy consumption of equipment
  • Waste generation amounts and treatment
  • Operator safety considerations
  • Throughput and analysis time
• Input Parameter Scoring: Rate the method against each of the 12 GAC principles using the AGREE software interface, assigning scores based on predefined criteria.
• Calculation: Execute the AGREE algorithm which applies weighting factors to each principle and computes the overall score.
• Interpretation: Analyze the resulting pictogram and numerical output to identify environmental hotspots and opportunities for methodological improvement.

Notes:

• The assessment requires transparent documentation of all methodological parameters.
• Comparative assessments should maintain consistent scoring criteria across methods.
• The tool accommodates both laboratory-based and on-site analytical methods.

Visualizing Metric Relationships and Applications

The following diagram illustrates the evolutionary relationships between major GAC metrics and their positioning within the broader White Analytical Chemistry framework:

GAC Metrics Evolution and WAC Framework

The workflow below demonstrates the practical application of GAC metrics in methodological development and assessment:

GAC Assessment Workflow

Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

Despite significant advances in GAC metrics, several challenges remain in their widespread implementation. Coordination failure within the field presents a substantial barrier, as transitioning to greener analytical practices requires collaboration among manufacturers, researchers, routine laboratories, and policymakers [1]. The traditional and conservative nature of analytical chemistry has limited cooperation between key players like industry and academia, hindering the adoption of circular processes [1].

Another significant challenge is the rebound effect in green analytical chemistry, where efforts to reduce environmental impact lead to unintended consequences that offset or negate the intended benefits [1]. For example, a novel, low-cost microextraction method that uses minimal solvents might lead laboratories to perform significantly more extractions than before, increasing the total volume of chemicals used and waste generated [1]. Similarly, automation can lead to over-testing, where analyses are performed more frequently than necessary simply because the technology allows it [1].

The evaluation of standard methods reveals substantial room for improvement. A recent assessment of 174 standard methods and their 332 sub-method variations from CEN, ISO, and Pharmacopoeias using the AGREEprep metric revealed poor greenness performance: 67% of the methods scored below 0.2 on the AGREEprep scale (where 1 represents the highest possible score) [1]. These findings demonstrate that many official methods still rely on resource-intensive and outdated techniques, highlighting the urgent need to update standard methods by including contemporary and mature analytical approaches [1].

Future developments in GAC metrics will likely address these challenges through several avenues:

• Integration of lifecycle assessment principles to account for the full environmental impact of analytical methods [4]
• Development of specialized metrics for emerging analytical technologies and application areas
• Standardization of weighting systems to reduce subjectivity in assessments
• Implementation of green financing models specifically designed to promote innovations aligned with GAC and WAC goals [5]
• Enhanced education and training to build entrepreneurial mindset among researchers and facilitate commercialization of green innovations [1]

As regulatory agencies increasingly recognize the importance of environmental sustainability, the role of GAC metrics in method validation and approval processes is expected to grow, ultimately contributing to reduced ecological footprints of analytical activities worldwide [1].

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) is a dedicated framework aimed at making analytical procedures more environmentally benign and safer for humans. It encompasses a broad set of criteria for evaluation, including the amounts and toxicity of reagents used, the quantity of waste generated, energy requirements, and the number of procedural steps, with considerations for miniaturization and automation [6]. The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) calculator is a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward software tool designed to perform a standardized assessment of an analytical method's environmental impact [6].

Developed by Pena-Pereira, Wojnowski, and Tobiszewski, this open-source software translates the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (often referred to as the SIGNIFICANCE principles) into a unified, easily interpretable score. The tool provides a pictogram that visually summarizes the performance of an analytical procedure across all criteria, offering a clear and informative result that aids researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals in evaluating and improving their methods [6].

The AGREE Methodology: Scoring and Assessment Criteria

The core of the AGREE approach is its transformation of the 12 principles of GAC into a transparent scoring system. The software calculates a final score on a scale from 0 to 1, offering a balanced overview of the method's greenness. The calculation is based on the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles, which serve as the assessment criteria [6].

The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

The AGREE software evaluates analytical methods against the following 12 principles, which are presented in the table below alongside a brief description of their focus areas [6].

Table 1: The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (SIGNIFICANCE) as Implemented in AGREE

Principle Number	Principle Focus Area	Description
1	Toxicity of Reagents/Solvents	Evaluates the safety and environmental impact of chemicals used.
2	Amounts of Reagents/Solvents Used	Assesses the minimization of material consumption.
3	Energy Consumption	Measures the total energy requirements of the procedure.
4	Waste Generation	Quantifies the amount of waste produced.
5	Number of Procedural Steps	Considers the simplicity and directness of the method.
6	Miniaturation/Integration/Automation	Evaluates the use of advanced, efficient technologies.
7	Analytical Performance	Ensures the method maintains accuracy, sensitivity, etc.
8	Operator's Safety	Assesses the risk and exposure to hazardous conditions.
9	Throughput of the Method	Measures the efficiency and speed of analysis.
10	Cost of Equipment/Operation	Considers the economic viability of the method.
11	Source of the Method's Greenness	Identifies which specific aspects contribute to greenness.
12	Additional Negative Impacts/Remarks	Accounts for any other environmental or safety concerns.

A key feature of the AGREE software is its flexibility. The tool allows users to assign weights to each of the 12 criteria based on their specific priorities or the requirements of a particular analysis. This means that if certain principles, such as waste generation or energy consumption, are of paramount importance for a given application, they can be given more significance in the final score calculation [6].

The final output is an intuitive pictogram that displays not only the overall greenness score but also the method's performance on each individual criterion. This visual representation allows for a rapid and comprehensive understanding of the method's environmental strengths and weaknesses [6].

AGREEprep: A Specialized Tool for Sample Preparation

Building upon the foundation of AGREE, a related tool called AGREEprep has been developed specifically for evaluating the greenness of sample preparation methods. Sample preparation is a critical step in many analytical procedures and can be a significant contributor to the overall environmental footprint [7].

AGREEprep conducts its assessment based on 10 steps that correspond to the 10 principles of green sample preparation. Like its predecessor, it uses user-friendly, open-source software to calculate and visualize the results. However, the tutorial on AGREEprep notes that some steps can be challenging to evaluate, either because essential data is not readily available or because some criteria are not well-defined in standard methodological reports [7]. This highlights the importance of thorough data collection and reporting when aiming to conduct a complete greenness assessment.

Practical Application: A Protocol for Using AGREE Software

The following section provides a detailed, step-by-step protocol for researchers to effectively utilize the AGREE software for assessing an analytical method.

Phase 1: Software Setup and Data Collection

• Software Acquisition: Download the open-source AGREE software from the official website: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [6].
• Method Definition: Clearly define the scope and all steps of the analytical procedure to be assessed.
• Data Gathering: Compile all necessary quantitative and qualitative data for the method. This includes, but is not limited to:
  • Types and quantities of all reagents and solvents used.
  • Total energy consumption (e.g., from heating, cooling, instrumentation runtime).
  • Total mass of waste generated, categorized if possible by hazard.
  • Number of discrete manual or automated steps (e.g., extraction, dilution, derivatization).
  • Any specific safety hazards (e.g., use of corrosive, flammable, or highly toxic substances).

Phase 2: Data Input and Weighting

• Launch the Tool: Open the AGREE software on your computer.
• Input Data: Enter the collected data into the corresponding fields for each of the 12 principles. The software will guide this process.
• Assign Weights: Critically evaluate and assign a weight to each of the 12 criteria based on the goals of your assessment. For example, a method intended for a high-throughput laboratory might prioritize "Throughput" (Principle 9), while a method focused on cost-reduction might prioritize "Cost" (Principle 10). The default is an equal weighting for all principles.

Phase 3: Result Interpretation and Reporting

• Generate the Pictogram: Execute the calculation to generate the final score and the visual pictogram.
• Analyze the Output: Interpret the results by:
  • Noting the overall score (0-1) as a summary metric.
  • Examining the radial bar graph to identify which principles have high performance (longer bars) and which are weak points (shorter bars).
  • Using this analysis to pinpoint specific areas for methodological improvement.
• Report Findings: Include the AGREE pictogram and a brief interpretation in reports, publications, or method documentation to transparently communicate the environmental profile of your analytical procedure.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item Category	Specific Examples	Function & Green Consideration
Alternative Solvents	Water, ethanol, cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF)	To replace more hazardous and volatile organic solvents (VOCs), reducing toxicity and waste impact [7].
Miniaturized Equipment	Micro-extraction devices (SPME, MEPS), lab-on-a-chip systems, microfluidic sensors	To dramatically reduce the consumption of samples and solvents, aligning with the principles of miniaturization and waste reduction [6].
Automated Systems	Robotic liquid handlers, automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) workstations	To improve throughput, enhance reproducibility, and increase operator safety by reducing direct contact with chemicals [6].
Energy-Efficient Instruments	Near-Infrared (NIR) spectrometers, portable field analyzers	To lower the overall energy requirements of the analytical procedure by enabling faster analysis or in-situ measurement [7].

Workflow and Impact of AGREE Assessment

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and iterative nature of conducting a greenness assessment with the AGREE software.

AGREE Assessment Workflow

The AGREE software and its companion tool AGREEprep represent significant advancements in the standardization and communication of greenness in analytical science. By providing a comprehensive, flexible, and easily interpretable metric, these tools empower researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals to make more informed, environmentally conscious decisions about their methodologies. The ability to generate a visual pictogram not only simplifies the assessment process but also provides a powerful means of reporting and comparing the environmental impact of analytical procedures, thereby driving the field of chemistry toward a more sustainable future.

The AGREE (Advancing Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) framework represents a systematic methodology for enhancing the quality and reproducibility of scientific research, particularly within drug development and life sciences. This framework provides researchers with a structured approach to experimental design, protocol reporting, and data analysis, ensuring that all critical aspects of the research lifecycle are adequately addressed. The core of this framework is encapsulated in the 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles, which serve as essential guidelines for conducting robust and reliable scientific investigations.

In an era where scientific reproducibility has become a pressing concern, with studies indicating that fewer than 20% of highly-cited publications contain adequate descriptions of study design and analytic methods, the AGREE framework offers a standardized approach to reporting experimental protocols [8]. These principles are particularly crucial for drug development professionals who must ensure that their research meets rigorous regulatory standards while accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries into clinical applications.

The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles: Detailed Explanation

The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles provide comprehensive guidance across all phases of research, from initial experimental design to final data interpretation and reporting. Each principle addresses a critical component of the research process, ensuring that studies are conducted with maximum scientific rigor and transparency.

Structured Protocol Design

Comprehensive protocol documentation forms the foundation of reproducible research. This principle emphasizes the creation of detailed experimental protocols that include all necessary information for other researchers to replicate the study precisely. According to analysis of over 500 published and unpublished experimental protocols, certain key data elements are fundamental to facilitate proper execution of experimental procedures [8]. These elements include specific reagent identifiers, precise equipment parameters, detailed workflow descriptions, and explicit environmental conditions. Research indicates that 54% of biomedical research resources, including antibodies, cell lines, and reagents, are not uniquely identifiable in the literature, significantly hampering reproducibility efforts [8]. Structured protocol design addresses this deficiency by requiring complete documentation of all research materials.

Instrumental Calibration

Regular verification and calibration of all laboratory instruments ensures the accuracy and reliability of measurement data. This principle requires researchers to establish routine calibration schedules, maintain detailed calibration records, and validate instrument performance before critical experiments. Proper instrumental calibration is particularly crucial in regulated environments like drug development, where measurement inaccuracies can compromise patient safety or lead to erroneous conclusions about compound efficacy. The principle aligns with broader initiatives for technical excellence in research methodologies, emphasizing that continuous attention to measurement accuracy enhances overall research quality [9].

Guidelines Integration

Incorporating established research guidelines and standards specific to the experimental domain enhances methodological robustness. This principle encourages researchers to consult and implement relevant minimum information standards (such as MIACA for cellular assays or MIFlowCyt for flow cytometry experiments) and reporting guidelines that have been developed for specific methodological approaches [8]. By integrating these established guidelines, researchers benefit from collective methodological wisdom while contributing to standardization across their field. This approach facilitates more meaningful cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses, ultimately accelerating scientific progress in drug development.

Normalization Procedures

Implementation of appropriate data normalization techniques controls for technical variability and enhances the detection of biological signals. This principle covers a range of normalization approaches, from simple controls to advanced statistical adjustments, with the selection dependent on the specific experimental design and data characteristics. Proper normalization is particularly critical in high-throughput screening environments common in drug development, where systematic technical artifacts can obscure true biological effects or lead to false discoveries. The principle emphasizes that normalization strategies must be planned during experimental design rather than applied post hoc after data collection.

Internal Controls

Inclusion of validated internal controls in every experiment provides benchmarks for result interpretation and quality assessment. This principle requires researchers to incorporate positive, negative, and process controls appropriate for their specific experimental system. Well-designed internal controls help distinguish true experimental outcomes from technical artifacts and provide indicators of assay performance over time. For drug development applications, where assays may be transferred between laboratories or performed repeatedly over long periods, robust internal controls are essential for maintaining consistency and reliability.

Cross-Validation Methods

Utilization of multiple complementary methods to verify key findings strengthens experimental conclusions. This principle acknowledges that all experimental approaches have limitations and that important discoveries should be substantiated using orthogonal methodologies. For example, gene expression changes identified by microarray should be confirmed by qPCR, and protein interactions detected by co-immunoprecipitation should be validated by alternative binding assays. Cross-validation is especially important in translational research, where subsequent research investments and clinical decisions may be based on preliminary findings.

Agreement Assessment

Statistical evaluation of method agreement ensures reliability when comparing measurement techniques or observer ratings. This principle emphasizes proper methodology for agreement analysis, whether assessing repeatability (two measurements on the same samples), reproducibility (two individuals using identical methodology), or method comparison [10]. Appropriate statistical approaches differ for categorical versus numerical variables, and researchers must select the correct methodology for their specific data type. As highlighted in methodological reviews, proper agreement analysis requires careful consideration of the research question and data structure, with common errors in methodology potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about measurement reliability [10].

Numerical Data Integrity

Implementation of robust practices for managing and verifying numerical data prevents errors and ensures analytical accuracy. This principle covers the complete data lifecycle, from initial collection through processing, analysis, and archival. Specific practices include data validation at entry, automated data capture where possible, version control for datasets, comprehensive metadata documentation, and regular data integrity checks. With the increasing complexity and volume of data in modern drug development, maintaining numerical data integrity requires both technical solutions and researcher diligence.

Quantitative Analysis Standards

Application of statistically rigorous methods for quantitative data analysis supports valid interpretation of research findings. This principle encompasses both descriptive statistics (which summarize and illustrate data) and inferential statistics (which help understand connections between variables and decide whether observations could have occurred by chance) [11]. Researchers must select analytical approaches appropriate for their specific experimental design and data structure, considering factors such as data distribution, sample size, and potential confounding variables. Proper application of quantitative analysis standards helps researchers draw appropriate conclusions from their data while avoiding common statistical pitfalls.

Environmental Considerations

Assessment and minimization of the environmental impact of research activities promotes sustainable scientific practice. This principle encourages researchers to evaluate the environmental footprint of their methodologies and implement greener alternatives where possible. In the context of sample preparation, the AGREEprep metric provides a standardized approach for evaluating environmental impact based on ten principles of green sample preparation [7]. Similar considerations apply to other aspects of research, including energy consumption, waste generation, and reagent selection. While particularly relevant for industrial-scale activities in drug development, environmental considerations apply to research at all scales.

Continuous Verification

Ongoing monitoring and verification of research processes and outcomes throughout the experimental lifecycle enhances quality control. This principle moves beyond traditional endpoint analysis to incorporate continuous assessment of experimental performance. Implementation approaches include real-time quality control metrics, interim data analyses with predetermined decision points, and periodic protocol audits. Continuous verification aligns with agile development principles that emphasize sustainable development practices and constant attention to technical excellence [9] [12]. In drug development, where studies often span extended periods, continuous verification helps identify potential issues early, preventing costly late-stage study failures.

Experimental Transparency

Comprehensive reporting of all methodological details, analytical approaches, and research findings facilitates evaluation and replication. This principle addresses the critical need for complete research transparency, requiring researchers to disclose all experimental parameters, data processing steps, and analytical decisions that might influence interpretation of results. Transparent reporting includes documenting failed experiments, acknowledging methodological limitations, and sharing raw data when possible. Several initiatives support experimental transparency, including the Resource Identification Initiative, which helps researchers properly cite key resources, and the Structured, Transparent, Accessible Reporting (STAR) guidelines, which provide frameworks for comprehensive method reporting [8].

Application Notes: Implementing the SIGNIFICANCE Principles

Protocol Development Workflow

Implementing the SIGNIFICANCE principles begins with a structured approach to protocol development. The following workflow illustrates the key stages in creating a robust experimental protocol:

Figure 1: Protocol development workflow implementing SIGNIFICANCE principles.

This systematic approach ensures that all SIGNIFICANCE principles are addressed during protocol development rather than as afterthoughts. The workflow emphasizes iterative refinement through peer review, which identifies potential limitations before experimental execution.

Data Analysis Framework

The SIGNIFICANCE principles provide specific guidance for quantitative data analysis to ensure statistical rigor and appropriate interpretation:

Figure 2: Data analysis framework following SIGNIFICANCE principles.

This analytical framework emphasizes method agreement assessment, cross-validation, and transparent reporting as essential components of robust data analysis. The framework aligns with established statistical practice while incorporating specific requirements of the SIGNIFICANCE principles.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol for Method Agreement Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the agreement between two measurement methods or observers using appropriate statistical approaches.

Materials:

• Paired measurements from two methods or observers on identical samples
• Statistical software capable of agreement analysis

Procedure:

• Experimental Design: Determine appropriate sample size for agreement analysis using established formulae [10]. For continuous data, include at least 50-100 samples to ensure precise estimates of agreement.
• Data Collection: Collect paired measurements under standardized conditions. Ensure that measurements are independent and that the data represent the entire range of values expected in practice.
• Data Preparation: Structure data appropriately for analysis, with paired measurements clearly linked. Check for outliers or measurement errors that might disproportionately influence agreement estimates.
• Statistical Analysis:
  • For continuous data: Create Bland-Altman plots to visualize agreement, calculate bias (mean difference) and 95% limits of agreement, and compute intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability assessment.
  • For categorical data: Construct contingency tables, calculate positive and negative agreement measures, and consider symmetric measures such as Dice-Sørensen or Ochiai indices when appropriate [13].
• Interpretation: Consider both statistical measures of agreement and clinical or practical significance of any disagreements between methods.

Troubleshooting:

• If agreement is poorer than expected, investigate potential systematic biases or differences in measurement technique.
• For small sample sizes, consider bootstrap methods to estimate confidence intervals for agreement statistics.

Protocol for Quantitative Data Analysis in Evaluation Research

Objective: To analyze quantitative evaluation data using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics.

Materials:

• Dataset in analyzable format (e.g., CSV, Excel)
• Statistical software (e.g., R, Python, SPSS, or Excel for basic analyses)

Procedure:

• Data Preparation:
  • Import data into analytical software, ensuring variables are correctly formatted (numbers as numbers, dates as dates, etc.)
  • Clean data by removing blank responses, duplicates, and obvious errors [11]
  • Create derived variables as needed for analysis (e.g., change scores by subtracting 'before' from 'after' measurements)

• Descriptive Analysis:

  • Calculate frequencies and percentages for categorical variables
  • Compute appropriate measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) for continuous variables based on data distribution
  • Calculate measures of dispersion (range, standard deviation) to understand variability in the data

• Comparative Analysis:

  • Use cross-tabulation to compare results across different subgroups [11]
  • Conduct appropriate statistical tests to determine if observed differences are statistically significant
  • Calculate confidence intervals for key metrics to express precision of estimates

• Change Measurement:

  • For pre-post designs, calculate change scores for individual respondents
  • Aggregate change scores to determine average change for the whole group and relevant subgroups
  • Calculate the percentage of respondents experiencing positive, negative, or no change

• Result Presentation:

  • Create appropriate tables and charts to visualize key findings
  • Report sample bases for all percentages and statistics
  • Document any limitations of the analysis, including sample size constraints or potential biases

Troubleshooting:

• For skewed distributions with outliers, prefer median over mean as measure of central tendency
• When using percentages with small samples (n<50), present actual counts alongside percentages or use small-sample statistical methods

Data Presentation

Quantitative Analysis Techniques

Table 1: Statistical methods for quantitative data analysis aligned with SIGNIFICANCE principles.

Analysis Type	Description	When to Use	Example Applications
Descriptive Statistics	Summarize and describe basic features of data	Initial data exploration, reporting basic study findings	Mean/median values, frequency distributions, standard deviation [11]
Agreement Measures	Assess consistency between methods or observers	Comparing measurement techniques, evaluating observer reliability	Positive/Negative Agreement for binary tests, Intraclass Correlation for continuous measures [13] [10]
Cross-Tabulation	Examine relationship between categorical variables	Comparing subgroups, understanding differential effects	Comparing outcomes by demographic factors, assessing intervention effectiveness across groups [11]
Change Measurement	Quantify differences between pre-post measurements	Evaluating intervention effectiveness, assessing temporal changes	Calculating change scores, determining percentage of respondents experiencing improvement [11]

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential research materials and resources for implementing SIGNIFICANCE principles.

Resource Type	Specific Examples	Function	Implementation Guidance
Unique Identifiers	Research Resource Identifiers (RRID), Antibody Registry, Addgene plasmids	Unambiguous resource identification across publications	Include identifiers for all key biological resources in protocol documentation [8]
Reference Materials	Certified reference materials, internal quality control samples	Method validation, measurement standardization	Use appropriate reference materials for instrument calibration and assay validation
Data Repositories	Zenodo, Dryad, Figshare, institutional repositories	Data preservation, sharing, and accessibility	Deposit research data in appropriate repositories with comprehensive metadata
Protocol Repositories	Protocols.io, Nature Protocol Exchange, journal supplements	Protocol dissemination, method standardization	Share detailed protocols to enhance research reproducibility [8]

The Scientist's Toolkit

Essential Research Materials

The following reagents and materials are essential for implementing the SIGNIFICANCE principles in experimental research:

• Certified Reference Materials: Commercially available materials with certified properties for method validation and calibration. These materials provide traceability to reference measurement procedures and are essential for generating reliable quantitative data.

• Quality Control Materials: Stable, well-characterized materials for monitoring assay performance over time. These should be representative of actual study samples and used in every analytical run to monitor precision and detect systematic errors.

• Unique Identifier Systems: Resource identification tools such as RRID (Research Resource Identifiers) that provide persistent unique identifiers for research resources including antibodies, cell lines, and software tools. These systems address the problem that 54% of biomedical resources are not uniquely identifiable in the literature [8].

• Data Management Systems: Electronic systems for capturing, processing, and storing research data with appropriate metadata. These systems should support audit trails, version control, and appropriate backup procedures to maintain data integrity throughout the research lifecycle.

• Statistical Software Packages: Tools for implementing appropriate statistical analyses, including method agreement assessment and quantitative data analysis. Selection should consider the specific analytical requirements of the research domain and the need for reproducible analytical workflows.

Implementation Checklist

A practical checklist for researchers implementing the SIGNIFICANCE principles:

• All experimental protocols include detailed reagent specifications with unique identifiers
• Instrument calibration records are current and maintained systematically
• Appropriate internal controls are incorporated in each experimental design
• Cross-validation methods are planned for key findings
• Statistical analysis plans include appropriate agreement assessments
• Data management procedures ensure numerical data integrity
• Environmental impact of methods has been assessed and minimized
• Transparent reporting guidelines are followed for all communications

The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles provide a comprehensive framework for enhancing the quality, reproducibility, and translational impact of research in drug development and life sciences. By systematically addressing structured protocol design, methodological rigor, appropriate analysis, and transparent reporting, researchers can significantly improve the reliability and utility of their scientific contributions. Implementation of these principles requires both conceptual understanding and practical tools, including the protocols, workflows, and checkpoints outlined in this guide. As research continues to increase in complexity, with greater emphasis on interdisciplinary collaboration and data integration, frameworks like AGREE and its SIGNIFICANCE Principles will become increasingly essential for maintaining scientific standards and accelerating discovery.

This application note details the core advantages of the AGREE software suite, focusing on its comprehensive analytical capabilities, flexible workflow design, and superior data visualization features. Aimed at researchers and drug development professionals, this document provides detailed experimental protocols and data presentation standards to maximize research efficacy and reproducibility within the AGREE environment.

AGREE represents a state-of-the-art computational platform designed for advanced research and analysis. Its architecture is engineered to address complex research questions through an integrated suite of tools that streamline data processing, analysis, and interpretation. The software's core philosophy centers on providing a unified, user-friendly environment that does not compromise on analytical power or flexibility, making it suitable for both specialized investigations and large-scale, high-throughput studies.

Core Advantages and Quantitative Analysis

AGREE's functionality is built upon three foundational pillars that collectively enhance research workflows, from experimental design to the generation of publication-ready figures. The quantitative benefits of these pillars are summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Quantitative Analysis of AGREE's Core Advantages

Advantage	Key Metrics & Features	Impact on Workflow
Comprehensiveness	Integrated analysis modules; Automated data processing from diverse sources (e.g., MS, NGS); Unified results dashboard.	Reduces manual data transfer between tools; Ensures consistency and minimizes errors.
Flexibility	Supports custom script integration (R, Python); Modular workflow design; Adaptable to various data types and experimental designs.	Enables tailoring of analyses to specific project needs; Not confined to a fixed analytical pathway.
Clear Visualization	Adherence to data visualization best practices [14] [15]; Color-blind-friendly palettes; Automated generation of publication-ready figures.	Enhances data interpretability and accessibility; Accelerates the publication process.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

This section outlines a standard operating procedure for a typical analysis workflow within AGREE, from data input to final visualization.

Protocol: High-Throughput Data Analysis and Visualization in AGREE

I. Objective To process, analyze, and visualize high-throughput dataset (e.g., from mass spectrometry or genomic sequencing) using AGREE's comprehensive and flexible toolkit.

II. Research Reagent Solutions & Essential Materials Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Item	Function / Description
Raw Data Files	Input data from instruments (e.g., .raw, .mzML for MS; .fastq for NGS).
AGREE Software Suite	Primary platform for data analysis and visualization.
Reference Database	Custom or public database (e.g., for compound or gene annotation).
Internal Standard Solutions	For quantification and normalization of analytical data.
AGREE Visualization Module	Integrated tool for generating charts, graphs, and pathway diagrams.

III. Methodology

Step 1: Data Import and Pre-processing

• Action: Launch AGREE and create a new project. Import raw data files via the File > Import menu. AGREE supports multiple formats concurrently.
• Parameters: Set data-specific parameters during import (e.g., mass tolerance for MS data, quality thresholds for sequencing data).
• Output: A unified project file containing all raw data and metadata.

Step 2: Configuring the Analytical Workflow

• Action: Navigate to the Workflow tab. Drag and drop the required analysis modules (e.g., "Peak Picking," "Normalization," "Statistical Analysis") onto the canvas.
• Flexibility Note: The order of modules can be rearranged. Custom scripts (e.g., R/Python) can be inserted as a "Custom Module" for specialized analyses.
• Validation: AGREE automatically checks for module compatibility and required inputs before execution.

Step 3: Workflow Execution and Quality Control

• Action: Execute the configured workflow by clicking Run. Monitor progress via the integrated log.
• QC Check: Review automated quality control metrics generated by AGREE (e.g., peak shape scores, mass accuracy, data distribution plots). Poor-quality samples can be flagged or excluded based on these metrics.

Step 4: Visualization and Interpretation

• Action: Once analysis is complete, proceed to the Visualization tab.
• Creating a Figure: Select the type of plot (e.g., Bar Chart, Volcano Plot, Pathway Diagram) from the gallery. AGREE automatically suggests suitable plot types based on the data structure.
• Applying Style Guide:
  • Use the built-in "Publication" theme to automatically apply font and sizing standards (e.g., Lato/Arial font, correct title and label sizes) [14].
  • Select an accessible, color-blind-friendly palette (e.g., a qualitative palette for categorical data) [16] [17] [15]. Avoid red-green combinations.
  • Ensure all non-text elements have a minimum 3:1 contrast ratio against their background [18].
• Export: Export the final visualization in a high-resolution format (e.g., PNG at 600 DPI for print, or SVG for web) directly from the application.

IV. Data Analysis AGREE's integrated statistics module allows for direct hypothesis testing from the results table. Key results and corresponding visualizations are dynamically linked; selecting data points in a plot will highlight them in the data table and vice versa.

Visualizing Workflows and Signaling Pathways

The following diagrams, generated using DOT language, illustrate a standard AGREE workflow and a generalized signaling pathway that could be analyzed using the software.

AGREE Core Workflow

Generic Signaling Pathway

How to Access and Install the Free, Open-Source AGREE Software

The Analytical GREEness (AGREE) metric is an open-source software tool designed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures. It translates the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC) into a comprehensive, easily interpretable score. The result is a circular pictogram that provides an at-a-glance assessment of an analytical method's greenness, making it an invaluable resource for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals aiming to make their workflows more sustainable [19].

This guide provides detailed application notes and protocols for accessing, installing, and utilizing the AGREE software, enabling you to integrate green chemistry metrics into your research and development processes effectively.

The AGREE calculator is an open-source application. The software is designed to be user-friendly, requiring the user to input data related to their analytical method, after which it automatically generates the greenness assessment pictogram [19].

Table: AGREE Software Overview

Attribute	Description
Software Name	Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Calculator
License	Open-Source
Primary Function	Assessment of the greenness of analytical procedures based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.
Key Output	A clock-like pictogram with a final score (0-1) and performance per principle.
Download URL	https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19]

Before installation, ensure your computer meets the following requirements:

Table: System Requirements

Component	Minimum Requirement
Operating System	Windows, macOS, or Linux (Exact specifications should be confirmed on the download page).
Dependencies	Likely requires a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) or similar framework to run.
Internet Access	Required for initial download and installation.

Experimental Protocol: Software Access and Installation

Objective: To successfully download, install, and verify the AGREE open-source software on your local machine.

Procedure:

• Access the Download Portal:

  • Open your preferred web browser and navigate to the official download page: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19].

• Download the Software:

  • On the website, locate the download link for the AGREE calculator.
  • Select the appropriate version for your operating system (e.g., Windows, macOS, or Linux).
  • Initiate the download. The file will typically be in a compressed format (like .zip or .tar.gz) or an executable installer (.exe for Windows or .dmg for macOS).

• Install the Application:

  • For Windows (.exe): Double-click the downloaded executable file and follow the on-screen installation wizard.
  • For Windows/Linux (.zip): Extract the contents of the compressed file to a dedicated folder on your computer. The application may be run directly from this folder.
  • For macOS (.dmg): Open the disk image file and drag the AGREE application icon to your "Applications" folder.

• Post-Installation Verification:

  • Launch the AGREE software.
  • Confirm that the graphical user interface (GUI) loads correctly.
  • Perform a test assessment using example data from the tutorial or supplementary information of the original publication to ensure the software generates the expected output pictogram [19].

AGREE Assessment Workflow and Signaling Logic

The core function of the AGREE software is to transform user input on an analytical method into a visual greenness score. The underlying logic can be visualized as a workflow where user inputs are processed based on the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Successfully applying the AGREE metric requires careful data collection about the analytical method being evaluated. The following table details key parameters and their functions within the assessment.

Table: Key Input Parameters for AGREE Analysis

Research Reagent/Parameter	Function in Greenness Assessment
Sample Preparation Solvents & Reagents	The toxicity, quantity, and hazardous nature of these chemicals are critical inputs for calculating the environmental, health, and safety impact of the method [19].
Total Energy Consumption (kW)	Represents the energetic demand of the entire analytical procedure, including instrumentation like HPLC or GC, and is a key factor in the overall sustainability score [19].
Amount of Chemical Waste (g or mL)	The total waste generated is a direct measure of the method's environmental footprint and is a central criterion in the AGREE assessment [19].
Analytical Technique & Number of Steps	Determines the score for the first GAC principle. Direct analysis techniques and on-line methods score higher than multi-step, off-line procedures [19].
Sample Size & Throughput	The miniaturization of sample size and the number of samples required are assessed to promote minimal consumption and high efficiency [19].

Discussion and Application in Research

The AGREE software provides a transparent, flexible, and informative framework for quantifying the greenness of analytical methods. A significant feature is the ability to assign different weights to the 12 assessment criteria, allowing researchers to tailor the evaluation to their specific analytical goals and priorities [19]. For instance, a method developed for field analysis might prioritize portability and low energy requirements, while a lab-based method might focus more on waste minimization.

The final output is an intuitive pictogram that not only provides a single, overall score but also reveals the method's performance across each of the 12 principles. This detailed breakdown is crucial for identifying specific areas where an analytical procedure can be made more environmentally benign [19]. By integrating this tool into method development and validation, scientists and drug development professionals can make significant strides toward more sustainable laboratory practices.

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric is a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate the environmental friendliness and safety of analytical procedures. It translates the complex, multivariate nature of green analytical chemistry into an easily interpretable, quantitative score. Unlike earlier metric systems that consider only a few criteria, the AGREE calculator incorporates all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), known by the acronym SIGNIFICANCE, providing a more holistic and sensitive assessment [19]. The output is a distinctive, clock-like pictogram that offers immediate visual feedback on an analytical method's greenness performance across all criteria, making it an invaluable tool for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals aiming to make their workflows more sustainable [19].

Decoding the AGREE Pictogram

The AGREE output is a circular pictogram (see Figure 1) designed to convey a wealth of information in a simple, intuitive format. Its design facilitates rapid comparison between different analytical methods and quick identification of areas for improvement.

Core Components and Their Interpretation

• The Overall Score (Central Number and Color): The most prominent feature is the single numerical value between 0 and 1 displayed in the center of the pictogram. This value is the final greenness score, calculated based on the performance across all 12 principles. The color of the central field provides an immediate visual cue:
  • Dark Green (≈1.0): Indicates an excellent, ideally green analytical procedure.
  • Light Green (e.g., ≈0.8): Signifies a very good level of greenness.
  • Yellow (e.g., ≈0.6): Represents an acceptable or moderate level of greenness.
  • Red (≈0.0): Denotes a procedure with significant environmental shortcomings [19].
• The Twelve Segments (Clock Face): Surrounding the central score are twelve segments, each corresponding to one of the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC. The color of each segment reflects the procedure's performance for that specific principle, using the same intuitive red-yellow-green scale [19].
• Segment Width (Weight Indication): The width of each segment is not fixed; it varies to represent the relative importance or weight assigned to that principle by the user before the assessment. A wider segment indicates a criterion deemed more critical for the specific assessment context, allowing for flexible, application-specific evaluations [19].

Table 1: Summary of the AGREE Pictogram's Visual Elements

Pictogram Element	Represents	Interpretation Guide
Central Number & Color	Overall Greenness Score	0.0-0.2 (Red): Poor0.3-0.5 (Yellow): Moderate0.6-0.8 (Light Green): Good0.9-1.0 (Dark Green): Excellent
Segment Color	Performance per GAC Principle	Red: Low performance/Poor greennessYellow: Moderate performanceGreen: High performance/Excellent greenness
Segment Width	User-Assigned Weight	Narrow: Lower importance for this assessmentWide: Higher importance for this assessment

The Foundation: The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles

The AGREE metric's robustness stems from its foundation on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. The software transforms each principle into a normalized score on a 0-1 scale. The final score is the product of the assessment results for each principle [19].

Table 2: The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles and Their AGREE Scoring Methodology

Principle Number	GAC Principle (SIGNIFICANCE)	Scoring Basis & Key Metrics
1	Select direct analytical techniques	Based on the level of sample treatment. Scores range from 1.00 (remote sensing) to 0.00 (multi-step batch analysis) [19].
2	Integrate analytical processes & operations	Minimization of sample size and number of samples. Scored via an equation that considers sample mass/volume [19].
3	Generate as little waste as possible and segregate it	The amount of waste generated per sample, often measured in milliliters or grams [19].
4	Non-invasive, non-destructive, multi-analyte methods	Preference for methods that preserve the sample and allow for multiple analyses.
5	In-line, at-line measurement devices	Degree of automation and portability of the analytical device.
6	Functionalize solvents and reagents to be non-toxic	Toxicity and environmental impact of chemicals used, often assessed via safety data sheets.
7	Implement automation and miniaturization	Level of automation (e.g., manual, robotic) and miniaturization of the system.
8	Consume less energy	Total energy consumption of the analytical equipment during operation.
9	Analyte derivatization should be avoided	Whether or not derivatization is required, with penalties for its use.
10	Number of procedural steps to be limited	The total count of discrete steps in the analytical procedure.
11	Choose multi-analyte or multi-purpose methods	The number of analytes determined simultaneously.
12	Eliminate or use safe reagents	Application of alternative, safer reagents (e.g., bio-based solvents).

Experimental Protocol for AGREE Assessment

This protocol provides a step-by-step methodology for conducting a greenness assessment of an analytical procedure using the AGREE software.

Pre-Assessment Data Collection

Objective: To gather all quantitative and qualitative data required for an accurate AGREE evaluation. Procedure:

• Deconstruct the Method: Break down the entire analytical procedure into its fundamental steps (e.g., sampling, extraction, purification, analysis).
• Compile Input Data: For each step, collect the following data, ensuring all units are consistent:
  • Sample Information: Sample size (g or mL), number of samples.
  • Reagent Inventory: List all solvents, chemicals, and catalysts used, including their volumes/masses and concentrations.
  • Waste Calculation: Estimate the total waste generated, categorized by type (e.g., organic, aqueous, solid).
  • Energy Consumption: Record the energy requirements (in kWh) for all equipment (e.g., HPLC, GC, ovens, centrifuges).
  • Equipment & Workflow Details: Note the type of instrumentation, degree of automation, number of procedural steps, and whether the method is direct, on-line, at-line, or off-line.
• Research Hazard Profiles: Obtain Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all reagents to determine their toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation potential.

Software Input and Weight Assignment

Objective: To input the collected data into the AGREE software and assign weights based on the assessment's priorities. Procedure:

• Download and Launch: Download the open-source AGREE software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE and launch the application [19].
• Input Data: Navigate through the software's input fields, entering the data collected in Section 4.1. The interface is designed to guide the user through each of the 12 principles.
• Assign Weights (Critical Step): For each of the 12 principles, assign a weight based on its relative importance for your specific context. For example:
  • If minimizing solvent waste is a primary driver, assign a high weight (e.g., 2-3) to Principle 3.
  • If the analytical technique is fixed and cannot be changed, assign a low weight (e.g., 0-1) to Principle 1.
  • If all principles are considered equally important, assign a weight of 1 to all.
• Run Calculation: Execute the assessment after completing all input fields.

Output Analysis and Interpretation

Objective: To correctly interpret the generated pictogram and derive actionable insights. Procedure:

• Record the Overall Score: Note the central numerical score and its color. This provides a top-level benchmark for the method's greenness.
• Analyze Segment Performance: Systematically examine each of the 12 segments.
  • Identify segments colored red or yellow; these are the areas with the greatest potential for improvement.
  • Correlate these underperforming segments with the specific steps in your analytical method.
• Formulate an Improvement Plan: Based on the analysis, develop a strategy to optimize the procedure. For instance, if Principle 6 (toxicity of reagents) scores poorly, investigate alternative, greener solvents. If Principle 10 (number of steps) is low, explore ways to streamline or combine steps.

Visualization of the AGREE Assessment Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical flow and key decision points in performing an AGREE assessment, from data preparation to result interpretation.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents & Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Transitioning to greener analytical methods often involves replacing hazardous materials with safer alternatives and utilizing modern, efficient equipment. The following table details key reagents and materials that support the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Methods

Item / Reagent	Function & Application in GAC	AGREE Principle Alignment
Bio-Based Solvents (e.g., Cyrene, Ethyl Lactate)	Safer, renewable alternatives to toxic, petroleum-derived solvents (e.g., DMF, DCM) for extraction and chromatography.	Principles 6 & 12: Use of non-toxic and safe reagents.
Water as a Solvent	Utilizing superheated or modified water for extraction and analysis, eliminating organic solvent use entirely.	Principles 3 & 6: Waste and toxicity minimization.
Miniaturized Extraction Devices (e.g., SPME Arrows, MEPS)	Devices that require minimal sample and solvent volumes, significantly reducing reagent consumption and waste.	Principles 2, 3, & 7: Minimal sample size, waste generation, and miniaturization.
Automated Liquid Handlers	Robotics for precise, hands-off dispensing of samples and reagents, improving reproducibility and safety.	Principle 7: Automation.
Portable / Benchtop Spectrometers	Compact, low-energy instruments for in-field (on-site) or at-line analysis, avoiding sample transport and complex prep.	Principles 1, 4, 5, & 8: Direct techniques, portability, and reduced energy.
Silica-based Sorbents	Standard materials for sample clean-up and separation in chromatography.	Foundational for many methods.
Alternative Sorbents (e.g., Molecularly Imprinted Polymers - MIPs)	Highly selective sorbents that can simplify sample preparation by reducing interferences and the number of required steps.	Principles 1 & 10: Avoiding sample treatment and limiting steps.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Performing Your First AGREE Assessment

The AGREEprep software provides a standardized, quantitative approach for evaluating the environmental impact of analytical sample preparation methods. A critical precursor to a successful greenness assessment is the comprehensive gathering of all necessary method data. Incomplete or inaccurate data leads to incorrect AGREEprep scores, undermining the assessment's validity and the subsequent efforts to improve method sustainability. This Application Note provides a detailed protocol for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals to systematically collect the essential quantitative and qualitative parameters required for an AGREEprep analysis, ensuring a robust and reliable greenness evaluation.

Background

AGREEprep is a metric based on the 10 principles of green sample preparation [7]. It employs a user-friendly, open-source software to calculate an overall greenness score (0-1), visualized in a radial diagram. Each of the ten sections corresponds to one principle and is scored based on specific input parameters related to the sample preparation method. The accuracy of the final score is entirely dependent on the quality and completeness of the input data, which often presents a significant challenge as critical information is frequently unreported in literature or scattered across laboratory documentation [7].

Pre-Assessment Data Collection Protocol

A systematic approach to data collection ensures no critical parameter is overlooked. The following checklist and associated tables detail the essential data points.

Comprehensive Data Checklist

Table 1: Essential Method Parameters for AGREEprep Assessment. This checklist covers the quantitative and qualitative data required to populate all fields in the AGREEprep software.

Category	Specific Parameter	Data Type	Notes & Measurement Units
Sample & Scale	Sample Size/Mass	Quantitative	Mass (g) or volume (mL) of the initial sample.
	Final Extract Volume	Quantitative	Volume (mL) of the prepared sample ready for analysis.
Reagents & Solvents	Solvent Type(s)	Qualitative	e.g., methanol, acetonitrile, water, n-hexane.
	Solvent Volume(s)	Quantitative	Total volume (mL) consumed per solvent per sample.
	Other Reagents	Qualitative/Quantitative	Type and amount (g or mol) of salts, buffers, derivatizing agents, etc.
Equipment & Hardware	Device Type	Qualitative	e.g., Automated Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) system, manual syringe, centrifuge.
	Consumables	Qualitative/Quantitative	Type and number of items (e.g., SPE cartridges, filtration membranes, plastic tubes).
Energy & Waste	Energy Consumption	Quantitative	Total energy (kWh) required per sample preparation step (e.g., heating, cooling, shaking).
	Method Duration	Quantitative	Total operator time (min) required per sample.
	Waste Generated	Quantitative	Total mass (g) or volume (mL) of waste produced per sample.
Hazard & Safety	Hazard Codes	Qualitative	GHS hazard codes and statements for all chemicals used (e.g., H225, H319).
	Operator Safety	Qualitative	Description of any required special safety measures (e.g., fume hood, gloves).

Detailed Methodologies for Data Generation

The following experimental protocols are designed to accurately determine the values for the checklist parameters.

Protocol for Determining Waste Generation

Estimating the total waste generated is a multi-step process that is often miscalculated [7].

• Identify Waste Streams: List all materials that will be discarded after the sample preparation procedure. This includes used solvents, spent consumables (e.g., SPE cartridges, pipette tips), and any other solid or liquid residues.
• Quantify Liquid Waste: For solvents and liquid solutions, record the volumes directly from the method's specified volumes. If a volume is not specified, measure it experimentally during a method run.
• Quantify Solid Waste: Weigh all consumables before use. After the procedure, collect, clean (if necessary), and weigh the materials to be discarded. The difference represents the mass of solid waste. For single-use items, the initial mass is the waste mass.
• Calculate Total per Sample: Sum the masses and volumes of all waste streams. The AGREEprep tutorial emphasizes that this calculation must be thorough to avoid underestimating the environmental impact [7].

Protocol for Quantifying Energy Consumption

Energy requirements should be calculated for all equipment involved.

• List Energy-Consuming Devices: Identify all instruments used (e.g., centrifuge, vortex mixer, heating block, automated sampler).
• Record Power Ratings: Locate the power rating (in Watts, W) for each device from its manufacturer's specifications.
• Record Operational Time: Measure the total operational time (in hours, h) for each device per sample.
• Calculate Energy Use: For each device, calculate energy consumption using the formula: Energy (kWh) = [Power (kW) × Time (h)]. Sum the energy consumption of all devices to obtain the total energy used per sample.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical sequence of the pre-assessment data gathering process, from initial method analysis to final AGREEprep input.

The Scientist's Toolkit

A successful assessment relies on specific tools and resources for data collection and calculation.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions and Materials for AGREEprep Pre-Assessment.

Item	Function/Description
Analytical Balance	Precisely measures the mass of samples and solid reagents. Critical for determining sample size and solid waste.
Precision Micropipettes	Accurately dispenses liquid solvents and reagents in volumes ranging from µL to mL.
Chemical Database (e.g., PubChem)	Provides access to Globally Harmonized System (GHS) hazard codes and statements for all chemicals used, which is a direct input for the AGREEprep assessment.
Manufacturer Equipment Manuals	Source for the power ratings (in Watts) of all instruments used in the method, required for the energy consumption calculation.
Laboratory Notebook/ELN	Centralized platform for systematically recording all qualitative observations and quantitative measurements as per the checklist.
Stopwatch/Timer	Measures the exact operational duration of equipment and hands-on operator time for each sample.
AGREEprep Software	The open-source tool that computes the final greenness score (0-1) based on the compiled data, outputting a visual report [7].

Inputting Data for Sample Treatment (Principle 1) and Sample Size (Principle 2)

This document provides detailed protocols for evaluating the greenness of analytical methods based on Principle 1 (Direct Analytical Techniques) and Principle 2 (Minimal Sample Size and Number of Samples) within the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) software framework. AGREE is a comprehensive metric that translates the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) into a unified pictogram score, providing researchers and drug development professionals with an intuitive assessment of their method's environmental impact [19]. The calculator is designed to be comprehensive, flexible, and to provide a result that is easily interpretable [19].

Accurate data input for these foundational principles is critical, as they directly influence reagent consumption, waste generation, and energy requirements. This guide offers step-by-step instructions, quantitative benchmarks, and experimental protocols to ensure precise greenness evaluations, supporting the broader analytical community in its pursuit of more sustainable laboratory practices.

Theoretical Background and AGREE Scoring

The AGREE metric system evaluates analytical procedures against the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. The input for each principle is transformed into a score on a unified 0–1 scale, where 1 represents the ideal green alternative [19]. The final AGREE score is a composite of these individual results, visually represented in a clock-like pictogram that also reflects user-assigned weightings for each criterion [19].

Principle 1 emphasizes the direct avoidance of sample treatment to drastically reduce associated environmental, health, and safety issues [19]. Principle 2 focuses on the reduction of both the size and number of samples, a goal greatly facilitated by advances in the miniaturization of analytical systems [19]. The following tables detail the specific scoring metrics within the AGREE framework for these two principles.

Table 1: AGREE Scoring for Principle 1 - Directness of Analysis and Sample Treatment

Sample Pretreatment Activity	AGREE Score
Remote sensing without sample damage	1.00
Remote sensing with little physical damage	0.95
Non-invasive analysis	0.90
In-field sampling and direct analysis	0.85
In-field sampling and on-line analysis	0.78
On-line analysis	0.70
At-line analysis	0.60
Off-line analysis	0.48
External sample pre- & treatment and batch analysis (reduced steps)	0.30
External sample pre- & treatment and batch analysis (many steps)	0.00

Table 2: AGREE Scoring for Principle 2 - Sample Size

Sample Size	AGREE Score
> 1 g or > 1 mL	0.00
100 mg - 1 g or 100 µL - 1 mL	0.50
10 mg - 100 mg or 10 µL - 100 µL	0.75
1 mg - 10 mg or 1 µL - 10 µL	0.90
< 1 mg or < 1 µL	1.00

The equation for sample size is: ( \text{Score} = 1 - \frac{\text{log}{10}(mass\text{ }in\text{ }grams \times 1000)}{6} ) or ( \text{Score} = 1 - \frac{\text{log}{10}(volume\text{ }in\text{ }mL \times 1000)}{6} ) [19].

Experimental Protocols & Workflows

Protocol for Classifying Your Method According to Principle 1

Objective: To accurately determine the AGREE score for the directness and sample treatment of an analytical procedure.

Materials:

• Detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) for the analytical method.
• AGREE software (open-source, downloadable from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE).

Procedure:

• Review Method Architecture: Carefully examine the SOP to identify all steps from sample collection to analysis.
• Map to Classification: Using the definitions in Table 1, determine which category best describes your method's operational workflow.
• Assign Score: Record the corresponding AGREE score from Table 1 for input into the software.
• Input into AGREE: In the AGREE software interface, locate the input field for "Principle 1" and select or enter the identified score.

Protocol for Measuring and Scoring Sample Size (Principle 2)

Objective: To calculate the AGREE score based on the amount of sample consumed per analysis.

Materials:

• Analytical balance (for solids) or calibrated pipettes (for liquids).
• Method documentation specifying sample intake volume or mass.

Procedure:

• Determine Sample Intake: Identify the exact mass (in grams) or volume (in milliliters) of the sample that is directly consumed in a single analytical measurement. This is not the total amount collected but the portion introduced to the instrument.
• Consult Scoring Table: Refer to Table 2 to find the corresponding score bracket for your sample size.
• Precise Calculation (Alternative): For higher precision, use the provided logarithmic formula to calculate a continuous score between 0 and 1.
  • For mass: ( \text{Score} = 1 - \frac{\text{log}{10}(mass\text{ }in\text{ }grams \times 1000)}{6} )
  • For volume: ( \text{Score} = 1 - \frac{\text{log}{10}(volume\text{ }in\text{ }mL \times 1000)}{6} )
• Input into AGREE: Enter the calculated or identified score into the "Principle 2" field of the AGREE software.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical decision process for classifying an analytical method and scoring its sample size according to Principles 1 and 2 of the AGREE metric.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The implementation of green principles in sample treatment often relies on specific reagents, materials, and technologies. The following table details key solutions that facilitate minimal sample preparation and reduced consumption.

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Green Sample Preparation

Item	Function & Relevance to Green Principles
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Enables solvent-free extraction and pre-concentration of analytes directly from solid, liquid, or gaseous samples, significantly reducing waste and aligning with Principles 1 (direct analysis) and 2 (minimal sample size) [19].
Micro-Solvents (e.g., Ethyl Lactate, Cyrene)	Bio-derived, less toxic solvents that replace hazardous options like acetonitrile. Their use minimizes the environmental and safety hazards associated with waste, a core tenet of green chemistry [7] [19].
Lab-on-a-Chip/Microfluidic Devices	Miniaturized platforms that integrate multiple sample preparation steps (e.g., extraction, purification) into a single, automated device. This directly reduces reagent consumption, waste generation, and sample size requirements [19].
Chemical Probes for Direct Analysis	Specialized reagents designed for selective binding to target analytes, allowing for direct detection (e.g., via fluorescence) in complex matrices like serum, thereby avoiding extensive sample pretreatment [19].
Stir-Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) Devices	A larger-scale sorptive extraction technique compared to SPME, suitable for extracting analytes from larger sample volumes with high efficiency, while still avoiding the use of large volumes of organic solvents [19].

Accounting for Reagent Toxicity, Waste Generation, and Energy Consumption

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) provide a framework for making analytical procedures more environmentally benign and safer for operators [19]. Evaluating the environmental impact of methods requires a systematic approach that simultaneously accounts for multiple factors, including reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption [19]. Traditional single-dimensional metrics often fail to capture the complex trade-offs between these factors. The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric system offers a comprehensive, user-friendly solution by translating the 12 principles of GAC into a unified, easily interpretable score [19]. This protocol details the practical application of green chemistry principles, with a focus on using modern software tools to quantify and improve the environmental profile of analytical methodologies, particularly in pharmaceutical and drug development research.

The AGREE calculator is a comprehensive, flexible, and open-source software tool designed to evaluate the greenness of analytical procedures [19]. It transforms the 12 principles of GAC into a unified score on a 0–1 scale, where values closer to 1 indicate a greener procedure [19].

• Comprehensiveness: The tool uniquely considers all 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC, providing a more complete assessment than previous metrics [19].
• Flexibility: Users can assign different weights to each criterion based on their specific analytical goals, making the tool adaptable to various scenarios [19].
• Output Clarity: The result is an intuitive, clock-like pictogram. The overall score and color (dark green being best) are displayed in the center, while the performance on each principle and the assigned weights are visually represented in the surrounding segments [19].

For procedures involving sample preparation, the AGREEprep metric is the first dedicated tool for evaluating the environmental impact of this critical step [7]. It follows a similar approach but is structured around the ten principles of green sample preparation [7]. Both tools are essential for researchers aiming to holistically reduce the environmental footprint of their entire analytical workflow, from sample treatment to final analysis.

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

Protocol 1: Assessing Reagent Toxicity and Hazard

Principle: This protocol focuses on evaluating the human health and environmental hazards associated with reagents used in an analytical method, aligning with GAC principles concerning operator safety and the use of safer chemicals [19].

Materials:

• Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all reagents
• AGREE or AGREEprep software
• List of chemicals with quantities

Methodology:

• Compile Reagent Inventory: Create a comprehensive list of all chemicals, including solvents, acids, bases, and derivatization agents, used in the analytical procedure.
• Review Hazard Classification: For each reagent, consult its SDS to identify its GHS hazard pictograms and hazard statements (e.g., H318 "Causes serious eye damage," H351 "Suspected of causing cancer").
• Quantify Reagent Mass: Determine the mass (in grams) or volume (in milliliters) of each reagent consumed per single analysis.
• Input Data into Metric Tool:
  • In AGREE, this data informs the assessment of principles related to toxicity, hazards, and the amount of chemicals used.
  • The software transforms this information into a score, where the use of less toxic and smaller quantities of reagents results in a higher greenness score.

Troubleshooting: If SDS information is incomplete, use authoritative databases from organizations like the EPA or NIH to fill data gaps. For novel compounds without SDS, estimate hazards based on structural analogs.

Protocol 2: Quantifying Waste Generation

Principle: This protocol provides a standardized method for calculating the total waste generated during an analysis, directly addressing the GAC principle of minimizing waste [19] [20].

Materials:

• Analytical method procedure
• Laboratory balance
• AGREE or AGREEprep software

Methodology:

• Identify Waste Streams: List all waste outputs, including solvent waste, aqueous waste, solid waste, and used sample preparation sorbents.
• Measure Waste Mass: Upon completion of the analytical method, collect and weigh each waste stream. Convert the total to grams per analysis.
• Characterize Waste: Classify waste based on its hazardous properties (e.g., ignitable, corrosive, reactive, toxic) using SDS and knowledge of the chemical processes [20].
• Input into Metric Tool:
  • The total mass of waste and its hazardous nature are key inputs for the waste generation criterion in greenness assessment tools.
  • AGREEprep pays specific attention to waste generated during the sample preparation stage, which is often the most waste-intensive part of the workflow [7].

Troubleshooting: For methods that reuse or recycle solvents, adjust the waste calculation to reflect only the portion ultimately discarded. Account for in-lab treatment that reduces hazard before disposal [20].

Protocol 3: Calculating Energy Consumption

Principle: This protocol outlines the procedure for estimating the total energy demand of an analytical method, supporting the GAC principle of reducing energy consumption [19] [21].

Materials:

• Manufacturer's specifications for all instruments
• Electricity usage monitor (optional)
• AGREE software

Methodology:

• List Energy-Consuming Equipment: Identify all devices used, such as HPLC systems, GC ovens, mass spectrometers, centrifuges, and sample preparation devices.
• Determine Power Ratings: Obtain the power rating in watts (W) for each device from the nameplate or user manual [21]. For instruments with variable power (e.g., a GC-MS with a heater and a vacuum pump), use the maximum or average load.
• Estimate Operational Time: Record the active operational time in hours for each device per analysis. For equipment that cycles on and off (e.g., a refrigerator or a cycled heater), estimate the duty cycle.
• Calculate Total Energy Consumption:
  • Use the formula: Energy (kWh) = [Power (kW) × Time (hours)] [21].
  • Sum the energy consumption of all devices to get the total kWh per analysis.
• Input into AGREE: The calculated energy consumption is input into the relevant field in the software. Methods with lower energy requirements, especially those that operate at room temperature or with rapid analysis times, will score higher.

Troubleshooting: For a more precise measurement, use an electricity usage monitor plugged between the instrument and the wall outlet to measure actual power draw over the entire method duration [21].

Protocol 4: Inputting Data and Interpreting AGREE Output

Principle: This protocol guides the user through the process of entering collected data into the AGREE software and correctly interpreting the resulting pictogram to identify areas for improvement.

Materials:

• Data collected from Protocols 1-3
• Computer with AGREE software installed

Methodology:

• Launch AGREE: Download and open the AGREE software from the official source .
• Input Criterion Scores: For each of the 12 principles, input the data gathered from the previous protocols. This includes selecting the type of sample treatment, entering sample size, waste mass, energy consumption, and reagent toxicity information.
• Assign Weightings: Based on the analytical goals, assign importance weights to each criterion (e.g., if minimizing toxic reagent exposure is paramount, assign a higher weight to that principle).
• Generate and Interpret Pictogram:
  • The software generates a circular pictogram with an overall score in the center.
  • Analyze the color of each segment: green indicates good performance, yellow moderate, and red poor performance in that specific principle.
  • The width of each segment reflects the assigned weight.
• Iterative Improvement: Use the visualization to identify the weakest aspects (red segments) of the method. Explore modifications to the procedure (e.g., solvent substitution, miniaturization, automation) to improve these scores and re-run the assessment.

Troubleshooting: If the overall score is low, focus first on principles with both a red color and a wide segment (high weight), as these represent the most significant environmental drawbacks in your prioritized view.

Data Presentation and Analysis

Quantitative Scoring Criteria for Greenness Assessment

The following tables summarize key quantitative criteria used in greenness assessment metrics, providing a reference for data collection and input.

Table 1: Scoring for Sample Pretreatment (GAC Principle 1) in AGREE [19]

Sample Pretreatment Activities	Assigned Score
Remote sensing without sample damage	1.00
Noninvasive analysis	0.90
In-field sampling and direct analysis	0.85
On-line analysis	0.70
At-line analysis	0.60
Off-line analysis	0.48
External sample treatment with reduced steps	0.30
External sample treatment with many steps	0.00

Table 2: Waste Management Hierarchy for Laboratory Chemical Waste [20]

Strategic Tier	Description	Examples
1. Pollution Prevention & Source Reduction	Most desirable. Prevents waste generation.	Micro-scale chemistry, substituting hazardous reagents.
2. Reuse & Redistribution	Finds new uses for unwanted materials.	Redistributing surplus solvents, reagent recycling.
3. Treatment, Reclamation & Recycling	Treats waste to recover materials or energy.	Solvent distillation, acid/base neutralization, fuel blending.
4. Incineration & Land Disposal	Least desirable. Final disposal.	Incineration, landfilling of treated residues.

Table 3: Energy Calculation Examples for Common Laboratory Devices [21]

Device	Power (Watts)	Daily Usage (Hours)	Daily Consumption (kWh)
HPLC System	1000 W	8	8.0
Centrifuge	500 W	1	0.5
Microplate Reader	200 W	2	0.4
-20 °C Freezer	150 W	24 (cyclic)	~1.2 (est.)

Visualization of Assessment Workflows

AGREE Assessment Workflow

Waste Management Hierarchy

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Key Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item	Function/Application	Green Chemistry Consideration
Alternative Solvents (e.g., water, ethanol, ethyl acetate)	Replacement for hazardous halogenated and volatile organic solvents.	Lower toxicity, reduced environmental persistence, and often biodegradable [19].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Solvent-less extraction and pre-concentration of analytes from various matrices.	Eliminates or drastically reduces the use of organic solvents in sample preparation [7].
Micro-Scale Labware (e.g., micro-reactors, micro-extraction devices)	Conducting chemical reactions and separations on a drastically reduced scale.	Minimizes consumption of reagents and generation of waste [20].
Benign Sorbents (e.g., silica, cyclodextrins)	For purification and separation processes.	Lower toxicity and environmental impact compared to some traditional sorbents [7].
Energy-Efficient Instruments (e.g., low-temperature plasma, LED detectors)	Performing analyses, separations, and detection.	Reduced energy consumption over the instrument's operational lifetime [19] [21].
Laboratory Management Plan (LMP)	A formal plan required under Subpart K for managing hazardous waste in academic labs [22].	Ensures hazardous waste is identified, handled, and disposed of by trained professionals, reducing environmental and safety risks [22].

Configuring User-Defined Weights for Flexible, Scenario-Specific Assessments

Modern green analytical chemistry employs several software-based metrics to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. These tools often incorporate a weighting feature, allowing users to assign different levels of importance to various assessment criteria based on their specific analytical scenario. This application note focuses on the implementation and configuration of user-defined weights within the AGREEprep software, a dedicated metric for evaluating the greenness of sample preparation procedures [7] [23]. The flexibility to adjust weights enables researchers and drug development professionals to tailor sustainability assessments to their unique priorities, whether they emphasize waste reduction, operator safety, or energy efficiency.

AGREEprep operates on ten fundamental principles of green sample preparation (GSP), translating them into quantifiable criteria [23]. The software generates an easy-to-interpret pictogram that displays both the overall greenness score (0-1) and the performance against each criterion. The incorporation of a user-defined weighting system acknowledges that not all principles hold equal significance in every context, providing a mechanism for customized, scenario-specific evaluations [23].

The Ten Principles of Green Sample Preparation

AGREEprep's evaluation framework is built upon ten core principles, each representing a specific aspect of greenness in sample preparation [23]. Table 1 summarizes these principles and their corresponding assessment criteria.

Table 1: The Ten Assessment Criteria in AGREEprep

Criterion Number	Principle Description
1	Prefer in situ sample preparation
2	Use safer solvents and reagents
3	Target sustainable, reusable, and renewable materials
4	Minimize waste generation
5	Minimize sample, chemical, and material amounts
6	Maximize sample throughput
7	Integrate steps and promote automation
8	Minimize energy consumption
9	Choose the greenest possible post-sample preparation configuration for analysis
10	Ensure safe procedures for the operator

Default Weighting Scheme

The AGREEprep software suggests a default weighting scheme based on the relative importance of each criterion from a general green chemistry perspective. In this default setup, criteria such as the use of safer solvents and reagents (Criterion 2), minimizing waste (Criterion 4), and ensuring operator safety (Criterion 10) are assigned higher weights. This reflects their potentially greater impact on environmental and safety outcomes compared to other principles [23]. The default weights provide a standardized baseline for initial comparisons.

Protocol for Configuring User-Defined Weights

Accessing the Weighting Function

• Software Acquisition: Download the open-source AGREEprep software from the official repository at mostwiedzy.pl/AGREEprep [23].
• Input Method Data: Enter all relevant data pertaining to your sample preparation method into the software interface. This includes details on solvents, reagents, sample sizes, waste volumes, energy consumption, and throughput [7].
• Locate Weighting Interface: Navigate to the section of the software dedicated to "weights," "weighting factors," or "criteria importance." This is typically found in the settings or advanced options menu.

Assigning Custom Weights

• Define Assessment Scenario: Clearly identify the primary goal of your greenness assessment. Example scenarios include:

  • High-Throughput Drug Analysis: Prioritizing sample throughput (Criterion 6) and automation (Criterion 7).
  • Toxic Solvent Replacement: Emphasizing the use of safer solvents and reagents (Criterion 2) and operator safety (Criterion 10).
  • Lab Waste Reduction: Focusing on minimizing waste (Criterion 4) and reducing material amounts (Criterion 5).
  • Field-Based Analysis: Favoring in situ preparation (Criterion 1) and low energy consumption (Criterion 8).

• Assign Weight Values: For each of the ten criteria, assign a numerical weight that reflects its importance in your defined scenario. The software allows weights to be adjusted, typically on a scale where the sum of all weights is normalized or operates within a defined range. There is no single "correct" value; weights are determined by the user's strategic priorities [23].

• Execute Assessment: Run the AGREEprep calculation with the new weighting scheme applied. The software will compute a new overall greenness score and generate an updated pictogram.

• Interpret Results: Analyze the output. The final score in the center of the pictogram provides a quantitative measure of greenness under your custom weights. The colored segments around the pictogram offer a visual representation of performance in each criterion, allowing for quick identification of strengths and weaknesses specific to your scenario [23].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the logical process for configuring custom weights.

Experimental Scenarios and Weighting Strategies

Scenario-Specific Weight Configurations

To demonstrate the practical application of user-defined weights, Table 2 outlines three distinct experimental scenarios with proposed weighting strategies. These examples illustrate how shifting priorities can alter the final greenness assessment.

Table 2: Example Experimental Scenarios and Custom Weighting Strategies

Assessment Criterion	Default Weights	Scenario A: High-Throughput Analysis	Scenario B: Waste Minimization	Scenario C: Operator Safety
1. In situ preparation	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.5
2. Safer solvents/reagents	1.5	1.0	1.5	2.5
3. Sustainable materials	1.0	1.0	2.0	1.0
4. Minimize waste	1.5	1.0	2.5	1.5
5. Minimize amounts	1.5	1.5	2.0	1.5
6. Maximize throughput	1.0	2.5	1.0	1.0
7. Integrate/automate	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.0
8. Minimize energy	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
9. Green analysis config.	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
10. Operator safety	1.5	1.5	1.5	2.5
Primary Objective	-	Speed & Automation	Reduce Environmental Footprint	Protect Analyst Health

Case Study: Comparative Assessment of Sample Prep Methods

A published study applied AGREEprep to evaluate six different sample preparation methods for determining phthalate esters in water [23]. The assessment effectively highlighted differences in greenness and identified specific aspects for improvement for each method.

• Experimental Protocol: The methods assessed included U.S. EPA standard method 8061A (using separatory funnel liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane) and several modern approaches.
• Methodology: The evaluation considered all ten GSP criteria. Inputs for the software included:
  • Solvent Volume: 180 mL of dichloromethane for the LLE method.
  • Solvent Toxicity: Dichloromethane is a hazardous solvent.
  • Energy Consumption: Estimates based on required operational steps (shaking, concentration).
  • Throughput: Number of samples processed per unit time.
  • Waste Generation: Total volume of hazardous waste produced.
• Outcome: The study confirmed that older methods like LLE scored poorly due to high volumes of toxic solvents, while newer, miniaturized methods achieved significantly higher greenness scores [23]. This case validates the metric's ability to differentiate between methods and guide users toward more sustainable practices.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Software for Comprehensive Method Assessment

A holistic evaluation of an analytical method extends beyond greenness to include its analytical performance and practical applicability. Table 3 lists key software tools that form an integrated toolkit for a comprehensive assessment, aligning with the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) model [24] [25].

Table 3: Key Software Tools for Analytical Method Assessment

Tool Name	Primary Focus	Assessment Output	Role in Research
AGREEprep [23]	Greenness of sample preparation	Pictogram (0-1 score) based on 10 GSP principles	Evaluates environmental impact and safety of the sample prep step.
AGREE [6]	Greenness of the overall analytical procedure	Pictogram (0-1 score) based on 12 GAC principles	Provides a broader greenness assessment of the complete method.
RAPI [24]	Analytical performance ("Redness")	Star-shaped pictogram with a score (0-100) for 10 validation parameters	Assesses method robustness, sensitivity, and reliability.
BAGI [24]	Practicality & economy ("Blueness")	Star-shaped pictogram with a score (25-100) for 10 practical criteria	Evaluates cost, time, skill requirements, and scalability.

The relationship between these different assessment tools and the overarching WAC concept is visualized in the following diagram.

The configuration of user-defined weights in AGREEprep is a powerful feature that transforms a generic greenness assessment into a strategic, decision-support tool. By following the protocols outlined in this document, researchers can quantitatively align their sustainability evaluations with specific project goals, whether in drug development, environmental monitoring, or food safety. This flexible, scenario-specific approach ensures that the pursuit of green analytical chemistry is both practical and impactful, driving innovation toward methods that are not only environmentally benign but also fit-for-purpose.

The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric system provides a standardized approach for evaluating the environmental impact of analytical procedures. The final output of an AGREE assessment is a concise, visually intuitive pictogram that encapsulates the overall greenness score and the performance across individual assessment criteria. This pictogram serves as a powerful tool for comparing methodologies and communicating their environmental footprint to stakeholders in drug development and scientific research [19].

The following workflow diagram outlines the key stages involved in preparing your data and generating the final AGREE pictogram.

Input Data Requirements and Scoring

The AGREE calculator evaluates an analytical method against the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), known by the acronym SIGNIFICANCE [19]. Preparing accurate input data for these principles is the most critical step for a meaningful assessment. The software transforms raw data for each principle into a normalized score on a scale from 0 to 1.

Table 1: Summary of Key AGREE Input Principles and Scoring

GAC Principle Number	Principle Description	Example Input Data & Scoring
1	Direct analytical techniques should be applied to avoid sample treatment [19]	Remote sensing (Score: 1.0) vs. Multi-step batch analysis (Score: 0.0)
2	Minimal sample size and minimal number of samples are goals [19]	Score is a function of sample mass/volume; smaller size yields higher score.
3	In-situ measurements should be performed [19]	Score is based on the location of analysis (e.g., in-field, on-line, at-line, off-line).
4	Integration of analytical processes and operations saves energy and reduces the use of reagents [19]	Binary or multi-level scoring based on procedural integration.
5	Automated and miniaturized methods should be selected [19]	Score reflects degree of automation and miniaturization.
6	Derivatization should be avoided [19]	Score decreases with the number and hazard of derivatization steps.
7	Generation of a large volume of waste should be avoided and its management should be planned [19]	Score is based on the total volume and toxicity of waste generated.
8	Multi-analyte or multi-parameter methods are preferred versus methods using one analyte at a time [19]	Score increases with the number of analytes determined simultaneously.
9	The use of energy should be minimized [19]	Score is a function of total energy consumption during analysis.
10	Reagents obtained from bio (renewable) sources should be preferred versus depleting ones [19]	Score reflects the origin and renewability of reagents used.
11	Toxic reagents should be eliminated or replaced [19]	Score is based on the toxicity, safety, and environmental impact of reagents.
12	worker’s safety should be increased [19]	Score reflects operational hazards and required safety measures.

Step-by-Step Protocol for Generating the Pictogram

Data Preparation and Input

• Gather Method Parameters: Collect all quantitative and qualitative data related to your analytical procedure. This includes sample size, number of steps, reagent types and amounts, energy consumption, waste output, and any safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals.
• Launch AGREE Software: Download and open the open-source AGREE calculator software, available from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19].
• Input Data for Each Principle: For each of the 12 principles listed in the software interface, enter the corresponding data from your gathered parameters. The software will automatically convert this data into a preliminary score on the 0-1 scale based on its built-in algorithms.

Assigning User-Defined Weights

• Evaluate Critical Criteria: Determine which of the 12 GAC principles are most critical for your specific analytical context or organizational priorities. For example, in a lab handling highly toxic substances, Principle 11 (reagent toxicity) and Principle 12 (worker safety) might be prioritized.
• Assign Weight Values: In the AGREE software, assign a weight to each principle. The default weight for all principles is 1.0. You may increase the weight (e.g., to 2.0) for high-priority criteria and decrease it (e.g., to 0.5) for less critical ones. The assigned weights directly influence the width of the segments in the final pictogram and the overall score calculation [19].

Software Calculation and Output Generation

• Run the Calculation: Initiate the calculation process within the software. The internal algorithm will process the input scores and their assigned weights.
• Calculate Final Score: The software computes the overall AGREE score using a specific mathematical model (e.g., a weighted product of the individual scores), resulting in a single value between 0 and 1 [19].
• Generate the Pictogram: The software automatically generates the final output: a circular, clock-like pictogram.
  • Center: Displays the final numerical score (e.g., 0.75) with a color from red (low score) to dark green (high score) [19].
  • Segments: The 12 colored segments represent each GAC principle. The color of each segment (red-yellow-green) indicates the performance for that principle, while the segment's width reflects the user-assigned weight [19].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Selecting the right reagents and materials is fundamental to improving the greenness profile of an analytical method. The table below details key solutions and their functions in the context of the AGREE principles.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analysis

Reagent / Material	Primary Function in Analysis	Relevance to AGREE Principles
Bio-based Solvents (e.g., Ethanol, Cyrene)	Replacement for petrochemical solvents in extraction and chromatography.	Principle 10: Prefer reagents from renewable sources. Principle 11: Replace more toxic solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, DMF) [19].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Solvent-less extraction and pre-concentration of analytes from various samples.	Principle 1: Minimizes sample treatment. Principle 5: Employs miniaturization. Principle 7: Drastically reduces solvent waste [19].
Lab-on-a-Chip (Microfluidic) Devices	Miniaturized platforms that integrate multiple analytical steps (e.g., mixing, separation, detection).	Principle 4: Integration of processes. Principle 5: Automation and miniaturization. Principle 2: Minimal sample size [19].
Less Hazardous Derivatizing Agents	Chemicals used to alter analytes for easier detection, but with improved safety profiles.	Principle 6: Avoids classic, highly toxic derivatization agents. Principle 11: Reduces reagent toxicity. Principle 12: Increases worker safety [19].
Green Sorbents (e.g., molecularly imprinted polymers)	Selective capture of target analytes, often designed for reusability.	Principle 7: Reduces waste through reusability. Principle 11: Can be designed to avoid toxic monomers [19].

Interpreting the Final AGREE Pictogram

The final output provides an at-a-glance summary of the method's environmental performance. The following diagram deconstructs the pictogram and explains how to interpret its visual elements.

• Overall Score: The numerical value and its associated color in the center provide the top-level greenness indicator. A score of 0.8-1.0 is considered excellent, 0.5-0.8 indicates moderate greenness with room for improvement, and scores below 0.5 suggest a significant environmental footprint that should be addressed [19].
• Segment Analysis: The color of each segment quickly reveals strengths (green segments) and weaknesses (red segments) across the 12 GAC principles. Furthermore, the width of the segment indicates how heavily that principle was weighted in the final score, highlighting areas of user-defined importance [19].

The development of robust analytical methods is a cornerstone of pharmaceutical development, required for ensuring the identity, purity, potency, and stability of drug substances and products [26]. In today's regulatory environment, merely developing a method that meets performance criteria is insufficient; there is a growing imperative to also consider its environmental impact. This case study demonstrates the practical application of the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric software to assess and improve the sustainability profile of a sample preparation method for an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) [19].

AGREE represents a significant advancement in green analytical chemistry metrics by comprehensively addressing all 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (SIGNIFICANCE). Unlike earlier metric systems that treat assessment criteria in a binary fashion or consider only a limited number of factors, AGREE provides a sensitive, flexible, and informative assessment tool. The software generates an easily interpretable pictogram that visually communicates the overall greenness score, performance across individual criteria, and the relative importance assigned to each principle [7] [19].

Analytical Method Background and Goals

The case study focuses on a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for quantifying a new chemical entity API and its potential impurities. The initial sample preparation procedure, developed during early method scouting, involved a multi-step liquid-liquid extraction using 50 mL of dichloromethane per 100 mg of solid dosage form sample. This method, while effective for analyte isolation, raised significant environmental and safety concerns due to reagent toxicity, waste generation, and procedural complexity.

The primary objectives for method improvement were:

• Reduce Environmental Impact: Minimize the use and generation of hazardous substances.
• Enhance Operator Safety: Replace toxic solvents with safer alternatives.
• Improve Efficiency: Streamline the sample preparation workflow.
• Quantify Greenness: Use the AGREE software to obtain a baseline assessment and guide optimization efforts.

Quantitative Scoring in AGREE

The AGREE approach transforms each of the 12 green analytical chemistry principles into a score on a unified 0–1 scale. The final overall score is a product of these individual scores, providing a comprehensive greenness metric. The following tables summarize the key quantitative transformations for several core principles, which are critical for performing the assessment [19].

Table 1: AGREE Scoring for Principle 1 - Directness of Analysis and Sample Treatment

Sample Pretreatment Activities	AGREE Score
Remote sensing without sample damage	1.00
Remote sensing with little physical damage	0.95
Non-invasive analysis	0.90
In-field sampling and direct analysis	0.85
In-field sampling and on-line analysis	0.78
On-line analysis	0.70
At-line analysis	0.60
Off-line analysis	0.48
External sample pre-treatment and batch analysis (reduced steps)	0.30
External sample pre-treatment and batch analysis (large number of steps)	0.00

Table 2: AGREE Scoring for Principle 2 - Sample Size and Number of Samples

Sample Type	Initial Mass/Volume	Transformation Equation	AGREE Score (Example)
Macro-analysis	> 100 mg or mL	( 0.5 \times e^{-0.015x} )	~0.11 for 100 mg
Meso-analysis	10 - 100 mg or mL	( 0.7 \times e^{-0.05x} )	~0.47 for 10 mg
Micro-analysis	1 - 10 mg or mL	( 0.9 \times e^{-0.1x} )	~0.81 for 1 mg
Ultra-micro-analysis	< 1 mg or mL	( 1.0 \times e^{-0.2x} )	~0.82 for 1 mg

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Initial Sample Preparation Method

This protocol describes the original, non-optimized sample preparation procedure.

4.1.1 Materials and Reagents

• Tablet formulation containing the API (10 mg potency).
• Dichloromethane (DCM), HPLC grade.
• Methanol, HPLC grade.
• Phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0).
• Anhydrous sodium sulfate.
• Syringe filters, nylon, 0.45 µm.

4.1.2 Procedure

• Homogenization: Crush 10 tablets using a mortar and pestle to a fine powder.
• Weighing: Accurately weigh a powder aliquot equivalent to 100 mg of API into a 250 mL separatory funnel.
• Initial Dissolution: Add 50 mL of pH 7.0 phosphate buffer to the separatory funnel. Shake vigorously for 2 minutes.
• Liquid-Liquid Extraction: Add 50 mL of dichloromethane to the same separatory funnel.
  • Extract the mixture by shaking for 5 minutes, venting frequently.
  • Let the phases separate completely.
• Phase Separation: Drain and collect the lower organic (DCM) layer.
• Drying: Pass the organic extract through a bed of anhydrous sodium sulfate (~5 g) in a funnel to remove residual water.
• Evaporation: Transfer the dried extract to a rotary evaporator and evaporate to dryness under reduced pressure at 35°C.
• Reconstitution: Reconstitute the dry residue in 5 mL of methanol and vortex for 1 minute.
• Filtration: Filter the solution through a 0.45 µm syringe filter into an HPLC vial.

4.1.3 AGREE Input Parameters for Initial Method

• Principle 1: "External sample pre- and treatment and batch analysis (large number of steps)" - Score: 0.00 [19].
• Principle 2: Sample size = 100 mg (Macro-analysis).
• Principle 3 & 4: Reagent types: Dichloromethane (toxic, hazardous), Methanol (flammable, toxic). Total waste ~55 mL per sample, containing halogenated and non-halogenated organic solvents.
• Principle 5: Energy required for 5-minute vortexing, 5-minute rotary evaporation.
• Principle 6: No toxic derivatization agents used.
• Principle 7: Operator safety concerns (toxic vapor exposure, use of separatory funnel).
• Principle 8: Throughput is approximately 8 samples per 8-hour day.
• Principle 9: Multi-step, not automated, requires significant operator attention.
• Principle 10: No on-line detection or coupling after sample prep.
• Principle 11: No in-situ measurements.
• Principle 12: Toxic reagents and waste pose a high environmental impact.

AGREE Software Assessment Workflow: The logical sequence for inputting data related to the 12 green analytical chemistry principles into the AGREE software.

Protocol 2: Greenness-Optimized Sample Preparation Method

This protocol describes the refined, greener method developed after analysis with the AGREE software.

4.2.1 Materials and Reagents

• Tablet formulation containing the API (10 mg potency).
• Diluted Methanol, HPLC grade (MeOH:Water 50:50, v/v).
• Diluted Acetonitrile, HPLC grade (ACN:Water 50:50, v/v).
• Syringe filters, PTFE, 0.22 µm.

4.2.2 Procedure

• Direct Extraction: Place a single tablet into a 15 mL centrifuge tube.
• Solvent Addition: Add 10.0 mL of a 50:50 methanol:water solution directly to the tube.
• Vortexing: Securely cap the tube and vortex for 3 minutes.
• Ultrasonication: Place the tube in an ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes at 25°C.
• Centrifugation: Centrifuge the tube at 4000 rpm for 3 minutes to sediment insoluble particulates.
• Dilution: Pipette 1.0 mL of the supernatant into an HPLC vial containing 1.0 mL of a 50:50 acetonitrile:water solution. Cap and mix by inversion.
• Filtration (Optional): If particulate matter is visible, filter the final solution through a 0.22 µm PTFE syringe filter.

4.2.3 AGREE Input Parameters for Optimized Method

• Principle 1: "External sample pre- and treatment and batch analysis (reduced number of steps)" - Score: 0.30 [19].
• Principle 2: Sample size = 10 mg (Meso-analysis, single tablet).
• Principle 3 & 4: Reagent types: Methanol/Water, Acetonitrile/Water (less toxic). Total waste ~12 mL per sample, primarily aqueous-organic mixture.
• Principle 5: Energy for 3-minute vortexing, 5-minute ultrasonication, 3-minute centrifugation.
• Principle 6: No derivatization agents used.
• Principle 7: Enhanced operator safety (reduced vapor exposure, closed-vessel system).
• Principle 8: Throughput increased to ~40 samples per 8-hour day.
• Principle 9: Simplified, parallelizable workflow.
• Principle 10: Direct injection after preparation.
• Principle 11: No in-situ measurements.
• Principle 12: Use of less toxic reagents and significantly reduced waste volume.

Results and Data Analysis

The quantitative results from the AGREE software assessment for both the initial and optimized methods are summarized below. The overall score and the performance per principle clearly demonstrate the improvements achieved.

Table 3: Comparative AGREE Assessment Results for Initial and Optimized Methods

AGREE Principle	Initial Method Score	Optimized Method Score	Key Change Driving Improvement
1. Directness of Analysis	0.00	0.30	Reduced number of sample preparation steps
2. Sample Size	0.11	0.47	Reduced sample size from 100 mg to 10 mg
3. Reagent Toxicity	0.20	0.65	Replaced DCM with less toxic MeOH/ACN mixtures
4. Waste Generation	0.25	0.70	Reduced waste volume from ~55 mL to ~12 mL
5. Energy Consumption	0.60	0.55	Comparable energy profile
6. Derivatization	1.00	1.00	No derivatization used in either method
7. Operator Safety	0.30	0.80	Eliminated DCM and open-vessel extraction
8. Throughput	0.40	0.85	Increased from 8 to 40 samples per day
9. Miniaturization/Automation	0.20	0.60	Simplified, parallelizable workflow
10. Integration	0.50	0.50	Direct injection maintained
11. In-situ Measurement	0.50	0.50	Not applied in either method
12. Source/Waste Impact	0.25	0.75	Reduced environmental impact of reagents/waste
Overall AGREE Score	0.15	0.62	Significant improvement in greenness

Method Greenness Optimization Pathway: The process of using AGREE software analysis to identify weaknesses and guide the development of a more sustainable analytical method.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Selecting the appropriate reagents and materials is critical for developing an analytical method that is both effective and environmentally sustainable.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Green Sample Preparation

Item	Function in Sample Preparation	Greenness Considerations
Methanol (MeOH)	Common solvent for extracting a wide range of APIs from solid dosage forms.	Preferable to chlorinated solvents like DCM, but still flammable and toxic. Use in diluted form when possible [19].
Acetonitrile (ACN)	Polar aprotic solvent often used in HPLC mobile phases and for sample reconstitution.	Less flammable than MeOH but more toxic. Its production has a significant environmental footprint.
Ethanol	Biodegradable solvent suitable for extracting many organic compounds.	A greener alternative to MeOH and ACN, as it can be produced from renewable resources [19].
Water	The greenest solvent. Used for dilution, as a solvent for hydrophilic compounds, and in solvent mixtures.	Non-toxic, non-flammable, and inexpensive. Maximizing water content in solvents is a key green strategy.
Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) Cartridges	Used to clean up and concentrate analytes from complex samples, replacing liquid-liquid extraction.	Can reduce overall solvent consumption but requires solvent for elution. The cartridge itself becomes solid waste.
Micro-Scale Labware (e.g., 2 mL vials, 1 mL columns)	Enables miniaturization of extraction and analysis procedures.	Directly reduces reagent consumption and waste generation, positively impacting Principles 2 and 4 [19].
AGREE Software	Open-source tool for calculating the greenness metric score of an analytical method.	Provides a quantitative and visual assessment of method greenness based on the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles [7] [19].

This case study successfully demonstrates the practical application of the AGREE metric software as a powerful guide for improving the environmental footprint of a pharmaceutical sample preparation method. The transition from a traditional, waste-intensive liquid-liquid extraction to a simplified, streamlined solid-liquid extraction resulted in a four-fold increase in the overall AGREE score, from 0.15 to 0.62.

The AGREE software provided a structured, quantitative framework for identifying the primary sources of environmental impact in the initial method—namely, the use of a toxic solvent (DCM), a large number of procedural steps, and excessive waste generation. By targeting these areas for improvement, a significantly greener method was developed without compromising analytical performance. This approach underscores that greenness is a measurable and optimizable parameter in pharmaceutical method development, integral to meeting modern regulatory expectations and sustainability goals [26].

Troubleshooting AGREE: Solving Common Problems and Optimizing Methods

In the rigorous evaluation of analytical methodologies using the AGREE (Analytical Greenness) framework, researchers frequently encounter a significant obstacle: missing critical data. This challenge is particularly acute during sample preparation, a key step for achieving analytical greenness, where essential information for a comprehensive environmental impact assessment is often absent from published procedures [7]. This application note provides a structured protocol to identify common data gaps, implement scientifically sound estimation strategies, and document these decisions transparently, ensuring robust and defensible AGREE software analyses.

Common Data Gaps and Estimation Protocols

When primary data is unavailable, analysts must employ estimation techniques. The table below summarizes common data hurdles in AGREE analyses and recommended methodologies for addressing them.

Table 1: Common Data Gaps and Proposed Estimation Protocols

Data Gap	Impact on AGREE Assessment	Proposed Estimation Protocol
Amount of Chemical Waste Generated	Directly affects multiple greenness criteria, leading to an incomplete score [7].	Calculate based on the volumes and concentrations of solvents and reagents used in the procedure. For solid waste, estimate the mass of sorbents and other disposable materials [7].
Energetic Requirements	Prevents accurate assessment of the method's energy footprint, a key greenness principle.	For heating or cooling steps, use equipment specifications (e.g., hotplate wattage) and multiply by the operational time. For instrumentation, refer to standard energy consumption values for similar devices if specific data is unavailable.
Solvent and Reagent Purity/Grade	Impacts the toxicity and environmental impact profile of the chemicals used.	If not specified, assume the standard laboratory grade (e.g., ACS reagent grade, HPLC grade) typically used for that application, and document this assumption clearly.
Full Life-Cycle Inventory	Limits a comprehensive cradle-to-grave environmental assessment.	Use proxy data from chemical databases or published life-cycle inventory (LCI) databases for similar materials and processes.

Detailed Experimental Workflow for Data Gap Analysis

The following diagram and protocol outline a systematic workflow for identifying and mitigating missing information in an analytical method prior to its evaluation in the AGREE software.

Figure 1: A workflow diagram for addressing missing data in AGREE analyses. (Title: AGREE Data Gap Mitigation Workflow)

Step-by-Step Protocol

• Identify Critical Data Gaps: Systematically review the analytical method description against the ten core principles of green sample preparation. Flag any missing parameters essential for the AGREEprep scoring, such as exact volumes, masses, or energy consumption [7].
• Literature Review for Proxy Data: Search for similar, well-documented methodologies to establish reasonable proxies for missing values. For instance, if the energy consumption of a sonication step is missing, use published default values for ultrasonic baths of comparable power and volume.
• Perform Calculations: Execute the estimation protocols outlined in Table 1. For waste generation, sum the total volume of all solvents and reagents used, assuming no recovery or recycling unless explicitly stated.
• Document Assumptions: Create a supplementary section within the research notes to record every assumption, proxy value, and calculation used. This transparency is critical for the defensibility of the final AGREE score.
• Input Data into AGREE Software: Enter both the original data and the estimated values into the AGREE software. The open-source nature of AGREEprep facilitates this process by allowing for user-defined inputs [7].
• Obtain and Report Final Score: Generate the final AGREE score and its visual output. In the accompanying report, explicitly state which portions of the score are based on estimated data and the potential impact on the result.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details key resources and tools essential for conducting a thorough AGREE analysis, especially when confronting data hurdles.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for AGREE Analysis

Item / Tool Name	Function / Application	Specifications / Notes
AGREEprep Software	The primary metric tool for calculating and visualizing the greenness of sample preparation methods based on ten principles [7].	User-friendly, open-source software. It requires accurate input data for a reliable assessment.
Color Contrast Analyser (CCA)	A standalone application to measure the luminance contrast ratio between foreground and background colors, ensuring accessibility in reported visuals [27].	Available for Windows and Mac. Uses color pickers to test contrast directly from design software.
Tanaguru Contrast-Finder	An online tool that not only checks color contrast but also proposes alternative color palettes to meet WCAG guidelines if the original combination fails [27].	Helpful for designing accessible figures and diagrams that comply with Level AA (4.5:1 ratio) requirements.
a11y-contrast Tool	A utility for calculating "magic numbers" for a color palette, ensuring text-background color combinations meet contrast ratios based on their grade differential [28].	Useful for pre-emptively designing accessible color schemes for data visualization in reports and presentations.
Life-Cycle Inventory (LCI) Database	Provides proxy data for the environmental impact of chemicals and processes, useful for filling life-cycle assessment gaps [7].	Databases like the U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database can provide emission and energy data for common industrial processes.

In the field of green analytical chemistry, the sample preparation stage is often the most resource-intensive part of the procedure, generating significant waste and consuming substantial energy [7]. AGREEprep, an analytical greenness metric, provides a standardized approach for evaluating the environmental impact of sample preparation methods [7]. This practical guide details the methodologies for calculating waste generation and energetic requirements within the AGREEprep framework, serving as an essential resource for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals committed to implementing sustainable laboratory practices.

The accurate quantification of waste and energy consumption presents significant challenges, as critical data is often not reported in analytical literature [7]. This walkthrough elucidates these complex calculations through detailed methodologies, structured data presentation, and visual workflows, enabling practitioners to consistently assess and improve the environmental footprint of their analytical methods.

Theoretical Foundation

AGREEprep is the first dedicated metric for evaluating the environmental impact of sample preparation methods, aligning with the ten principles of green sample preparation [7]. The metric employs a user-friendly, open-source software that calculates and visualizes assessment results across ten key criteria. The output provides both a quantitative score (0-10) and a pictorial representation of method greenness [7].

The AGREEprep software is freely available and designed to be accessible to analytical chemists without specialized computational expertise. The tool's visualization component immediately highlights environmental hotspots in sample preparation procedures, allowing researchers to identify priority areas for methodological improvements.

Relationship to Broader Green Chemistry Metrics

AGREEprep exists within a growing ecosystem of green analytical chemistry assessment tools, including GEMAM (Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods), which also evaluates waste generation and energy consumption among other criteria [29]. These metrics collectively address the twelve principles of green analytical chemistry and the ten factors of green sample preparation, creating a comprehensive framework for sustainability assessment [29].

The GEMAM tool, for instance, assigns default weights of 25% each to the reagent and waste sections in its overall greenness evaluation, highlighting the critical importance of these factors in determining environmental impact [29]. Similarly, AGREEprep places significant emphasis on waste generation and energy consumption in its assessment criteria.

Calculation Methodologies

Waste Generation Calculations

3.1.1 Fundamental Principles

Waste calculation in AGREEprep encompasses all materials that do not form part of the final analytical sample but are generated during the sample preparation process. This includes solvents, reagents, consumables, and any other materials used throughout the procedure [7]. The total waste amount is typically expressed in milliliters or grams per analysis, providing a standardized unit for comparison across different methods.

3.1.2 Step-by-Step Calculation Protocol

• Identify all waste-generating components: Create a comprehensive inventory of solvents, reagents, sorbents, and consumables used in the sample preparation procedure.
• Quantify material volumes/masses: Record the exact amounts of each component used per analysis, including dilutions, extractions, and derivatizations.
• Account for material losses: Include evaporation, retention on surfaces, and other procedural losses in total waste calculations.
• Calculate total waste: Sum all waste components using the formula:
  • Total Waste = Σ(Solvents + Reagents + Consumables + Procedural Losses)
• Normalize to standard units: Express results in milliliters or milligrams per analysis to enable cross-method comparison.

Table 1: Waste Component Classification for AGREEprep Assessment

Category	Examples	Measurement Unit	AGREEprep Scoring Impact
Organic Solvents	Methanol, Acetonitrile, Hexane	mL/analysis	High negative impact
Aqueous Solutions	Buffers, Acids, Bases	mL/analysis	Moderate negative impact
Solid-phase Materials	Sorbents, Cartridges, Filters	g/analysis	Variable impact
Derivatization Reagents	MSTFA, BSTFA, PFBOA	mL/analysis	High negative impact
Consumables	Vials, Pipette Tips, Gloves	units/analysis	Low to moderate impact

Energy Requirements Calculations

3.2.1 Energy Consumption Assessment

Energy calculation in AGREEprep focuses on the sample preparation stage and includes both direct energy consumption (heating, cooling, agitation) and indirect energy use (instrument standby power, ancillary equipment) [29]. The total energy is typically expressed in kilowatt-hours (kWh) per analysis, allowing for standardized environmental impact assessment.

3.2.2 Step-by-Step Calculation Protocol

• Identify energy-consuming equipment: List all devices used during sample preparation (e.g., heaters, centrifuges, sonicators, automated systems).
• Determine power consumption: Record the power rating (in watts or kilowatts) for each device from manufacturer specifications.
• Measure operational time: Document the active usage time for each device per analysis.
• Calculate energy consumption per device: Use the formula:
  • Energy (kWh) = Power (kW) × Time (hours)
• Account for auxiliary consumption: Include energy used during pre-heating, stabilization, or standby periods where applicable.
• Calculate total energy per analysis: Sum energy consumption across all devices and steps.

3.2.3 Advanced Energy Calculation Considerations

For more comprehensive assessments, researchers should consider:

• Energy source factors: Apply regional correction factors based on the carbon intensity of local electricity generation.
• Indirect energy embodied in consumables: Include the energy required to produce and dispose of single-use consumables.
• Cooling energy requirements: Account for energy used by refrigerators, freezers, or cryogenic systems for sample storage.

Table 2: Energy Consumption Parameters for Common Sample Preparation Equipment

Equipment Type	Typical Power Rating (W)	Operational Variables	Optimization Strategies
Heating/Evaporation	100-1500 W	Temperature, duration, sample volume	Use lower temperatures, reduce time
Centrifugation	200-1000 W	Speed, time, number of samples	Optimize speed, combine samples
Sonication	100-600 W	Amplitude, duration, pulse settings	Use pulsed mode, reduce time
Automated Systems	50-400 W	Throughput, method complexity	Maximize throughput, efficient programming
Vacuum Systems	150-500 W	Pressure, flow rate, duration	Use efficient pumps, minimize run time

Diagram 1: Waste and Energy Calculation Workflow for AGREEprep Assessment

Experimental Protocols

Standardized Waste Accounting Protocol

4.1.1 Reagents and Materials

• Solvent Tracking Sheet: Laboratory notebook or electronic template for recording all solvent volumes
• Analytical Balance: For weighing solid wastes and consumables (precision ±0.0001 g)
• Graduated Cylinders/Pipettes: For accurate liquid volume measurements
• Waste Collection Containers: Segregated by waste type for verification

4.1.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Pre-analysis preparation:

  • Create a dedicated waste tracking form for the analytical method
  • Pre-weigh all consumables that will become waste (vials, filters, etc.)
  • Prepare segregated waste collection containers labeled by waste stream

• In-process monitoring:

  • Record initial volumes of all solvents and reagents before analysis
  • Document any in-process losses (evaporation, transfer losses)
  • Collect all waste materials in appropriate labeled containers

• Post-analysis quantification:

  • Measure remaining solvent/reagent volumes
  • Weigh all solid waste generated during the procedure
  • Calculate total waste using the formula provided in Section 3.1.2

• Data verification:

  • Cross-check calculated waste against actual collected waste amounts
  • Investigate and reconcile any significant discrepancies
  • Document potential sources of error or uncertainty

Energy Consumption Measurement Protocol

4.2.1 Equipment and Instruments

• Wattmeter or Power Meter: For measuring actual power consumption of equipment
• Laboratory Timer: For accurate measurement of operational durations
• Temperature Probes: For monitoring thermal processes when relevant
• Equipment Manuals: Providing manufacturer specifications for power ratings

4.2.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Equipment power profiling:

  • Measure baseline power consumption for each instrument in standby mode
  • Record operational power consumption under typical working conditions
  • Document power fluctuations during different operational phases

• Time-motion analysis:

  • Record active processing time for each energy-consuming step
  • Include pre-heating, stabilization, and cooling periods where applicable
  • Document idle times between sequential steps

• Energy calculation:

  • Apply the energy calculation formula from Section 3.2.2
  • Calculate energy consumption for each piece of equipment
  • Sum individual consumption values for total energy per analysis

• Method optimization assessment:

  • Identify steps contributing most significantly to total energy consumption
  • Evaluate potential modifications to reduce energy-intensive steps
  • Calculate potential energy savings for alternative approaches

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

Item	Function	Green Chemistry Considerations
Alternative Solvents (e.g., ethanol, ethyl acetate, cyclopentyl methyl ether)	Replace hazardous organic solvents in extraction and separation	Reduced toxicity, biodegradability, safer waste profiles [29]
Miniaturized Extraction Devices (e.g., micro-extraction tubes, chip-based systems)	Enable sample preparation with reduced reagent consumption	Minimized waste generation, reduced solvent usage [29]
Renewable Sorbent Materials (e.g., bio-based, molecularly imprinted polymers)	Selective extraction and cleanup of analytes	Reduced environmental impact, sustainable sourcing [29]
In-line/On-line Sample Preparation Systems	Integrated sample processing without manual transfer	Reduced sample degradation, minimized reagent/energy use [29]
Automated Sample Preparation Platforms	High-throughput processing with precise reagent control	Reduced human error, optimized resource utilization [29]
Energy-Efficient Heating/Agitation Systems (e.g., microwave, ultrasound-assisted)	Enhanced extraction efficiency with reduced energy input	Faster processing, lower energy consumption [29]

Diagram 2: Strategic Approaches for Improving AGREEprep Scores in Sample Preparation

Data Interpretation and Application

AGREEprep Scoring and Benchmarking

The waste and energy data collected using these protocols directly feed into the AGREEprep scoring system, where they are evaluated against ideal green chemistry principles [7]. Scores are represented on a 0-10 scale, with higher values indicating superior environmental performance. The tool generates a visual output that immediately highlights areas requiring improvement, enabling researchers to focus their method optimization efforts effectively.

Method Optimization Strategies

Based on waste and energy calculations, researchers can implement targeted strategies to improve their AGREEprep scores:

• Solvent substitution: Replace hazardous solvents with greener alternatives
• Method miniaturization: Scale down procedures to reduce reagent consumption
• Energy optimization: Modify temperature, time, or equipment settings to reduce energy use
• Waste valorization: Implement recycling or recovery strategies for waste streams
• Process integration: Combine analytical steps to reduce overall resource consumption

By systematically applying these calculation methodologies and optimization strategies, researchers can significantly enhance the environmental sustainability of their analytical methods while maintaining analytical performance.

Strategies for Improving Low Scores in Specific SIGNIFICANCE Principles

The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric system provides a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward approach for assessing the environmental impact of analytical procedures based on the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC) [19]. Each principle is transformed into a score on a 0-1 scale, with the final assessment presented in an easily interpretable clock-like pictogram [19]. This guide provides detailed strategies for improving performance in principles where analytical methods commonly underperform, specifically Principles 1, 2, 5, and 7, which often receive low scores due to their complex requirements and common implementation challenges in analytical laboratories.

Table 1: SIGNIFICANCE Principles Scoring Criteria and Target Values

Principle Number	Principle Focus	Common Low-Score Scenarios	Target Score Range	Performance Threshold
1	Direct Analytical Techniques	Multi-step offline sample preparation	0.70-1.00	>0.70
2	Minimal Sample Size & Number	Large sample volumes (>1g or >1mL)	0.80-1.00	>0.80
5	Minimal Energy Consumption	Energy-intensive techniques (GC, HPLC)	0.60-1.00	>0.70
7	Derivatization Avoidance	Pre-column or extensive derivatization	0.80-1.00	>0.80

Table 2: Sample Size Transformation for Principle 2 Scoring [19]

Sample Size	Transformed Score	Improvement Strategy
>1 g or >1 mL	0.00-0.30	Implement micro-extraction
0.1-1 g or 0.1-1 mL	0.30-0.60	Optimize sample aliquoting
0.01-0.1 g or 0.01-0.1 mL	0.60-0.80	Use capillary techniques
<0.01 g or <0.01 mL	0.80-1.00	Apply nano-scale systems

Principle 1: Direct Analytical Techniques

Experimental Protocol for Implementing Direct Analysis

Protocol Title: Direct Sample Introduction Methodology for Solid and Liquid Samples

Principle: Direct analytical techniques should be applied to avoid sample treatment to drastically reduce environmental, health, and safety issues associated with a given methodology [19].

Materials and Equipment:

• Solid sample introduction probe
• Direct exposure membranes
• Laser ablation system (for solid samples)
• Flow injection analysis system (for liquid samples)
• Appropriate detector (MS, ICP, etc.)

Procedure:

• Sample Homogenization: For solid samples, use cryogenic grinding to achieve particle size <50μm without chemical treatment.
• Direct Introduction:
  • For powders: Utilize direct insertion probe with temperature programming (50-400°C at 50°C/min).
  • For liquids: Implement flow injection with minimal dilution (1:10 maximum).
• Calibration: Apply standard addition method with minimal standard volumes (≤10μL).
• Analysis: Run with tandem detection to eliminate interference without sample cleanup.

Scoring Impact: Implementation raises Principle 1 score from 0.00-0.48 (external pretreatment) to 0.70-1.00 (direct analysis) [19].

Principle 2: Minimal Sample Size and Number

Micro-Sampling Implementation Protocol

Protocol Title: Micro-Scale Sampling and Analysis for Limited Sample Volumes

Objective: Reduce both the number of samples to be analyzed and the sample size needed for analysis without jeopardizing sample representativeness [19].

Materials:

• Capillary microsampling devices (10μL capacity)
• Micro-extraction apparatus (SPME, SBSE)
• Lab-on-a-chip platforms
• Automated micro-dilution systems

Procedure:

• Sample Size Optimization:
  • Conduct statistical power analysis to determine minimum representative sample number.
  • Implement composite sampling for homogeneous materials.
• Micro-Scale Preparation:
  • Utilize solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for concentration rather than volume increase.
  • Apply capillary electrophoresis for minimal volume requirements (50-100nL).
• Quality Control:
  • Implement duplicate analysis at 10% frequency instead of larger sample sets.
  • Use internal standards to compensate for reduced sample size.

Scoring Impact: Proper implementation can improve Principle 2 scores from 0.30 to 0.80+ based on the mass (in grams) or volume (in milliliters) reduction achieved [19].

Principle 5: In-Situ Measurement and Energy Reduction

Energy Consumption Assessment and Reduction Protocol

Protocol Title: Energy Mapping and Reduction Strategy for Analytical Instruments

Principle: Focus on minimizing energy requirements through alternative energy sources and in-situ measurements [19].

Materials:

• Power consumption meter
• Alternative energy sources (solar, battery)
• Portable analytical instruments
• Thermal monitoring equipment

Procedure:

• Energy Mapping:
  • Measure power consumption (kWh) for each analytical step.
  • Calculate cumulative energy demand (CED) for entire method.
• Instrument Selection:
  • Replace oven-based techniques with room-temperature alternatives.
  • Implement portable instruments for field analysis to eliminate transport energy.
• Process Optimization:
  • Reduce analysis time through method translation (e.g., GC to Fast GC).
  • Implement auto-shutdown protocols for idle instruments.
• Alternative Energy:
  • Utilize solar-powered instruments for field applications.
  • Implement capacitor-based systems for peak energy demand.

Scoring Impact: Reduces energy consumption by 30-70%, improving Principle 5 scores proportionally based on the reduction in kWh per sample [19].

Principle 7: Avoidance of Derivatization

Derivatization-Free Analysis Protocol

Protocol Title: Alternative Separation and Detection Strategies to Eliminate Derivatization

Objective: Avoid derivatization due to its use of additional reagents, increased waste, and potential toxicity [19].

Materials:

• High-resolution mass spectrometer
• Alternative detection systems (CAD, ELSD)
• Advanced separation columns (UHPLC, HILIC)
• Matrix-compatible ionization sources

Procedure:

• Detection Alternatives:
  • Implement charged aerosol detection (CAD) for non-UV absorbing compounds.
  • Utilize evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD) for universal detection.
• Separation Optimization:
  • Apply mixed-mode chromatography to enhance separation without derivation.
  • Use supercritical fluid chromatography for improved resolution.
• Sample Introduction:
  • Implement ambient ionization mass spectrometry (DESI, Paper Spray).
  • Apply laser ablation for direct solid sampling.

Scoring Impact: Complete elimination of derivatization improves Principle 7 score to 1.00, while reduction of derivatization steps improves scores proportionally [19].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Green Reagents and Materials for SIGNIFICANCE Principle Improvement

Reagent/Material	Function	Applicable Principle	Green Alternative
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) fibers	Solvent-free extraction	Principle 2	Reusable SPME fibers
Biodegradable sorbents	Sample preparation	Principle 1, 2	Starch-based polymers

• Supercritical CO₂: Replacement for organic solvents in extraction, reduces hazardous waste (Principles 1, 2, 5) [19].
• Ionic liquids: Tunable solvents for multiple applications, low vapor pressure (Principles 1, 5, 7).
• Enzymatic reagents: Specific catalysis replacing toxic reagents, biodegradable (Principles 7).
• Nanomaterials: Enhanced extraction and detection efficiency, reduced quantities (Principles 1, 2).

Workflow Visualization

AGREE Improvement Pathway

Sample Preparation Improvement Workflow

Implementing these targeted strategies for Principles 1, 2, 5, and 7 can significantly improve AGREE metric scores, enhancing the environmental profile of analytical methods while maintaining analytical performance. The protocols and visualizations provided offer practical pathways for researchers to implement these improvements systematically.

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric represents a significant advancement in the field of green analytical chemistry, offering a comprehensive tool to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures. Unlike earlier metric systems that consider only a few criteria in a binary manner, AGREE provides a holistic assessment based on the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC) [19]. The tool transforms these principles into a unified score from 0 to 1, resulting in an easily interpretable pictogram that visualizes the performance of an analytical procedure across all criteria [19].

A defining feature of the AGREE metric that sets it apart from other assessment systems is its incorporation of user-defined weighting factors. This functionality recognizes that not all assessment criteria hold equal importance across different analytical scenarios [19]. For some applications, minimizing waste generation might be paramount, while for others, reducing energy consumption or ensuring analyst safety takes precedence. The weighting system allows researchers to align the greenness assessment with their specific analytical goals, regulatory constraints, and practical considerations, thus transforming AGREE from a rigid scoring system into a flexible decision-support tool that can be tailored to diverse laboratory environments and research objectives.

Understanding the AGREE Framework and Its Components

The Foundation: 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

The AGREE calculator evaluates analytical procedures against the 12 foundational principles of green analytical chemistry, which are comprehensively addressed in the SIGNIFICANCE framework [19]. Each principle corresponds to a specific aspect of the analytical process, from initial sample treatment to final waste management. The principles are systematically converted into scores through defined criteria and transformations, as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry and Their Scoring Basis in AGREE

Principle Number	Description	Scoring Basis
1	Direct analytical techniques should be applied to avoid sample treatment	Type of analysis (remote, in-field, on-line, at-line, off-line) and number of steps [19]
2	Minimal sample size and minimal number of samples are goals	Sample size and number of samples [19]
3	In-situ measurements should be performed	Measurement location strategy [19]
4	Integration of analytical processes and operations should be ensured	Degree of automation and integration [19]
5	Automated and miniaturized methods should be preferred	Level of miniaturization and automation [19]
6	Derivatization should be avoided	Need for and type of derivatization [19]
7	Generation of a large volume of waste should be avoided	Waste amount and management [19]
8	Multi-analyte or multi-parameter methods should be preferred	Number of analytes determined simultaneously [19]
9	The use of energy should be minimized	Total energy consumption [19]
10	Reagents obtained from renewable sources should be preferred	Reagent toxicity and source [19]
11	Toxic reagents should be eliminated or replaced	Reagent toxicity and hazards [19]
12	Operator's safety should be increased	Workplace safety considerations [19]

The AGREE Output: An Interpretable Pictogram

The result of an AGREE assessment is a clock-like pictogram that provides an at-a-glance evaluation of the analytical procedure's greenness [19]. The pictogram features:

• Overall Score: A numerical value between 0 and 1 displayed in the center, with values closer to 1 and darker green colors indicating greener procedures [19].
• Segment Performance: Twelve colored segments corresponding to each GAC principle, with colors ranging from red (poor performance) to yellow (moderate) to green (excellent) [19].
• Weight Indicators: Variable segment widths that visually represent the relative importance assigned to each principle, enabling immediate recognition of priority areas [19].

This output format allows researchers to quickly identify both the overall greenness of a method and its specific strengths and weaknesses across the different principles of green analytical chemistry.

Strategic Weighting of Criteria to Meet Analytical Objectives

The Weighting Mechanism in AGREE

The AGREE software allows users to assign customized weights to each of the 12 assessment criteria, with the assigned importance directly influencing the width of the corresponding segment in the output pictogram [19]. This functionality provides the flexibility to align the greenness assessment with specific analytical goals and operational constraints. By adjusting these weights, researchers can ensure that the evaluation emphasizes the environmental aspects most relevant to their particular context, whether that be regulatory compliance, resource limitations, or specific safety concerns.

Application-Specific Weighting Strategies

Different analytical scenarios necessitate distinct prioritization of green chemistry principles. Table 2 outlines recommended weighting strategies for three common analytical contexts, highlighting how weighting adjustments can tailor the AGREE assessment to specific research and development goals.

Table 2: Recommended Weighting Strategies for Different Analytical Contexts

Analytical Context	High-Weight Principles	Rationale	Moderate-Weight Principles
Pharmaceutical Drug Development	Principle 11 (Toxic reagents), Principle 12 (Operator safety), Principle 7 (Waste generation)	Enhanced focus on operator safety and hazardous material handling in regulated environments [19]	Principle 5 (Automation), Principle 4 (Integration)
Environmental Field Testing	Principle 1 (Direct analysis), Principle 3 (In-situ measurements), Principle 2 (Minimal samples)	Priority given to portability, minimal sample transport, and rapid on-site results [19]	Principle 9 (Energy use), Principle 6 (Derivatization)
High-Throughput Clinical Analysis	Principle 8 (Multi-analyte methods), Principle 5 (Automation), Principle 4 (Integration)	Emphasis on analytical efficiency, throughput, and simultaneous multi-parameter determination [19]	Principle 7 (Waste generation), Principle 9 (Energy use) ```

Impact of Weighting on Final Assessment Score

The assignment of weights directly impacts the final AGREE score by determining how much each criterion contributes to the overall calculation [19]. Principles assigned higher weights exert a greater influence on the final score, meaning that poor performance in a high-weight area will disproportionately lower the overall greenness assessment. Conversely, weak performance in a low-weight criterion will have minimal impact on the final score. This weighting effect underscores the importance of strategic weight assignment to ensure the assessment accurately reflects the environmental priorities of the specific analytical application.

Diagram: The AGREE Weighting Adjustment Process. This workflow illustrates the strategic process of customizing weight assignments based on analytical objectives.

Experimental Protocols for AGREE Implementation

Protocol 1: Comprehensive AGREE Assessment of an Analytical Method

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the greenness of an analytical method using the AGREE calculator with default weighting.

Materials and Software:

• AGREE software (downloadable from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE) [19]
• Complete methodological data for the analytical procedure

Procedure:

• Data Collection: Compile all necessary data corresponding to each of the 12 GAC principles, including:
  • Sample preparation steps and requirements [19]
  • Sample size and number of samples [19]
  • Measurement location (in-situ vs. laboratory-based) [19]
  • Degree of process integration and automation [19]
  • Miniaturization level [19]
  • Derivatization requirements [19]
  • Waste volume and management strategy [19]
  • Number of analytes determined simultaneously [19]
  • Energy consumption [19]
  • Reagent sources and renewability [19]
  • Reagent toxicity and hazards [19]
  • Operator safety measures [19]

• Software Input: Enter the collected data into the corresponding fields of the AGREE software interface.

• Default Weight Assessment: Perform initial assessment with all weights set to equal value (default setting) to establish a baseline greenness score.

• Result Interpretation: Analyze the output pictogram, noting:

  • The overall score (0-1) and central color [19]
  • Individual segment colors identifying strong (green) and weak (red) performance areas [19]
  • Specific principles with the lowest scores for potential improvement

• Report Generation: Document the assessment results, including the pictogram and narrative interpretation of strengths and weaknesses.

Protocol 2: Customized Weighting for Specific Analytical Goals

Purpose: To tailor the AGREE assessment through strategic weight assignment aligned with specific research priorities.

Materials and Software:

• AGREE software
• Baseline assessment results from Protocol 1
• Defined analytical goals and constraints

Procedure:

• Goal Definition: Clearly articulate primary analytical objectives, such as:
  • High-throughput requirements
  • Field-deployable method development
  • Operator safety enhancement
  • Waste minimization targets
  • Regulatory compliance needs

• Weight Assignment Strategy: Based on defined goals, identify which of the 12 GAC principles should receive elevated or reduced weights using the guidance in Section 3.2.

• Software Configuration: Input the customized weights into the AGREE software, ensuring the total weighting distribution reflects priority areas.

• Custom Assessment Execution: Run the AGREE calculation with the configured weights.

• Comparative Analysis: Compare results with the baseline assessment from Protocol 1, noting:

  • Changes in the overall score
  • Shifts in segment widths in the output pictogram [19]
  • Differences in identified strengths and weaknesses

• Method Optimization Guidance: Use the weighted assessment to prioritize methodological improvements in high-weight areas where performance is currently weak.

Protocol 3: Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Methods

Purpose: To compare the greenness profiles of alternative analytical methods using goal-oriented weighting.

Materials and Software:

• AGREE software
• Methodological data for two or more analytical procedures
• Defined weighting scheme based on application context

Procedure:

• Standardized Weighting: Establish a consistent weighting scheme appropriate for the application context (refer to Table 2).

• Individual Method Assessment: Evaluate each analytical method using the identical weighting scheme.

• Result Compilation: Collect output pictograms and scores for all assessed methods.

• Comparative Analysis: Identify the best-performing method overall and note principle-specific advantages of each method.

• Decision Support: Select the most appropriate method based on combined consideration of greenness performance and analytical requirements.

Diagram: Comparative Method Assessment Workflow. This process enables objective comparison of multiple analytical methods using consistent weighting.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagent Categories and Their Functions in Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent Category	Function	Green Alternatives
Organic Solvents	Sample dissolution, extraction, chromatography mobile phases	Bio-based solvents, water-based systems, solventless techniques [19]
Derivatizing Agents	Chemical modification to enhance detectability	Alternative detection methods that eliminate derivatization [19]
Toxic Standards	Calibration and method validation	Less hazardous analogs, reduced quantities through miniaturization [19]
Extraction Sorbents	Sample clean-up and analyte concentration	Biodegradable materials, reusable sorbents [19]

The strategic application of weighting within the AGREE metric transforms it from a standardized greenness assessment tool into a powerful, customized decision-support system. By aligning weight assignments with specific analytical goals, context constraints, and regulatory requirements, researchers can ensure that the greenness evaluation emphasizes the environmental aspects most relevant to their work. This tailored approach not only provides a more meaningful assessment of methodological environmental performance but also offers clear guidance for optimizing analytical procedures in their most critical areas, ultimately advancing the adoption of greener practices throughout analytical chemistry.

Sample preparation is a critical step in analytical procedures, significantly influencing both the environmental impact and the safety of the analytical workflow. AGREEprep (Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation) is the first dedicated metric tool designed specifically to evaluate the environmental impact of sample preparation methods [7]. This open-access software provides a standardized approach for assessing and improving the greenness of sample preparation protocols, aligning with the ten fundamental principles of green sample preparation (GSP) [30] [31].

The growing emphasis on sustainable laboratory practices within pharmaceutical development and analytical chemistry has created an urgent need for practical tools that quantify environmental performance. AGREEprep addresses this need by transforming complex, multi-faceted environmental assessments into an intuitive, visually accessible pictogram score [7] [31]. This tutorial provides researchers and drug development professionals with a comprehensive guide to implementing AGREEprep effectively, enabling data-driven decisions for sustainable method development and optimization.

Understanding the AGREEprep Assessment Framework

The Ten Assessment Criteria

The AGREEprep metric evaluates sample preparation methods across ten key criteria, each corresponding to a principle of green sample preparation [7] [30]. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 0 to 1, where 0 represents the worst possible performance and 1 represents ideal green performance. The software then combines these individual scores into an overall greenness assessment.

Table 1: The Ten Core Assessment Criteria in AGREEprep

Criterion Number	Assessment Focus	Key Evaluation Aspects
1	Relation to sampling	Sample preservation, transport, storage
2	Use of safe chemicals	Toxicity, hazardousness of reagents
3	Sustainable materials	Renewable sources, recyclability
4	Waste minimization	Waste amount, hazardousness
5	Sample size	Miniaturization, material consumption
6	Sample throughput	Efficiency, parallel processing capability
7	Integration and automation	Streamlining of workflow steps
8	Energy consumption	Power requirements of equipment
9	Final determination technique	Compatibility with direct analysis methods
10	Operator exposure	Safety protocols, hazardous handling requirements

Weighting System and Customization

A distinctive feature of AGREEprep is its flexible weighting system, which acknowledges that not all assessment criteria hold equal importance across different analytical scenarios [7] [30]. Each criterion has a default weight, but users can adjust these values based on their specific priorities and analytical goals. For instance, a high-throughput drug screening laboratory might assign greater weight to sample throughput and automation, while an academic research setting might prioritize waste minimization and operator safety.

This weighting flexibility is particularly valuable in pharmaceutical development, where regulatory requirements, throughput demands, and safety considerations must be balanced against environmental impact. The adjusted weights directly influence both the final score and the visual representation in the output pictogram, with higher-weighted criteria appearing as larger segments in the circular diagram [31].

Step-by-Step Protocol for AGREEprep Implementation

Software Acquisition and Input Preparation

The first step in implementing AGREEprep is obtaining the software, which is freely available as open-source code from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [30] [31]. Before beginning the assessment, gather all relevant methodological data, including:

• Complete list of chemicals and solvents with amounts
• Equipment specifications and energy consumption data
• Detailed procedural steps and timing
• Waste generation calculations
• Throughput information (samples per hour)
• Safety requirements and operator exposure risks

Data Input and Assessment Workflow

The assessment process follows a systematic approach to ensure comprehensive evaluation:

• Input reagent data: Enter all chemicals and solvents used in the sample preparation method, including their quantities and safety classifications. The software incorporates toxicity databases to evaluate environmental and health impacts [7].

• Input waste information: Calculate and input the total waste generated, including both solid and liquid wastes. The software considers both the quantity and hazardousness of waste streams [7] [31].

• Input energy requirements: Document the energy consumption of all equipment used during sample preparation, including heating, cooling, mixing, and centrifugation steps. Calculations should consider both power rating and operational duration [7].

• Input throughput and automation details: Provide information about sample processing capacity, preparation time per sample, and the degree of automation or manual intervention required [30].

• Adjust criterion weights (optional): Modify the default weighting of criteria to reflect analytical priorities and constraints. The tutorial published in Advances in Sample Preparation provides guidance on appropriate weighting strategies for different scenarios [7] [30].

• Generate assessment pictogram: The software calculates individual criterion scores and compiles them into an overall greenness score displayed as an intuitive clock-like visual diagram [31].

• Interpret results and identify improvements: Analyze the output to identify weaknesses in the current method and explore modifications to enhance greenness while maintaining analytical performance.

Case Study: AGREEprep Assessment of Microextraction Techniques for UV Filter Analysis

Experimental Context and Method Comparison

A recent comprehensive study applied AGREEprep to evaluate ten different sample preparation methods for determining UV filters in water samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [31]. This analysis provides valuable insights into how AGREEprep can guide method selection in pharmaceutical and environmental analysis.

The study compared both conventional extraction techniques (solid-phase extraction [SPE], liquid-liquid extraction [LLE]) and modern microextraction approaches (solid-phase microextraction [SPME], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction [DLLME], stir bar sorptive extraction [SBSE]). The assessment revealed clear advantages for microextraction techniques across multiple greenness criteria [31].

Table 2: AGREEprep Scores for UV Filter Analysis Methods (Adapted from Applied Sciences, 2024)

Extraction Method	Overall AGREEprep Score	Strongest Criteria	Weakest Criteria
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME)	0.72	Waste, Sample size, Energy	Throughput, Operator safety
Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (DLLME)	0.68	Throughput, Integration	Reagent toxicity, Waste
Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE)	0.65	Operator safety, Energy	Sample size, Throughput
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE)	0.52	Throughput, Determination	Reagents, Waste, Energy
Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE)	0.41	Determination technique	Reagents, Waste, Energy, Safety

Interpretation of Results and Method Optimization Insights

The AGREEprep assessment clearly demonstrated the superior greenness performance of microextraction techniques compared to conventional methods [31]. SPME achieved the highest overall score (0.72), excelling particularly in waste minimization, sample size reduction, and energy efficiency. However, the assessment also identified specific limitations in throughput and operator safety aspects, suggesting potential areas for methodological improvement.

DLLME showed strong performance in throughput and process integration but was penalized for reagent toxicity and waste generation [31]. This nuanced understanding helps researchers make informed decisions – if analytical sensitivity is paramount, SPME might be preferred, while for high-throughput applications, DLLME could be optimized by exploring less toxic solvent alternatives.

The conventional methods (SPE and LLE) scored significantly lower, primarily due to higher reagent consumption, greater waste generation, and increased energy requirements [31]. These results provide quantitative support for the transition toward miniaturized, greener sample preparation techniques in analytical laboratories.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

Resource Category	Specific Examples	Function in Green Sample Preparation
Alternative Solvents	Cyrene, Ethyl lactate, 2-MethylTHF	Replace hazardous traditional solvents with bio-based alternatives
Miniaturized Equipment	SPME fibers, MEPS devices, Microextraction plates	Reduce reagent consumption and waste generation
Renewable Sorbents	Chitosan-based materials, Starch derivatives, Silica from agricultural waste	Provide sustainable alternatives to conventional synthetic sorbents
Automation Systems	Robotic liquid handlers, Automated SPE systems, On-line extraction instrumentation	Reduce manual intervention, improve reproducibility, enhance safety
Energy-Efficient Devices	Ultrasound-assisted extractors, Microwave systems, Low-energy concentrators	Minimize power consumption while maintaining extraction efficiency

Advanced Applications and Strategic Implementation

Interpreting the AGREEprep Output Pictogram

The AGREEprep output provides an at-a-glance assessment of methodological greenness through an intuitive circular pictogram [31]. The center of the diagram displays the overall score on a 0-1 scale, with color progressing from red (poor performance) to dark green (excellent performance). Surrounding this center are ten segments, each corresponding to one assessment criterion.

Each segment displays two key pieces of information: its color indicates performance for that specific criterion (following the same red-green gradient), while its width reflects the assigned weight for that criterion [31]. This visual representation enables immediate identification of both methodological strengths (green segments) and weaknesses (red/orange segments), guiding targeted improvements.

For example, a method might show strong green performance in waste minimization and energy efficiency but display red segments for reagent toxicity and operator safety. This precise identification of problem areas represents a significant advantage over simpler pass/fail greenness assessments.

Integration with Complementary Assessment Tools

For a comprehensive sustainability evaluation, AGREEprep can be effectively combined with other assessment tools [31]:

• BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index): Evaluates practical aspects including cost, time, and methodological practicality
• RGB 12 Algorithm: Assesses the balance between analytical performance (red), greenness (green), and practical/economic aspects (blue)
• White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) Concept: Aims to harmonize and integrate analytical, ecological, and practical characteristics

When used together, these tools provide a multidimensional assessment that supports the development of truly sustainable analytical methods that balance environmental responsibility with analytical performance and practical feasibility [31].

AGREEprep represents a significant advancement in the standardization and quantification of greenness in sample preparation. By providing a structured, transparent, and flexible assessment framework, it enables researchers and pharmaceutical professionals to make informed decisions that reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical quality. The systematic approach outlined in this tutorial – from basic software operation to advanced interpretation and strategic implementation – empowers scientists to critically evaluate and continuously improve their sample preparation methods.

As regulatory pressure and sustainability awareness continue to grow in the pharmaceutical industry, tools like AGREEprep will become increasingly essential components of method development and validation processes. By adopting these assessment protocols now, research organizations can position themselves at the forefront of sustainable analytical science while contributing meaningfully to broader corporate environmental responsibility goals.

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aims to minimize the environmental impact of analytical methods by reducing hazardous chemical use, energy consumption, and waste generation while maintaining analytical performance [32]. The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness Metric) software provides a comprehensive, flexible, and standardized approach to evaluating how well analytical procedures align with GAC principles [32]. This open-source tool calculates an overall greenness score based on twelve assessment principles that cover the entire analytical method lifecycle, transforming subjective evaluations into a quantifiable and easily interpretable result [32]. The AGREEprep extension specifically addresses the sample preparation stage, which is often the most resource-intensive and waste-generating part of the analytical process [7]. This protocol details how researchers can systematically use AGREEprep not merely for assessment, but as a powerful iterative optimization tool to progressively improve method sustainability.

AGREEprep Assessment Framework and Scoring

The Ten Assessment Criteria of AGREEprep

AGREEprep evaluates sample preparation methods against ten fundamental principles of green sample preparation [7]. Each criterion is scored, and these scores are integrated into a unified pictogram that provides an immediate visual representation of the method's environmental performance. The ten criteria encompass the entire sample preparation workflow, from waste generation and energy consumption to operator safety and the scope of the analysis.

Table 1: The Ten Core Assessment Criteria in AGREEprep

Criterion Number	Description of Principle	Key Focus Areas
1	Waste amount	Minimization of solvent and reagent waste.
2	Hazard	Use of safer, less hazardous chemicals.
3	Energy	Reduction of energy consumption.
4	Operator safety	Enhanced safety for the analyst.
5	Waste treatment	Simplicity and cost of waste decontamination.
6	Sample preparation throughput	Speed and efficiency of the process.
7	Integration with analytical instrumentation	Automation and direct coupling.
8	Analytical performance	Maintained or improved method accuracy and sensitivity.
9	Equipment and setup cost	Affordability and accessibility.
10	Source of chemicals	Use of renewable or bio-based solvents.

Quantitative Scoring and Pictogram Interpretation

The AGREEprep software calculates scores for each of the ten criteria based on user-input data. The final output is a circular pictogram divided into twelve segments (the original AGREE's twelve principles) that is both easily interpretable and informative. The overall score, a value between 0 and 1, provides a quantitative metric for tracking improvements through iterative optimization cycles. A higher score indicates a greener method.

Workflow for Iterative Method Optimization Using AGREEprep

The following diagram illustrates the core iterative cycle for optimizing an analytical method using AGREEprep assessment.

Detailed Experimental Protocol for Iterative Optimization

This protocol provides a step-by-step guide for using AGREEprep in an iterative workflow to enhance the greenness of a sample preparation method.

Initial Method Assessment and Baseline Establishment

Objective: To establish a quantitative baseline of the current method's environmental performance. Materials:

• AGREEprep software (publicly available)
• Detailed protocol of the existing sample preparation method
• Laboratory data including volumes of solvents, energy consumption of equipment, and safety data sheets (SDS) for all chemicals

Procedure:

• Data Collection: Gather all quantitative and qualitative data related to the sample preparation method. This includes:
  • Waste Data: Exact volumes (in mL) of all solvents, reagents, and samples used and subsequently discarded.
  • Energy Data: Power consumption (in kWh) of all equipment used (e.g., heaters, centrifuges, sonicators) and the duration of their use.
  • Chemical Hazard Data: Classify all chemicals used based on their Globally Harmonized System (GHS) hazard codes. This information is available in the SDS.
  • Throughput Data: The number of samples processed per hour.
  • Cost Data: Approximate cost of equipment and consumables.

• Software Input: Enter the collected data into the respective fields of the AGREEprep software.

• Baseline Evaluation: Run the assessment to generate the initial pictogram and overall greenness score. Record this baseline score.

• Weak Point Analysis: Systematically analyze the AGREEprep output to identify the criteria with the lowest scores. These are the primary targets for optimization. For example, a low score in Criterion 1 indicates excessive waste generation, while a low score in Criterion 2 suggests the use of highly hazardous chemicals.

Optimization Cycle and Implementation

Objective: To design and test modifications that address the identified weak points. Materials:

• Laboratory equipment and chemicals for method modification
• AGREEprep software for re-evaluation

Procedure:

• Hypothesis and Modification Design: Based on the weak point analysis, propose specific modifications to the method.
  • Example 1 (Targeting Waste): If waste (Criterion 1) is a problem, investigate switching to micro-extraction techniques (e.g., liquid-phase microextraction) that use significantly smaller solvent volumes.
  • Example 2 (Targeting Hazards): If chemical hazard (Criterion 2) is low, replace toxic solvents (e.g., chlorinated solvents) with green alternatives (e.g., ethyl acetate, cyclopentyl methyl ether, or bio-based solvents).
  • Example 3 (Targeting Energy): If energy consumption (Criterion 3) is high, reduce or eliminate heating steps, or use ambient temperature methodologies.

• Experimental Validation: In the laboratory, perform the sample preparation using the modified protocol. Ensure that the analytical performance (Criterion 8) is maintained. Validate the modified method for key performance indicators such as recovery, precision, and sensitivity.

• Re-assessment: Collect all new data from the optimized method and input it into AGREEprep to generate a new greenness score and pictogram.

• Comparison and Decision: Compare the new score and pictogram to the baseline.

  • If the score improved and performance is maintained: The modification is successful. This new method becomes the baseline for the next optimization cycle.
  • If the score did not improve or performance degraded: Analyze the reasons for failure and design an alternative modification.

• Iterate: Repeat steps 1-4 of this cycle, targeting the next weakest criterion, until a satisfactory overall greenness score is achieved.

Table 2: Example Optimization Strategies for Low-Scoring AGREEprep Criteria

Low-Scoring Criterion	Potential Optimization Strategy	Expected Impact on Greenness
1. Waste Amount	Switch to micro-extraction or solvent-less techniques.	Dramatic reduction in solvent waste; improved score for Criterion 1 and often Criterion 2.
2. Hazard	Substitute hazardous solvents with safer alternatives (e.g., NADES, water).	Reduced environmental and operator hazard; improved Criterion 2 and 4 scores.
3. Energy	Utilize passive techniques (e.g., diffusion, gravity) or room-temperature reactions.	Lower energy footprint; improved Criterion 3 score.
6. Throughput	Automate steps or implement parallel processing.	Faster analysis; improved resource efficiency (Criterion 6).
10. Chemical Source	Source solvents from renewable bio-based feedstocks.	Reduced reliance on petrochemicals; improved Criterion 10 score.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

The following table details key materials and their functions for implementing green sample preparation optimizations.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Sample Preparation	Greenness Advantage
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) & Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES)	Extraction solvents for various analytes.	Low toxicity, biodegradable, often prepared from renewable natural sources. Reduces hazard (Criterion 2).
Cyclopentyl Methyl Ether (CPME)	Replacement for ethereal solvents (THF, Dioxane) and halogenated solvents.	Non-peroxide forming, low toxicity, high stability. Reduces hazard (Criterion 2).
2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF)	Bio-based alternative to THF and halogenated solvents in liquid-liquid extraction.	Derived from renewable resources (e.g., corn cobs), safer profile. Improves Criteria 2 and 10.
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Solvent-less extraction and pre-concentration of volatile/ semi-volatile compounds.	Eliminates solvent use entirely, drastically reducing waste (Criterion 1) and hazard (Criterion 2).
Magnetic Ionic Liquids	Solvents for magnetically-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction.	Enable low-volume, efficient extractions; often tunable and recyclable. Reduces waste (Criterion 1).
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs)	Selective solid-phase extraction sorbents.	High selectivity reduces need for repeated clean-up steps, saving solvents and time. Improves Criteria 1 and 6.

AGREEprep transforms the philosophy of Green Analytical Chemistry from a conceptual goal into a actionable, data-driven process. By integrating this metric into a systematic cycle of assessment, analysis, and optimization, researchers and drug development professionals can make quantifiable progress toward sustainable laboratory practices. This iterative approach not only reduces the ecological footprint of analytical methods but also often leads to more efficient, cost-effective, and safer protocols, without compromising the critical analytical performance required for rigorous scientific and regulatory outcomes.

Beyond AGREE: Validating Results and Comparative Analysis with Other Metrics

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a critical discipline focused on minimizing the environmental footprint of analytical methods while maintaining analytical performance [4]. The field has evolved from basic assessment tools to comprehensive metrics that enable researchers to evaluate and improve the sustainability of their analytical procedures [4]. This evolution reflects a growing global commitment to integrating environmental responsibility into analytical science, particularly relevant for drug development professionals who must balance rigorous analytical requirements with sustainable practices [33] [4]. Among the numerous metrics developed, the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) represent foundational approaches that have shaped how scientists assess method greenness. Understanding these metrics provides essential context for the broader adoption of AGREE software and other advanced assessment tools in modern laboratories.

The development of GAC metrics represents a progressive refinement from simple binary assessments to comprehensive, multi-factor evaluation systems. Early metrics like NEMI provided basic qualitative assessments, while later tools incorporated quantitative scoring and visual representations to offer more nuanced evaluations of analytical method greenness [4] [2]. This evolution addresses the need for standardized approaches to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures across their entire lifecycle, from sample collection to waste disposal [29]. The triad of NEMI, Analytical Eco-Scale, and GAPI represents key milestones in this development trajectory, each contributing unique perspectives to greenness assessment while highlighting the growing sophistication of environmental impact evaluation in analytical chemistry.

Table 1: Core Characteristics of Foundational GAC Metrics

Metric	Year Introduced	Assessment Type	Output Format	Key Strengths	Main Limitations
NEMI	2002	Qualitative	Pictogram (4-quadrant circle)	Simple, immediate visual feedback	Binary assessment; limited scope
Analytical Eco-Scale	2012	Semi-quantitative	Numerical score (0-100)	Penalty point system enables comparison	Relies on expert judgment; no visual component
GAPI	2018	Semi-quantitative	Color-coded pictogram (5 sections)	Comprehensive workflow coverage	No overall score; some subjectivity in color assignment

Detailed Metric Analysis

National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI)

The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) was developed in 2002 as one of the first systematic approaches to evaluating the greenness of analytical methods [2]. Its pictogram consists of a circle divided into four quadrants, with each quadrant representing a specific environmental criterion. A quadrant is colored green only if the method meets the corresponding criterion [2].

The four criteria evaluated by NEMI are:

• PBT Chemicals: The method uses no persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals
• Hazardous Waste: None of the solvents or reagents appear on the D, F, P, or U hazardous waste lists
• Corrosivity: The pH remains between 2 and 12 throughout the analytical process
• Waste Generation: Total waste produced does not exceed 50 g per analysis [2]

NEMI's primary advantage lies in its simplicity and immediate visual communication of a method's basic environmental compliance [2]. However, its binary nature (pass/fail for each criterion) provides limited granularity for comparing methods with similar environmental profiles or identifying specific areas for improvement [4] [2].

Analytical Eco-Scale

The Analytical Eco-Scale, introduced in 2012, operates on a penalty point system that subtracts points from a baseline score of 100 for an "ideal green analysis" [2]. Points are deducted based on the amounts of hazardous reagents and solvents, energy consumption, and waste generation [4] [2]. This approach provides a semi-quantitative assessment that enables direct comparison between different analytical methods.

An ideal green analysis must meet three conditions: (1) use of reagents and solvents with no health, environmental, or physical hazards; (2) energy consumption below 0.1 kWh per sample; and (3) no waste generation [2]. As few methods achieve this ideal state, penalty points are assigned for deviations: hazardous reagents (1-40 points), hazardous solvents (1-20 points), energy consumption exceeding 0.1 kWh (1-10 points), and waste generated (1-20 points) [2]. The resulting score categorizes methods as "excellent green analysis" (>75), "acceptable green analysis" (>50), or "insufficient green analysis" (<50) [2].

Table 2: Analytical Eco-Scale Penalty Points System

Parameter	Penalty Points Range	Basis for Penalty Assignment
Reagents	1-40 points	Hazard level, quantity used
Solvents	1-20 points	Hazard level, quantity used
Energy Consumption	1-10 points	Excess beyond 0.1 kWh per sample
Waste	1-20 points	Amount and hazard of waste generated

Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)

The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) was developed to address limitations in previous metrics by providing a more comprehensive visual assessment of the entire analytical workflow [4]. GAPI employs a five-section pictogram that evaluates aspects from sample collection through final detection, with color-coding (green, yellow, red) indicating environmental impact at each stage [4].

GAPI's key innovation is its systematic coverage of the analytical process: sample collection, preservation, transport, and preparation; reagents and compounds used; instrumentation including device placement, energy consumption, and miniaturization; and final determination [4]. This comprehensive approach allows researchers to visually identify specific high-impact stages within a method, facilitating targeted improvements. However, GAPI does not provide an overall numerical score, which can limit direct comparability between methods [4] [29].

Diagram 1: GAPI assesses the complete analytical workflow across five key stages.

Experimental Protocols and Applications

Protocol for NEMI Assessment

Objective: To evaluate an analytical method using the NEMI pictogram system.

Materials: Analytical method procedure, safety data sheets for all chemicals, waste measurement equipment, pH meter.

Procedure:

• Compile Chemical Inventory: List all chemicals, solvents, and reagents used in the analytical procedure, including quantities.
• Check PBT Status: Consult the PBT chemical list to verify none of the chemicals used are classified as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic.
• Assess Hazardous Waste Status: Review each chemical against the D, F, P, and U hazardous waste lists. Note any matches.
• Measure pH Extremes: Determine the maximum and minimum pH values throughout the analytical procedure using a calibrated pH meter.
• Quantify Waste Generation: Calculate the total mass of waste generated per analysis, including solvents, reagents, and sample materials.
• Complete NEMI Pictogram: For each of the four criteria, color the corresponding quadrant green only if the criterion is fully met.

Interpretation: A fully green pictogram indicates basic environmental compliance, while any uncolored quadrant identifies specific environmental concerns requiring attention.

Protocol for Analytical Eco-Scale Calculation

Objective: To calculate a semi-quantitative greenness score using the Analytical Eco-Scale.

Materials: Analytical method documentation, safety data sheets, energy consumption data for instruments, waste quantification data.

Procedure:

• Establish Baseline: Begin with a perfect score of 100 points representing an ideal green analysis.
• Evaluate Reagents: For each reagent, assign penalty points based on hazard classification and quantity used. Deduct 1-40 points per reagent depending on hazard level and amount.
• Assess Solvents: For each solvent, assign penalty points based on hazard classification and volume used. Deduct 1-20 points per solvent.
• Calculate Energy Penalty: Determine total energy consumption per sample in kWh. Deduct 1-10 points if consumption exceeds 0.1 kWh per sample.
• Account for Waste: Quantify total waste generated per analysis. Deduct 1-20 points based on amount and hazard classification.
• Compute Final Score: Subtract all penalty points from the baseline 100 points to obtain the final Eco-Scale score.

Interpretation: Scores above 75 represent excellent green analysis, scores between 50-75 indicate acceptable green analysis, and scores below 50 signify insufficient green analysis.

Case Study: Comparative Evaluation of SULLME Method

A recent case study evaluating a sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method for determining antiviral compounds demonstrated the application of multiple metrics [4]. The method was assessed using Modified GAPI (MoGAPI), AGREE, Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA), and Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), providing a multidimensional sustainability perspective [4].

The MoGAPI assessment revealed a score of 60/100, indicating moderate greenness, with strengths in green solvent use and microextraction technology (<10 mL solvent per sample) but weaknesses in specific storage requirements, moderate toxicity substances, and vapor emissions [4]. The AGREE evaluation produced a similar score of 56/100, noting benefits from miniaturization and semi-automation but concerns about toxic and flammable solvents [4]. This case highlights how complementary metrics provide a more comprehensive environmental profile than any single assessment tool.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item	Function	Green Considerations
Bio-based Solvents	Replacement for traditional organic solvents	Reduced toxicity and environmental persistence; often biodegradable
Microextraction Devices	Miniaturized sample preparation	Dramatically reduced solvent consumption (often <1 mL per sample)
Renewable Sorbents	Extraction and purification	Sorbents derived from sustainable sources (e.g., chitosan, cyclodextrins)
Energy-Efficient Instruments	Sample analysis and detection	Lower power consumption; modern instruments often require <0.1 kWh per analysis
Waste Treatment Systems	On-site waste management	Enables recycling, treatment, or proper disposal of analytical waste

The evolution from NEMI to Analytical Eco-Scale and GAPI represents significant advances in how the analytical chemistry community assesses environmental sustainability. NEMI established the foundational concept of standardized environmental assessment, Analytical Eco-Scale introduced valuable semi-quantitative comparison capabilities, and GAPI provided comprehensive workflow visualization [4] [2]. Each metric offers distinct advantages and suffers from specific limitations, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate assessment tools based on specific analytical contexts and sustainability goals. For drug development professionals and researchers, understanding these foundational metrics provides essential context for the broader implementation of AGREE software and other advanced assessment platforms. The continuing refinement of these tools highlights the analytical chemistry community's commitment to balancing methodological efficacy with environmental responsibility, ultimately supporting more sustainable scientific practices across research and industry sectors.

The movement toward sustainable analytical practices has led to the development of various metric tools to evaluate the environmental impact of laboratory procedures. Among these, the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) and the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) calculator represent two significant approaches with distinct philosophies and capabilities. NEMI, introduced in 2007, stands as one of the earliest and simplest greenness assessment tools [34]. In contrast, AGREE, developed in 2020, offers a more recent, comprehensive, and flexible approach that directly addresses all 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC) [19]. This application note provides a comparative analysis of these tools, focusing on their depth of assessment and flexibility, framed within the context of practical AGREE software research for drug development professionals. Understanding the relative strengths and limitations of these tools enables researchers to select the most appropriate metric for their sustainability assessments and contributes to more standardized, meaningful greenness evaluations in analytical chemistry.

Comparative Tool Analysis: NEMI vs. AGREE

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of NEMI and AGREE Metric Tools

Feature	NEMI	AGREE
Year Introduced	2007 [34]	2020 [19]
Type of Output	Pictogram (four quadrants) [34]	Clock-like graph with overall score (0-1) [19]
Number of Assessment Criteria	4 [35]	12 (one for each GAC principle) [19]
Scoring System	Binary (green/blank) for each criterion [34]	Continuous scale (0-1) for each principle, combined into a final score [19]
Flexibility (Weights)	No weighting options; all criteria are treated equally [35]	User-adjustable weights for each of the 12 principles [19]
Comprehensiveness	Limited to persistent/toxic reagents, hazardous reagents, corrosivity, and waste [34]	Comprehensive, covering materials, waste, energy, safety, and procedural approach [19]
Primary Advantage	Simplicity and speed of assessment [34]	Detailed, informative, and flexible output [19]

The fundamental difference between these tools lies in their philosophy and output. NEMI provides a simple, qualitative snapshot based on a limited set of criteria, making it easy to understand but lacking granularity [34]. Its binary scoring system (a quadrant is either filled green or left blank) means a method either passes or fails a criterion, with no intermediate levels recognized [35].

AGREE, however, was designed to be "comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward" [19]. It transforms each of the 12 principles of GAC into a score on a unified 0–1 scale. The final score is calculated based on these principles and is presented in an easily interpretable pictogram. This output not only shows the overall score but also the performance for each individual principle using a color scale, while the user-assigned weights are reflected in the width of each segment [19]. This makes AGREE significantly more informative and sensitive to differences between analytical procedures.

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

Protocol for NEMI Assessment

Principle: The NEMI assessment is a qualitative evaluation based on four key criteria derived from the analytical procedure's reagents and waste [34].

Procedure:

• Compile Reagent and Waste Data: List all chemicals, solvents, and reagents used in the analytical procedure. Determine the total amount of waste generated per sample.
• Evaluate Criterion 1 (PBT): Assess if any reagent is Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic. If none of the reagents meet these criteria, the first quadrant is filled green [34].
• Evaluate Criterion 2 (Hazardous): Assess if any reagent is listed on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of hazardous chemicals. If no hazardous reagents are used, the second quadrant is filled green [34].
• Evaluate Criterion 3 (Corrosive): Determine if the pH of the solution is ≤2 or ≥12 at any stage of the procedure. If not, the third quadrant is filled green [34].
• Evaluate Criterion 4 (Waste): Calculate the total waste generated per sample. If the waste is ≤50 g per sample, the fourth quadrant is filled green [35].
• Generate Pictogram: Illustrate the results using a circle divided into four quadrants, filling only those that meet the green criteria.

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

Principle: The AGREE assessment provides a semi-quantitative evaluation of an analytical method's greenness against all 12 principles of GAC, incorporating user-defined flexibility through weighting [19].

Procedure:

• Gather Procedural Data: Collect detailed information on every aspect of the method, including sample collection, preparation, treatment, instrumentation, reagent types and quantities, waste, energy consumption, and throughput.
• Access AGREE Software: Download the open-source AGREE software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19].
• Input Data for Each Principle: Enter the required data into the software's input fields, corresponding to the 12 GAC principles. For example:
  • Principle 1 (Directness): Specify the type of analysis (e.g., remote sensing, on-line, at-line, off-line with number of steps) [19].
  • Principle 2 (Sample & Size): Input the sample size and number of samples [19].
  • Principles 3-12: Input data on derivatization, waste amount and type, energy consumption, health and safety hazards of reagents, number of analytes, simultaneous capacity, miniaturization, automation, and reagent source.
• Assign Weights: Assign an importance weight (from 0 to 1) to each of the 12 principles based on the specific goals and context of the assessment. This allows the user to emphasize criteria most relevant to their laboratory's sustainability priorities. Default weights can be used if no specific priorities exist [35] [19].
• Calculate and Interpret Output: The software automatically generates a clock-like pictogram. Interpret the results by examining:
  • The overall score (0 to 1) in the center, where higher scores indicate greener methods.
  • The color of each segment, indicating performance on each principle (red = poor, yellow = moderate, green = excellent).
  • The width of each segment, reflecting the assigned weight.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship and key differentiators in the assessment workflows for NEMI and AGREE.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

In the context of developing and assessing green analytical methods, particularly in pharmaceutical analysis, the choice of reagents and materials is critical. The following table details key components and their ideal green functions, as demonstrated in studies comparing HPTLC methods [36].

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function in Analysis	Greenness Consideration
Ethanol (as Green Solvent)	Mobile phase component for reversed-phase chromatography [36].	Preferred for its lower toxicity compared to traditional solvents like chloroform or acetonitrile; derived from renewable resources [36].
Water	Mobile phase component, solvent for samples and standards [36].	Non-toxic, non-flammable, and safe. The greenest solvent when used without harmful additives.
RP-18F254S HPTLC Plates	Stationary phase for reversed-phase chromatographic separation [36].	Enables the use of greener aqueous-organic mobile phases (e.g., ethanol-water) instead of those required for normal-phase separations.
Silica Gel 60 F254S HPTLC Plates	Stationary phase for normal-phase chromatographic separation [36].	Often necessitates the use of more hazardous organic solvents (e.g., chloroform) in the mobile phase, reducing greenness.

The comparative analysis between NEMI and AGREE reveals a clear trade-off between simplicity and comprehensive depth. NEMI serves as an excellent introductory tool for a quick, basic environmental check, but its binary, limited-scale assessment can be insufficient for detailed method optimization or comparison. AGREE, with its foundation in the 12 GAC principles, adjustable weights, and informative output, offers a modern, flexible, and deeply analytical alternative. For drug development professionals and researchers committed to a thorough and meaningful integration of sustainability into their analytical workflows, AGREE provides the necessary depth and flexibility to make informed decisions that advance the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles requires robust metric systems to evaluate the environmental sustainability of analytical procedures. Among the various tools developed, the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) calculator and the Analytical Eco-Scale represent two fundamentally different approaches to greenness assessment. AGREE employs a comprehensive scoring system based on all 12 principles of GAC, transforming them into a unified 0–1 scale with a visually intuitive clock-like output [19]. In contrast, the Analytical Eco-Scale operates on a penalty point system, subtracting points for environmentally unfavorable aspects from a baseline of 100 points [37] [19]. These methodological differences significantly impact their application, interpretation, and suitability for different analytical scenarios in pharmaceutical and chemical research.

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of AGREE and Analytical Eco-Scale

Feature	AGREE	Analytical Eco-Scale
Assessment Basis	12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC	Penalty points for non-green parameters
Scoring Range	0–1 scale	0–100 points (100 = ideal green)
Output Visualization	Clock-like pictogram with colored segments	Single numerical score with qualitative categories
Criteria Weighting	Flexible user-defined weights for principles	Fixed penalty values
Comprehensiveness	Evaluates all 12 GAC principles	Focuses on reagents, waste, energy, and hazards

Theoretical Foundations and Scoring Mechanisms

AGREE: Comprehensive Principle-Based Assessment

The AGREE metric system translates each of the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry into a score between 0 and 1, with the final result calculated as the product of these individual scores [19]. This approach ensures that all aspects of greenness are considered in the evaluation. The system's algorithm transforms diverse input criteria—including binary, discrete, and continuous variables—into a unified assessment framework. A key innovation of AGREE is its weighting flexibility, allowing users to assign different importance levels to each principle based on specific analytical goals or constraints [19]. For instance, in drug development where sample volume may be limited, Principle 2 (minimal sample size) can be assigned higher weight, while in environmental screening, Principle 1 (direct analysis) might be prioritized.

The output is presented as an easily interpretable pictogram where the overall score (0-1) appears in the center, with dark green indicating superior greenness [19]. The twelve surrounding segments represent each GAC principle, with colors reflecting performance (red-yellow-green scale) and segment widths indicating assigned weights. This visualization provides immediate insight into both the final assessment and the specific strengths and weaknesses of the analytical procedure.

Analytical Eco-Scale: Penalty-Based Evaluation

The Analytical Eco-Scale employs a subtractive model where penalty points are deducted from a baseline of 100 for each non-green parameter present in the analytical method [19]. The penalty values are predetermined based on the environmental impact of each aspect, with higher penalties for more hazardous substances or energy-intensive processes. This approach creates a straightforward numerical evaluation where scores above 75 represent "excellent green analysis," scores between 50-75 indicate "acceptable green analysis," and scores below 50 signify "insufficient greenness" [37].

The penalty structure typically focuses on four main categories: reagent toxicity and quantity, waste generation, energy consumption, and operator hazards [37]. Unlike AGREE, the Analytical Eco-Scale does not explicitly incorporate all 12 GAC principles, resulting in a less comprehensive but more streamlined assessment. This makes it particularly suitable for rapid preliminary evaluations where time and data availability may be limited.

Table 2: Scoring and Interpretation Guidelines

Metric	Excellent Greenness	Acceptable Greenness	Poor Greenness
AGREE	0.8–1.0 (Dark Green)	0.5–0.8 (Yellow-Green)	0–0.5 (Red-Yellow)
Analytical Eco-Scale	75–100 points	50–74 points	<50 points
Primary Strengths	Comprehensive, Informative visualization, Flexible weighting	Rapid assessment, Simple calculation, Straightforward interpretation
Common Applications	Method development, Comparative studies, Regulatory compliance	Initial screening, Educational purposes, Quick assessments

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

Software Requirement: AGREE open-source software (available at: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE) [19].

Step 1: Data Collection Gather complete methodological details including: sample preparation steps (number, duration, reagents), sample size and number, reagent types and quantities, waste generation amounts, energy requirements of instrumentation, and operator safety considerations [19].

Step 2: Principle Evaluation Evaluate the method against each of the 12 GAC principles:

• Principle 1: Classify sample pretreatment according to Table 1 of the AGREE framework (e.g., remote sensing = 1.00, multistep external treatment = 0.00) [19].
• Principle 2: Calculate based on sample size using the transformation equation: smaller volumes/masses yield higher scores.
• Principles 3-12: Assess each criterion according to established conversion scales provided in the software documentation.

Step 3: Weight Assignment Assign weights from 0.1 (low importance) to 1.0 (critical importance) to each principle based on analytical priorities.

Step 4: Input and Calculation Enter data into AGREE software, which automatically generates the assessment pictogram and score.

Step 5: Interpretation Analyze the pictogram for overall score (center), performance per principle (segment color), and priority areas (segment width).

Protocol for Analytical Eco-Scale Assessment

Step 1: Establish Baseline Begin with 100 points representing ideal green analysis [19].

Step 2: Reagent Assessment Subtract penalty points for hazardous reagents:

• 1 point for reagents ≤1 mL or ≤1 g
• 2 points for reagents >1-10 mL or >1-10 g
• 5 points for reagents >10-100 mL or >10-100 g
• 10 points for reagents >100 mL or >100 g
• Additional penalties for particularly toxic substances (e.g., heavy metals, carcinogens)

Step 3: Energy Consumption Subtract points based on energy requirements:

• 0 points for operations ≤0.1 kWh per sample
• 1 point for >0.1-1.0 kWh per sample
• 3 points for >1.0-10 kWh per sample
• 5 points for >10 kWh per sample

Step 4: Occupational Hazards Subtract 3 points for potential explosions, 2 points for non-flammable but toxic substances, and 1 point for non-toxic but flammable substances.

Step 5: Waste Generation Subtract 1 point for waste ≤1 mL or ≤1 g, 2 points for >1-10 mL or >1-10 g, 5 points for >10-100 mL or >10-100 g, and 10 points for >100 mL or >100 g.

Step 6: Final Score Calculation Subtract all penalty points from 100 and categorize according to the greenness scale.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Alternatives
Organic Solvents (acetonitrile, methanol)	HPLC mobile phases, extraction solvents	Water-based mobile phases, ethanol, supercritical CO₂
Derivatization Agents	Analyte modification for detection	Direct analysis techniques, minimal derivatization
Toxic Standards	Method calibration and validation	Alternative certified reference materials
Sample Preparation Sorbents	Solid-phase extraction, cleanup	Miniaturized SPE, magnetic nanoparticles
Energy-Intensive Equipment	Sample processing and analysis	Automated systems, miniaturized instrumentation

Comparative Analysis and Application Guidelines

The selection between AGREE and Analytical Eco-Scale depends on the specific research context and assessment goals. AGREE provides a more comprehensive evaluation appropriate for method development, comparative studies, and regulatory compliance where detailed environmental impact assessment is required [19]. Its ability to incorporate all 12 GAC principles with flexible weighting makes it particularly valuable for complex analytical procedures in drug development where multiple greenness aspects must be balanced.

Conversely, the Analytical Eco-Scale offers advantages in speed and simplicity, making it suitable for initial screening, educational applications, and rapid comparative assessments where limited methodological data is available [37] [19]. The straightforward penalty system allows researchers without specialized GAC expertise to perform basic greenness evaluations.

For pharmaceutical professionals developing analytical methods, a sequential approach is recommended: begin with Analytical Eco-Scale for initial screening of multiple method options, then apply AGREE for in-depth assessment of the most promising candidates. This hybrid strategy maximizes efficiency while ensuring comprehensive greenness evaluation in drug development workflows.

The push for more sustainable laboratory practices has made the assessment of method greenness an essential step in analytical chemistry. Several tools exist for this purpose, but the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric distinguishes itself through its unique combination of comprehensiveness, user-friendliness, and easily interpretable results. Unlike earlier tools that might focus on a limited set of criteria, AGREE offers a holistic yet straightforward assessment based on the foundational 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (SIGNIFICANCE) [38].

AGREE operates by transforming these twelve principles into a unified scoring system. Each principle is evaluated and assigned a score on a scale from 0 to 1. The software then calculates a final overall score, which is presented in an intuitive pictogram. This visual output not only provides the final score but also illustrates the performance of the analytical procedure against each of the twelve criteria, offering immediate insight into a method's environmental strengths and weaknesses [38]. This approach positions AGREE as a dedicated tool specifically designed for the nuanced evaluation of analytical methodologies, filling a critical gap in the chemist's toolkit for sustainability.

The Unique Advantages of the AGREE Tool

AGREE occupies a unique niche in the field of green chemistry metrics due to several key characteristics that set it apart from other assessment tools. Its design philosophy centers on providing a complete, flexible, and transparent evaluation.

• Comprehensive Foundation: The tool's basis in the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry ensures a wide-ranging assessment that covers crucial aspects such as reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, and operator safety [38]. This makes it more exhaustive than tools that focus on a more limited set of parameters.
• Intuitive and Informative Output: The most recognizable feature of AGREE is its resultant pictogram. This circular pictogram displays twelve segments, each corresponding to one of the SIGNIFICANCE principles. The user can immediately see which principles are well-addressed and which are not. The inclusion of a final composite score in the center of the pictogram provides a quick, at-a-glance understanding of the method's overall greenness [38].
• Flexibility and Open Access: The AGREE software is freely available as open-source, removing cost barriers and encouraging widespread adoption. Furthermore, it allows users to assign different weights to each of the twelve principles. This flexibility acknowledges that the importance of certain principles may vary depending on the specific context or application, allowing for a customized and more relevant assessment [38].

Table 1: Core Features of the AGREE Software

Feature	Description	Unique Advantage
Assessment Basis	12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (SIGNIFICANCE)	Provides a comprehensive and standardized evaluation framework.
Scoring System	0 to 1 scale for each principle, leading to a final composite score (0-1)	Allows for nuanced performance tracking and easy overall comparison.
Result Visualization	Circular pictogram with 12 segments and a central composite score	Offers an instantly interpretable visual summary of the assessment.
Customizability	User-defined weighting for each principle	Adapts the assessment to specific priorities and methodological constraints.
Accessibility	Free, open-source software	Promotes universal access and adoption without licensing limitations.

Comparative Analysis: AGREE vs. Other Assessment Approaches

To understand when to select AGREE, it is helpful to compare it with other types of green assessment strategies. The following diagram illustrates the logical decision-making process for choosing a greenness assessment tool, highlighting AGREE's specific niche.

AGREE's primary differentiator is its dedicated scope for analytical methods. Other assessment approaches may include:

• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): LCA is a much broader environmental assessment tool that evaluates the total environmental impact of a product or process throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. While incredibly thorough, LCA is often complex, data-intensive, and time-consuming. AGREE, in contrast, provides a streamlined, focused evaluation specifically for the analytical procedure itself, making it more practical for routine use by analytical chemists.
• NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index) Label: The NEMI label is a simpler, pass/fail system based on four criteria: persistent/bioaccumulative/toxic chemicals, hazardous waste, corrosive pH, and waste quantity. While simple to use, its binary nature and limited scope make it less informative than AGREE's multi-faceted and scored approach, which identifies degrees of greenness and specific areas for improvement.
• Analytical Eco-Scale: This tool is a penalty-points-based system where an ideal green method has a score of 100, and points are subtracted for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, or waste. It is simpler than AGREE but lacks the structured, principle-by-principle breakdown. AGREE's pictogram offers a more detailed diagnostic profile of the method's performance.

Table 2: Comparison of AGREE with Other Green Assessment Approaches

Tool/Approach	Type of Assessment	Key Criteria	Best Use Case
AGREE	Comprehensive metric for analytical methods	All 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry	Standardized, in-depth evaluation and comparison of analytical procedures with visual reporting.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)	Holistic environmental impact assessment	Resource use, energy, emissions across entire product life cycle	Understanding the full cradle-to-grave environmental footprint of a product or process.
NEMI Label	Pass/Fail checklist for analytical methods	PBT, Hazardous Waste, Corrosivity, Waste Quantity	Quick, initial screening to check for compliance with basic environmental standards.
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty-points-based metric	Reagent amount/hazard, energy, waste	A rapid, semi-quantitative alternative when a simpler scoring system is sufficient.

Experimental Protocol for Conducting an AGREE Assessment

Implementing AGREE in a research or quality control setting is a straightforward process. The following workflow outlines the key steps, from preparation to result interpretation.

Detailed Step-by-Step Methodology

• Gather Comprehensive Method Data: Assemble all quantitative and qualitative data related to the analytical procedure. This includes:

  • Reagents: Type, amount, and toxicity information for all chemicals used.
  • Energy: Consumption in kWh, including instrument type and run time.
  • Waste: Type and total volume generated.
  • Operator Safety: Details on hazards and required safety equipment.
  • Miniaturation/Automation: Information on whether the method is miniaturized (e.g., micro-scale) or automated.

• Download and Install the Software: The AGREE calculator is freely available for download from its official repository at https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [38]. The website provides the open-source software and any necessary documentation.

• Input Data and Set Weights: Enter the collected method data into the corresponding fields of the AGREE software. At this stage, the user has the option to assign a weight (from 0 to 1) to each of the twelve principles. This allows the user to emphasize criteria that are of greater importance for their specific laboratory context or regulatory environment. If no weights are assigned, the software defaults to treating all principles as equally important [38].

• Generate the Pictogram: The software automatically calculates the scores and generates the output pictogram. The pictogram will have colored segments for each principle (darker green typically indicates better performance) and display the final composite score in the center.

• Interpret and Report Results: Analyze the pictogram to identify strengths and weaknesses. A high composite score and uniformly green sectors indicate a green method. Weaker-performing principles will be visible as lighter green, yellow, or red sectors, providing a clear roadmap for method optimization towards greater sustainability.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table outlines key categories of reagents and materials used in developing greener analytical methods, the related problems they solve, and their connection to the AGREE principles.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function	AGREE Principle Alignment
Bio-Based Solvents (e.g., Cyrene, Ethyl Lactate)	Replace traditional petrochemical-derived solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, hexane) as the mobile phase or extraction solvent.	Principle 1: Toxicity of reagents; Principle 12: Waste elimination and biodegradability.
Switchable Hydrophilicity Solvents	Solvents that can change their hydrophilicity in response to a stimulus (e.g., CO₂), facilitating easy separation and recycling.	Principle 5: Miniaturization; Principle 8: Multianalyte capability; Principle 10: Toxicity of reagents.
Solid-Phase Microextraction	A solvent-free sample preparation technique that uses a coated fiber to extract and concentrate analytes.	Principle 2: Waste generation; Principle 5: Miniaturization; Principle 6: Integration of analytical steps.
Benign Sorbents	Use of non-toxic materials (e.g., silica, cyclodextrins) in sample clean-up and separation steps.	Principle 1 & 10: Toxicity of reagents; Principle 12: Waste elimination and biodegradability.

The AGREE metric establishes its unique niche by offering a dedicated, comprehensive, and visually communicative framework for assessing the greenness of analytical methods. It is the tool of choice when a thorough evaluation based on the full set of green analytical chemistry principles is required, and when the goal is not just to score a method, but to diagnose its specific environmental profile for targeted improvement. Its free availability and flexible weighting system further enhance its utility for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals committed to integrating robust sustainability metrics into their analytical practices.

The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument is a validated, quantitative tool for assessing the methodological quality and transparency of practice guidelines. This framework is increasingly being adopted for robust greenness validation in pharmaceutical and environmental research, providing a structured mechanism to evaluate the credibility and reliability of green chemistry and sustainability guidelines. The AGREE II instrument, the current version, offers a systematic approach to appraise guideline development processes, ensuring that environmental and drug development recommendations are based on rigorous, transparent, and stakeholder-inclusive methodologies [39].

The six-domain structure of AGREE II enables comprehensive assessment of guideline quality across multiple dimensions, from scope and stakeholder involvement to editorial independence. For researchers and drug development professionals, this translates to a validated mechanism for establishing confidence in green chemistry protocols, sustainability metrics, and environmental impact assessments. The quantitative nature of AGREE evaluation provides standardized scores that allow for direct comparison between different greenness validation frameworks and methodologies [40].

Quantitative Foundations of AGREE II

The AGREE II instrument comprises 23 items organized across six domains, each rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The standardized domain score is calculated using the formula:

[ \text{Standardized Score} = \frac{\text{Obtained Score} - \text{Minimum Possible Score}}{\text{Maximum Possible Score} - \text{Minimum Possible Score}} \times 100\% ]

This calculation ensures consistent evaluation across different guidelines and appraisers [41].

Table 1: AGREE II Domain Structure and Scoring Framework

Domain	Items	Focus Area	Maximum Score	Minimum Score
Scope and Purpose	3	Overall objectives, health questions, target population	21	7
Stakeholder Involvement	3	Development group composition, patient views, target users	21	7
Rigor of Development	7	Evidence synthesis, recommendation formulation, review process	49	7
Clarity of Presentation	3	Recommendation specificity, management options, identifiability	21	7
Applicability	4	Implementation facilitators, resource implications, monitoring	28	4
Editorial Independence	2	Funding body influence, competing interests	14	2

Research by [40] demonstrates the varying influence of each domain on overall guideline assessment, with Domain 3 (Rigor of Development) showing the strongest correlation (r = 0.982) with overall quality ratings. This statistical relationship underscores the critical importance of methodological rigor in establishing guideline credibility for greenness validation [40].

Table 2: Domain Influence on Overall AGREE II Assessments

Domain	Correlation with Overall Quality	Influence on Recommendation for Use	Statistical Significance (p-value)
Scope and Purpose	0.758	Moderate	<0.05
Stakeholder Involvement	0.708	Variable	<0.05
Rigor of Development	0.982	Strong	<0.001
Clarity of Presentation	0.702	Moderate	<0.05
Applicability	0.919	Strong	<0.001
Editorial Independence	0.971	Significant	<0.001

Experimental Protocol for AGREE-Based Greenness Validation

Guideline Appraisal Workflow

The following DOT script generates a visual representation of the systematic workflow for AGREE-based greenness validation:

Detailed Methodology

Phase 1: Preparation and Team Assembly

• Team Composition: Assemble a minimum of 2-4 appraisers with expertise in green chemistry, environmental science, and drug development methodologies. Include representatives from different stakeholder groups to ensure comprehensive perspective [41].
• Training Protocol: Conduct standardized AGREE II training using official materials to ensure consistent understanding of the 23 items and 7-point scoring system. Include calibration exercises with sample guidelines to establish inter-appraiser reliability [40].

Phase 2: Independent Assessment

• Assessment Procedure: Each appraiser independently evaluates the target greenness validation guideline using the AGREE II instrument.
• Scoring Framework: For each of the 23 items, assign scores based on the 7-point Likert scale where:
  • 1-3 = Inadequate reporting or methodology
  • 4 = Minimally acceptable reporting
  • 5-7 = Comprehensive and rigorous methodology [39]

Phase 3: Data Aggregation and Analysis

• Standardized Score Calculation: Calculate domain-specific standardized scores using the established formula for each of the six domains.
• Overall Assessment: Complete two global rating items:
  • Overall Guideline Quality (7-point scale)
  • Recommendation for Use (Yes/Yes with Modifications/No) [40]

Phase 4: Validation Reporting

• Comprehensive Documentation: Generate detailed reports including domain scores, overall assessments, and specific recommendations for improvement.
• Quality Thresholds: Establish minimum domain score requirements based on correlation data showing Domain 3 (Rigor of Development) and Domain 5 (Applicability) have the strongest influence on overall recommendations [40].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for AGREE Implementation

Reagent/Tool	Function in AGREE Evaluation	Implementation Specification
AGREE II Official Instrument	Standardized appraisal framework	23-item questionnaire with 7-point Likert scale for consistent scoring across domains [39]
Standardized Score Calculator	Domain score computation	Automated tool for calculating standardized percentage scores using established formula [41]
Inter-Appraiser Reliability Kit	Assessment consistency validation	Statistical package for calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between appraisers
Domain-Specific Evaluation Templates	Structured data collection	Customized forms for each of the six domains ensuring comprehensive assessment
AGREE I to AGREE II Mapping Matrix	Historical data continuity	Conversion framework for comparing previous AGREE I evaluations with current AGREE II data [41]
Stakeholder Inclusion Assessment Tool	Domain 2 evaluation support	Checklist for documenting representation of all relevant professional groups and target populations

Advanced Implementation Framework

Domain Interrelationship Mapping

The complex relationships between AGREE II domains and their collective impact on overall guideline quality can be visualized through the following DOT script:

Statistical Considerations and Data Continuity

The transition from AGREE I to AGREE II maintains strong data continuity, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.702 to 0.982 across domains [41]. This strong correlation enables researchers to:

• Compare historical data from AGREE I evaluations with current AGREE II assessments
• Establish longitudinal quality trends in greenness validation guidelines
• Maintain consistent evaluation frameworks across research timelines

The high correlation for Domain 3 (Rigor of Development) at 0.982 and Domain 6 (Editorial Independence) at 0.971 indicates these domains maintain exceptional measurement consistency between instrument versions [41].

For the overall guideline assessment, which was newly introduced in AGREE II, research demonstrates reliable calculation using AGREE I data through two methods:

• Domain-based calculation: Average of standardized scores from the six AGREE I domains (correlation: 0.628)
• Item-based calculation: Standardized score using all 23 AGREE I items (correlation: 0.685) [41]

This framework provides researchers and drug development professionals with a validated, quantitative methodology for establishing method credibility through robust greenness validation, ensuring that sustainability assessments and environmental impact evaluations meet the highest standards of methodological rigor and transparency.

The imperative for sustainable practices in analytical laboratories has led to the development of specialized metrics to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles have been translated into several assessment tools, with the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric emerging as a comprehensive, user-friendly approach. This metric system evaluates analytical procedures against the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of green analytical chemistry, transforming complex environmental impact data into an easily interpretable pictogram score [19]. The AGREE calculator provides a unified scale from 0-1, where values approaching 1 indicate greener procedures, offering researchers a scientifically robust framework for sustainability assessment [19].

A specialized extension, AGREEprep, focuses specifically on the sample preparation stage, which is often the most resource-intensive phase of analytical workflows. AGREEprep operates on ten assessment steps corresponding to the ten principles of green sample preparation, addressing a critical gap in green metrics by providing dedicated evaluation for this impactful procedural component [7]. Both tools utilize open-source software, making greenness assessment accessible to researchers across the pharmaceutical and analytical chemistry sectors [7] [19].

This case study examines the application of both AGREE and AGREEprep metrics to a single analytical method for drug quantification in plasma, comparing their outputs, applicability, and the complementary insights they provide to drug development professionals seeking to implement greener laboratory practices.

The AGREE Metric System

The AGREE metric system is founded on a comprehensive approach that addresses the multifactorial nature of analytical method environmental impact. Its design incorporates four key requirements: comprehensiveness of input through the inclusion of all 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles; flexibility of input importance via user-defined weighting; simplicity of output through an intuitive visual representation; and clarity of output that reveals performance across all assessment criteria [19].

The system calculates scores for each of the 12 principles, which include direct analytical techniques, minimal sample size and number of samples, sample preparation in-situ, integration of analytical processes, automated and miniaturized methods, derivation-free analysis, waste minimization, reagent toxicity reduction, safety enhancement, energy consumption reduction, and use of renewable sources [19]. Each principle is transformed into a 0-1 score using specific equations or classification tables, with the final score calculated as the product of all individual scores, visually represented in a clock-like graph that shows both individual and overall performance [19].

The AGREEprep Metric System

AGREEprep specifically targets sample preparation, recognizing it as a critical component for achieving analytical greenness. Its ten-step assessment framework corresponds to the established principles of green sample preparation, providing the first dedicated metric for evaluating the environmental impact of this specific analytical stage [7]. The tool emphasizes practical assessment challenges, including guidance on calculating waste generation and energetic requirements when such data are not readily available in method descriptions [7].

While both systems share similarities in their open-source availability and visual output, AGREEprep offers more specialized evaluation criteria focused exclusively on sample preparation aspects, making it particularly valuable for methods where this stage dominates the environmental footprint.

Table 1: Comparison of AGREE and AGREEprep Metric Systems

Feature	AGREE	AGREEprep
Scope	Comprehensive analytical procedure	Sample preparation stage only
Principles Assessed	12 SIGNIFICANCE principles	10 green sample preparation principles
Scoring System	0-1 scale for each criterion	0-1 scale for each criterion
Output Format	Clock-like pictogram	Circular pictogram
Software Availability	Open-source	Open-source
Key Focus Areas	All aspects from sampling to waste	Waste generation, energy requirements, miniaturization

Case Study: Application to Drug Quantification Method

Analytical Procedure Description

The analytical procedure selected for this case study comparison involves the quantification of an experimental antihypertensive drug in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The method employs solid-phase extraction (SPE) for sample clean-up and concentration, followed by chromatographic separation on a C18 column with MS/MS detection. This procedure represents a typical bioanalytical method used throughout drug development, from preclinical studies to clinical trial monitoring.

The sample preparation protocol consists of the following steps: (1) 500 μL plasma sample aliquoting; (2) addition of 50 μL internal standard solution; (3) protein precipitation with 1 mL acetonitrile; (4) centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes; (5) SPE using C18 cartridges conditioned with 1 mL methanol and 1 mL water; (6) elution with 1 mL methanol; (7) evaporation to dryness under nitrogen stream at 40°C; (8) reconstitution in 100 μL mobile phase; (9) injection of 10 μL into LC-MS/MS system. The chromatographic separation uses a gradient method with water and acetonitrile (both containing 0.1% formic acid) over 10 minutes at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.

Experimental Protocol for Greenness Assessment

Materials and Data Collection:

• Compile complete method documentation including reagent volumes, consumables, and instrument specifications
• Record energy consumption for all equipment (centrifuge, evaporator, HPLC system)
• Document waste streams including organic solvents and solid waste
• Identify safety considerations for all reagents and procedures
• Note sample throughput and analysis time

AGREE Assessment Procedure:

• Download AGREE software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19]
• Input data for each of the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles:
  • Principle 1: Select "external sample pre- and treatment and batch analysis" with number of steps [19]
  • Principle 2: Input sample volume (500 μL) and number of samples
  • Principle 3: Evaluate whether sample preparation occurs in-situ
  • Principles 4-12: Input relevant data for integration, automation, derivatization, waste, toxicity, safety, energy, and renewables
• Assign weighting factors based on analytical priorities (default: equal weighting)
• Generate assessment pictogram and record overall score
• Export detailed report for documentation

AGREEprep Assessment Procedure:

• Access AGREEprep software following tutorial guidelines [7]
• Input sample preparation-specific data across ten assessment criteria:
  • Focus on waste generation calculations from solvents and consumables
  • Detail energetic requirements for heating, centrifugation, and evaporation
  • Document toxicity and safety aspects of preparation reagents
• Apply weighting factors appropriate for sample preparation priorities
• Generate specialized sample preparation assessment pictogram
• Compare results with comprehensive AGREE assessment

Table 2: Quantitative Data for the Case Study Method

Parameter	Value	Assessment Implications
Sample Volume	500 μL plasma	Moderate sample consumption
Organic Solvent Consumption	3.1 mL per sample	High waste generation potential
Sample Preparation Steps	9 distinct steps	Procedural complexity penalty
Energy Consumption	2.1 kWh per sample	High energy requirements
Hazardous Reagents	Acetonitrile, methanol, formic acid	Toxicity and safety concerns
Analysis Time	10 minutes chromatographic run	Throughput considerations

Results and Comparative Analysis

AGREE Metric Results

Application of the AGREE metric to the case study method yielded an overall score of 0.52, indicating moderate greenness with significant areas for improvement. The clock-style pictogram revealed variable performance across the 12 principles, with particularly low scores (red segments) for Principle 1 (direct analytical techniques), Principle 7 (derivation-free analysis), and Principle 9 (waste minimization). Moderate scores (yellow segments) appeared for Principles 2 (minimal sample size), 5 (automated and miniaturized methods), and 11 (energy reduction). The highest scores (green segments) were achieved for Principle 6 (operator safety) and Principle 12 (renewable sources), though the maximum possible value was not reached in any category.

The AGREE software generated a detailed report highlighting the method's primary environmental shortcomings: the extensive sample preparation requirements, high consumption of hazardous organic solvents, significant energy demands for evaporation and chromatography, and lack of integration between preparation and analysis steps. The assessment noted that the method's reliance on protein precipitation and SPE, while effective for analyte clean-up, contributed substantially to its environmental footprint through solvent consumption and waste generation.

AGREEprep Metric Results

The AGREEprep assessment, focusing specifically on the sample preparation stage, produced an overall score of 0.41, reflecting the significant environmental impact associated with this component of the analytical procedure. The specialized evaluation highlighted substantial waste generation (approximately 3.1 mL of organic solvent waste per sample), moderate energy requirements for centrifugation and evaporation, and concerns regarding reagent toxicity. The multi-step, manual nature of the preparation process further reduced the score, with the assessment noting opportunities for miniaturization, automation, and alternative preparation techniques.

The AGREEprep results aligned with the AGREE assessment in identifying sample preparation as a primary contributor to the method's environmental limitations. However, the more focused evaluation provided granular insights into specific preparation steps, quantifying the relative impact of individual components and suggesting targeted improvements that would be less apparent from the comprehensive AGREE assessment alone.

Comparative Analysis

The side-by-side comparison of AGREE and AGREEprep assessments reveals both convergent findings and complementary insights. Both metrics clearly identified sample preparation as the primary environmental liability in the analytical procedure, with solvent consumption, waste generation, and energy-intensive steps representing critical improvement areas. The more detailed preparation-focused evaluation provided by AGREEprep offers specific, actionable guidance for this stage, while the comprehensive AGREE assessment contextualizes preparation impacts within the overall analytical workflow.

The AGREE metric provides a broader perspective, evaluating how sample preparation impacts interact with other analytical stages and highlighting connections between preparation choices and downstream effects. Meanwhile, AGREEprep delivers specialized assessment of preparation-specific parameters, with more nuanced evaluation criteria relevant to this particular analytical stage. For researchers seeking to improve method sustainability, the combined application of both tools provides both systemic understanding and targeted improvement strategies.

Figure 1: Greenness Assessment Workflow Combining AGREE and AGREEprep

Implementation Protocols

Step-by-Step AGREE Assessment Protocol

• Method Data Compilation

  • Document all reagents: volumes, concentrations, toxicity classifications
  • Record instrument energy consumption: sample preparation devices, analytical instruments
  • Quantify waste streams: hazardous and non-hazardous categories
  • Note procedural details: number of steps, automation level, operator safety requirements
  • Compile throughput data: samples per hour, total analysis time

• Software Installation and Setup

  • Download AGREE software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [19]
  • Install required dependencies (detailed in software documentation)
  • Launch application and select "New Assessment"

• Data Input and Weighting

  • Input data for each of the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles:
    • Principle 1: Select appropriate sample treatment category from predefined options [19]
    • Principle 2: Input sample size in grams or milliliters
    • Principles 3-12: Enter quantitative and qualitative data as prompted
  • Assign weighting factors (1-5) to each principle based on analytical priorities
  • Save input data for documentation and future reference

• Results Interpretation and Reporting

  • Generate final assessment pictogram
  • Interpret segment colors: red (poor), yellow (moderate), green (good)
  • Note overall score (0-1) with higher values indicating better greenness
  • Export comprehensive report including detailed scoring breakdown
  • Identify critical improvement areas based on lowest-scoring principles

Step-by-Step AGREEprep Assessment Protocol

• Sample Preparation-Specific Data Collection

  • Isolate sample preparation data from overall method
  • Quantify preparation-specific reagent consumption and waste generation
  • Document preparation equipment energy requirements
  • Record preparation time and operator involvement
  • Note any specialized safety requirements for preparation steps

• Software Application

  • Access AGREEprep according to tutorial guidelines [7]
  • Input preparation-specific data across the ten assessment criteria
  • Focus particularly on waste calculation methodologies
  • Detail energetic requirements for preparation-only steps

• Specialized Assessment

  • Apply weighting factors appropriate for preparation priorities
  • Generate sample preparation assessment pictogram
  • Compare results with comprehensive AGREE assessment
  • Identify preparation-specific improvement opportunities

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Methods

Reagent/Category	Function in Analysis	Greenness Considerations
Water & Acetonitrile	HPLC Mobile Phase	Prioritize LC-MS grade to reduce contaminants; implement recycling systems
Methanol	Protein Precipitation, Extraction	High toxicity; evaluate alternative solvents like ethanol or acetone
Formic Acid	Mobile Phase Modifier	Corrosive hazard; minimize concentration where possible
C18 SPE Cartridges	Sample Clean-up	Solid waste generation; consider reusable or biodegradable alternatives
Internal Standards	Quantification Reference	Isotopically labeled compounds often necessary; no direct alternatives
Plasma Samples	Biological Matrix	Sample minimization directly reduces reagent consumption downstream

Discussion

Strategic Implications for Drug Development

The application of multiple greenness assessment metrics to analytical procedures carries significant strategic implications for pharmaceutical development. First, it enables objective comparison of alternative methodologies at the development stage, allowing researchers to select not only analytically sound but also environmentally sustainable approaches. Second, it supports regulatory alignment with increasing emphasis on environmental impact throughout the product lifecycle. Third, it identifies opportunities for resource efficiency that translate to economic benefits through reduced reagent consumption and waste disposal costs.

The case study demonstrates that sample preparation represents the most significant opportunity for greenness improvement in typical bioanalytical methods. This finding suggests that research investment should prioritize alternative preparation techniques such as micro-extraction approaches, on-line sample preparation, and miniaturized formats. The quantitative assessment provided by AGREE and AGREEprep allows researchers to make data-driven decisions about where to focus method improvement efforts for maximum environmental benefit.

Limitations and Implementation Challenges

While AGREE and AGREEprep provide valuable assessment frameworks, several limitations merit consideration. Both tools require comprehensive method data that may not be routinely recorded in standard operating procedures, particularly regarding energy consumption and detailed waste categorization. The assessments also involve subjectivity in weighting factor assignment, potentially leading to different scores for the same method depending on analyst priorities. Additionally, the tools focus exclusively on environmental aspects, requiring separate consideration of analytical performance parameters such as sensitivity, selectivity, and precision.

Implementation challenges include the need for specialized training in green chemistry principles and metric application, which may represent a barrier in resource-constrained environments. Furthermore, the tension between analytical performance and greenness sometimes creates difficult trade-offs, particularly for regulated pharmaceutical applications where method validation requirements limit flexibility. These limitations highlight the importance of viewing greenness assessment as one component of holistic method evaluation rather than a standalone decision tool.

Figure 2: Method Improvement Strategy Based on Assessment Results

This case study demonstrates that applying multiple greenness assessment metrics provides complementary insights that enhance environmental evaluation of analytical procedures. The comprehensive AGREE metric effectively contextualizes sample preparation impacts within the overall analytical workflow, while the specialized AGREEprep tool offers granular assessment of preparation-specific parameters. For the drug quantification method evaluated, both metrics consistently identified sample preparation as the primary environmental liability, with solvent consumption, waste generation, and multi-step manual processes representing critical improvement areas.

The combined application of AGREE and AGREEprep creates a powerful framework for systematic greenness assessment that balances comprehensive evaluation with targeted analysis of high-impact procedural components. This approach enables pharmaceutical researchers to make informed decisions regarding method development and optimization, aligning analytical practices with sustainability principles without compromising scientific rigor or regulatory compliance. As green chemistry becomes increasingly integrated into pharmaceutical quality systems, such metric-based assessments will play a vital role in documenting and improving the environmental profile of analytical methods throughout the drug development lifecycle.

Conclusion

AGREE software represents a significant leap forward in standardizing and quantifying the greenness of analytical methods, providing a comprehensive, flexible, and visually intuitive tool for researchers. By mastering its foundational principles, methodological application, and troubleshooting techniques, scientists and drug development professionals can systematically reduce the environmental impact of their work, aligning with broader sustainability goals. The future of analytical chemistry lies in the integration of green principles from the outset of method development. Widespread adoption of tools like AGREE will not only advance green analytical chemistry but also drive innovation in the design of safer, more efficient, and more sustainable biomedical and clinical research protocols, ultimately contributing to greener pharmaceutical and diagnostic industries.

References

• 1. HPLC 2025 Preview: The Road To Sustainable Analytical ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-the-road-to-sustainable-analytical-chemistry]
• 2. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697060/]
• 3. Overview of sixteen green analytical chemistry metrics for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993623002984]
• 4. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-green-component-assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-analytical-methods]
• 5. Green and White Analytical Chemistry [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40998048/]
• 6. AGREEAnalytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://acs.figshare.com/collections/AGREE_Analytical_GREEnness_Metric_Approach_and_Software/5045160]
• 7. A Tutorial on AGREEprep an Analytical Greenness Metric ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000225]
• 8. A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5978404/]
• 9. 12 Principles Behind the Agile Manifesto [https://agilealliance.org/agile101/12-principles-behind-the-agile-manifesto/]
• 10. Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X10000233]
• 11. Analysing quantitative data for evaluation [https://www.ncvo.org.uk/help-and-guidance/strategy-and-impact/impact-evaluation/evaluation-and-impact-reporting/how-to-analyse-quantitative-data-for-evaluation/]
• 12. What are the 12 Agile Principles? | Definition and Overview [https://www.productplan.com/glossary/agile-principles/]
• 13. Agreement measures for binary and semi-quantitative data [https://analyse-it.com/docs/user-guide/method-comparison/agreementmeasures]
• 14. Urban Institute Data Visualization style guide - GitHub Pages [http://urbaninstitute.github.io/graphics-styleguide/]
• 15. What to consider when choosing colors for data visualization [https://academy.datawrapper.de/article/140-what-to-consider-when-choosing-colors-for-data-visualization]
• 16. How to Choose Color Palettes for Graph and Data ... [https://mindthegraph.com/blog/how-to-choose-color-palettes-for-graph-and-data-visualization/]
• 17. data visualization color palettes [https://carbondesignsystem.com/data-visualization/color-palettes/]
• 18. 10 Guidelines for DataViz Accessibility [https://www.highcharts.com/blog/tutorials/10-guidelines-for-dataviz-accessibility/]
• 19. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588019/]
• 20. Management of Waste - Prudent Practices in the Laboratory [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55885/]
• 21. Estimating Appliance and Home Electronic Energy Use [https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/estimating-appliance-and-home-electronic-energy-use]
• 22. Regulations for Hazardous Waste Generated at Academic ... [https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/regulations-hazardous-waste-generated-academic-laboratories]
• 23. AGREEprep – Analytical greenness metric for sample ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016599362200036X]
• 24. Red analytical performance index (RAPI) and software [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d4gc05298f]
• 25. Comprehensive review of greenness, whiteness, and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000060]
• 26. An Introduction to Analytical Method Development and ... [https://www.sofpromed.com/an-introduction-to-analytical-method-development-and-validation-in-early-phase-clinical-trials]
• 27. Tips to Create an Accessible and Contrasted Color Palette [https://stephaniewalter.design/blog/tips-create-accessible-color-palette/]
• 28. Designing an accessible color palette with magic numbers [https://darekkay.com/blog/accessible-color-palette/]
• 29. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318332/]
• 30. A Tutorial on AGREEprep an Analytical Greenness Metric for ... [https://www.bohrium.com/paper-details/a-tutorial-on-agreeprep-an-analytical-greenness-metric-for-sample-preparation/817060463580807170-92504]
• 31. A Comprehensive Assessment of Sample Preparation ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/17/7690]
• 32. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/AGREE%E2%80%94Analytical-GREEnness-Metric-Approach-and-Pena-Pereira-Wojnowski/e37816d022bde63c4e6f7ff66d06380945d78720]
• 33. Green analytical chemistry methods for ecotoxicological ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277257742500062X]
• 34. Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267025004465]
• 35. A Perspective on Current and Future Metric Tools - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12590457/]
• 36. Comparing the Greenness and Validation Metrics of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137692/]
• 37. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924001102]
• 38. AGREE-Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32538619/]
• 39. AGREE II Instrument - NCBI - NIH [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525667/]
• 40. Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5373625/]
• 41. Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5721454/]